Assessment of the visual aesthetic quality of the urban landscape in the Tabriz metropolis | ||
| Sustainable Earth Trends | ||
| دوره 2، شماره 4، 2022، صفحه 55-67 اصل مقاله (944.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/ser.2023.231579.1013 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sonia Sarafraz Asbagh1؛ Hassan Mahmoudzadeh* 1؛ Asa Ode Sang2 | ||
| 1Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp , Sweden | ||
| چکیده | ||
| To improve human well-being, there is a growing awareness of enhancing aesthetic benefits through landscape design, planning and management. Monitoring long-term changes can play a significant role in the direction of urban management. This study aims to visually evaluate the aesthetic quality of the Tabriz metropolis landscape and monitor changes in Landscape Aesthetic Quality (LAQ). LAQ is as-sessed based on visual scale, naturalness, stewardship, historicity, complexity, disturbance, ephemera, and imageability. Using multiple temporal satellite images and landscape metrics, we analyze land use changes between 1984 and 2020. The results reveal that urbanization has led to landscape fragmentation and loss of coherence over the past three decades. Additionally, we calculate the weights of the criteria using the CRITIC method, highlighting the changing importance of different factors. The results are historicity with a coefficient of 0.22, naturalness 0.15, Disturbance 0.14, and coherence. 0.14, ephemera 0.13, complexity 0.11, and visual scale 0.11 in 1984. For the year 2020, the coefficient for historicity is 0.13, naturalness is 0.18, disturbance is 0.11, coherence is 0.10, ephemera is 0.10, complexity is 0.12, and visual scale is 0.26 Historicity and naturalness hold the greatest weights in 1984, while visual scale and naturalness receive the highest weights in 2020. Significant changes are observed in districts 9 and 1, while districts 7 and 6 show minor adjustments. The findings provide valuable insights for improving ecological networks in future urban planning in Tabriz. Urban management should consider these calculations to enhance the LAQ index. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| landscape aesthetics quality (LAQ)؛ land use change detection؛ CRITIC method؛ Tabriz metropolitan area | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anderson, J.R., 1991. The adaptive nature of human categorization, Psychological Review, 98(3), 409. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409.
Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J.F., Cañas-Madueño, J.A. & Ruiz-Aviles, P., 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029.
Asbagh, N.B., 2019. A short glimpse to the urban development of Tabriz during the history, Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 3(2), 73-83. doi: 10.25034/ijcua.2018.4703.
Bell, J., 1999. Redefining national identity in Uzbekistan: Symbolic tensions in Tashkent’s official public landscape, Ecumene, 6(2), 183-213. doi: 10.1177/096746089900600204.
Cabrini, S.M., Cristeche, E.R., Pace Guerrero, I.R. & Bitar, M.V., 2023. Rural landscape simplification and provision of cultural ecosystem services. A case study in the Argentine Pampas, Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales-Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23(1), 7-34. doi: 10.7201/earn.2023.01.01.
Carlson, R.E., 1977. A trophic state index for lakes 1. Limnology and oceanography, 22(2), 361-369, doi: 10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361. Carrizo Moreira, A., Rêga Pereira, C., Fernandes Lopes, M. et al., 2023. Sustainable and green city brand, An exploratory review, Cuadernos de Gestión, 23(1), 23- 35. doi: 10.5295/cdg.221715ac.
Caspersen, O.H. & Olafsson, A.S., 2010. Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.007.
Chan, C.S. & Marafa, L.M., 2014. Rebranding Hong Kong “Green”: The potential for connecting city branding with green resources, World Leisure Journal, 56(1), 62-80. doi: 10.1080/04419057.2013.876587.
Chen, B., Adimo, O.A. & Bao, Z., 2009. Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: The case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(1), 76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.001.
Clay, G.R. & Smidt, R.K., 2004. Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66(4), 239-255. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00114- 2.
Dampage, U., Bandaranayake, L., Wanasinghe, R. et al., 2022. Forest fire detection system using wireless sensor networks and machine learning, Scientific Reports, 12(1), 46. doi: s41598-021-03882-9.
Daniel, T.C., 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267-281. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
De Groot, W.T. & van den Born, R.J., 2003. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), 127-138.
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. & Papayannakis, L., 1995. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
Dramstad, W.E., Fry, G., Fjellstad, W., et al., 2001. Integrating landscape-based values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3-4), 257-268. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0.
Ellis, C.D., Lee, S.W. & Kweon, B.S., 2006. Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction and the urban forest: an investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(1), 70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.004.
Eroglu, E., Muderrisoglu, H. & Kesim, G.A., 2012. The effect of seasonal change of plants compositions on visual perception, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(3), 196- 205.
Feizizadeh, B., Omarzadeh, D., Ronagh, Z., et al., 2021. A scenario-based approach for urban water management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a case study for the Tabriz metropolitan area, Iran, Science of The Total Environment, 790. 148272. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148272.
Fumagalli, N., Maccarini, M., Rovelli, R. et al., 2020. An exploratory study of users’ preference for different planting combinations along rural greenways, Sustainability, 12(5), 2120. doi: 10.3390/su12052120.
Girma, Y., Terefe, H., Pauleit, S., 2019. Urban green spaces use and management in rapidly urbanizing countries: The case of emerging towns of Oromia special zone surrounding Finfinne, Ethiopia, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43, 126357. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.019.
Gulsrud, N.M., Gooding, S. & Van Den Bosch, C.C.K., 2013. Green space branding in Denmark in an era of neoliberal governance, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(3), 330-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.03.001.
Häfner, K., Zasada, I., Van Zanten, B.T. et al., 2018. Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Markische Schweiz, Germany, Landscape Research, 43(6), 846- 861, doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289.
Havinga, I., Marcos, D., Bogaart, P.W. et al., 2021. Social media and deep learning capture the aesthetic quality of the landscape, Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20000. doi: s41598-021-99282-0.
Hermes, J., Albert, C. & Von Haaren, C., 2018. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany, Ecosystem Services, 31, 296-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.
Hermes, J., Van Berkel, D., Burkhard, B. et al., 2018. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 31, 289- 295. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011.
Hernandez, F., Madrid, J., Garcia, V. et al., 2004. Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance, digestibility and digestive organ size, Poultry Science, 83(2), 169-174. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.2.169.
Heyman, E., 2012. Analysing recreational values and management effects in an urban forest with the visitor- employed photography method, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.003.
Howley, P., 2011. Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes, Ecological Economics, 72, 161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026.
James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M.D. et al., 2009. Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001.
Jorgenson, A.K. & Burns, T.J., 2007. The political- economic causes of change in the ecological footprints of nations, 1991–2001: a quantitative investigation. Social Science Research, 36(2), 834-853. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.003.
Junge, X., Schupbach, B., Walter, T. et al., 2015. Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland, Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010.
Kalinauskas, M., Miksa, K., Inacio, M. et al., 2021. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania, Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112239, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239.
Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skrivanova, Z. & Zahradnik, D., 2014. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics, Journal of EnvironMental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009.
Kaltenborn, B.P. & Bjerke, T., 2002. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences, Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0169- 2046(01)00243-2.
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge university press. Kerebel, A., Gelinas, N., Dery, S. et al., 2019. Landscape aesthetic modelling using Bayesian networks: Conceptual framework and participatory indicator weighting, Landscape and Urban Planning, 185, 258- 271. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001.
Kim, J. & Kaplan, R., 2004. Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village, Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313-340. doi: 10.1177/0013916503260236.
Langemeyer, J., Camps-Calvet, M., Calvet-Mir, L. et al., 2018. Stewardship of urban ecosystem services: Understanding the value (s) of urban gardens in Barcelona, Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 79- 89. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013.
Laurance, W.F., 2007. Forest destruction in tropical Asia, Current Science, 93(11), 1544-1550.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X. & Matthies, D., 2010. The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation, Biological Conservation, 143(1), 195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003.
Litton, R.B., 1974. Visual vulnerability of forest landscapes, Journal of Forestry, 72(7), 392-397. doi: 10.1093/jof/72.7.392.
Lothian, A., 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 177-198. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5.
Lovell, S.T. & Taylor, J.R., 2013. Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States, Landscape Ecology, 28, 1447-1463. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013- 9912-y.
Mahmoudzadeh, H., 2007. Digital change detection using remotely sensed data for monitoring green space destruction in Tabriz, International Journal of Environmental Research.
Mundher, R., Abu Bakar, S., Maulan, S. et al., 2022. Aesthetic quality assessment of landscapes as a model for urban forest areas: A systematic literature review, Forests, 13(7), 991. doi: 10.3390/f13070991.
Naghsh Moheet engineering consultant co. 2014. Naghsh Moheet engineering consultant co. Tabriz, Iran: comprehensive plan of Tabriz city, Available online: xxxxx (accexxed on Day/month/year).
Ode, A., Hagerhall, C.M. & Sang, N., 2010. Analysing visual landscape complexity: Theory and application, Landscape Research, 35(1), 111-131. doi: 10.1080/01426390903414935.
Ode, A. & Miller, D., 2011. Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1), 24-40. doi: 10.1068/b35084.
Ode, A., Tveit, M.S. & Fry, G., 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory, Landscape Research, 33(1), 89-117. doi: 10.1080/01426390701773854.
Ode, A.K. & Fry, G.L., 2002. Visual aspects in urban woodland management, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1(1), 15-24. doi: 10.1078/1618-8667- 00003.
Ozguner, H. & Kendle, A.D., 2006. Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK), Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(2), 13-157. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.003.
Pachaki, C., 2003. Agricultural Landscape Indicators, A suggested approach for the scenic value, In: Agricultural Impacts on Landscapes: Developing Indicators for Policy Analysis, Proceeding of the NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape Indicators; Oslo, Norway; 247.
Palang, H., Alumae, H. & Mander, U., 2000. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(1-3), 85-94. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-5.
Palmer, J.F., 1997. Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(1-2), 109-113. doi: 10.1016/S0169- 2046(96)00375-1.
Peckham, S.D., Hutton, E.W. & Norris, B., 2013. A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: The design of CSDMS, Computers & Geosciences, 53, 3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.002.
Qureshi, S., Breuste, J.H. & Lindley, S.J., 2010. Green space functionality along an urban gradient in Karachi, Pakistan: a socio-ecological study, Human Ecology, 38(2), 283-294. doi: 10.1007/s10745-010-9303-9.
Rahimi, A., 2016. A methodological approach to urban land-use change modeling using infill development pattern—a case study in Tabriz, Iran, Ecological Processes, 5, 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s13717-016-0044-6.
Ribe, R.G., 2006. Perceptions of forestry alternatives in the US Pacific Northwest: Information effects and acceptability distribution analysis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(2), 100-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.004.
Sahraoui, Y., Clauzel, C. & Foltête, J.C., 2016. Spatial modelling of landscape aesthetic potential in urban-rural fringes, Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 623-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.031.
Schirpke, U., Tasser, E. & Tappeiner, U., 2013. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 111, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.010.
Statistical Center. 2020. Statistical Center of Iran Results of the general population and housing census of 2020, Available online: https://www.amar.org.ir/english (accessed on 10/03/2020).
Suciptoroso, A., 2022. Reconstruction of Corporate Criminal Sanction in the Crime of Forest Destruction, In: Proceeding of the Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Law and Social Justice.
Sullivan III, W.C., 1994. Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings, Landscape and Urban Planning, 29(2-3), 85- 101. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)90020-5.
Sullivan, W.C. & Lovell, S.T., 2006. Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural–urban fringe, Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(1-2), 152- 166. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.008.
Swanwick, K., 2002. Musical Knowledge: Intuition, Analysis and Music Education, Psychology Press.
Swetnam, R., Harrison-Curran, S. & Smith, G., 2017. Quantifying visual landscape quality in rural Wales: A GIS-enabled method for extensive monitoring of a valued cultural ecosystem service. Ecosystem Services, 26, 451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.004.
Taheri, M., Gholamalifard, M., Ghazizade, M.J. & Rahimoghli, S., 2014. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste disposal site in Tabriz, Iran using rapid impact assessment matrix, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(2), 162- 169, doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.896082.
Taylor, A.M., Gartner, B.L. & Morrell, J.J., 2002. Heartwood formation and natural durability-a review, Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236633002.pdf (accessed on 1/8/2002).
Tian, Y., Jim, C.Y. & Wang, H., 2014. Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city, Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.001.
Todorova, A., Asakawa, S. & Aikoh, T., 2004. Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 403-416, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.11.001.
Tveit, M., Ode, A. & Fry, G., 2006. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character, Landscape Research, 31(3), 229-255. doi: 10.1080/01426390600783269.
Tveit, M.S., Ode Sang, A. & Hagerhall, C.M., 2018. Scenic beauty: Visual landscape assessment and human landscape perception, In: Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Wiley; 45-54.
Tveit, M.S. & Sang, A.O., 2014. Landscape assessment in metropolitan areas–developing a visual indicator- based approach, Spool, 1(1), 301-316.
Van Berkel, D.B. & Verburg, P.H., 2014. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape, Ecological indicators, 37, 163-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
Van Herzele, A. & Wiedemann, T., 2003. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2), 109-126.
Van Zanten, B.T., Verburg, P.H., Espinosa, M. et al., 2014. European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services, a review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 309-325. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4.
Voelker, S. & Kistemann, T., 2013. Reprint of: I'm always entirely happy when I'm here! Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany, Social Science & Medicine, 91, 141-152. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.016.
Vogt, C.A. & Marans, R.W., 2004. Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: a study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3), 255-269. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.006.
Wang, K., Zhang, C., Chen, H. et al., 2019. Karst landscapes of China: Patterns, ecosystem processes and services, Landscape Ecology, 34, 2743-2763. doi: 10.1007/s10980-019-00912-w.
Wang, R., Jiang, W. & Lu, T., 2021. Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127389. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389.
Wang, R., Zhao, J. & Liu, Z., 2016. Consensus in visual preferences: The effects of aesthetic quality and landscape types, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005.
Wanghe, K., Guo, X., Wang, M. et al., 2020. Gravity model toolbox: An automated and open-source ArcGIS tool to build and prioritize ecological corridors in urban landscapes, Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e01012. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01012.
Wu, W.B., Ma, J., Meadows, M.E. et al., 2021. Spatio- temporal changes in urban green space in 107 Chinese cities (1990–2019): The role of economic drivers and policy, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 103, 102525. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102525.
Zafar, S., Alamgir, Z. & Rehman, M., 2021. An effective blockchain evaluation system based on entropy- CRITIC weight method and MCDM techniques. Peer- to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(5), 3110- 3123.
Zhang, H., Chen, B., Sun, Z. & Bao, Z., 2013. Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.001.
Zhang, H. & Lin, SH., 2011. Affective appraisal of residents and visual elements in the neighborhood: A case study in an established suburban community. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 11-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 38,523 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 383 |
||