The Limitations of the Lmplementation of Polycentric Governance in Iran's Raw Steel Production Inputs (With an Emphasis on Iron Ore) | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 4، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 303-328 اصل مقاله (705.69 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jep.4.1.303 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Masume Valli1؛ Ziaaldin Kiaalhoseini* 2 | ||
| 1Phd. student of International Economic, Mofid University, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Economic Department, Mofid University, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The aim of this study is to examine the tragedy of the commons in Iran's iron ore mining sector. To do so, the theory of polycentric governance was employed, taking into account the lack of legal and distributional frameworks for common resources, and incorporating the theories of Commons and Nozick. The steel industry faces several challenges, such as pollution, raw material supply, lack of cooperation between miners and steel producers, lack of energy in raw steel production, and government intervention and sanctions, which all stem from the monocentric decision-making system. The current research begins by introducing various types of polycentric governance and then delves into the Ostrom-Commons-Nozick theory, utilizing content analysis and analytical descriptive methods. The analysis first examines the different types of polycentric governance, taking into consideration the distribution of power among institutions and the legal rules outlined by Commons. Polycentric governance is concerned with the negotiation process. The vulnerability index is used to assess the consequences of government intervention and monocentric governance. The study's findings reveal a fragmented polycentric governance in operation in the national steel industry. Due to recent imposed sanctions and the multitude of government institutions, strong polycentric governance is not feasible in Iran, given the existing structural inequalities, such as the country's degree of development and climatic conditions. A consistent choice could not be attained. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Fragmented polycentric governance؛ Nozick؛ Commons؛ Iron Ore؛ Tragedy of the Commons | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Araral, Ed., Kris H. (2013). Polycentric Governance for a New Environmental Regime: Theoretical Frontiers in Policy Reform and Public Administration, France, First International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP), 1-33.
Bauwens, Th. (2017). Polycentric Governance Approaches for a Low-Carbon Transition: The Roles of Community-Based Energy Initiatives in Enhancing the Resilience of Future Energy Systems, Labanca, Nicola, Complex systems and Social Practicies in Energy Transitions: Framing Energy Sustainability in the Time of Renewables, Springer.
Block, W., & Jankovic, I. (2016). Trajedy of the Partnership: A Critique of Elinor Ostrom, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(2): 289-318.
Chayes, A. (1976). The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89: 1281–1284.
Commons, J.R., (1950). The Economics of Collective Action, University of Wisconsin.
Crawford, S.E. & E. Ostrom, (1995). A Grammar of Institutions, the American Political Science Review, 89 (3): 582-600.
Fuller, L., (1978). The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92: 353-409.
Davoudi, S. (2002). Polycentricity – Modelling or Determining Reality?. Town and Country Planning, April, 114-117.
Deputy of production studies, (2021). About the Correction of the Price of Energy Carriers: Resilience of the Country’s Steel Industry.
Eldidi, H., Rawat, S., Meinzen-Dick, R. S., and Chaturvedi, R. (2021). Polycentricity and Multi-stakeholder Platforms: Governance of the Commons in India (December 7, 2021). IFPRI Discussion Paper 2067.
Fortnam, M., L. Evans, A.M. Amira Mas Ayu, L. Bastian, T. Chaigneau, L. Creencia, H. C. Goh, B. Gonzales, K. Madarcos, C. Maharja, M. Mohd Iqbal, T. Ngoc Le, R. A. Praptiwi, J. Sugardjito, Q. Van Nguyen, W.M.A. Wan Nur Syazana, (2022). Polycentricity in Practice: Marine Governance Transitions in Southeast Asia, Environmental Science and Policy, 137: 87-98.
Ghazinoory., S, Fatemi., M, & Abad, A. (2021). Iranian Steel Industry: Domination of Dispersed Direct Reduction Plants in an Inefficient Value Chain and a Droughty Environment.
Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J., Van Alstine, J. (2017). Can National Policy Blockages Accelerate the Development Of Polycentric Governance? Evidence from Climate Change Policy in The United Kingdom, Global Environmental Change, 45: 174-182.
Horowitz, D. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Brookings Institution Press.
Iran Statistics Center, (2015). The Results of the Statistics of iMnes in Operation in the Country, 2014, First Edition. From: amar.org
Iran Statistics Center, (2017). The Results of Statistics of Mines in Operation in the Country, 2016, First Edition. From: amar.org
Iran Statistics Center, (2018). The results of statistics of mines in operation in the country, 2018, first edition. From: amar.org
Iran Statistics Center, (2019). The Results of Statistics of the Country's mines in Operation in 2018, First Edition. From: amar.org
Iran Statistics Center, (2015). The Results of Statistics from the Environmental Information of Mines in Operation in the Country, 2014. From: amar.org
Iran Statistics Center, (2016). The Results of Statistics from the Environmental Information of Mines Currently in use in the Country, 2015. From: amar.org
Kaiser, C. (2022). Rethinking Polycentricity: on the North–South Imbalances in Transnational Climate Change Governance, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22: 693–713.
Moftakhari, H., Shao, W., Moradkhani, H., AghaKouchak, A., Sanders, B., Matthew, R., Jones, S., Orbinski, J. (2020). Enabling Incremental Adaptation in Disadvantaged Communities: Polycentric Governance with a Focus on Non-financial Capital, Climate Policy, 21(3): 396-405.
Motevaseli, M., (2019). Legal Foundations of the Dynamic Economy, 6(2): 238-248.
Motvaseli, M., Esmaill beigi, B., Farmahini farahani, (2020). Application of Elinor Ostrom's Institutionalism in Development Planning, Journal of Program and Development Research, 1(3(: 10-35.
Ostrom. E, (2007). Challenges and Growth: the Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(3): 239-264.
Ostrom, E., (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100 (3): 641–72.
Pahl-Wostl, C., and Knieper, C. (2014). The Capacity of Water Governance to Deal with the Climate Change Adaptation Ahallenge: Using Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to dDistinguish between Polycentric, Fragmented and Centralized Regimes. Global Environmental Change, 29: 54–139.
Patala, S., Abareda, L., Halme, M. (2022). Polycentric Governance of Privately Owned Resources in Circular Economy Systems, Journal of Manangement Studies, 59 (6): 1563-1596.
Polanyi, M., (1951). The Logic of Liberty. University of Chicago Press.
Rezapour, Z., Renani, M., Hadi, A. (2021). Management of Common Resources: Market, Government, or Neither? A Review of Water Resources Management Studies in Iran (with an Emphasis on Ostrom’s View), Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 26(88): 89-127. (In Peesian)
Swennenhuis, F., Vincent de Gooyert, Heleen de Coninck, (2022). Towards a CO2-neutral Steel Industry: Justice Aspects of CO2 Capture and Storage, Biomass- and Green Hydrogen-based Emission Reductions, Energy Research & Social Science, 88: 1-11.
Sovacool, B.K., (2011). An International Comparison of Four Polycentric Approaches to Climate and Energy Governance, Energy Policy, 39: 3822-3844.
https://www.donyayemadan.com
https://mimt.gov.ir
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 158 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 161 |
||