اپیدمی و دولت تنظیمگر | ||
| فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی | ||
| دوره 25، ویژه نامه حقوق و کرونا شماره 2، خرداد 1401، صفحه 461-478 اصل مقاله (347.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/jlr.2022.226829.2167 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| عرفان شمس* | ||
| استادیار، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نوشتار حاضر بحران کرونا را از منظر حقوق تنظیمی به بحث می‌گذارد. به عبارت دقیق‌تر، موضوع اصلی بحث، تأثیر متقابل وضعیت‌های اپیدمی و دولت تنظیمگر است. پرسش اصلی این نوشتار آن است که وضعیت اپیدمی چه تأثیر یا تأثیرات احتمالی بر دولت تنظیمگر می‌گذارد و پاسخ یا پاسخ‌های احتمالی دولت تنظیمگر به وضعیت‌های اپیدمیک، مانند کووید-19 چه پارادایمی را از نسبت مفهوم منفعت عمومی و نظام بازار ترسیم می‌کند؟ پاسخ اجمالی به این پرسش آن است که ورود شوک‌های جدید مانند بحران‌های سلامت به نظام تنظیمی، وضعیت تنظیمی را به سطح بالاتری که متضمن مداخله بیشتر دولت است، سوق می‌دهد. این امر به‌واسطۀ فشارهای مختلف، مانند فشارهای ناشی از افکار عمومی، ذی‌نفعان و فشارهای ناشی از کاستی بازار صورت می‌گیرد و هم‌زمان، میزان پایبندی دولت به مفهوم منفعت عمومی را به رخ می‌کشد. در عین حال، آموزه‌های تنظیم خوب و تقویت نظارت‌ها و تضمین متابعت از مقررات تنظیمی در کنار کاهش تشریفات غیرضروری و تقویت همکاری‌های بین‌المللی در هنگام بروز بحران‌های سلامت می‌تواند به ترسیم تصویری دقیق‌تر از پارادایم جدید دولت و بازار کمک کند. پارادایمی که عمدتاً مبتنی بر تنظیم‌گری هوشمندانه، وابسته به نتیجه و معطوف به تقویت اعتماد شهروندان به دولت تنظیمگر است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| دولت تنظیمگر؛ اپیدمی؛ پارادایم جدید تنظیمی؛ مداخله دولت؛ منفعت عمومی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Epidemic and the Regulatory State | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| EFRAN SHAMS | ||
| Assistant Professor of law, Shahid Beheshti University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This paper discusses the Covid-19 crisis from the perspective of regulatory law. To be more precise, the main topic of discussion is the interaction between epidemic situations and the regulatory state. The main question of this paper is what effect or possible effects the epidemic situation will have on the regulatory state, and the possible response of the regulatory state to epidemic situations, such as Covid-19, draws which kind of relationship between the concept of the public interest and the market system. The short answer to this question is that the entry of new shocks, such as health crises, into the regulatory system, pushes the regulatory situation to a higher level, which requires more government intervention. This is due to various pressures, such as pressures from public opinion, stakeholders and pressures from market failures as well as the extent to which the government adheres to public interest. At the same time, the findings of good regulation and strengthening of supervision, monitoring and ensuring compliance with regulatory regulations, along with reducing redtapes and strengthening international cooperation in the event of a health crisis, can provide an accurate picture of the new paradigm of government and market; A paradigm that is largely based on smart, outcome-oriented regulation, and aims to strengthen citizens' trust in the regulatory state. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Regulatory State, Epidemic, New Regulatory Paradigm, Government Intervention | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Books 1.Bartle, Ian and Vass, Peter (2007), Self-Regulation Within the Regulatory State, Blackwell Publishing. 2.Barzelay, M (2001), The New Public Management, Berkeley, University of California Press. 3.Cunningham, N and Grabovsky, P (1998), Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy, Oxford, Clarendon Press. 4.Hood, C. H. Rothstein and R. Baldwin (2001), The Government of Risk, Understanding Risk Regulation Schemes, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 5. Hutter, Bridget M. (2001), Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 6.Ogus, Anthony (1994), Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Hart Publishing. 7.Patricia A. McCoy (2011), the Subprime Virus: Reckless Credit, Regulatory Failure and Next Steps, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Articles 8.Baldwin, R and Black, J (2008), “Really Responsive Regulation”, Modern Law Review, 71(1): 59-94. 9.Bevan, RG and Hood, C (2006), “What’s measured is what matters”, Public Administration 84 (3): 527-38. 10. Cogliance, Cary (2012), “Measuring Regulatory Performance, Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy”, Expert Paper No. 1. 11.Maxwell, John W., Lyon., Thomas P. and Hackett, Steven C. (2000), “Self-regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XLIII. 12.May, P. (2003), “Performance-Based Regulation and Regulatory Regimes: The Saga of Leady Buildings”, Law and Policy, No. 1. 13. Ogus, Anthony I. (2007), “Better Regulation-Better Enforcement”, in Stephen Robson Weatherill (ed.), Better Regulation, Oxford, Hart Publishing. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی- ویژهنامه حقوق و کرونا ش 2اپیدمی و دولت تنظیمگر 478 Internet Sources 14. Dun, Gibson (2020), Covid-19 and Personal Injury Tort Liability: Preliminary Considerations for Businesses, available at: https://www.gibsondunn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/covid-19-andpersonal-injury-tort-liability-preliminary-considerations-for-businesses.pdf/. 15. ECDC (2020), An overview of the rapid test situation for COVID-19 diagnosis in the EU/EEA, Published in: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Overview-rapidtest-situation-for-COVID-19-diagnosis-EU-EEA.pdf/. 16. OECD (2016), International Regulatory Co-operation: The Role of International Organizations in Fostering Better Rules of Globalization, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264244047-en. 17. OECD (2020), Better regulation in Latin America as a fundamental mechanism to face the crisis and accelerate recovery, Available at: http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/Better-regulation-and-crisisOECD-LAC.pdf/. 18. Savares, John F. et. al. (2020), White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement in the Era of COVID-19, Online at: https://wp.nyu.edu/compliance_enforcement/2020/04/07/white-collar-andregulatory-enforcement-in-the-era-of-covid-19/. 19. Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (2020), International Cooperation for the Corona Virus Combat: Results, Lessons and Way Ahead, published at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/kjgzbdfyyq/ P020200310355462655277.pdf/. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 569 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 695 |
||