تأملی بر برخی مسائل حقوقی- اخلاقیِ «فناوریِ زیستیِ کایمرا»؛ مورد پژوهی رویکرد اسناد بین المللی | ||
فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 27، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 108، بهمن 1403، صفحه 105-120 اصل مقاله (627.27 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jlr.2023.202667.1796 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
علی مشهدی* 1؛ محمدرضا جهانی پور2 | ||
1دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه قم | ||
2دکتری حقوق بینالملل عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه قم | ||
چکیده | ||
ایجاد کایمراها، به ویژه اختلاطهای انسان– حیوان مسائل متعدد اخلاقی و حقوقی را در دانش پزشکی و زیست شناسی ایجاد کرده است. از یک سوی این موجودات ممکن است آثار نامطلوب و خطرات جدی بر سلامت و حیات انسانی و نیز تنوع زیستی بر جای گذارند. از سوی دیگر میتوانند فوایدی از قبیل کمک به بیماران صعب العلاج در دانش پزشکی داشته باشند و لذا نباید تحقیقات علمی در این زمینه را ممنوع یا محدود نمود. این امر باعث شده است، مجادلات اخلاقی- حقوقی متعددی در این زمینه مطرح گردد. این سئوال اساسی مطرح است که آیا تحقیقات و تولید کایمرها از لحاظ حقوقی و اخلاقی قابل توجیه و مجاز هستند؟ در این مقاله کوشیده شده است برخی ابعاد حقوقی- اخلاقی تحقیق و ایجاد موجودات کایمرا در پرتو اسناد بین المللی و قواعد مورد اشاره در این اسناد مورد بررسی و ارزیابی قرار گیرند. اجمالا در این خصوص سه رویکرد کلی مخالفت مطلق، مخالفت نسبی و موافقت قابل ذکر است. در اسناد بین المللی برخی قواعد و هنجارهای بین المللی مورد اشاره در اسناد بین المللی حوزه زیست پزشکی، ژنوم انسانی و حقوق حیوانات با تحقیقات و تولید کایمرها مرتبط هستند. فرض اساسی این مقاله در پاسخ به سئوال اصلی بر این مبنا استوار است که، دولتها مکلفند در صدور مجوز به فعالیتهای علمی مرتبط با کایمرا و هیبرید، جنبه احتیاطی امر را رعایت نموده و حتی الامکان از آثار نامطلوب آن بر موجودات زنده به ویژه انسان و تنوع زیستی پیشگیری نمایند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
کایمرا؛ فناوری زیستی؛ زنوترنسپلنتیشن؛ ابعاد حقوقی؛ ابعاد اخلاقی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Reflection on the Legal-Ethical Problems of Chimera Biotechnology; a Case Study of the International Instruments | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ali mashhadi1؛ MohamadReza Gahanipour2 | ||
1University of Qom | ||
2. Ph. D., Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The creation of chimeras, especially human-animal mixing, has raised numerous ethical and legal issues in medical science and biology. On the one hand, these organisms may have adverse effects and serious risks to human health and life as well as biodiversity. On the other hand, they can have benefits, such as helping patients with medical problems. Therefore, scientific research in this field should not be prohibited or restricted. This has led to a number of ethical-legal controversies. The key question is whether the research and production of chimeras is legally and morally justifiable and permissible? In this paper, some legal-ethical aspects of the research and creation of Chimera creatures in the light of international documents and the rules are examined and evaluated. there are three general approaches to absolute disagreement, relative disagreement, and agreement. In international documents, although there is no comprehensive document in this area, some of the international norms and norms mentioned in international documents in the field of biomedicine, human genome and animal rights are related to the research and production of chimeras. The basic presumption of this article is based on the answer to the question that governments are obliged to authorize scientific activities related to Chimera and hybrids to observe the precautionary aspect and even possibly its adverse effects on living things. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Chimera, Biotechnology, Xenotransplantation, Legal Dimensions, Ethical Dimensions | ||
مراجع | ||
رضویفرد، سیده ثنا و رامین مظاهری نژادفرد، «کایمرا و موزاییک، از افسانه تا واقعیت»، نشریه پژواد، شماره 3، 1391.
References
Books
Bonnicksen, A. Chimeras, Hybrids, and Interspecies Research, Washington DC: Georgetown University Pres, 2009.
Dratwa, J. Representing Europe with the precautionary principle, In: Reframing rights: Bio-constitutionalism in the genetic age, 2011.
Ethikrat, D. Human–Animal Mixtures in Research, Berlin: German Ethics Council, 2011.
Ethikrat, D. Mixed Human-Animal Beings in Research, Berlin: German Ethics Council, 2013. (In French)
Fourgous, D. Hybrid and Mixed, Metis: Anthropology of the Ancient Greek Worlds, Volume 8, Issue 1, 1993. (In French)
Ghari Sayyed Fatemi, Sayyed Mohamad, Human rights in contemporary world, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, 2003. (in Persian)
Ghorban-Nia, Nasser, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Qom: Islamic Culture and Thought Organization, 2011. (in Persian)
Hammaker, D. Health Care Management and the Law: Principles and Applications, Delmar, First Edition, 2011.
Huther, C. Chimeras: The Ethics of Creating Human-Animal Interspecifics, Doctoral Thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 2009.
Korff, D. The Right to Life, Strasburg: Council of Europe, First Edition, 2006.
Mashhadi, Ali, The Right to a Healthy Environment, Tehran: Mizan, 2013. (in Persian)
National Research Council. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.
Newman, S. A. My Attempt to Patent a Human-Animal Chimera, The Genetics Observatory, 2006.
Taupitz, J. and Weschka, M. CHIMBRIDS - Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International research, Berlin: Springer, First Edition, 2009.
West, D. Biotechnology Policy across National Boundaries:The Science-Industrial Complex, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Articles
Anderson, M. “Xenotransplantation: a Bioethical Evaluation”. Journal of medical ethics, Volume 32, Issue 4, 2006.
Behringer, R. R. “Human-Animal Chimeras in Biomedical Research”, Cell stem cell, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2007.
DiSilvestro, R. “A Neglected Solution to the Problem of the Metaphysical and Moral Status of the Human-Animal Chimera”, Ethics and Medicine, Volume 20, Issue 2, 2004.
Hermerén, G. “Ethical Considerations in Chimera Research”, Development, Volume 142, Issue 1, 2015.
Hubner, D. “Human-Animal Chimeras and Hybrids: An Ethical Paradox behind Moral Confusion?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Volume 43, Issue 2, 2018.
Hyun, I et al. “Ethical Standards for Human-to-Animal Chimera Experiments in Stem Cell Research”, Cell Stem Cell, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2007.
Inoue, Y. Shineha, R. and Yashiro, Y. “Current Public Support for Human-Animal Chimera Research in Japan is Limited, Despite High Levels of Scientific Approval”, Cell Stem Cell, Volume 19, Issue 2, 2016.
Kurtz, A. Oh, S. J. “Non-Human Primate Chimeras Make a Move”, Stem Cell Investigation, Volume 3, Issue 13, 2016.
Palacios-González, C. “Ethical Aspects of Creating Human–Nonhuman Chimeras Capable of Human Gamete Production and Human Pregnancy”, Monash Bioethics Review, Volume 33, Issue 2-3, 2015.
Palacios-González, C. “Human Dignity and the Creation of Human–Nonhuman Chimeras”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Volume 18, Issue 4, 2015.
Razavi Fard, Sayyedeh Sana and Ramin Mazaheri Nejad-Fard, “Chimera and Mosaic, from Myth to Reality ”, Pejvad Journal, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2012. (in Persian)
Salter, B. and Harvey, A. “Creating Problems in the Governance of Science: Bioethics and Human/Animal Chimeras”, Science and Public Policy, Volume 41, Issue 5, 2014.
Electronic Resources
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings, adopted 1998, available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007f2ca, Accessed March 12, 2020.
Committee of Ministers. “Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on xenotransplantation”, Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 June 2003at the 844th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805df8df, Accessed: 15 March ,2020.
Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, 11 November 1997, available at :http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&Url_Do=Do_Topic&Url_Section=201.html,accessed February 12, 2020.
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 2009, available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf.accessed March 8 2020, Accessed March 1 ,2020.
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for. Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, 1986, available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007a67b, accessed March 7, 2020.
Streiffer, R. “Human/Non-Human Chimeras”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/chimeras/accessed.14 March 2020
The European Convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine, 1997, available at : https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98. accessed, March 15, 2020.
The European Convention on Human Rights, adopted 1950, available at : https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.accessed March 14, 2020.
United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning, 2005, available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/541409?ln=en, Accessed January 28, 2020.
Universal Declaration of Animal Rights, 1978, available at: http://www.la.utexas.edu/users/bump/Universal%20Declaration%20of%20Animal%20Rights.htm, Accessed March 16, 2020. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,533 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 582 |