The Impact of Justice and Development Party’s Governance Method on Turkey’s Democratization Process | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 3، شماره 2، 2022، صفحه 301-330 اصل مقاله (679.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/jep.3.2.301 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hassan Sadeghian* 1؛ Abbas Ali Rahbar2؛ Yadollah Behjati3 | ||
| 1Researcher at Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Allameh Tabatabai University,Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Researcher on Turkey and the Middle East, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Over the past century, Turkey has experienced various and dissimilar governance methods, such as constitutional, single-party, multi-party, fiduciary, participatory liberalism, conservative liberalism, delegative and quasi-authoritarian, each of which has influenced democratization process in either positive or negative way (history). This issue raises numerous doubts about the why and how of the impact of governance method on democratization process (problem/ issue), a subject that has not received adequate attention by researchers (background) so far. The main question in this study involves the explanation and elaboration of such positive or negative effects (question). This is fulfilled via process tracing method, expression of the causal mechanism (mechanism finding), and the use of library and digital resources (methodology). Justice and Development Party, as the leading sovereignty of Turkey for the last two decades, has employed three governance methods of “conservative liberalism”, “delegative” and “quasi-authoritarian” with positive, positive-negative and negative impacts, respectively on democratization process. The main finding of this study, therefore, is that the type of governance method can act as either a barrier or a facilitator on the path to democratization process. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Democratization Process؛ Delegative Democracy؛ Quasi-authoritarian؛ Governmental Method؛ Turkey | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aras, B. (2022). Turkey’s State Crisis: Institutions, Reform and Conflict. Contemporary Issues in The Middle East. Publisher: Syracuse University Press.
Bora, T. (2017). Cereyanlar; Türkiye’de Siyasi Cereyanlar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Çaylak, Adem (2016). İslamcı Siyasette İktidar ve İtikat. Birikim, Ağustos-Eylül 2016, (328-329), 27-37.
Chaguaceda, A. (2019). Mexico: Political Change and Delegative Democracy. The Varieties of Democracy Institute, V-Dem Working Paper Series, 1-17.
Coşkun, V. (2017). 16 Nisan 2017 Tarihinde Kabul Edilen Anayasa Değişikliklerinin Değerlendirmesi. Yayın: DÜHFD, Cilt: 22, Sayı: 36: 3-30.
David Collier (2011). Political Science and Politics. University of California: Berkeley. 44(4): 823-30.
Karpat H. K. (2012). Kısa Türkiye Tarihi 1800-212. Yayınevi: Timaş Tarih.
Kongar, Emre, Cumhurbaşkanına hakaret suçu kaldırılmalıdır. Cumhuriyet.com.tr\ 17.2. Kuran, T. (2014). Turkey’s Electoral Dictatorship. 10 April 2014/ project-syndicate.org.
Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1): 120–47.
--------------- (2003). Tentative Answers to Questions about Causal Mechanisms. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American political science association.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (1993). Delegative democracy. Published: World Development.
Özbudun, E. (1996). Democratization in the Middle Este: Turkey – How Far from Consolidation?. Journal of Democracy. Publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (3): 123-138.
Özbudun, E. (2000). Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. Publisher: Lynne Rienner Pub.
Özbudun, E. (2014). AKP at the crossroads: Erdoğan's Majoritarian Drift. South European Society and Politics, 19 (2): 155-167.
"PKK ile MİT’in Oslo Görüşmesi". Hürriyet, 14.09.2011. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/pkk-ile-mit-in-oslo-gorusmesi-sizdi-iddiasi-18726260. "Sadece iki ilde 1700 polisin yeri değişti". Hürriyet, 07.01.2014. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/sadece-iki-ilde-1700-polisin-yeri-degisti-25515006. ashiriyeh, H. (2007). Transition to Democracy (Theoretical Speeches). Tehran: Gam-e No Publication. (in persian)
Burhanettin D. (2008). The Justice and Development Party's 'new politics, içinde Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: the making of the Justice and Development Party, Ed. Ümit Cizre. Abington: Routledge, 97.
Çaǧaptay, S. (2018). The New Sultan”; Erdoğan and Crisis in Turkey. Translator: Mehdi Gharache Daghi, Tehran: No Andish Publication. (in persian)
Darabzadeh, A., Vosoughi, S, Ghorbani, M. (2013). Investigating the Opportunities and Challenges of Transition to Democracy in Turkey since the 1980s from the Constructivism Theory Perspective. Islamic World Political Research Quarterly, (4): 26-48. (in persian)
Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ercan Gürses, "Korkunç Narkoz Planı Tutmadı", Türkiye, 21.02.2014, http://www.turkiyegazetesi.com.tr/gundem/134748.aspx.
Ergun Ö. (2015). Turkey's Judiciary and the Drift to toward Competitive Authoritarianism. The International Spectator, 50 (2):42-55.
Fathollahi, A. R., (2017). “Bow around Bomb”, Etemad Newspaper, Also: Ettela’at Newspaper, “Turkey’s New Government: Totalitarian or Towards Political Suicide”, 4/08/12017 (in persian)
Gareth H. J. (2009). Between Fact and Fantasy: Turkey's Ergenekon Investigation. Central Asia Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Washington, 37.
Ghazizadeh, H. (2018). Transition to Democracy, Tehran: Akhtaran Publication. (in persian)
Göbel, C. (2012). Semi –Authoritarianism. Published: SAGE reference.
Gol Mohammadi, V. (2016). Turkey’s Failed Coup; Strategic Implications and Prospects”. International Foreign Relations Quarterly, 30, 9–16. (in persian).
Hatem, E. (2013). The Political Reverberations of the Gezi Protests. Insight Turkey, 15 (3): 15-25.
Hiro, D. (2013). "Turkey Economic Miracle Under Fire". Internet Resources: http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/turkesys-economic-miracle-under-fire.
Kadivar, Mohammad Ali (2007). Transition to Democracy (Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations). Tehran: Gam-e No Publication. (in persian)
Kafi, M., (2016). Historical Sociology (Foundations, Concepts and Theories). Tehran: Department and University Research Center. (in persian)
Kalemi Ozjan, S. (2013). Why did Turkey Rebel. accessed at: www.siyasetema.com (in persian)
Lührmann, A., and Lindberg, S.I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?, Democratization 26 (7):1095-1113.
Michels, R. (2013). Sociology of Political Parties. Translator: Ahmad Naghibzadeh, Tehran: Ghoomes Publication. (in persian)
Müge A. (2013). Civil-Military Relations During the AK Party Era: Major Developments and Challenges. Insight Turkey, 15 (4): 131-150.
Pérez-Liñ á n, A., Schmidt, N. and Vairo, D. (2019). Presidential hegemony and democratic backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016, Democratization, 26 (4):. 606-625.
Sadeghian, H, Ebadi, B. (2022). Prerequisites for Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey (The late Ottoman Government and the First Two Decades of Republic of Turkey) A Quarterly Journal Of Historical studies of Islam, 13 (51): Reserch Center For Islamic History, http://journal.pte.ac.ir/ Scientific-Research, 65-107. Sadeghian, H. (2021), The process of democratization in Turkey and the obstacles to its consolidation In the government of the AKP; Enteşarat Jameşenasan. (in persian)
Shokouhi, S, Safari, A, Moradifar, S. (2022). The Impact of Eeuropanization and De-europanizaton on Turkish Foreign Policy. Geopolitics Quarterly, 2: 141-173. (in persian)
Taleban, M. R. (2009). Mechanisms and Sociology (The Role and Importance of Mechanisms in Explaining Social Phenomena). Humanities Methodology, 15 (61): 63-102. (in persian)
Tilly, C. (2013). Democracy, Historical Sociology - Democratic Developments. Translated by: Yaghoub Ahmadi. Tehran: Sociologists Publication. (in persian)
Tuğal, C. (2016). Fall of the Turkish Model”. Translators: Mohammad Shoushtari, Reza Jaski. London-New York: Varso Liberalism Publication. (in persian)
Ümit C. (2007). The Justice and Development Party and the Military. Routledge. 6 (2): 132-171.
Yeşim, A. (2013). Violence, Resistance and Gezi Park. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 45 (4): 807-808.
Yilmaz, İ, Çaman, M. E. and Bashirov, G. (2019). How an Islamist party managed to legitimate its authoritarianization in the eyes of the secularist opposition: the case of Turkey. Democratization, 27 (2): 265-282. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 341 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 242 |
||