هستیشناسی قید در فرایند طراحی | ||
| صفه | ||
| دوره 33، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 100، 1402، صفحه 9-24 اصل مقاله (465.15 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/sofeh.33.1.9 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| گلناز مشرقی* 1؛ حمیدرضا انصاری2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری دانشکدة معمارى، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استادیار دانشکدۀ معمارى، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه علیرغم فرصت برخورداری از داشتهها و گزینههای انتخابی بیشتر در مقایسه با گذشته، امکان تجربۀ همۀ این گزینهها، بهدلیل محدود بودن زمان، وجود ندارد. این تعارض در حرفۀ طراحی، بهدلیل ماهیت مسائل این حرفه، که در دستۀ مسائل با دامنۀ باز قرار میگیرند و نیاز به خلق حداکثری ارزشهای زیباییشناسی دارند، بیشتر دیده میشود. بهصورتیکه تعریف طراحی با واژۀ قیود، به معنی عاملی محدودکننده، پیوند خورده است. بنابراین، جستجو در چیستی قیود در روند طراحی از مسائل بااهمیت در طراحیپژوهی است. در این پژوهش، با هدف پاسخ به سؤال چیستی قیود طرح و مراتب و چگونگی اِعمال آنها در روند طراحی، از روشی مبتنی بر هستیشناسی در علم اطلاعات ــ که در مطالعات هستیشناسی طراحی نیز به کار رفته است ــ و رویۀ اسنادی استفاده شده است. با توجه به این روش، پژوهش به پنج مرحلۀ شناخت دامنۀ قیود، بازخوانی تعاریف موجود، واژگان مشابه، مراتب قیود، و نحوۀ اعمال قیود در روند طراحی تقسیم شد. نتیجه آن است که قیود طرح در دو مرتبۀ معطوف به درون ذهن طراح و معطوف به خارج از ذهن او قرار دارند که هرکدام نیز به زیرمجموعههای دیگری تقسیم میشوند. همچنین مشخص شد که طراح در روند طراحی ممکن است نیاز به تشخیص، انتخاب، مدیریت، و تولید قیود طرح داشته باشد تا بتواند با محدود کردن راه حلهای ممکن، به ساختاردهی مجدد مسئله بپردازد و فعل طراحی را ممکن کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| قیود طرح؛ هستی شناسی طراحی؛ روند طراحی؛ مسئلة طراحی؛ ساختاردهی مسئله؛ قاب بندی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Constraint Ontology in Design Process | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Golnaz Mashreghi1؛ Hamid Reza Ansari2 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate, Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The concept of design is associated with the notion of constraint as a limiting factor, and the search for the constraint in the design process is essential in design research. This study applies the ontological method to define the domain and scope of constraints, their classes and subclasses, and how to apply them. We concluded that there are two types of constraints in design: inside the designer’s mind or internal constraint and outside it or external constraint. Each of these is classified into two subclasses: internal constraints can be divided into deduced and subject constraints, and external constraints are categorised into imposed and intrinsic constraints. In the end, we proposed a model that shows that designers can identify, choose, manage, and even generate constraints in the design process to facilitate the restructuring of the design problem, which helps them solve the design problem. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Design constraints, Design ontology, Design process, Design problem, Structuring of the problem, Framing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
دورک، دانا پی. برنامهدهی معماری: مدیریت اطلاعات برای طراحی. ترجمة سیدامیرسعید محمودی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران، 1397.
شریعت راد، فرهاد و حمید ندیمی. «قاببندی مسئله: راه طراحانة رویارویی با مسئلة طراحی». در صفه، ش74 (پاییز 1395)، ص5-24.
صادقی فسایی، سهیلا و محسن ناصری راد. «عناصر بنیادین پژوهش کیفی در علوم اجتماعی: هستیشناسی، معرفتشناسی، روششناسی و روش»، در مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، ش2 (تابستان 1390)، ص80-100.
لاوسون، برایان. طراحان چگونه میاندیشند: ابهامزدایی از فرایند طراحی. ترجمة حمید ندیمی. تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 1392.
مریخ بیات، فرشاد. الگوریتمهای بهینهسازی فراابتکاری، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی، 1393.
Ashrafganjouei, Mohammadali & John S. Gero. “Exploring the Effect of a Visual Constraint on Students’ Design Cognition”. In AI EDAM, Vol. 35, No. 1 (2021), pp. 3–19. Ball, Linden J. & Balder Onarheim & Bo T. Christensen. “Design Requirements, Epistemic Uncertainty and Solution Development Strategies in Software Design”. In Design Studies, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.003 Barták, Roman. “History of Constraint Programming”. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, January 14, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.EORMS0382 Bastien, Claude. “Does Context Modulate or Underlie Human Knowledge”. In Cognition and Context, ISPA, Lisboa, 1998, pp. 13-25. Biskjaer, Michael Mose & Bo T. Christensen & Morten Friis-Olivarius & Sille J.J. Abildgaard & Caroline Lundqvist & Kim Halskov. “How Task Constraints Affect Inspiration Search Strategies”. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09496-7 Biskjaer, Michael Mose & Kim Halskov. “Decisive Constraints as a Creative Resource in Interaction Design”. In Digital Creativity, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2014), pp. 27-61. Bonnardel, Nathalie. “Towards Understanding and Supporting Creativity in Design: Analogies in a Constrained Cognitive Environment”. In Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 13, No. 7-8 (2000), pp. 505-513. Brézillon, Patrick & J-Ch Pomerol & Ilham Saker. “Contextual and Contextualized Knowledge: An Application in Subway Control”. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 48, No. 3 (1998), pp. 357-373. Bucciarelli, L.L. & G. Goldschmidt & D.A. Schon. “Generic Design Process in Architecture and Engineering”. In Proceedings of the 1987 Conference on Planning and Design in Architecture, 1987, pp. 105-111. Butterworth, George. “Context and Cognition in Models of Cognitive Growth”. In Context and Cognition: Ways of Learning and Knowing, 1992, pp. 1-13. Chevalier, Aline & Laure Martinez. “The Role of the Context in the Acquisition and in the Organisation of Knowledge: Studies from Adults and from Children”. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Springer, 2001, pp. 425-428. Cross, Nigel. “Designerly Ways of Knowing”. In Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1. ________ . Developments in Design Methodology. Wiley, 1984. Darke, Jane. “The Primary Generator and the Design Process”. In Design Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1979), pp. 36-44. Dorst, Kees. “Design Research: A Revolution-Waiting-to-Happen”. In Design Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1 (January 2008), pp. 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.001. ________ . “On the Problem of Design Problems - Problem Solving and Design Expertise”. In J. of Design Research, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1504/jdr.2004.009841. Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge University Press, 2000. Galle, Per. “The Ontology of Gero’s FBS Model of Designing”. In Design Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4 (July 1, 2009), pp. 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.02.002. Gero, John S. & Udo Kannengiesser. “The Function-Behaviour-Structure Ontology of Design”. In An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, 2014, pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_13 Gero, John S. “Design Prototypes : A Knowledge-Based Schema for Design”. In The AI Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 4 (1990), pp. 26-36. Goldratt, EM. Theory of Constraints. 1990. http://brharnetc.edu.in/br/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/5.pdf. Green, Stephen & Darren Southee & John Boult. “Towards a Design Process Ontology”. In The Design Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4 (December 28, 2014), pp. 515-537. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480032. Gross, Mark D. & Stephen M. Ervin & James A. Anderson & Aaron Fleisher. “Constraints: Knowledge Representation in Design”. In Design Studies, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90042-7 Gross, Mark Donald. “Design as Exploring Constraints”. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985. Gruber, Thomas R. “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing”. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43, Issues 5-6 (November 1995), pp. 907-928. Harfield, Steve. “On Design ‘Problematization’: Theorising Differences in Designed Outcomes”. In Design Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2 (2007), pp. 159-173. Hillier, Bill & John Musgrove & Pat O’Sullivan. “Knowledge and Design”. In Environmental Design: Research and Practice, 2 (1972), pp. 1-3. Josephson, John R. & V. Richard Benjamins. “The Ontology of Tasks and Methods”. In AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, 1997. Joyce, Caneel K. “The Blank Page: Effects of Constraint on Creativity”. In SSRN Electronic Journal, (2012). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1552835. Jul, Susanne. From Brains to Branch Points: Cognitive Constraints in Navigational Design. University of Michigan ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2004. Lawson, Bryan. How Designers Think. Routledge, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979 Liu, Yilin Elaine & Seunghyun (Tina) Lee & Ljilja Ruzic Kascak & Jon A. Sanford. “The Bridge Connecting Theory to Practice - A Case Study of Universal Design Process”. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9175 (2015), pp. 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_7 Love, Terence. “Philosophy of Design: A Meta-Theoretical Structure for Design Theory”. In Design Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3 (May 1, 2000), pp. 293-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00012-5 Malhotra, Ashok & John C. Thomas & John M. Carroll & Lance A. Miller. “Cognitive Processes in Design”. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2 (February 1, 1980), pp. 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(80)80013-7 Nadler, Gerald & Shozo Hibino. Breakthrough Thinking. Prima Pub. & Communications, 1990. Newell, Allen & Herbert Alexander Simon. Human Problem Solving. Vol. 104. Prentice-hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972. Noguchi, Hisataka. “How Do Material Constraints Affect Design Creativity?”. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 1999, pp. 82-87. Noy, Natalya F. & Deborah L. McGuinness. “A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology”. In Biomedical Informatics Reseach, 2001, pp. 7-25. http://bmir.stanford.edu/file_asset/index.php/108/BMIR-2001-0880.pdf. Onarheim, Balder & Michael M. Biskjaer. “An Introduction to Creativity Constraints”. In Proc. ISPIM Innovation Conference, 2013. Onarheim, Balder & Michael Mose Biskjaer. “Balancing Constraints and the Sweet Spot as Coming Topics for Creativity Research”. Undefined, 2017. Onarheim, Balder & Stefan Wiltschnig. “Opening and Constraining: Constraints and Their Role in Creative Processes”. In Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, 2010, pp. 83-89. Onarheim, Balder. “Creativity from Constraints in Engineering Design: Lessons Learned at Coloplast”. In Journal of Engineering Design, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.631904. Pauwels, Pieter & Tiemen Strobbe & Ronald De Meyer. “Analysing How Constraints Impact Architectural Decision-Making”. In International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 21(1) (2015), pp. 83-111. Portillo, M. & J.H. Dohr. “Bridging Process and Structure through Criteria”. In Design Studies, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90004-3 Reitman, Walter R. “Heuristic Decision Procedures, Open Constraints, and the Structure of Ill-Defined Problems”. In Human Judgments and Optimality, 1964, pp. 282-315. Rosso, Brent D. “Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams”. In Organization Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4 (2014), pp. 551-585. Rowe, Peter G. Design Thinking. MIT press, 1987. Savage, Justin C.D. & Christopher Miles & Carolynne J. Moore & John C. Miles. “The Interaction of Time and Cost Constraints on the Design Process”. In Design Studies, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00004-0. Schon, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Vol. 5126. Basic books, 1984. Simon, Herbert A. The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, 1996. Simon, Herbert A. & Allen Newell. “Human Problem Solving, The State of the Theory in 1970”. In American Psychologist, 26(2) (1971), pp. 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806. 1971. Simonsen, Jesper & Connie Svabo & Sara Malou Strandvad & Kristine Samson & Morten Hertzum & Ole Erik Hansen, Situated Design Methods, MIT Press, 2014. Stacey, Martin & Claudia Eckert. “Reshaping the Box: Creative Designing as Constraint Management”. In International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 11, No. 3-4 (2010), pp. 241-255. Stokes, Patricia D. Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough, New York, NY: Springer Pub. Co., 2006. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2005-11603-000&site=ehost-live. Vandenbosch, Betty & Kevin Gallagher. ”The Role of Constraints”. In Managing as Designing, 2004, pp. 198-202. Zeisel, John. Inquiry by Design: Environment/Behavior/Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning, 2006. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 725 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 947 |
||
