سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

طیّبی, امیر, ذکاوت, کامران. (1396). تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ ای. , 27(2), 63-78.
امیر طیّبی; کامران ذکاوت. "تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ ای". , 27, 2, 1396, 63-78.
طیّبی, امیر, ذکاوت, کامران. (1396). 'تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ ای', , 27(2), pp. 63-78.
طیّبی, امیر, ذکاوت, کامران. تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ ای. , 1396; 27(2): 63-78.

تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ ای

صفه
مقاله 5، دوره 27، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 77، تیر 1396، صفحه 63-78    اصل مقاله (137.21 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
امیر طیّبی* 1؛ کامران ذکاوت2
1دانشجوی دکتری طراحی شهری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2دانشیار دانشکدة معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
تصویر ذهنی گردشگران از مقصد یکی از مهم‌ترین مفاهیم مؤثر در شناخت ادراک و رفتار آنان است. این مطالعه با هدف فهم تصویر ذهنی گردشگران داخلی از فضاهای شهری اصفهان و طراحی مدل برای آن و به صورت کیفی و با رویکرد نظریة زمینه‏ای انجام شد. روش اصلی جمع‌آوری داده‏ها، مصاحبة نیمه‏ ساختاریافته با 30 نفر شامل 24 گردشگر داخلی بازدیدکننده از فضاهای شهری اصفهان و 6 راهنمای گردشگری بود. داده‌ها بر اساس رویکرد کربین و استراوس تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. تحلیل داده‌ها منجر به ظهور 5 مقوله شامل جست‌وجوی معنی، بعد محسوس‌ـ مصنوع، جامعة میزبان، کشف فضا، و عوامل زمینه‏ای شد. یک مدل مفهومی نیز برای توضیح روابط میان مقولات طراحی شد. نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند به طراحان شهری و متخصصان گردشگری در فهم ادراکات و نیازهای بازدیدکنندگان از فضاهای شهری کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تصویر ذهنی گردشگر از مقصد؛ فضای شهری؛ نظریة زمینه ای؛ مدل مفهومی؛ اصفهان
عنوان مقاله [English]
Exploring Iranian Tourists’ Image of Isfahan using Grounded Theory
نویسندگان [English]
Amir Tayyebi1؛ Kamran Zekavat2
1Ph.D. candidate, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University
2Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]
‘Tourist destination image’ is among the most significant concepts in knowing the perceptions and behaviors of visitors. The objective of this study is to explore the Iranian tourists’ image of Isfahan’s urban spaces by way of a conceptual model. The study follows a qualitative approach using grounded theory. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 30 Iranian visitors of Isfahan, 24 of which were tourists and six of which were tourist guides. The data were analyzed using Corbin and Strauss’s approach. Data analysis revealed five categories including search for meaning, sensory-physical dimension, hosting community, discovery of space, and contextual factors. A conceptual model was then developed to explain the inter-relationships of these categories. The results of this study can help urban designers and tourism experts to understand the needs and perceptions of visitors of urban spaces.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
tourist destination image, urban space, grounded theory, conceptual model, Isfahan
مراجع
  1. Alexander, Christopher, et al. A Pattern Language, Gustavo
  2. Gili, 1977.
  3. Appleyard, Donald. “Styles and Methods of Structuring a
  4. City”, in Environment and Behavior, 2(1) (1970), pp. 100-117.
  5. Baloglu, Seyhmus & David Brinberg. “Affective Images of
  6. Tourism Destinations”, in Journal of Travel Research, 35(4)
  7. (1997), pp. 11-15.
  8. Baloglu, Seyhmus & Ken W. McCleary. “A Model of
  9. Destination Image Formation”, in Annals of Tourism
  10. Bonaiuto, Marino, et al. “Multidimensional Perception of
  11. Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood
  12. Attachment in the Urban Environment”, in Journal of
  13. environmental psychology, 19(4) (1999), pp. 331-352.
  14. Carmona, Matthew. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The
  15. Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge, 2003.
  16. Carr, Stephen & Kevin Lynch. “Open Space: Freedom
  17. and Control”, in Urban Open Spaces, New York: Rizzoli
  18. International Publications, 1981.
  19. Carr, Stephen, et al. Public Space (Cambridge Series in
  20. Environment and Behavior), 1992.
  21. Choi, W.M. & Andrew Chan & Janice Wu. “A Qualitative and
  22. Quantitative Assessment of Hong Kong’s Image as a Tourist
  23. Destination”, in Tourism Management, 20(3) (1999), pp. 361-
  25. Chon, Jinhyung & C. Scott Shafer. “Aesthetic Responses
  26. to Urban Greenway Trail Environments”, in Landscape
  27. Research, 34(1) (2009), pp. 83-104.
  28. Corbin, Juliet & Anselm Strauss. Basics of Qualitative
  29. Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing
  30. Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, San Jose State University,
  31. USA, 2008.
  32. Crompton, John L. “An Assessment of the Image of
  33. Mexico as a Vacation Destination and the Influence of
  34. Geographical Location upon that Image”, in Journal of Travel
  35. Research, 17(4) (1979), pp. 18-23.
  36. Dahles, Heidi. “The Politics of Tour Guiding: Image
  37. Management in Indonesia”, in Annals of Tourism
  38. Research, 29(3) (2002), pp. 783-800.
  39. De Carlo, Manuela, et al. “Moving Milan towards Expo 2015:
  40. Designing Culture into a City Brand”, in Journal of Place
  41. Management and Development, 2(1) (2009), pp. 8-22.
  42. Dolnicar, Sara & Bettina Grün. “Validly Measuring
  43. Destination Image in Survey Studies”, in Journal of Travel
  44. Research, 52(1) (2013), pp. 3-14.
  45. Echtner, Charlotte M. & JR Brent Ritchie. “The Meaning and
  46. Measurement of Destination Image”, in Journal of Tourism
  47. Studies, 2(2) (1991), pp. 2-12.
  48. Echtner, Charlotte M. & JR Brent Ritchie. “The Measurement
  49. Holahan, Charles J. & Paul F. Sorenson. “The Role of
  50. Figural Organization in City Imageability: An Information
  51. Processing Analysis”, in Journal of Environmental
  52. Psychology, 5(3) (1985), pp. 279-286.
  53. Jacobs, Allan & Donald Appleyard. “Toward an Urban
  54. Design Manifesto”, in Journal of the American Planning
  55. Association, 53(1) (1987), pp. 112-120.
  56. Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities.
  57. Vintage, 1961.
  58. Jiang, Bin. “The Image of the City out of the Underlying
  59. Scaling of City Artifacts or Locations”, in Annals of the
  60. Association of American Geographers, 103(6) (2013), pp.
  61. -1566.
  62. Johnson, R. Burke. “Examining the Validity Structure of
  63. Qualitative Research”, in Education, 118(2) (1997), p. 282.
  64. Khirfan, Luna & Bessma Momani. “(Re) Branding Amman: A
  65. ‘Lived’city’s Values, Image and Identity”, in Place Branding
  66. and Public Diplomacy, 9(1) (2013), pp. 49-65.
  67. Kozak, Metin & Mike Rimmington. “Tourist Satisfaction
  68. with Mallorca, Spain, as an Off-season Holiday Destination”,
  69. in Journal of Travel Research, 38(3) (2000), pp. 260-269.
  70. Kozak, Metin. “Comparative Analysis of Tourist
  71. Motivations by Nationality and Destinations”, Tourism
  72. Management, 23(3) (2002), pp. 221-232.
  73. Law, Christopher M. Urban Tourism: Attracting Visitors to
  74. Large Cities, Mansell Publishing Limited, 1993.
  75. Low, Setha M. & Gary W. McDonough. “Introduction
  76. to ”Remapping the City: Place, Order, and Ideology””,
  77. in American Anthropologist, 103(1) (2001), pp. 5-6.
  78. Lui, Tai-lok. “City-branding without Content: Hong Kong’s
  79. Aborted West Kowloon Mega-project, 1998–2006”,
  80. in International Development Planning Review, 30(3) (2008),
  81. pp. 215-226.
  82. Luque-Martinez, Teodoro, et al. “Modeling a City’s Image:
  83. The Case of Granada”, in Cities, 24(5) (2007), pp. 335-352.
  84. Lynch, Kevin. The Image of the City, Vol. 11, MIT press, 1960.
  85. Madanipour, Ali. Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a
  86. Socio-spatial Process, John Wiley & Son Ltd, 1996.
  87. Mannarini, Terri, et al. “Image of Neighborhood, Self-Image
  88. Environmental Psychology, 18(3) (1998), pp. 307-319.
  89. Raszkowski, PhD Andrzej. “The Importance of City Image in
  90. Socio-Economic Development”, in Nierowności Społeczne a
  91. Wzrost Gospodarczy, nr 29 (2012), pp. 335-344.
  92. Relph, Edward. Place and Placelessness, Vol. 1. Pion, 1976.
  93. Richardson, Alan. Mental Imagery, Springer, 2013.
  94. Rubinstein, Robert I. & Patricia A. Parmelee. “Attachment
  95. to Place and the Representation of the Life Course by the
  96. Elderly”, in Place Attachment, Springer, Boston, MA, 1992, pp.
  97. -163.
  98. Ryan, Chris & Jenny Cave. “Structuring Destination Image:
  99. A Qualitative Approach”, in Journal of Travel Research, 44(2)
  100. (2005), pp. 143-150.
  101. San Martin, Hector & Ignacio A. Rodriguez Del Bosque.
  102. “Exploring the Cognitive– Affective Nature of Destination
  103. Image and the Role of Psychological Factors in its
  104. Formation”, in Tourism Management, 29(2) (2008), pp. 263-
  106. Sancho Esper, Franco & Jorge Álvarez Rateike. “Tourism
  107. Destination Image and Motivations: the Spanish
  108. Perspective of Mexico”, in Journal of Travel & Tourism
  109. Marketing, 27(4) (2010), pp. 349-360.
  110. Selby, Martin & Nigel J. Morgan. “Reconstruing Place Image:
  111. A Case Study of its Role in Destination Market Research”,
  112. in Tourism Management, 17(4) (1996), pp. 287-294.
  113. Smith, Andrew. “Conceptualizing City Image Change: The
  114. ‘Re-imaging’of Barcelona”, in Tourism Geographies, 7(4)
  115. (2005), pp. 398-423.
  116. Steele, Fritz. The Sense of Place, Cbi Pub Co, 1981.
  117. Stepchenkova, Svetlana & Xiang Robert Li. “Destination
  118. Image: Do top-of-mind Associations Say it All?”, in Annals of
  119. Tourism Research, 45 (2014), pp. 46-62.
  120. Stylidis, Dimitrios & Amir Shani & Yaniv Belhassen. “Testing
  121. an Integrated Destination Image Model across Residents
  122. and Tourists”, in Tourism Management, 58 (2017), pp. 184-
  124. Tasci, Asli DA & William C. Gartner. “Destination Image
  125. and its Functional Relationships”, in Journal of Travel
  126. Research, 45(4) (2007), pp. 413-425.
  127. Research, 26(4) (1999), pp. 868-897.
  128. Beerli, Asuncion & Josefa D. Martin. “Factors Influencing
  129. Destination Image”, in Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3)
  130. (2004), pp. 657-681.
  131. Bentley, Ian, ed. Responsive Environments: A Manual for
  132. Designers, Routledge, 1985.
  133. Bojanic, David C. “The Use of Advertising in Managing
  134. Destination Image”, in Tourism Management, 12(4) (1991),
  135. pp. 352-355.
  136. of Destination Image: An Empirical Assessment”, in Journal
  137. of Travel Research, 31(4) (1993), pp. 3-13.
  138. Fakeye, Paul C. & John L. Crompton. “Image Differences
  139. between Prospective, First-time, and Repeat Visitors to the
  140. Lower Rio Grande Valley”, in Journal of Travel Research, 30(2)
  141. (1991), pp. 10-16.
  142. Forsyth, Ann & Katherine Crewe. “New Visions for Suburbia:
  143. Reassessing Aesthetics and Place-making in Modernism,
  144. Imageability and New Urbanism”, in Journal of Urban
  145. Design, 14(4) (2009), pp. 415-438.
  146. Gallarza, Martina G. & Irene Gil Saura & Haydee Calderon
  147. Garcıa. “Destination Image: Towards a Conceptual
  148. Framework”, in Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1) (2002), pp.
  149. -78.
  150. Gartner, William C. “Image Formation Process”, in Journal of
  151. Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2(2-3) (1994), pp. 191-216.
  152. Gehl, Jan. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space, Island
  153. Press, 2011.
  154. Gilboa, Shaked, et al. “A Summated Rating Scale for
  155. Measuring City Image”, in Cities 44 (2015), pp. 50-59.
  156. Goodey, B. “Two Gentleman in Verona: the Qualities of
  157. Urban Design”, STREETWISE-BRIGHTON- 4 (1993): 3-3.
  158. Griffin, Tony & Bruce Hayllar. “Urban Tourism Precincts and
  159. the Experience of Place”, in Journal of Hospitality Marketing &
  160. Management, 18(2-3) (2009), pp. 127-153.
  161. Hayllar, Bruce & Tony Griffin & Deborah Edwards. City
  162. Spaces-Tourist Places: Urban Tourism Precincts, Routledge,
  164. Hayllar, Bruce & Tony Griffin. “The Precinct Experience:
  165. A Phenomenological Approach”, in Tourism
  166. Management, 26(4) (2005), pp. 517-528.
  167. Heidarzadeh Hanzaee, Kambiz & Hamid Saeedi. “A Model
  168. of Destination Branding for Isfahan City: Integrating
  169. the Concepts of the Branding and Destination Image”,
  170. in Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(4)
  171. (2011), pp. 12-28.
  172. Herstein, Ram & Eugene D. Jaffe. “The Children’s City—The
  173. Transition from a Negative to a Positive City Image”, in Place
  174. Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4(1) (2008), pp. 76-84
  175. and Sense of Community”, in Journal of Environmental
  176. Psychology, 26(3) (2006), pp. 202-214.
  177. Montgomery, John. “Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and
  178. Urban Design”, in Journal of Urban Design, 3(1) (1998), pp.
  179. -116.
  180. Nasar, Jack L. “The Evaluative Image of the City”, in Journal of
  181. the American Planning Association, 56(1) (1990), pp. 41-53.
  182. Nasar, Jack L. & Xiaodong Hong. “Visual Preferences in
  183. Urban Signscapes”, in Environment and Behavior, 31(5)
  184. (1999), pp. 671-691.
  185. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. “The Phenomenon of Place”,
  186. in The Urban Design Reader, 3 (1976), pp. 125-137.
  187. Nowacki, Marek & Piotr Zmyślony. “The Measurement of
  188. City Image: Urban Tourism Market Segmentation”, in Current
  189. Issues of Tourism Research, 2011, pp. 10-18.
  190. Oldenburg, Ray. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops,
  191. Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and other Hangouts at the Heart
  192. of a Community, Da Capo Press, 1999.
  193. Pike, Steve. “Destination Image Analysis— A Review of 142
  194. Papers from 1973 to 2000”, in Tourism Management, 23(5)
  195. (2002), pp. 541-549.
  196. Pike, Steven & Chris Ryan. “Destination Positioning Analysis
  197. through a Comparison of Cognitive, Affective, and Conative
  198. Perceptions”, in Journal of Travel Research, 42(4) (2004), pp.
  199. -342.
  200. Prayag, Girish. “TOURISTS’EVALUATIONS OF DESTINATION
  201. IMAGE, SATISFACTION, AND FUTURE BEHAVIORAL
  202. INTENTIONS— THE CASE OF MAURITIUS”, in Journal of Travel
  203. & Tourism Marketing, 26(8) (2009), pp. 836-853.
  204. Puczko, Laszlo & Tamara Ratz & Melanie Smith. “Old City,
  205. New Image: Perception, Positioning and Promotion of
  206. Budapest”, in Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 22(3-4)
  207. (2007), pp. 21-34.
  208. Qiu, Shangzhi, et al. “Destination Image of Japan and Social
  209. Reform Generation of China: Role of Consumer Products”,
  210. in Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(3) (2017), pp.
  211. -244.
  212. Ramadier, Thierry & Gabriel Moser. “Social Legibility,
  213. The Cognitive Map and Urban Behaviour”, in Journal of
  214. The Urban Task Force. Towards an Urban Renaissance,
  215. Routledge, 2003.
  216. Tibbalds, Francis, ed. Making People-friendly Towns:
  217. Improving the Public Environment in Towns and Cities, Taylor
  218. & Francis, 2012.
  219. Tuan, Yi-Fu. “Images and Mental Maps”, in Annals of the
  220. Association of American Geographers, 65(2) (1975), pp. 205-
  222. ________ . Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, U
  223. of Minnesota Press, 1977.
  224. Vanolo, Alberto. “The Image of the Creative City: Some
  225. Reflections on Urban Branding in Turin”, in Cities, 25(6)
  226. (2008), pp. 370-382.
  227. Violich, Francis. “‘Urban Reading’and the Design of Small
  228. Urban Places: The Village of Sutivan”, in Town Planning
  229. Review, 54(1) (1983), p. 41.
  230. White, Christopher J. “Destination Image: To See or not to
  231. See?”, in International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
  232. Management, 16(5) (2004), pp. 309-314.
  233. Whyte, William Hollingsworth. The Social Life of Small Urban
  234. Spaces, Conservation Foundation, 1980.
  235. Williams, Sheryl L. & Mary Anne Moffitt. “Corporate Image
  236. as an Impression Formation Process: Prioritizing Personal,
  237. Organizational, and Environmental Audience Factors”,
  238. in Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(4) (1997), pp. 237-
  240. World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC). Travel & Tourism
  241. Economic Impact 2015, London: WTTC. 2015.
  242. Wu, Chuntao & Carolin Funck & Yoshitsugu Hayashi. “The
  243. Impact of Host Community on Destination (re)Branding: A
  244. Case Study of Hiroshima”, in International Journal of Tourism
  245. Research, 16(6) (2014), pp. 546-555.
  246. Yeung, Henry Wai-chung & Victor R. Savage. “Urban Imagery
  247. and the Main Street of the Nation: The Legibility of Orchard
  248. Road in the Eyes of Singaporeans”, in Urban Studies, 33(3)
  249. (1996), pp. 473-494.
  250. Zhang, Li & Simon Xiaobin Zhao. “City Branding and the
  251. Olympic Effect: A Case Study of Beijing”, in Cities, 26(5)
  252. (2009), pp. 245-254.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 294
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 225