سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

رشیدی, محسن, صارمی, حمیدرضا, شیعه, اسماعیل. (1403). آسیب شناسی محتوایی/ رویه‌ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و شهروندی. , 6(10), 115-131. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.232996.1149
محسن رشیدی; حمیدرضا صارمی; اسماعیل شیعه. "آسیب شناسی محتوایی/ رویه‌ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و شهروندی". , 6, 10, 1403, 115-131. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.232996.1149
رشیدی, محسن, صارمی, حمیدرضا, شیعه, اسماعیل. (1403). 'آسیب شناسی محتوایی/ رویه‌ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و شهروندی', , 6(10), pp. 115-131. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.232996.1149
رشیدی, محسن, صارمی, حمیدرضا, شیعه, اسماعیل. آسیب شناسی محتوایی/ رویه‌ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و شهروندی. , 1403; 6(10): 115-131. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2023.232996.1149

آسیب شناسی محتوایی/ رویه‌ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و شهروندی

فصلنامه علمی توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی
مقاله 7، دوره 6، شماره 10، تیر 1403، صفحه 115-131    اصل مقاله (1.04 M)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/sdge.2023.232996.1149
نویسندگان
محسن رشیدی1؛ حمیدرضا صارمی* 2؛ اسماعیل شیعه1
1گروه شهرسازی، واحد تهران غرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
نظام حقوق شهری کشور ظرفیت­های حقوقی لازم برای آماده­سازی بسترهای قانونی مناسب  شهروندسازی محلی از منظر حق به شهر را ندارد. لذا هدف تحقیق حاضر آسیب­شناسی محتوایی/رویه­ای سیاستگذاری شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران از منظر حق به شهر در قوانین شهری و  شهروندی است. روش این پژوهش تحلیل محتوای کیفی جهت­دار است. بر اساس ادبیات و مبانی نظری موضوع، چارچوب تحلیلی تحقیق مشخص شد و متغیرها، ابعاد، مؤلفه­ها، و مقوله­های منتج از آن عرضه و با استفاده از همین چارچوب، قوانین مورد نظر به روش نمونه­گیری از منابع معتبر، انتخاب و تحلیل شدند. برای این منظور 8 قانون انتخابی در 13 مؤلفه از چارچوب تحلیلی امتیازدهی شد که برآورد پایایی تحلیل برابر 895/0 بدست آمد. نتایج نشان داد قوانین در مولفۀ رویه‌ای با امتیاز 85/3 نسبت به مولفه محتوایی با امتیاز 11/3 مطلوبیت بیشتری داشته‌اند. بنابراین آسیب­پذیری سیاستگذاری­ها بیشتر از جنبه محتوایی بوده است. همچنین در میان هشت قانون مورد بررسی از قانون اساسی کشور، از نظر کیفیت محتوایی و رویه­ای رتبه اول و قانون احترام به آزادی­های مشروع از نظر کیفیت محتوایی و رویه­ای، رتبه هشت را بدست آورد. بنابراین تصمیم گیری­های فنی یا برنامه­ریزی و طرح­ریزی­های فرمایشی نمی­توانند واجد عنوان قانونگذاری در شهرسازی و معماری تلقی شوند. از این­رو، تا وقتی نظام حقوقی و نظام شهرسازی تکلیف خود را با موضوع و مسائل شهرسازی مشخص نکند، سیاست­های تدوین شده نمی­توانند راهگشای مشکلات شهرسازی و معماری باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آسیب شناسی"؛ حق به شهر"؛ سیاستگذاری"؛ "؛ شهروند"؛ "قوانین شهری"
عنوان مقاله [English]
Content/procedural Pathology of the Policy of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran from the Perspective of the Right to the City in Urban and Citizenship Laws
نویسندگان [English]
Mohsen Rashidi1؛ Hamidreza Saremi2؛ Esmaeil Shieh1
1Department of Urban Planning, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and purpose
Analysis of what and how the concept of the right to the city is reflected in the policy-making laws of the urban area of Iran and its lack of success and inefficiency is the main topic of this research. Considering the originality of the concept of the right to the city in the theoretical arena, as well as the indeterminacy of its limits and loopholes in the existing laws, firstly, a procedural review and analysis of urban and citizenship laws governing the right to the city in Iran, and secondly, a review and content analysis of the dimensions and components. The right to the city in these laws can lead to a detailed picture of what and how the concept of the right to the city is in the relevant laws and policies. It is necessary to explain that the purpose of the analysis of procedures in this article is not to examine the process of implementing laws in the field of practice; Rather, it is the structural features of the laws.
Methodology
In the current research, qualitative content analysis was used. Due to the novelty of the concept of the right to the city in the field of opinion, measuring its content and procedure in the existing laws requires a method that has high accuracy and validity. Therefore, the method of content analysis has been chosen. On the other hand, in qualitative content analysis, theory has a reference role and is the beginning of the analysis process. Choosing the method of qualitative content analysis in this research, on the one hand, makes the results of the research more valid due to its structure compared to other conventional approaches in qualitative content analysis, and on the other hand, to The reason for the referential role of the theory in the analysis of the findings, the analysis and interpretation of the results can be done more flexibly. Therefore, based on the conceptualization and review of the theoretical and experimental literature of the right to the city, the main components and criteria of interest in this field are presented in the article.
Findings and discussion
Based on the results of the research, two main content and procedural components have been identified and six criteria have been identified: the right to urban space, the right to citizen participation, content, stylistic language, architectural structure and publication, each of which has indicators of participation and democracy, support for groups Vulnerability, justice, effectiveness, accountability, preventing the exclusion of poor people, social support, living with dignity, pluralism, efficient transportation, access to public services, permeability, compact urban form, security, vitality, diversity, surprise, scale Human, were presented. Its realization depends on the creation of a mutual learning structure in the process of interactions between public and private institutions and people and the mutual understanding of the actors regarding the limits of each other's expectations and preferences.
Conclusion
The most important opportunity for the cities to redefine the concept of citizen and transition from a citizen of the country to a citizen living in the city and to reflect the full right to the city in the urban and citizenship laws of Iran is the approval of the comprehensive urban management law, the realization of which depends on the will of the aforementioned institutions and demands. It will be people. Therefore, mere technical decisions or planning and planning cannot be considered as legislation in urban planning and architecture. Therefore, until the legal system and the urban planning system do not specify their task with the issue and issues of urban planning, the developed policies cannot solve the problems of urban planning and architecture.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Pathology, Substantive, Procedural, Policymaking, Right to the city
مراجع

Alipour Kohi, P., Alikaei, S. and Maddahzad, S., 2023. Formulating the Conceptual Framework of the "Right to the City" Theory by Exploring Lefebvre's Thoughts, Intercultural Studies Quarterly: 17(53), 9-30 (In Persian).

Afshari, M. and Pourmahabadian, E., 2020. Legal analysis of urban laws with emphasis on the concept of the right to the city and its relation to citizenship rights. Specialized Quarterly of Judicial Law: 6(26), 29-48 (In Persian).
Althorpe, C. and Horak, M., 2023. The End of the Right to the City: A Radical-Cooperative View. Urban Affairs Review: 59(1), 14-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815.
Beccarello, M. and Di Foggia, G., 2023. A Circularity Mapping Framework for Urban Policymaking. Journal of Politics and Law, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n1p11. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4317980.
Biglieri, S., 2020. The Right to (Re)Shape the City, Journal of the American Planning Association: 78(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1852100.
Bose, D., 2020. Where is the city in “The Right to the City”? The colliding politics of place‐making in a resettlement colony in Delhi’s periphery. Area. doi:10.1111/area.12665.
Bueno de Mesquita, E. and Landa, D., 2015. Political accountability and sequential policymaking. Journal of Public Economics, 132, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.012.
De Frants, M., 2022. The Politics of the EU Urban Agenda: Mobilising the ‘Right to the City’ for European Governance? Urban Research & Practice: 15(5), 655-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1896029.
Domaradzka, A., 2018. Urban Social Movements and the Right to the City: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Urban Mobilization: 29(4), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0030-y.
Eshtiaghi, M., Sharepor, M. and Fazeli, M., 2021. Examining the Requirements of the Right to the City in the Policy-Making Process and Development Planning of the Cities: A Case Study of Tehran Transportation Development, Socio-Cultural Strategy: 10(2), 223-257.
Espey, J., Parnell, S. and Revi, A., 2023. The transformative potential of a Global Urban Agenda and its lessons in a time of crisis. npj Urban Sustain: 3(15), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00087-z
Faghih Larijani, F., 2022. The Dichotomy between Municipality and City Council’s Legal Entity: The Structural Pathology of Local Government in Iran. Public Law Studies Quarterly: 52(4), 2095-2109. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2021.302337.2425.
Gairney, P., 2021. The politics of policy design, EURO Journal on Decision Processes: 9, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2021.100002.
Khanmohammadi, M., Navabakhsh, F., Seyedi, F., Mashhadi, J. and Tooski, M., 2023. Pathology of Arak urban development from the perspective of structural, contextual and behavioral injuries, Hoviatshahr: 16(2), 27-34 (In Persian).
Kulabadi, F. and Afsharnia, A., 2016. .Assessment of Invalidated Ratifications of Urban Development and Architecture Higher Council of Iran By Administrative Justice Court "from the Beginning so far"
.Hoviatshahr: 10(35), 91-100 (In Persian).
Kolivand, H., Talachian, M. and Majedi, H., 2023. Meta-study of pathology articles on urban development plans in Iran. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU): 14(1), 327-340. doi: 10.30475/isau.2023.292516.1729 (In Persian).
Lefebvre H. 1996. Writings on cities. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://chisineu.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/lefebvre-henri-writings-on .
cities.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjpoKiQ48mHAxVA_QIHHblmGQEQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0AzCUn50j301oGS0C_hpHg
Miura, R., 2021. Rethinking Gentrification and the Right to the City: The Process and Effect of the Urban Social Movement against Redevelopment in Tokyo, International Journal of Japanese Sociology: 30(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijjs.12123.
Moslemi Mehni, Y., Ilkhani Pournadri, A., Afsharmanesh, H. and sedeghi, N., 2022. An Analytical Introduction to Problematic Issues in Urban Policy Making. Geography (Regional Planning): 12(48), 1324-1347. doi: 10.22034/jgeoq.2022.266195.2888 (In Persian).
Pourahmad, A., Hataminejad, H. and Hosseini, S., 2006. Pathology of urban development plans in the country. Geographical Research, 38(58), 167-180. https://sid.ir/paper/435429/fa. (In Persian).
Rahimi, H., 2021. Lefebvre or Derrida: Deconstructive Questioning the Concept of the Right to the City. Wisdom and Philosophy: 17(68), 63-99. doi: 10.22054/wph.2021.49681.1808 (In Persian).
Rafieian, M. and Alvandipour, N., 2016. Iranian Journal of Sociology: 16(2), 25-47 (In Persian).
Roosta, M. and Ghasempour, M., 2018. A Study on the Status of ‘Urban Design’ In Iran’s Urban Rules (A Content Analysis of the Decisions of Iran’ Supreme Council for Urbanism and Architecture from 1964 to 2016). Urban Planning Knowledge: 2(2), 19-32. doi: 10.22124/upk.2018.10220.1074.

Samal, M., 2022. Implementing the Right to the City: A Legal Tool for Improving the Rights of Refugees in Indian Cities. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 22(1), 69-79. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4047424.
Sanaei, M., Vafadar Sooraki, R. and Aatefi, K., 2022. Assessment of Spatial Differences (Discrepancies) of Realization of Right to Participation and Assigning the City to Self in Light of the Notion of Right to City in Hachirood- Chalous Township .Urban Environmental Planning and Development: 2(5), 45-60 (In Persian).
Samadi, A., Ahmadian, R. and Bandarabad, A., 2024. Evaluation of the Realization Level of Spatial Justice in Urmia City with Emphasis on the Approach of the Right to the Health of the City. Journal of Space and Place Studies: 2(4), 65-80.
Talebi, M.A., Rahnemaei, M.T. and Ghorbaninezhad, R., 2021. Pathology of Barriers to Good Urban Governance in Middle Cities Case Study: Neyshabur City. Sustainable city: 3(4), 43-57. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2021.251270.1326 (In Persian).
Topp, L., Mair, D., Smillie, L. et al, 2018. Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Palgrave Commun: 4(87). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0143-3.
Valencia, V.P., Montúfar, M.C. and Sancho, D.B., 2023. The right to the city and contemporary housing policy in Ecuador, Housing Studies: 135, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2180491.
Vargas-Hernández, J.G., 2020. Urban planning, policymaking and scenarios of land uses’ design, Labor E Engenho: 14, e020002. https://doi.org/10.20396/labore.v14i0.8659271

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 680
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 355