Assessing the contexts affecting the financial costs of parliamentary elections in Iran (Focusing on the tenth term of the Islamic Consultative Assembly elections in Rasht Township) | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 2، شماره 2، 2021، صفحه 67-94 اصل مقاله (568.28 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/jep.2.2.67 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Baqer Heshmatzadeh1؛ Javad Etaat2؛ Seyed Sohrab Teymourifar3 | ||
| 1Faculity of Economics and Political Science Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran,iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Economics and Political Science,Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Faculity of Economics and Political Science Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran.iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the: Election Campaign Finance of parliamentary elections in Iran. The spatial scope of this study was the financial expenses of the candidates for the Islamic Consultative Assembly in the tenth election of Rasht Township in Guilan province. This study was conducted in the period of spring 2020 to the end of spring 2021. The main question that the researcher sought to answer is: What are the factors affecting the financial costs of the parliamentary elections in Iran? The mixed method was used to achieve the research objectives - distributed a questionnaire with a sample size of 379 people and semi-in-depth interviews with ten activists and parliamentary candidates.In terms of theoretical framework, both the agency and rational choice of political actors and the impact of the structures and institutional position of the political electoral machine in Iran have been considered. The results of the study showed that the most important factors influencing the methods of financing parliamentary elections in Iran are: historical contexts and political culture, political knowledge of voters, MP-citizen linkage, citizens' attitudes toward the electoral system, number and variety of sponsors and their motives, the type of political system, social and political divisions, and the economic situation of society. Among the mentioned factors, the citizen's relationship with the memberof parliament and the type of political system have the most impact on how the parliamentary elections are financed. Almost 95% of the respondents emphasized that in authoritarian electoral regimes, the short-term interests of citizens, especially their sponsors, take precedence over other matters, and that there is a kind of institutionalized supportive relationship that goes beyond the issue of elections and for reproduction and continuity during the past decades have affected all aspects of the lives of citizens in different parts of the province, and by weakening the democratic process, it has provided numerous and complex contexts for all kinds of corruption. The findings also suggest that in order to reduce the adverse consequences of the methods of financing and spending political money, current laws should be reviewed and the experiences of other countries should be used. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Campaign Finance؛ Election؛ Parliament؛ Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadvand, Shoja, Saber Mahani, Ferdows (2015), "Comparative income on campaign finance (study of electoral systems in Iran, France, Russia and the United States"), Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research, Year 17, No. 49, Winter. [In Persian]
-Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Nicholas Valentino. (1994) ‘Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?’ The American Political Science Review 88.4: 829–838.
-Baktiari, B. (1996). Parliamentary politics in revolutionary Iran: The institutionalization of factional politics. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
-Blaydes, L. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-Bermeo, N., ‘On democratic backsliding’, Journal of Democracy, 27/1 (2017), pp. 5–19.
-Bulmer, E. W.,(2015), Presidential Veto Powers, International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer No. 14, May 2015, <http://www. idea. int/ publications/ catalogue/presidential-veto-powers?lang=en>, accessed 1 August.
-Clawson, Dan, and Alan Neustadtl. 1989. “Interlocks, PACs and corporate conservatism.” American Journal of Sociology 94:749–73.
-Degan, A. (2013) ‘Civic Duty and Political Advertising’. Economic Theory 52.2: 531–540.
-Dehghani, Hamid (2016), From Election Campaigns to Election Behavior, Tehran: Sociologists Publications. [In Persian]
-Dobratz, Betty A) .2018), Power, politics, and society: an introduction to political sociology, Published by Routledge.
-Dormagen, Jean-Yves, Daniel Moushar (2014), Fundamentals of Political Sociology, translated by Abdolhossein Nikgohar, Tehran: Ad. [In Persian]
-Dorsti, Hajar (2014), "Pathology of the Islamic Consultative Assembly Election Campaign in the Light of Legal Principles Governing Campaigning", Quarterly Journal of the Assembly and Strategy, Year 21, Issue Eighty, Winter 2014, pp. 89-110. [In Persian]
-Ebrahimi, Adel and Soleiman Mirzaei Rajeouni (2017), Qualitative Research in Social Sciences, Tehran: Loya Publishing. [In Persian]
-Etaat, Javad (2008), "The Nature of Government in Iran (6)", Quarterly Journal of Political-Economic Information, No. 249-250, Year 22, June and July, 2008, pp. 68-79. [In Persian]
-Evans, Thomas A. (2007) ‘An Empirical Test of Why Incumbents Adopt Campaign Spending Limits’. Public Choice 132.3–4: 437–456.
-Falguera, Elin and et.al. 2014. Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns, A Handbook on Political Finance, International IDEA.
-Foreman, Conrad (2018), Money in Politics: Campaign Finance and Its Influence over the Political Process and Public Policy, The John Marshall Law Review. 185.
-Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan S. Krasno. (1988) ‘Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections’. American Journal of Political Science 32.4: 884–907.
-Hogan, Robert E. (2013) ‘Campaign Spending and Voter Participation in State Legislative Elections’. Social Science Quarterly 94.3: 840–864.
-Jacobson, Gary C. (1985) ‘Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972–1982’. Public Choice 47.1: 7–62.
-Jedi, Hossein (2019), "Study of the effect of the structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran on its political structure with emphasis on the process of democracy", Quarterly Journal of Transcendental Politics, Volume 7, Number 25, Summer, pp. 195-221. [In Persian]
-Johnson, J.W. (2012) ‘Campaign Spending in Proportional Electoral Systems: Incumbents Versus Challengers Revisited’. Comparative Political Studies 46.8.
-Kaid, Lynda Lee and Christina Holtz-Bacha.editors.(2008), Encyclopedia of political communication, SAGE Publications, Inc.
-Keefer, Philip and Razvan Vlaicu,(2017), Vote Buying and Campaign Promises, Journal of Comparative Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2017.07.001.
-Langsæther, Peter Egge. (2019). Cleavage Politics in the 21 st Century: How and why social background affects political preferences.phD. Thesis, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.
-La Raja Raymond, J., and Brian F. Schaffner. (2015) Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
-Maleki, Ali (2020), "Fundamentals of Political Participation in the Islamic Republic of Iran", Quarterly Journal of Transcendental Politics, Volume 8, Number 30, Fall, pp. 187-206. [In Persian]
-Manza, Jeff, Clem Brooks, and Michael Sauder. (2005).“Money, Participation and Votes: Social Cleavages and Electoral Politics.” Pp. 201–226 in The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, edited by T. Janoski, Cambridge University Press.
-Mirzaei Rajeouni, Soleiman (2013), A Study of the Divergence Trend among Iranian Religious Forces in the Establishment Period (1979-1988), PhD Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. [In Persian]
-Mirzaei Rajeouni, Soleiman (2020), Political Sociology (two volumes), Tehran: Loya Publications. [In Persian]
-Misic, Gorana (2018), Do Regulation Matter? Impacts of political Financing Regulations on Party Corruption in Croati and Serbia, Budapest.
-Mohammadzadeh, Hussein. (2013). A Historical Trend of Ethnic Cleavages in ContemporaryIran, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, October 2013, Vol. 3, No. 10.
-Mushfaq, Mohammad Ali (2017), Pathological Excavation in the Electoral System, Tehran: Kavir. [In Persian]
-Odera, Levy C. 2011. Citizen-Politician Linkages in the Informal Sector in Kenya: When are Politicians Most Likely to be Responsive to Citizens? Paper prepared for APSA annual meeting, Seattle, 1 – 4 September 2011.
-Parsa, Misagh (2016), Democracy in Iran: why it failed and how it might succeed, Harvard University Press.
-Przeworski, A. (2014), ‘Ruling against rules’, in T. Ginsburg and A. Simpser (eds), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-Raisi, A. 2019. The Puzzle of Populism in Iran’s Electoral Arena. Democratization, 26(6), 916–934.
-Raisi, A. (2020). Electoral Participation in Iran’s Parliamentary Politics: Between Two Competing Explanations, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.
-Schaffer, Frederic Charles (2007), Clean Elections and the Great Unwashed: Vote Buying and Voter Education in the Philippines.
-Zamani Zadeh, Mostafa (2019), "The optimal system of financing election campaigns in Iran in the light of international standards", Quarterly Journal of Comparative Law Studies, Volume 10, Number, Fall and Winter, pp. 467-483. [In Persian].
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 188 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 270 |
||