Public Finance or Public Choice? The Scholastic Political Economy As an Essentialist Synthesis | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 5، شماره 1، 2024، صفحه 217-238 اصل مقاله (355.77 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jep.5.1.217 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Hosein Bahmanpour khalesi* 1؛ Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh2 | ||
| 1Research Fellow, Imam Sadiq (p.b.u.h.) University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Economics, Imam Sadiq (pbuh) University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Nowadays, it is thought that there are only two approaches to political economy: public finance and public choice; however, this research aims to introduce a new insight by investigating scholastic sources. We study the relevant classic books from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries and reevaluate the scholastic literature based on public finance and public choice doctrines. The findings confirm that the government is the institution for realizing the common good according to a scholastic attitude. Therefore, scholastic thinkers saw a typical government mission based on their essentialist attitude toward human happiness. Social conflicts and lack of social consent are the product of diversification in ends and desires; hence, if the ends of humans were unified, there would be no conflict of interest. Accordingly, if the government acts according to its assigned mission, the lack of public consent is not significant. Based on the scholastic point of view, this study introduces the third approach to political economy, which can be considered an analytical synthesis of classical doctrines. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Scholastic Economics؛ Political Economy؛ Public Finance؛ Public Choice؛ Arrow’ s impossibility | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alves, A.A. (2017). Vitoria, the Common Good and the Limits of Political Power. In: Beneyto, J., Corti Varela, J. (eds) At the Origins of Modernity. Studies in the History of Law and Justice, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62998-8_4
Alves, A. A., & Moreira, J. (2013). The Salamanca School. Bloomsbury Publishing: USA.
Anderson, G. M. (1989). The butcher, the baker, and the policy-maker: Adam Smith on public choice, with a reply by Stigler. History of Political Economy, 21(4), 641-659.
Aquinas, St T. [1270] 1947. “Summa theologica” New York: Benziger Bros.
Aquinas, St T.[1267]1949. "On Kingship to the King of Cyprus”. trans. by Gerald B" Phelan. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Aquinas, St T. [1503]1956. Quaestiones quodlibetales. Marietti edition: Torino/Rome.
Arrow, K. J. 1950. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.
Azpilcueta, M. [1549] 2004. Commentary on the resolution of money. Journal of markets and morality, 7(1).
Bahmanpour-khalesi, M., & Sharifzadeh, M. (2023). Utility or Ability to Pay? Scholastic Tax Theory as an Analytical Synthesis and its Implications for Islamic Economics. Islamic Economics Studies Bi-quarterly Journal,.doi: 10.30497/ies.2023.243294.2124.( in Persian)
Blankart, C. B. (2016). Public choice. In Handbook on the history of economic analysis volume II (pp. 401-416). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Buchanan, James M. 1986 . the Constitution of Economic Policy, Nobel Prize Lecture. Retrieved from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1986/buchanan/lecture/
Buchanan James M..; & Musgrave, R. A. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. MIT Press.
Buridan, Jean. [1349] 2020. Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics. In E. W. Fuller (compiler), A Source Book on Early Monetary Thought: Writings on Money before Adam Smith (pp. 54-70). Edward Elgar.
Chafuen, A. A. 2003. Faith and liberty: The economic thought of the late scholastics. Lexington Books.
Chaplygina, I., & Lapidus, A. 2016. Economic thought in scholasticism. In Handbook on the history of economic analysis volume II (pp. 20-42). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ganshof, F. L. 1996. Feudalism (Vol. 34). University of Toronto Press.
Gunning, J. P. 2003. Understanding democracy: an introduction to public choice. Nomad Press.
Hamilton, B. 1963. Political Thought in Sixteenth-Century Spain: A Study of the Political Ideas of Vitoria, De Soto, Suarez and Molina.
Hirschfeld, M. L. 2018. Aquinas and the Market. Harvard University Press.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1994. The nature of man. Journal of applied corporate finance, 7(2), 4-19.
Downs, A. 1957. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of political economy, 65(2), 135-150.
Langholm, O. 1982. Economic freedom in scholastic thought. History of Political Economy, 14(2), 260-283.
Marciano, A. (2005). Benevolence, sympathy, and hume's model of government: How different is new political economy from classical political economy?. History of political economy, 37(Suppl_1), 43-70.
Malthus, T. R. 1986. An essay on the principle of population (1798). The Works of Thomas Robert Malthus, London, Pickering & Chatto Publishers, 1, 1-139.
Mariana, J. [1493]1950. Del Rey y de la Institución Real, in Biblioteca de Autores Españoles, Rivadeneya, vol. 31. Madrid: Editions Atlas
Mariana, J. [1611]1969. De Rege et regis institutione Libri tres: Eiusdem de ponderibus & mensuris Liber. Germany: Aubrius, .
Mariana, Juane de . 1981. La dignidad real y la educación del rey (De rege et regis institutione), ed. L. Sanchez Agesta, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid.
Mariana, J. [1609] 2002. “A Treatise on the Alteration of Money”. Journal of Markets & Morality, 5(2): 523–593.
Medema, S. G. 2007. The hesitant hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the evolution of the theory of market failure. History of Political Economy, 39(3), 331-358.
Meredith, C. T. 2008. The ethical basis for taxation in the thought of Thomas Aquinas. Journal of Markets & Morality, 11(1).
Moss, L. S. (1977). Some public-choice aspects of Hobbes's political thought. History of Political Economy, 9(2), 256-272.
Moss, L. S. (1991). Thomas Hobbes's Influence on David Hume: The Emergence of a Public Choice Tradition. History of Political Economy, 23(4), 587-612.
Niehans, J. 1993. “A Reassessment of Scholastic Monetary Theory”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 15(2): 229-248.
Perdices de Blas, L., & Revuelta López, J. 2011. Markets and taxation: modern taxation principles and the school of Salamanca. ESIC Market Economic and Business Journal, 138, 91-116.
Pounds, Norman John Greville. 2014. An economic history of medieval Europe. Routledge.
Ricardo, D. 1996. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. United States: Prometheus Books.
Smith, A. [1776] 2010.The Wealth of Nations. United Kingdom: Harriman House.
Soto, D de. [1556]1968, De iustitia et iure . Madrid: Instituto de Estúdios Políticos.
Stiglitz, J. E. 1989. Markets, market failures, and development. The American economic review, 79(2), 197-203.
Suárez, F. [1612] 2017. Tractatus de Legibus AC Deo Legislatore in Decem Libros Distributus (Classic Reprint). United States: Fb&c Limited.
Schwartz, D. 2019. The Political Morality of the Late Scholastics: Civic Life, War and Conscience. Cambridge University Press.
Urban, Konrad Edward. 2014. Aquinas and the Welfare State. .retrieved from: http://2014.austriancenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Aquinas-and-the-Welfare-State.pdf
De Vitoria, F. 1991. Vitoria: political writings. Cambridge University Press.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 623 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 70 |
||