Metaphorical Conceptualization in the Last Eleven Parts of the Holy Qur’an: A Cognitive and Cultural Explanation | ||
| Journal of Interdisciplinary Qur'anic Studies | ||
| دوره 1، شماره 1، شهریور 2022، صفحه 157-185 اصل مقاله (1.05 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.37264/jiqs.v1i1.9 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Talebi Anvari1؛ Mahinnaz Mirdehghan Farashah* 2 | ||
| 1PhD in Linguistics, Shahid Beheshti University | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Shahid Beheshti University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present semantic research has been performed in order to provide a cognitive and cultural explanation of conceptual metaphors in parts 20 to 30 of the Holy Qur’an. Extraction of ‘types of conceptual metaphors,’ determination of ‘high frequency metaphors,’ ‘source domains’ and ‘target domains’ is the process of conducting research using the conceptual metaphor theory. The variety of concepts of ‘target’ and the functional frequency of ‘source’ concepts indicate what concepts are intended in the holy Qur’an through metaphorical conceptualization. This study provides a basis for further understanding of the worldview presented in the Holy Qur’an and the possibility of determining the behavioral patterns of religion by identifying metaphors. The results of the present study represent a septenary classification of metaphors in the ‘empirical source domain,’ containing: ‘social life,’ ‘needs of the body and its activity,’ ‘image schemas (schema-based),’ ‘elements of nature,’ ‘person,’ ‘body parts,’ and ‘similarity-based metaphors (simile)’; Among which, the highest percentage of metaphorical conceptualization in the source domain is in ‘social life’ and the lowest one is in the domain of ‘person.’ Considering the fact that most of the human knowledge is about the elements and subdomains of ‘social life,’ Qur’anic sources in this domain have played the major role in abstracting the cultural and doctrinal concepts of religion and organizing Islamic religious experiences using the sources of this field and have been used as customary (conventional) and practical models. Accordingly, Qur’anic metaphors lead to the formation of cultural and cognitive patterns, and the ‘monotheistic belief system’ (Qur’anic) directs human bodily experiences in metaphorical conceptualization, and this ‘Qur’anic worldview’ can be seen as an Islamic cultural and cognitive model in the Qur’anic metaphorical schema. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Qur’anic conceptual metaphors؛ Basic level concepts؛ Image schema؛ Qur’anic conceptual metonymy؛ similarity-based metaphors | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| مفهوم‌سازی استعاری در یازده جزء قرآن کریم: تبیینی شناختی و فرهنگی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| علی طالبی انوری1؛ مهین ناز میردهقان فراشاه2 | ||
| 1دکترای زبانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| 2دانشیار زبانشناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| پژوهش معنیشناختی حاضر به منظور ارائه تبیینی شناختی و فرهنگی بر استعارههای مفهومی در جزء‌های 20 تا 30 قرآن مجید به انجام رسیده است. استخراج «انواع استعارههای مفهومی»، تعیین «استعارههای پربسامد»، «حوزههای مبدأ» و «حوزههای مقصد» روند انجام پژوهش با استفاده از نظریۀ استعارۀ مفهومی می‌باشد. تنوع مفاهیم «مقصد» و بسامد کاربردی مفاهیم «مبدأ» نشان می‌دهند، قرآن مجید در خصوص چه مفاهیمی قصد معنی‌افزایی از طریق مفهوم‌سازی استعاری را داشته است. این بررسی زمینه‌ای برای درک بیشتر جهانبینی ارائهشده در قرآن مجید و امکان تعیین الگوهای رفتاری دین با شناسایی استعاره‌ها را فراهم می‌آورد. نتایج تحقیق حاضر نمایانگر طبقه‌بندی هفت‌گانه از استعاره‌ها در «حوزة تجربی مبدأ» مشتمل بر: «زندگی اجتماعی»، «نیازهای بدن و فعالیت آن»، «طرحواره‌های انگارهای (طرحواره‌بنیاد)»، «عناصر طبیعت»، «شخص»، «اعضای بدن»، و «استعارههای شباهت‌بنیاد (تشبیهی)» است؛ که از آن میان بیشترین درصد مفهوم‌سازی استعاری در حوزه‌ی مبدأ «زندگی اجتماعی» و کمترین آن در حوزه‌ی «شخص» است. با در نظر داشتن این نکته که بیشترین شناخت بشر از عناصر و زیرحوزه‌های «زندگی اجتماعی» است، مبادی قرآنی نیز در این حوزه بیشترین نقش را در انتزاع‌زدایی مفاهیم فرهنگی و اعتقادی دین داشته‌اند و تجارب دینی اسلامی را با استفاده از مبدأهای این حوزه سامان داده و به عنوان الگوهایی عرفی (قراردادی) و عملی به کار برده‌اند. بر این اساس، استعارههای قرآنی به تشکیل الگوهای فرهنگی و شناختی می‌انجامند و «نظام اعتقادی توحیدی» (قرآنی) به تجارب بدن‌مند بشر در مفهوم‌سازی استعاری جهت داده، و این «جهانبینی قرآنی» به صورت الگویِ فرهنگیِ اسلامی و شناختی در طرحواره استعاری قرآن قابل مشاهده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| استعارههای مفهومی قرآنی, مفاهیم سطح پایه‌ای, طرحواره انگارهای, مجاز مفهومی قرآنی, استعاره شباهت‌بنیاد | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The Holy Qur’an, Trans. Ali Quli Qarai (2004). London: ICAS. Al-ʿAskarī, Abū Hilāl (1981). Kitāb al-ṣināʿatayn, al-kitābah wa al-shiʿr. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyah. Al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad , (1996). Al-Mustasfā min ʿilm alusūl. Cairo: Al-Matba'ah, Al-Amiriyyah. Alipour, F. (2013). Study of rhetorical aspects in parts 2 and 3 of the Holy Qur'an; simile and metaphor (in Persian). M.A. thesis, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz. Al-Jurjānī, 'Abd al-Ghādir (1988). Asrār al-Balāghah, Tehran: Tehran University. al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, H. (1991). al-Mufradāt al-Qur'ān, Trans. Ghulāmriḍā Khusrawī Ḥusaynī. Tehran: Mortazavi. Al-Rummānī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn ʿĪsā (1968). Al-Nukat fī ʾIʿjāz Al-Qur'an. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'rifa. al-Sabziwārī, Muḥammad (1985). al-Jadīd fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-Majīd. Beirut: Dār al-Ta'āruf. Al-Suyūṭī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr (1973). al-Itqān fī 'Ulūm al-Qur'ān. Beirut: Al-maktaba al-thaqafiya. al-Ṭabrisī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan (1981). Majma' al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān, Trans. Ḥusayn Nūrī Hamadānī et al. Tehran: Farāhānī. Amini, F., Fattahizadeh, F., Afrashi, A. (2018). 'Conceptualization of "good deeds" in the Holy Qur'an with a cognitive approach', Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22108/nrgs.2018.107728.1191 Bani-Assar, Amir (2018). The role of conceptual metaphor for understanding of verses with adaption of metaphor of "life is commerce". Journal of Mind (Zehn), 19(73), 139-158. Barati, M., Salehi Mazandarani, M., Emami, N., LuWaimi Motlaq, K. (2016). 'The Concept of Metaphor in the West and Islamic Rhetoric', Literary Studies, 49(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.22067/jls.v49i1.58425 Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chippe, D. L. & Kennedy, J. M. (2001). Literal Bases for Metaphor and Simile. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3-4), 249-276. Darzi, G., Faramarz Gharamaleki, A., Mirdehghan, M. (2017). 'Reflections on the Reflective Patterns of Cognitive Linguistics in Interdisciplinary Studies; With the Emphasis on the Quranic word of "Shakilah"', Islamic Studies and Culture, 1(2), 25-52. El-Sharif, A. (2011). A Linguistic Study of Islamic Religious Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors in the Prophetic Tradition, PhD diss., Queen Mary University of London. Available online at: http:// qmro.qmul.ac.uk /jspui/handle/123456789/2417. Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics, Trans. Kourosh Ṣafawī. Tehran: 'Ilmī. Ghaemi, M., zolfaghari, A. (2016). 'Image Schemas in Worldly and Otherworldly Life in the Qur'anic Language', Literary Quranic Researches, 4(3), 1-22. Ghaemi, M., Zolfaghari, A. (2016). 'Study of the Cognitive Metaphors Referring to Wordily and Heavenly Lives in the Qur'an', Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran, 5(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22108/nrgs.2016.20528 Ghamari, A. (2007). Simile in the Qur'an. Kermanshah: Razi University. Hanks, P. (2012). The Roles and Structure of Comparisons, Similes, and Metaphors in Natural Language (An Analogical System), Paper presented at the Stockholm Metaphor Festival. Hejazi, S., baharzadh, P., afrashi, A. (2018). 'Cognitive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors of Movement in the Holy Qur'an', Islamic Studies and Culture, 2(3), 1-20. Hosseini, S. M., Qaeminia, A. (2017). Conceptual metaphor of divine mercy in the Holy Qur'an. Journal of Mind (Zehn). 18(69), 27-52. Houshangi, H., Seifi Pargo, M. (2009). Conceptual metaphors in the Qur'an from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. Journal of Qur'anic Sciences and Knowledge, 3, 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678897 Ibarretxe-Antunãno, I. (2013). The Relationship between Conceptual Metaphor and Culture. In: Intercultural Pragmatics, Rosario Caballero, Javier E. Díaz-Vera, eds. 10(2), 315-339. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014 Imanian, H., naderi, Z. (2014). 'Orientational Metaphors in Nahj-albalagha: A Cognitive Perspective', Quarterly Journal of Nahj al-Balagha Research, 1(4), 73-92. Izutsu, T., (1981). Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'an, Trans. Badra'ī, F. Tehran: Qalam. Jäkel, O. (2002). Hypothesis Revisited: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor Applied to Religious Texts, Available online at: metaphorik.de 02/2002: 20-42. Kimmel, Michael (2010). Why We Mix Metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse Coherence, Conceptual Metaphor, and Beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.017 Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kövecses, Z. (2004). Metaphor and Emotion, Language, Culture, and Body in Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh, the Embodied Mind and its Challenges to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in American English in Cultural Models. In Dorothy et al. (Eds), Language and Thought, 195-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive Semantics. In Umbeto et al. (Eds), Meaning and Mental Representation, 119-54. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indian University Press. Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed), Metaphor and Thought, 202-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, G. (2012). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor, Trans. Sujūdī, F. In Istiʻārah, Mabnā-yi Tafakkur wa Abzāri Zībāʼī-āfarīnī (Metaphor: The Basis of Thought and Aesthetic Device), 2nd ed., 135-230. Tehran: Surah-yi Mihr. Lakoff, G. 2006, The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. (Ed), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 185-238. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Maalej, Z. (2008). The Heart and Cultural Embodiment in Tunisian Arabic. In Sharifian, F. et al. (Eds). Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualization of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, 395-429. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp.395-429. Makarem Shirazi, N. (1993) Tafsīr-i Nimūnah. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. Maʻrefat, M. H. (2007) Naqd-i Shubahāt Pīrāmūn-i Qur'ān (Critique of Doubts about the Holy Qur'an), Trans. Ḥakīmbāshī, Ḥ. et al. Tehran: Tamhīd. Mirzababaei, S. M. (2017). Conceptual metaphor of Sam' and 'Ozon in Qur'anic verses. Journal of Mind (Zehn). 18(72), 67-88. Naseri, S. (2013). The role of metaphor in explaining Qur'anic concepts in the short words of Nahj al-Balaghah (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Falavarjan. Niculae, V. & Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. (2014). Brighter than Gold: Figurative language in User Generated Comparisons. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008-2018. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1215 Noor Mohammadi, M., Aghagolzadeh, F., and Golfam, A. (2012). Conceptual Analysis of Nahj al-Balagheh Metaphors (Linguistic Approach). Journal of the Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature. 8 (22), 155-192. Pakzad, Z. (2009). Qur'anic manifestations in Khorasanian style metaphors (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Razi University of Kermanshah. Pourebrahim, S. (2009). Linguistic study of metaphor in the Qur'an: the approach of contemporary theory of metaphor (cognitive framework) (in Persian). Ph.D. dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University. Pourebrahim, S., Golfam, A., Aghagolzadeh, F, and Kurd Zafranloo Kambuzia, A. (2009). A Linguistic Study of Up / Down Directional Metaphor in the Language of the Qur'an: A Cognitive Semantic Approach. Scientific-Research Journal of the Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature. 5(12), 55-81. Pragglejazz Group (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1 Qaeminia, A. (2011). Maʻnā-shināsī-yi Shinākhtī-yi Qur'ān (The Cognitive Semantics of the Qur'an). Tehran: Qur'an and Islamic Culture Research Institute Publishing Organization. Qaeminia, A. (2017). Isiʻārah-hā-yi Mafhūmī wa Faḍā-hā-yi Qur'ān (Conceptual Metaphors and Spaces of the Qur'an). Tehran: Qur'an and Islamic Culture Research Institute Publishing Organization. Qaeminia, A., Poursina, M.R. and Nosrati, Sh. (2016). Conceptualization of the divine word in the Qur'an based on conceptual communication and metaphor. Journal of Mind (Zehn),17(68), 30-50. Qurashī Bunābī, A. (1992). Qāmūs-i Qur'ān (The Qur'an Lexicon). Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. Rosch, E. et al. (1976). Basic Objects in Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X Sabahi Garaghani, H., Heidarian Shahri, A., Mohammadhossienzadeh, A. (2016). 'A Study of Conceptual Metaphor in Surah Baqarah', Journal of Prose Studies in Persian Literature, 19(39), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.22103/jll.2016.1455 Sabbagh, T. (2007). Istiʻārah-hā-yi Qur'ān: Pūshish-hā-yi Guftārī dar Qur'ān (La métaphore dans le Coran), Trans. Marʻashi, M. Ḥ. Tehran: Surah-yi Mihr. Salehimanesh, M. (2016). 'The Metaphors Existed in The Examples of Qur'an and Bedouin culture', Journal of Religion and the Contemporary World, 3(1), 39-52. Santibáñez, F. (2002) The Object Image-Schema and Other Dependent Schemas. Atlantis, 24(2), 183-201. Sh’abanpur, M., Kalbasi Ashtari, H., Soleyman Heshmat, R., Manaqebi, H. (2019). Divine Names and Attributes in the Holy Quran: A Comparative Study of Allameh Tabatabai's Viewpoint and Conceptual Metaphor. Pazhouhesh Name-ye Quran va Hadith. 12(23), 147-168. Shamīsā, Sīrūs (2008). Bayan, 3rd ed. Tehran: Mitrā. Shokr, M. B. et al. (2006). The Metaphorical Concept 'Life is a journey.' In The Qur'an: a Cognitive-semantic Analysis, 94-132, Available at: http//:www.metaphoric.de/10/ shokr.pdf. Steen, G. (2002). Towards a Procedure for Metaphor Identification, Language and Literature, 11(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100103 Stockwell, P. J. (1992). The Metaphorics of Literary Reading. In Papers in Language and Discourse, 4, 52-80. Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 Tabataba'i, M. H. (1996). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān, Trans. Mūsawī Hamadānī, M. B. Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī. Talebi Anvari, A. (2019). Mafhūm-sāzī-yi Istiʻārī dar Yāzdah Juzʼ-i Qur'ān-i Karīm, Tabyīnī Shinākhtī wa Farhangī (Cognitive and Cultural Explanation of Metaphorical Conceptualization in Parts 20th to 30th of the Holy Qur'an). PhD dissertation. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. Talebi Anvari, A., mir dehghan, M., abdolkarimi, S., darzi, G. (2018). A Cognitive Explanation on the Resemblance-Based Metaphors in the Last Eleven Parts of the Glorious Qur'an. Language Studies, 9(17), 49-75. Talebi Anvari, A., Mirdehghan, M., Abdolkarimi, S., Darzi, G. (2019). 'Probe into Object Metaphors in the Twenty Six to the Thirtieth Parts of the Holy Qurʼanʼ, Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran, 8(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22108/nrgs.2019.112034.1299 Vaysi, E., Oraki, G. (2015). 'An Analysis of the Structure of the Qur'anic Language within the Contemporary Metaphor Theory of', Literary Quranic Researches, 3(1), 80-100. Yeganeh, F., and Afrashi, F. (2016). Orientational Metaphors in Quran: A Cognitive Semantic Approach. Language Related Research, 7, 5(33), 193-216. Zamani, M. (1388). Deductive allegory in the Holy Qur'an (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Tehran. ZeinalAbedin Moghaddam, N. (2013). Analytical study of metaphor and simile in parts 10 and 11 of the Holy Qur'an (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Azad University of Tabriz. ZiaAzari, S. (2002). Metaphor in the Qur'an from the perspective of Sharif Razi in the summary of the words (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Tehran. Zolfaghari, A. (2016). Analysis of the system governing the conceptual metaphors of life- worldly and otherworldly- in the language of the Qur'an (in Persian). M.A. Thesis, Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,534 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,430 |
||