سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

حسامی, شاهرخ, زینالی عظیم, علی. (1404). ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی به‌مکان در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهر مهاباد. , 7(12), 78-93. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2024.233648.1162
شاهرخ حسامی; علی زینالی عظیم. "ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی به‌مکان در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهر مهاباد". , 7, 12, 1404, 78-93. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2024.233648.1162
حسامی, شاهرخ, زینالی عظیم, علی. (1404). 'ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی به‌مکان در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهر مهاباد', , 7(12), pp. 78-93. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2024.233648.1162
حسامی, شاهرخ, زینالی عظیم, علی. ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی به‌مکان در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهر مهاباد. , 1404; 7(12): 78-93. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2024.233648.1162

ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی به‌مکان در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهر مهاباد

توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی
مقاله 6، دوره 7، شماره 12، فروردین 1404، صفحه 78-93    اصل مقاله (1.21 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/sdge.2024.233648.1162
نویسندگان
شاهرخ حسامی1؛ علی زینالی عظیم* 2
1گروه معماری، واحد اهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهر، ایران
2گروه طراحی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پیشینه و هدف: مطالعات متعددی دلبستگی به‌مکان را به‌عنوان عاملی مؤثر بر تجربه زیسته و کیفیت زندگی در محیط‌های شهری بررسی کرده‌اند. این مطالعات بیشتر بر شناسایی مؤلفه‌های دلبستگی (مانند هویت، وابستگی و تعهد مکانی) و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (نظیر تعاملات اجتماعی و ویژگی‌های محیطی) تمرکز داشته‌اند. با این حال، اغلب این پژوهش‌ها به‌صورت نظری یا در مقیاس‌های کلی انجام شده‌اند و بررسی‌های تجربی که به‌صورت مشخص رابطه دلبستگی مکانی با کیفیت زندگی را در بافت‌های شهری خاص تحلیل کرده باشند، محدودند. به‌ویژه در شهرهای کوچک و متوسط با زمینه‌های فرهنگی خاص مانند مهاباد، این ارتباط کمتر به‌صورت داده‌محور مطالعه شده است. از این‌رو، خلأ پژوهشی مشخصی در تحلیل تأثیر دلبستگی به‌مکان بر کیفیت زندگی در چنین بافت‌هایی وجود دارد. مسئله اصلی پژوهش حاضر، تبیین نحوه اثرگذاری دلبستگی مکانی بر ابعاد مختلف کیفیت زندگی در شهر مهاباد است. هدف این تحقیق، ارزیابی تجربی این رابطه و شناسایی مؤلفه‌هایی از دلبستگی است که بیشترین نقش را در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی ساکنان ایفا می‌کنند.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی و مبتنی بر پیمایش است و هدف آن کاربردی است؛ زیرا یافته‌های آن می‌تواند برای حل مسائل واقعی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. جامعه آماری شامل ساکنان شهر مهاباد با جمعیتی بالغ بر 393/168 نفر است. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران، 383 نفر تعیین شد. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های عمیق و پرسش‌نامه گردآوری شدند. پرسش‌نامه بر اساس طیف لیکرت 5 درجه‌ای طراحی شده و روایی آن از طریق نظرات خبرگان تأیید شده است. پایایی پرسش‌نامه نیز با استفاده از ضریب پایایی ترکیبی سنجیده شد که مقدار آن بالاتر از 0.7 بوده و نشان‌دهنده پایایی بالا است. برای تحلیل داده‌ها، ابتدا نرمال بودن داده‌ها با آزمون کولموگروف-اسمیرنوف بررسی شد و پس از تأیید نرمال بودن، از همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبه دوم استفاده شد. تمامی تحلیل‌ها با نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Amos انجام گرفت.
یافته‌ها و بحث: تحلیل عاملی مرتبه دوم نشان داد که تمامی عوامل مرتبط با دلبستگی به مکان دارای بار عاملی بالاتر از 4/0 هستند و در سطح اطمینان 95 درصد معنادارند. در میان ابعاد مختلف، بعد اجتماعی-فرهنگی بیشترین تأثیر را بر دلبستگی به مکان در ارتباط با کیفیت زندگی شهری در مهاباد دارد. پس از آن، بعد محیطی-فضایی و سپس بعد ادراکی-شناختی در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار دارند. در میان زیرشاخص‌های عوامل اجتماعی-فرهنگی، تعاملات اجتماعی بیشترین تأثیر را داشته و مشارکت کمترین تأثیر را نشان داده است؛ بنابراین لازم است برای بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهری توجه بیشتری به شاخص مشارکت شود. در بُعد محیطی-فضایی، دسترسی‌پذیری بیشترین و فرم کالبدی کمترین تأثیر را داشته است. در بُعد ادراکی-شناختی نیز، هویت بیشترین و خوانایی کمترین تأثیر را داشته‌اند. بنابراین، شاخص‌های خوانایی و مشارکت نیازمند توجه بیشتر برای ارتقای کیفیت زندگی شهری هستند. مدل ساختاری نهایی نشان داد که بعد اجتماعی-فرهنگی بیشترین نقش را در دلبستگی به مکان و کیفیت زندگی شهری در مهاباد ایفا می‌کند.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که ابعاد اجتماعی-فرهنگی بیشترین تأثیر را در ایجاد دلبستگی به مکان در ارتباط با بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهری در شهر مهاباد دارند. کمترین تأثیر مربوط به بعد ادراکی-شناختی است. در مجموع، همه ابعاد بررسی‌شده بر شکل‌گیری دلبستگی به مکان در راستای بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهری ساکنان مهاباد تأثیرگذارند. بنابراین، ایجاد دلبستگی به مکان در این شهر با چالش‌هایی در حوزه‌های اجتماعی-فرهنگی، امنیتی، معنایی، زیبایی‌شناسی بصری، هویت، فضایی، محیطی و عملکردی مواجه است. توجه ویژه به تعامل انسان با محیط و اولویت‌بندی تمامی مؤلفه‌ها می‌تواند زمینه‌ساز تقویت دلبستگی به مکان و در نتیجه ارتقای کیفیت زندگی فردی و شهری باشد.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
محیط؛ ادراک؛ دلبستگی به مکان؛ کیفیت زندگی؛ مهاباد
عنوان مقاله [English]
Evaluation Effects of Attachment to Place in Improving Quality of Life in Mahabad City
نویسندگان [English]
Shahrokh Hesami1؛ Ali Zeynali Azim2
1Department of Architecture, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
2Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Purpose: Many studies have explored place attachment as a key factor affecting quality of life in urban environments. These works mainly focus on their core components—place identity, dependence, and commitment—and influencing factors such as social ties and environmental qualities. However, most of this research is theoretical or conducted at broad scales, lacking detailed, empirical analysis in specific local contexts. Particularly, the relationship between place attachment and quality of life has rarely been investigated in small to medium-sized cities with distinct cultural identities, such as Mahabad. This indicates a research gap in understanding how place attachment functions in urban settings. The present study addresses this gap by examining how different dimensions of place attachment impact residents’ perceived quality of life in Mahabad. The aim is to identify which aspects of attachment most strongly contribute to improving life quality, offering insights that can support culturally responsive urban planning and policy-making.
Methodology: This study is descriptive and survey-based, and its objective is practical, as the findings can be used to solve real-world issues. The statistical population includes the residents of Mahabad city, with a total of 168,393 individuals, and the sample size was determined to be 383 through Cochran's formula. Data collection was done using in-depth interviews and questionnaires. The questionnaire, based on a 5-point Likert scale, was validated with expert opinions. Reliability was assessed using composite reliability, with the reliability coefficient exceeding 0.7, indicating high reliability. To analyze the data, the normality of the data was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and after confirming the normality, Pearson correlation and second-order confirmatory factor analysis were employed. All calculations were performed using SPSS and Amos software.
Findings and Discussion: Second-order factor analysis reveals that all factors of place attachment have factor loadings greater than 0.4 and are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. The social dimension has the highest influence on place attachment in terms of urban quality of life in Mahabad, with a factor loading of 0.89. This is followed by the environmental-spatial dimension with a factor loading of 0.81 and the cognitive-perceptual dimension with a factor loading of 0.75. Among the sub-indices of social-cultural factors, social interaction has the highest influence with a factor loading of 0.95, while participation has the lowest with a factor loading of 0.79. Therefore, greater attention should be paid to the participation sub-index to improve urban quality of life. In the environmental-spatial dimension, accessibility has the highest influence with a factor loading of 0.88, while shape has the lowest with a factor loading of 0.68. In the cognitive-perceptual dimension, identity has the highest influence with a factor loading of 0.89, and readability has the lowest with a factor loading of 0.63. Therefore, more attention should be given to readability and participation sub-indices to improve urban quality of life. The final structural model shows that the social-cultural dimension has the greatest influence on place attachment and urban quality of life in Mahabad.
Conclusion: The findings of the research showed that the socio-cultural dimensions have the greatest impact on creating place attachment in relation to improving the quality of urban life in Mahabad city. The least influence was observed in the cognitive-perceptual dimension. Therefore, all the dimensions examined have an impact on the formation of place attachment in relation to improving the urban quality of life for the residents of Mahabad city. Consequently, creating place attachment in Mahabad for achieving a better quality of life faces socio-cultural, security, semantic, visual aesthetics, identity, spatial, environmental, and functional challenges. Special attention must be given to the interaction between humans and their environment, and all components should be prioritized to foster and strengthen place attachment, which in turn leads to the enhancement of life quality and urban quality of life.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Environment, Perception, Place attachment, Quality of Living, Mahabad
مراجع

Ahmadi, S. Y., Ghalehnoee M, and Zamani B. 2021. Explanation of the Physical Factors Influencing the Formation of Place Attachment Among Newcomers: A Case Study of Elective Urban Spaces of Isfahan. mmi; 11 (27): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/%E2%80%8E10.52547/mmi.79.13990723. (In Persian).

Alexander C. D and Joshua H, 2021, The Power of Place in Place Attachment, Geographical Review, 112(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1884983.

Amini, S, Ahmad zadeh, H, Houshyar, H. and Valizadeh, R. 2021. Identifying the Future Components of Urban Livability with a Future Studies Approach Case Study: Mahabad city. Sustainable city, 4(3), 99-113. https://www.doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2021.263604.1383. (In Persian).

Baghbe, K., Porjafar, M. R., and Ranjbar, E. 2014. Analysis and evaluation of sitting activities in urban spaces: A case study of the Teatr-e-Shahr Square in Tehran. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 7(13), 113-131. https://www.doi.org/10.30480/aup.2014.96. (In Persian).

Barati, N. and Soleimannejad, M. A. 2011. Perception of Stimuli in Controlled Environment and Gender Impact on It Case Study: Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism Students at the International University of Imam Khomaini, Qazvin, Iran. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 8(17), 19-30. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_110.html. (In Persian)

Behroozi, M, Majedi, H. and Saeedeh Zarabadi, Z. S. 2022. Identifying the factors affecting the promotion of a sense of attachment to the place with emphasis on design-led planning approach. Geography (Regional Planning), 12(48), 108-124 https://www.doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2022.339181.3670. (In Persian).

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., and Orús, C. 2016. City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. Cities, 50, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016.

Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., and Grover, H. 2008. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and behavior, 40(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298800.

Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., and Brown, G. 2003. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(3), 259-271.

Bynum B; Marianna S; Emily Pauline Y; Manuel Alector R; Kayode D. A; Kyle Maurice W; Benjamin Prangle M; 2021. Measuring place attachment with the Abbreviated Place Attachment Scale (APAS). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101577. 

Chappell, E. N., Parkins, J. R., and Sherren, K. 2020. Climax thinking, place attachment, and utilitarian landscapes: implications for wind energy development. Landscape Urban Planning. 199, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/jlandurbplan.2020.103802.

Collins-Kreiner, N, 2020. Hiking, Sense of Place, and Place Attachment in the Age of Globalization and Digitization: The Israeli Case. Sustainability, 12(11), 4548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114548.  

De Dominicis, S., Fornara, F., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Twigger-Ross, C., and Bonaiuto, M. 2015. We Are at Risk, and So What? Place Attachment, Environmental Risk Perceptions and Preventive Coping Behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010.

Di Masso, A., Dixon, J., and Hernandez, B. 2017. Place Attachment, Sense of Belonging and the Micro-Politics of Place Satisfaction. In Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research, eds G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, and O. Navarro (Berlin: Springer), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7.

Di Masso, A., Williams, D. R., Raymond, C. M., Buchecker, M., Degenhardt, B., and Devine-Wright, P., 2019. Between fixities and flows: Navigating place attachments in an increasingly mobile world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.006.

Friesinger, J.G., Haugland, S.H. and Vederhus, JK. 2022, The significance of the social and material environment to place attachment and quality of life: findings from a large population-based health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes, (135), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02045-2.

Hall, E. (2008). The hidden dimension (M. Tabeeyan, Trans.). University of Tehran. (Original work published 1966). (In Persian).

Hanks, L., Zhang, L., and Line, N. 2020. Perceived Similarity in Third Places: Understanding the effect of Place Attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102455.

Hesami S, Sedaghati A, Babazadeh Oskouei S, Shafizadeh A. 2022, Analysis of human interaction with the environment in terms of the effects of perception and behavior on the Place attachment (case study of Mehr Mokrian Housing Complex in Mahabad). Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories; 3 (1) :39-57: http://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-61902-fa.html. (In Persian)

Hosany, S., Prayag, G., Van Der Veen, R., Huang, S. (Sam), and Deesilatham, S. (2016). Mediating Effects of Place Attachment and Satisfaction on the Relationship between Tourists’ Emotions and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 56(8), 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516678088.

Ibrahim, M. M and Sadek A, S, 2022, Place Attachment as an Outcome of Placemaking and the Urban Quality of Life, University Engineering Journal, MSA, 1(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/MSAENG.2022.222358.

Ji, X, Niu, Y, Acheampong, A, 2023, A Study on the Causes and Effects of Place Attachment -Based on the Perspective of Person, E3S Web of Conferences 409, 06011 (2023) ICMSEM 2023, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340906011.

Johnstone, M. L. 2012. The Services Cape: The Social Dimensions of Place. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(11-12), 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.694370.

Kalali, P, 2015. Meaningful perception of place: The most effective dimensions and factors. Urban Design International, 20(3), 222–240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.10. 

Karami, I., Basiri, M. and Zeynali Azim, A. 2021. Analysis of place attachment and related variables in third urban locations (Case study: Elgoli Park of Tabriz). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(3), 735-759. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.318070.1450. (In Persian).

Khakzand, M., Mohammadi, M., Jam, F., and Aghabzorgei, K. 2014. Identifying effective factors in the design of urban façades with an emphasis on aesthetic and environmental dimensions: A case study of Vali-e-Asr Street (Aj) in Qeshm city. Urban Studies Quarterly, 3(10), 15-26. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_8763.html. (In Persian).

Khandan, P. and Rezaei, H. 2021. Investigate and Analyze the Adaptation of Physical Factors with Perceptual-Cognitive Dimensions of the Sense of Place in Public Spaces from Socio-Cultural Perspective; Case Study: Public Spaces in Kermanshah City. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, 13(33), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.167623.1789. (In Persian)

Koohsari, J, Yasunaga, A, Oka, K, Nakaya, T, and Nagai, Y. 2023, Place attachment and walking behavior: mediation by perceived neighborhood walkability, Landscape and Urban Planning 235:104767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104767.  

Lang, J. 2002. Creation of architectural theory (A. Ainyfar, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

Line, N. D., and Hanks, L. 2019c. Boredom-induced switching behavior in the restaurant industry: the mediating role of attachment. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 43(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348018762579.

Line, N. D., Hanks, L., and Kim, W. G. 2018a. An Expanded Services Cape Framework as the Driver of Place Attachment and Word of Mouth. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 42(3), 476–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1096348015597035.

Lynch, K. (2008). The city design and the appearance of the city. In M. Mazini (Trans.), Essays on city and urban planning (pp. xx-xx). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

Magdi Mohammed, I, and Sadek, S. A, 2023, Place Attachment as an Outcome of Placemaking and the Urban Quality of Life, MSA engineering Journal, 1(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/MSAENG.2022.222358.  

Mesch, G. S., and Manor, O. 1998. Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and behavior, 30(4), 504-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000405.

Mojtabavi, S. M, Motalebi, G. and Ghoddusifar, S. H. 2022. The Effect of the Components of Sensory Richness on Creating a Sense of Place Attachment (A Comparative Study between Traditional Bazaars and Modern Shopping Malls). MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape, 14(61), 60-75. https://www.doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2022.317860.2167. (In Persian).

Motalebi, GH, Khajuei, A, and Fanaei Sheykholeslami, F, 2023, Investigating the effective factors on place attachment in residential environments: Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the 600-unit residential complex, Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage., 8(3): 373-390, https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2023.03.06. 

Mousazadeh, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Azadi, H.; Almani, F.A.; Mosazadeh, H.; Zhu, K.; and Dávid, L.D. 2023, Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary. Sustainability, 15, 6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608

Naghizadeh, M. (2007). Perception of beauty and city identity (in the light of Islamic principles) in Isfahan. Isfahan Cultural and Recreational Organization. (In Persian).

Nejad Ebrahimi A, and Sheikhol Hokamaei M.2021, The effect of hierarchy sequence in creating a sense of places Tabriz mosques. JRIA; 9 (4) :59-75 http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1347-fa.html, (In Persian).

Pourjafar, M. R., Izadi, M. S., and Khabiri, S. 2016. Place attachment: Conceptualization, principles, and criteria. Hoviatshahr, 9(24), 43-54. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17359562.1394.9.24.5.9 (In Persian).

Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., and Kaminoff, R. 1983. Place-identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8.

Rapoport, A. 1990. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Rapoport, A. 2005. The meaning of the built environment (F. Habib, Trans). Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning Company.

Ratcliffe, E., and Korpela, K. M. 2016. Memory and Place Attachment as Predictors of Imagined Restorative Perceptions of Favourite Places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.005.

Relph, E. 1976, Place and Place lessness? Pion: London, UK.

Rezaei, H, keramati, G, Dehbashi sharif, M. and Nasir Salami, M. 2018. A Schematic Explanatory Pattern for the Psychological Process of Achieving Environmental Meaning and Actualizing Sense of Place Focusing on the Intervening Role of the Perception. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 15(65), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2018.74083. (In Persian)

Samanian, S. 2021. The sense of place in real and virtual spaces and its role in the meaning making and experience of artworks. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 26(2), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2020.296455.666401. (In Persian)

Santos, M.P., Page, A.S., Cooper, A.R., Ribeiro, J.C., and Mota, J., 2009. Perceptions of the built environment in relation to physical activity in Portuguese adolescents, Journal of Health and Place, 15. 548-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.006.

Sarı, E. and Bükün, M. F. 2023. Predictors of life quality in university campuses: The role of campus attachment and university identification. Nesne, 11(28), 170-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.7816/nesne-11-28-01.  

Scannell, L., and Gifford, R. 2016. Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 359-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916516637648.

Sébastien, L, 2020. The power of place in understanding place attachments and meanings. Geoforum, 108, 1-13, S0016718519303100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.001.

Selseleh, A., and Selseleh, M. 2009. Impact of Islamic-Iranian identical factor on beautification of city. Armanshahr, 2(2), 47-58. https://sid.ir/paper/202531/en. (In Persian).

Shamlou, S., and Farah, H. 2014. Explaining the cognitive conception of cityscape aesthetics criteria. Hoviatshahr, 16(1), 14-15. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17359562.1392.7.16.1.5. (In Persian).

Soller, B., Goodkind, J. R., Greene, R. N., Browning, C. R., and Shantzek, C. 2018. Ecological Networks and Community Attachment and Support Among Recently Resettled Refugees. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(3-4), 332-343. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/ajcp.12240.

Song, Z., and Soopramanien, D. 2018. Types of Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Urban Residents in Beijing. Cities, 84, 112-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.012.

Tonge, J., Ryan, M. M., Moore, S. A., and Beckley, L. E. 2014. The Effect of Place Attachment on Pro-environment Behavioral Intentions of Visitors to Coastal Natural Area Tourist Destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 54(6), 730–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047287514533010.

Woosnam, K. M., Aleshinloye, K. D., Ribeiro, M. A., Stylidis, D., Jiang, J., and Erul, E. 2018. Social determinants of place attachment at a world heritage site. Tourism Management, 67, 139-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.012.

Zenker, S., Braun, E., and Petersen, S. 2017. Branding the Destination Versus the Place: The Effects of Brand Complexity and Identification for Residents and Visitors. Tourism Management, 58, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.008.

Zeynali Azim A. 2022, Analysis of Tabriz citizens' satisfaction with the city's public services in terms of mental dimensions. Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories; 3 (1) :59-76 http://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-61806-fa.html. (In Persian).

Zeynali Azim, A. 2022. Analysis of place attachment in the city of Tabriz by using the scale of smart cities during the Covid-19 disease. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(3), 65-80. https://www.doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.342120.1687. (In Persian).

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 571
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 31