مفهوم و گفتمان مراکز آموزشی اجتماع محله در پارادایم پایداری شهری | ||
توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی | ||
مقاله 12، دوره 6، شماره 11، اسفند 1403، صفحه 209-226 اصل مقاله (784.05 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/sdge.2023.232278.1134 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
رامین شریفیتشنیزی؛ زهره فنی* ؛ پگاه مرید السادات | ||
گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
واژه و مفهوم مدرسۀ اجتماع محلهمحور، نشاندهنده رابطۀ مدرسه یا محیطهای آموزشی با اجتماع محلهای است. بنابراین در دیدگاه کلی آنچه ارتباط این دو مفهوم را با نظام برنامهریزی شهری مشخص میکند، رابطۀ ساختار اجتماعی آموزش با مکان است. بر این مبنا، با توجه به نو بودن موضوع پژوهش در ادبیات جغرافیای شهری ایران، مؤلفههای شکلدهندۀ مدرسۀ اجتماع محور شناسایی، بررسی و تحلیل شده و چارچوب کلی نظری-مفهومی و مدلسازی متغیرهای دخیل در آن بر پایه دیدگاه توسعۀ پایدار تدوین و ارایه شده است. از این رو براساس اهمیت نقش کالبدی عناصر شهری و عملکرد اجتماعی – هویتی آن بر مبنای بهرهگیری از فلسفۀ پراگماتیستی و رویکرد آمیخته، کاربست تکنیک تحلیل محتوا و روش پشتیبان اجماع گسسته به وسیلۀ استخراج مضامین و مفاهیم و مقولهسازی از طریق کدگذاری دادهبنیاد و سپس کاربست آن در مدل آن، عوامل مؤثر بر مدرسۀ اجتماع محله محور بر پایۀ توسعۀ پایدار واکاوی و تحلیل شده است. نتایج این جمعبندی بر مبنای نمونۀ هدفمند تعیین شده است و از میان منابع تخصصی و همچنین 12 خبرۀ حوزه برنامهریزی شهری استخراج شده که بیانگر اهمیت 9 متغیرِ ساختار سیاسی، مدیریت فرهنگی، مدیریت اقتصادی، مدیریت اجتماعی، مدیریت محیطی، یادگیری، مدارس تماموقت، فضای چند عملکردی، مدیریت فضای آموزشی در تعریف و مدلسازی مدارس اجتماع محور است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
- آموزش؛ -اجتماع محله محور؛ -توسعۀ پایدار؛ -توافق زیستی – محیطی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Concept and Discourse of Neighborhood Community Educational Centers in the Paradigm of Urban Sustainability | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ramin Sharifi-Tashnizi؛ Zohreh Fanni؛ Pegah Moridosadat | ||
Human Geography & Spatial Planning Department, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Background and purpose: The concept of Community-centered school is a spatial discourse with an explanation of how currents exist in a local community. Based on this, the present methodological research has identified, investigated, and analyzed the insights and components of the social school and presented the overall theoretical-conceptual framework and modeling of the variables involved in it based on the perspective of sustainable development to provide the possibility of evaluating the tools and extractive variables. It should be a framework for further studies. These insights are grouped, into four main axes: The first insight is educational communication based on learning based on the local community. In the second vision, integration with the neighborhood community is discussed. The third insight, local community participation, and the fourth insight, citizen-based actions have been proposed. Methodology: The methodological nature, is based on knowing the appropriate methods of investigation and analysis of its new subject. Based on the importance of the physical role of urban elements and its social-identity function based on the use of pragmatist philosophy and mixed approach, the application of content analysis technique and discrete consensus support method by extracting themes and concepts and categorization through database coding and then applying it in the support model Discrete consensus, factors influencing the formation of neighborhood-oriented community schools based on sustainable development have been studied and analyzed. This approach is hierarchical and first, the effective components of the research were identified using a qualitative approach. Then the findings were analyzed based on a quantitative approach. In this study, descriptive strategies and grand theory strategy were used as a road map; Techniques such as content analysis, validity, and reliability have been proposed and experts' questionnaires have been used. The statistical population is all printed texts in the field of local community schools, sustainable urban development, and all the experts of the urban planning system of Iran. In this society, the basis for determining the sample size is the theoretical saturation limit. On the other hand, in the quantitative part, i.e. measuring tools for qualitative analysis, urban planning experts were used, based on theoretical saturation, there were 12 experts in this field. Findings and discussion: The present study was proposed based on the identification and development of the initial model of local community schools and urban sustainability. To identify the impact of community schools on the physical structure of the city and its role in the urban planning system, the researcher has collected qualitative data to find the most important and basic general framework from among the experts of the urban planning system of Iran and the codes extracted from printed texts. to identify First, 11 influencing variables of content analysis were identified. To prioritize and select the best variables, a discrete consensus support method was used. In the summary, discussion, and conclusion, the influential variables were obtained based on the highest level of consensus of the experts, and two main variables were removed from the study process due to the lack of consensus level. Therefore, 9 variables remained in the extracted model. The results of this summary were determined based on a targeted sample and extracted from specialized sources and 12 experts on the urban planning system, which show the importance of 9 variables of political structure, cultural management, economic management, social management, environmental management, learning, full-time schools, multi-functional space, the management of educational space are community-oriented in defining and modeling schools. Conclusion: The influencing variables on the formation of the discourse and road map of local community schools in sustainable urban development are political structure variables such as intellectual systems in planning and political theoretical foundations influencing the educational process. Cultural management includes concepts such as continuous change and evolution, cultural diversity and promotion of appropriate biological principles. Economic management includes local links, development capacity building, production innovations, and links of different economic sectors. Social management includes the implementation of collaborative programs, preservation of cultural heritage, capacity building of institutions, control, and supervision at local levels; These findings are consistent with the present study. Environmental management: The community-oriented school emphasizes the relationship between the natural environment and human society more than anything else, and includes the topics of technology changes, sustainable quality of biological resources, and energies, land use changes, tourism, land use management, and environmental integrity. Learning is a concept related to experience and processes of understanding and applying it. Full-time schools have been used as a dependent variable in the qualitative section and selective coding in the movement from part to whole. This variable is the community-oriented school, which has a full-time social function, as an effective structure in the social system. Multi-functional space: It is a space belonging to all generations and it is a local community-oriented school with various functions in the city. Educational space management: includes a set of concepts in education, educational communication, academic motivation, per capita, school location, and physical-human resources. According to the collective agreement of the elites of Iran's urban planning system, all these effective elements in the model of community-oriented schools can be a model for measuring schools in Iran to determine how much and how they can be classified based on the sustainability system and neighborhood-oriented communities. . | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Keywords: Education, Neighborhood-oriented community, Sustainable development, Biological-environmental agreement | ||
مراجع | ||
References Allemang, B., Sitter, K., and Dimitropoulos, G. 2022. Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research. Health Expectations, 25(1), 38-47. doi: 10.1111/hex.13384. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34748689/ Blaton, L., and Van Avermaet, P. 2016. Community schools in Ghent: Strengthening neighborhoods in Belgium (Flanders). Developing Community Schools, Community Learning Centers, Extended-service Schools, and Multi-service Schools: International Exemplars for Practice, Policy and Research, 173-204. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25664-1_7 Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory, Second Edition, SAGE, 416. Cogan, J. J., 1982. Education and Development in the Third World. Chapter at: Educational Leadership, Mike Bottery, By the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 241. https://www.scribd.com/document/434616700/ebook-Educational-Leadership-pdf Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D., Kessler, S., and Dowsett, G. W. 2021, Making the difference: Schools, families, and social division. Routledge, 228 P., DOI: 10.4324/9781003116400 Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. 2005. Mixed methods research: Developments, debates, and dilemmas, A chapter (18) of the book: Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry, 315-326. (459p.) Berrett-Koehler Publishers, PDF e-book ISBN 978-160509-333-8 Firmansyah, F. 2022. A New Paradigm on Human Resources Management in State Islamic University. Al-Ishlah: Journal Pendidikan, 14(1), 71-84. DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1513 Fletcher, (2003), Participation, negotiation, and poverty: encountering the power of images pro-poor development programs, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 188. ISBN:0754633772, 9780754633778. Heath, N.L Duggan, J.M., Lewis, S.P., and Baxter, A.L. 2012. An examination of the scope and nature of non-suicidal self-injury online activities: Implication for school mental health professionals. School Mental Health, 4(1),56-67, 26. DOI: 10.1007/s12310-011-9065-6 http:// modireamari.org/Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Kim, G. 2023. Geography education professionals’ understanding of global citizenship: Insights for a more just geography curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 1-26. Doi:10.1080/00933104.2022.2159595 Klevan, S., Daniel J, Fehrer, K. and Maier A, 2023. Creating the Conditions for Children to Learn: Oakland’s Districtwide Community Schools Initiative. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/784.361 Lieber, E., Fung, H., and Leung, P. W.-L. (2006). Chinese child-rearing beliefs: Key dimensions and contributions to the development of culture-appropriate assessment. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00191.x Liu, W., Cheng, H., and Han, X. 2022. Rebuilding geography for the 21st century through disciplinary reunification and social engagement. Environment and Planning Journal indexing and metrics: 1(1), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825221082162. Miller, K. D. 2015. Agent-based modeling and organization studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization Studies: 36(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556921 Neuman, W.L. 2011 Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th Edition, Pearson, Boston. 598. ISBN, 1292020237, 9781292020235. Oskouee Aras, A., and Badamchizadeh, P. 2024. Analyzing the approaches of neighborhood-oriented planning and community-oriented regeneration. Geography and Human Relationships, 6(3), 733-767. Doi:10.22034/GAHR.2023.406966.1912 Rock, A. E. 2022. Bringing geography to the community: Community-based learning and the geography classroom. GeoJournal, 87(Suppl 2), 235-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10408-3 Saldana, J., 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Translated by Abdullah Giviyan, 1st Edition, Tehran: Elm va Farhang Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company, 476 pages. (In Persian) Sharifi, S. M., Farhangi, A., Heydari, A., Aghili, S., and Mirzaei Rabar, F. 2020. Designing a Competency Model for Leaders in Creative Industries Using the Discrete Consensus Support Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling. Industrial Management, 12(2), 299-. (In Persian). Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. 1994. Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Chapter 17, pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks,184. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1264397 Wong, Tai-Chee and Belinda Y. 2011.Eco-city Planning Policies, Practice, and Design, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, 295. ISBN-10: 9400703821 ISBN-13: 978-9400703827 Xu, J., and Wu, Z. 2011. A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(8), 1196-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.05.007 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 289 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 81 |