همبستگی و تضاد در روابط فرزندان بزرگ‌سال و والدین | ||
| خانواده پژوهی | ||
| دوره 19، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 73، 1402، صفحه 91-106 اصل مقاله (824.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/JFR.19.1.91 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه مدیری* 1؛ توفیق مبادری2 | ||
| 1گروه مطالعات خانواده، مؤسسۀ تحقیقات جمعیت کشور | ||
| 2گروه آمار زیستی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این مقاله، با استفاده از روش تحلیل طبقۀ پنهان و نرم‌افزار Mplus به گونه‌شناسی روابط فرزندان بزرگ‌سال و والدین پرداخته‌ایم. جامعۀ آماری پیمایش، زنان و مردان هجده سال و بالاتر شهر تهران بودند که حداقل یک والد زنده داشتند و با والدین خود هم‌سکنا نبوده‌اند. ابزار به‌کارگرفته‌شده پرسش‌نامه بوده و به‌شیوۀ نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای، نمونۀ ۱۰۰۰نفری از 30 حوزۀ شهر تهران انتخاب شده است. نتایج نشان داده: الگوی روابط فرزندان بزرگ‌سال با پدر و مادر تقریباً یکسان بوده و چهار گونه رابطۀ هماهنگ، عاطفی، اجباری، و ناسازگار شناسایی شده که متأثر از شرایط ساختاری بوده‌اند. روابط هماهنگ بیش از ۵۰ درصد و روابط عاطفی بیش از ۳۰ درصد را به خود اختصاص داده‌اند. روابط اجباری در سطح پایین و در مادران بیش از پدران (۵/۵ در برابر ۵/۳) بوده و روابط ناسازگار نیز در سطح پایین و در پدران بیش از مادران بوده است (۶/۸ در برابر ۷/۳). با افزایش فاصلۀ جغرافیایی شانس قرارگرفتن در گونه‌های عاطفی و ناسازگار افزایش یافته است. روابط ناسازگار در افرادی که پدرانشان طلاق گرفته یا بدون همسر بوده‌اند، بیش از دیگر گونه‌ها گزارش شده است. کیفیت رابطۀ با والدین، در گونۀ هماهنگ و عاطفی، بالاتر از گونۀ اجباری و به‌ویژه گونۀ ناسازگار بوده است. به‌طور کلی می‌توان گفت در روابط میان فرزندان بزرگ‌سال و والدین در شهر تهران، همبستگی نسلی غالب بوده و تضاد نسلی شایع نیست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| همبستگی نسلی؛ تضاد با والدین؛ تحلیل طبقۀ پنهان؛ Mplus؛ گونه‌شناسی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Solidarity and Conflict between Adult Children and Parents | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fateme Modiri1؛ Tofigh Mobaderi2 | ||
| 1National Institute for Population Research | ||
| 2Biostatistics dep., Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this article, we have studied the typology of adult children and parents using the latent class analysis method and Mplus software. The statistical population of this survey was men and women aged 18 and over in Tehran who had at least one living parent and noncoresident. The instrument used was a questionnaire and the sampling method is multi-stage cluster and has been selected a sample of 1000 people from 30 districts of Tehran. The results show that: The pattern of adult children's relationships with father and mother is almost the same and have been identified 4 types of Harmonious, Emotional, Obligatory and Discordant relationships that have been affected by structural conditions. Harmonious relationships have been more than 50% and emotional relationships more than 30%. Obligatory relationships were lower at mothers than fathers (5.5 vs. 3.5) and discordant relationships were lower at fathers than mothers (8.6 vs. 3.7). With increasing geographical distance, the chances of being in the emotional and discordant types have increased, and discordant relationships has been reported more in people whose fathers are divorced or without a spouse than in other types. The quality of the relationship with the parents, in a harmonious and emotional types, have been more than obligatiry and especially discordant. In general, it can be said that in the relations between adult children and parents in the city of Tehran, generational solidarity is dominant and generational conflict is not common | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Generational solidarity, Conflict with Parents, Latent Class Analysis, Mplus, Typology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
مدیری، ف (۱۳۹۹). بررسی حمایت فرزندان بزرگ‌سال از والدین و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن در شهر تهران، دوفصلنامۀ مطالعات جمعیتی، 6(2)، 3-32.
Bengtson, V. L., Rosenthal, C., & Burton, L. (1996). Paradoxes of families and aging. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (4th ed., pp. 253 – 282). NewYork: Academic Press.
Bengtson, V. L., Oyama, P. S. (2007). Intergenerational solidarity: Strengthening economic and social ties. New York: United Nations Headquarters.
Clarke, E. J., Preston, M., Raksin, J., & Bengtson, V. L. (1999). Types of conflicts and tensions between older parents and adult children. The Gerontologist, 39(3), 261-270.
Connidis, I. A., McMullin, J. A. (2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of marriage and family, 64(3), 558-567.
Coser, L.A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
De Jong Gierveld, J., Dykstra, P. A. (2002). The long-term rewards of parenting: Older adults’ marital history and the likelihood of receiving support from adult children. Ageing International, 27(3), 49-69.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1998). Intergenerational relationships and solidarity within the family. In K. Matthijs (Ed.), The family: Contemporary perspectives and challenges. Festschrift in honor of Wilfried Dumon (pp.31–49). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Dykstra, P. A. (1998). The effects of divorce on intergenerational exchanges in families. The Netherlands’Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 77 – 93.
Fingerman, K.L., Hay, E.L., & Birditt, K.S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 792 – 808.
Fischer, T. F. C. (2004). Parental divorce, conflict, and resources. The effects on children’s behavior problems, socioeconomic attainment, and transitions in the demographic career. ICS-dissertation, Nijmegen, Netherlands: NijmegenUniversity.
Gulbrandsen, L., Langsether, A. (2000). Wealth distribution between generations. A source of conflict or cohesion? In S. Arber & C. Attias-Donfut (Eds.), the myth of generational conflict: The family and state in ageing societies (pp. 69–87). London: Routledge.
Hallquist, M. N., Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(4), 621–638.
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293 – 318.
Kalmijn, M. (2014). Adult intergenerational relationships. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to the sociology of families, 385-403.
Krause, N., & Rook, K.S. (2003). Negative interaction in late life: Issues in the stability and generalizability of conflict across relationships. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58B, 88 –99.
Lanza, S.T., Collins, L.M., Lemmon, D.R., & Schafer, J.L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 671–694.
Lincoln, K.D. (2000). Social support, negative social interactions, and psychological well-being. Social Service Review, 74, 231 – 252.
Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 413-425.
Lye, D. N. (1996). Adult child-parent relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 79 – 102.
Modiri, F. (2021). The Study of adult children’s supports for their parents and the influencing factors in Tehran. Iranian Population Studies, 6(2), 3-32 [in Persian].
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nazari, S., Foroughan, M., Shahboulaghi, F. M., Rassouli, M., Sadeghmoghadam, L., Farhadi, A., & Shabestari, A. N. (2016). Perceived social support in Iranian older adults: A qualitative study. Educational Gerontology, 42(6), 443-452.
Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2002). Explaining mothers’ ambivalence toward their adult children, Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 602 – 613.
Pillemer, K., Munsch, C.L., Fuller‐Rowell, T., Riffin, C., & Suitor, J.J. (2012). Ambivalence toward adult children: Differences between mothers and fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1101-1113.
Rabe-Hesketh, S, Skrondal, A, & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM manual. In U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series (working paper 160). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Electronic Press.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), online publication.
Schenk, N., & Dykstra, P.A. (2012). Continuity and change in intergenerational family relationships: An examination of shifts in relationship type over a three-year period. Advances in life course research, 17(3), 121-132.
Settersten, A. J. (2005). Linking the two ends of life: What gerontology can learn from childhood studies. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60B, S173 – S180.
Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V.L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult-parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429 – 460.
Silverstein, M., Chen, X., & Heller, K. (1996). Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 970 – 982.
Simmel, G. (1904). The sociology of conflict I. American Journal of Sociology, 9, 490 – 525.
Spitze, G., & Logan, J.R. (1991). Sibling structure and intergenerational relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 871 – 884.
Sprey, J. (1969). The family as a system in conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 699 –706.
Steinbach, A. (2008). Intergenerational solidarity and ambivalence: Types of relationships in German families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 115-127.
Van Gaalen, R. I., & Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis. Journal of marriage and family, 68(4), 947-960.
Van Gaalen, R. I., Dykstra, P.A., & Komter, A.E. (2010). Where is the exit? Intergenerational ambivalence and relationship quality in high contact ties. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(2), 105-114.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and advanced. Belmont Massachusetts: Statistical Innovations Inc.
Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., & Elder, G. H. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055 – 1072. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,453 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,595 |
||