Impact of Pre and Post Global Economic Crisis on Quality of Economic and Political Institutions and Economic Growth | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 3، شماره 1، 2022، صفحه 227-244 اصل مقاله (424.13 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/jep.3.1.227 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hafiz Umer Khatab* | ||
| Department of Economics, Federal Urdu University of Art, Science and Technology Islamabad, Pakistan | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Research Problem and Objective: The Study investigates political as well as economic institutions nexus for the panel of SAARC countries over the period 2004 -2020. We divide data into pre and post samples to find impact of international financial crisis. Method: Static and dynamic panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) techniques are used to seek the estimation with fixed effects. Result: The empirical results illustrate that improvement in institutions is necessary to enhance long run economic growth for SAARC countries. Pre and post samples differentiate the quality of political and economic institutions Conclusion: The estimated results show that institutions are important for long run growth of SAARC countries. It reveals that there are some common factors which impact growth through declining quality of institutions. Economies can uplift the growth to overcome the effects of these factors by improving quality of economic as well as political institutions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Key words: growth؛ Institutions؛ SAARC؛ GMM | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abubakar, S. (2020). Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria. African Journal of Economic Review, 8(1): 48-64.)
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2010). The role of institutions in growth and development. Leadership and growth, 135.
Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?. The American Economic Review, 83(2): 409-414.
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. The quarterly journal of economics, 114(1): 83-116.
Bernard, A. B., & Jones, C. I. (1996). Technology and convergence. The Economic Journal, 106(437): 1037-1044.
Iqbal, N., & Daly, V. (2014). Rent seeking opportunities and economic growth in transitional
economies. Economic Modelling, 37, 16-22.
Fulk, N. (2017). The Relationship between a Nation-State Being Land-Locked and Its Economic Development.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. In Classic papers in natural resource economics (pp. 87-137). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
North, D. C. (1987). Institutions, transaction costs and economic growth. Economic inquiry, 25(3): 419-428.
Gallup, A., & Gallup, G. (1999). The Gallup poll cumulative index: public opinion, 1935-1997. Rowman & Littlefield.
Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic development. International regional science review, 22(2): 179-232.
Sachs, J. D. (2003). Institutions don't rule: direct effects of geography on per capita income (No. w9490). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Olsson, O., & Hibbs Jr, D. A. (2005). Biogeography and long-run economic development. European Economic Review, 49(4): 909-938.
Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Economic convergence and economic policies (No. w5039). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. H. (1999). Does trade cause growth?. American economic review, 89(3): 379-399.
North, D. C. (1993). Toward a theory of institutional change. Political economy: Institutions, competition, and representation, 31(4): 61-69.
Medema, S. G. (Ed.). (1997). Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics (Vol. 60). Springer Science & Business Media.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 350 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 290 |
||