واکاوی موانع و چالش های حکمروایی یکپارچه شهری (مورد مطالعه: شهر ارومیه)

حسین پور, مهدی; کلانتری, محسن; پیری, عیسی

doi:10.48308/sdge.2024.228380.1067

	واکاوی موانع و چالش های حکمروایی یکپارچه شهری (مورد مطالعه: شهر ارومیه)
فصلنامه علمی توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی
مقاله 9، دوره 6، شماره 10، تیر 1403، صفحه 150-166 اصل مقاله (924.97 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/sdge.2024.228380.1067
نویسندگان
مهدی حسین پور¹؛ محسن کلانتری^* ²؛ عیسی پیری¹
¹گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
²گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
در تدوین سیاست‌های توسعه پایدار، اهمیت حکمروایی اغلب دست‌کم یا نادیده گرفته می‌شود. حکمروایی شهری به‌عنوان رهیافتی نوین در فرآیند مدیریت شهری، نویدبخش مشارکت در تصمیمگیریها بین مدیریت شهری، جامعه شهروندی و بخش خصوصی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر تبیین چالشها، موانع و مشکلات اثرگذار در حکمروایی یکپارچه شهر ارومیه است تا درک بهتری از شرایط برای سیاستگذاران شهری پدید آید و گامی مؤثر در رفع کمبودها و کاستیهای بدنۀ ساختاری و اجرایی برداشته شود. این پژوهش، از لحاظ روش، توصیفی – تحلیلی، با ماهیت کاربردی است. شیوه گردآوری اطلاعات به‌صورت اسنادی و پیمایشی بوده و رویکرد گردآوری دادهها، تعاملی– خبره محور است. در این تحقیق، روش تحلیل دادهها کمی –کیفی (ترکیبی) و جامعه آماری آن 55 نفر از کارشناسان، خبرگان و اعضای هیئت‌علمی بوده است که به روش نمونهگیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری دادهها از روش دلفی آنی و در تحلیل آنها از نرمافزارهای SPSS و Smart PLS استفاده شده است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که در سطح اطمینان 95 درصد، سازههای مؤثر در تحقق حکمروایی یکپارچه شهر ارومیه به ترتیب شامل: موانع کنش ارتباطی و دسترسی 88 درصد، موانع فردی 87 درصد، موانع تعارض منافع 78 درصد و موانع ساختاری – نهادی 69 درصد است. در این پژوهش مقدار شاخص ریشه میانگین مربعات باقیمانده استانداردشده برای موانع تحقق حکمروایی 057/0 و شاخص نرم برازندگی مدل، 905/0 بوده که حاکی از مقدار نیکویی برازش مناسب است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ارومیه؛ توسعه پایدار؛ حکمروایی خوب؛ یکپارچگی
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Obstacles and Challenges of Integrated Urban Governance (Case Study: Urmia City)
نویسندگان [English]
mahdi hosseinpour¹؛ Mohsen Kalantari²؛ isa piri¹
¹Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
²Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and purpose Integrated urban governance is a new approach to urban management. One of the most critical challenges of urban management is centralization in the decision-making system, following outdated traditional methods, functional complexity of decision-makers, neglecting new management approaches, and mastery of the top-down view. The present study aims to explain the challenges, obstacles, and problems affecting the integrated governance of Urmia City so that a better understanding of the conditions for urban policymakers emerges and a practical step is taken to solve the deficiencies and short comings of the structural and executive body. The summary of the background and innovation of the present research is as follows. First, the geographical scale of most of the study is at the macro-national level, or they have paid more attention to the big cities. Second, these researchers have mentioned challenges in pathology that result from background conditions and other structural factors that have not been carefully evaluated and investigated. Thirdly, the background of urban policy and integrated approach has been neglected in analyzing obstacles to realizing good urban governance. Methodology The present applied study employed a descriptive-analytical research method. The data were collected via library and survey research using an interactive-expert approach and analyzed via quantitative-qualitative (mixed methods) research. The study area covers Urmia City. About fifty-five urban planning experts, specialists, and faculty members were selected via a snowball sampling technique. The Delphi technique was employed to collect data analyzed in descriptive and inferential statistics and SPSS and Smart PLS software. Forty-nine components to be entered into the software are based on structural-institutional obstacles, obstacles to citizens’ lack of access to political leaders (communication action and access), obstacles to moving collective goals with personal goals of politicians (personal obstacles), obstacles to the controversial nature of institutions and organizations with interest in the government (conflict of interests). Findings and discussion At the 95% confidence level, effective structures in the realization of integrated governance in Urmia city were prioritized: communication and access obstacles at 88%, personal obstacles at 87%, conflict of interest's obstacles at 78%, and structural-institutional obstacles at 69%. The standardized residuals’ root mean square (RMS) value for the obstacles to the realization of justice is 0.057, and the adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) value is 0.905. The obtained values for the investigated variables are within the acceptable range: “structural-institutional obstacles” with 0.487, “communication and access obstacles” with 0.774, “individual obstacles” with 760, and “conflict of interests” with 0.616. T-values of all variables indicated a value greater than 1.96, indicating the significance of all covert variables. Obstacles of communication action and access in not realizing integrated governance of Urmia City with a beta of 25.34 and individual obstacles in not realizing an integrated governance with a t-value of 21.95, obstacles to conflict of interests with a t-value of 18.31, and structural-institutional obstacles with a beta of 7.64 had effects on not realizing integrated urban governance of Urmia City. The overall model has a desirable GOF. Conclusion The performance of the items demonstrates that the highest factor loadings for the structural-institutional obstacles are related to the lack of strategic vision agreed by all those with interests in the city regarding the good urban governance, lack of a realistic and futuristic view of the city and the weakness in urban expertise; for communication action and access, the items such as concentration of top-to-bottom power in the city management, the indifference of officials towards problems, and lack of attention to the citizens’ duties and rights; for personal obstacles, the items such as no presentation of transparent performance by officials, weak participation and movement towards autocracy in decisions, and application of relation-oriented instead of rule-oriented measures; and for conflict of interests, items such as the existence of various types of divisions in urban management, the existence of multiple urban planning commissions with improper functioning, the existence of unofficial stakeholders and those related to political factions in the city management--the absence of integrated management.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Urmia, Sustainable development, Good governance, Integration

مراجع
Addink, H., 2019. Good governance: Concept and context, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 350 p. Ashnavar, M., Vasheghani Farahani, E. and Rabiei Fardad, A., 2020. Study of obstacles and background challenges facing urban governance in Iran, Journal of Geography and Human Relations, 4(3), 18-31 (In Persian). https://www.gahr.ir/article_142822.html Alavian, M., Ghasemi, A. and Rahmani, M., 2021. Grounded Theory: Obstacles to the Realization of the Paradigm of Good Urban Governance in Iran, Journal of urban structure and function studies, 9(31), 199-228 (In Persian) http://shahr.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3699.html Azouz, N., 2015. Good Urban Governance of Informal Settlements in Metropolitan Areas, Thesis Submitted for the partial Fulfilment for the Requirement of the Degree of Master of Science in Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Engineering-Ain Shams University, 137 p. Badi Azandahi, M., vasegh, M., Malek Mohammadi, H. and Alam, R., 2019. Governance in the 21st Century and Its Challenges, Journal of political analysis of space, 1(3), 179-188 (In Persian) http://psp.modares.ac.ir/article-42-32383-fa.html Badach, J. and Dymnicka, M., 2017. Concept of ‘Good Urban Governance’ and Its Application in Sustainable Urban Planning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/245/8/082017 Bhaduri, S., 2020. Unit-2 Urban Management and Management of Urban Services. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Open University. http://egyankosh.ac.in//handle/123456789/59436 Biswas, R., Jana, A., Arya, K. and Ramamritham, K., 2019. A good-governance framework for urban management, Journal of Urban Management. 12, (4), 45-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.009 Davari, A. and Rezazadeh, A., 2015. Structural equation modeling with PLS software, Third edition, Tehran: Academic Jihad, 239 p. (In Persian) https://www.gisoom.com/book/11097132 Dorostkar, E., 2021. Applying and Assessing Expediency in the Framework of Governance of Urban Management of Tehran Metropolitan, Journal of political analysis of space, 3(4), 271-284 (In Persian) http://psp.modares.ac.ir/article-42-57651-fa.html HeshmatZadeh, M., Haji Yousefi, A. and Talebi, M., 2016. Investigation of Obstaclesto realizationof Good Governance in Iranian Political Culture, Journal of contemporary political essays, 8(23), 1-24 (In Persian). https://politicalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2630.html Hoseinpour, M., Kalantari, M. and Piri, I., 2020. Identifying and analyzing the main and influential actors in good urban governance (case study: Urmia city), Journal of geographical studies of coastal areas, 3(8), 27-43 (In Persian). https://hgscaj.guilan.ac.ir/article_5569.html Halla, P., Merino-Saum, A. and Binder, C.R., 2022. How to link sustainability assessments with local governance? – Connecting indicators to institutions and controversies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106741 Iran Statistics Center., 2015. Detailed results of the general population and housing census, West Azarbaijan province, Urmia city (In Persian). Jonga, W., 2012. Prioritizing Political Banditry than Good Governance: Rethinking Urban Governance in Zimbabwe, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(24), 117-135. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184161 Kazemian, G., Vaezi, R., Ghorbanizadeh, V. and Shahmohammadi, M., 2018. Pathology of the Formation of Iranian Local Governance using Constructing Grounded Theory, Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, 6(1), 63-80 (In Persian). https://jgusd.um.ac.ir/article_28019.html Khoshfar, G., Shayan, M. and Khodadad, M., 2018. An analysis on the performance of rural management with an emphasis on good governance indicators of the case: villages of Zarin Dasht city, Journal of Social and Cultural Development Studies, 7(4), 9-35 (In Persian). http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-768-fa.html Lemanski, C., 2017. Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa, IDPR, 39(1) 15-35. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2017.2 Lyall, C. and Tait, J., 2019. Beyond the Limits to Governance: New Rules of Engagement for the Tentative Governance of the Life Sciences. Research Policy, 48(5), 1128-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.009 Martı´-Costa, M. and Toma`s, M., 2017. Urban governance in Spain: From democratic transition to austerity policies, Urban Studies, 54(9), 2107-2122. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098016669452 Meyer, N. and Auriacombe, C., 2019. Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 11(19), 55-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195514 Meshkini, A., Hoseinpour, M. and Khodaei, S., 2020. An analysis of the role of social capital in the formation of good urban governance (case study: Ardabil city), Environmental Studies Journal, 13(51), 133-158 (In Persian). https://ebtp.malayer.iau.ir/article_680307.html Momeni, A., Jahanshiri, M. and Azmi, A., 2019. The effects of good governance on the livability of peri-urban settlements in Adran the village, Journal of development of peri-urban spaces, 2(1), 193- 205 (In Persian). http://www.jpusd.ir/article_114043.html Moore-Cherry, N. and Tomaney, J., 2019. Spatial planning, metropolitan governance and territorial politics in Europe: Dublin as a case of metro-phobia? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418783832 Nallathiga, R., 2008. Metropolitan Urban Governance Approaches and Models: Some Implications for Indian Cities Centre for Good Governance, 1-17. http://doi=10.1.1.508.8946&rep=rep1&type=pdf Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., Van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C. and Barau, A., 2017. Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001 Pazoki, M., Shikhi, D. and Smadi Mogadam, Sh., 2019. Analysis of the role of governance based on good governance in sustainable rural development (Case study: Filestan District, Pakdasht Township), Journal of Geography and Development, 18(58), 93-112 (In Persian). https://gdij.usb.ac.ir/article_5178.html Soroushan, G., Zivyar, P., Hindani, A. and Tavakolan, A., 2020. Explaining the status of desirable urban governance indicators in Tehran, Journal of Geography, 19(70), 135-151 (In Persian) http://mag.iga.ir/article_247582.html Talebi, M., Ranemaei, M. and Ghorbaninezad, R., 2019. Pathology of obstacles to the realization of good urban governance in middle cities, a case study: Neishabur city, Sustainable City Journal, 3(4), 43-57 (In Persian) http://www.jscity.ir/article_125569.html https://nnt.sci.org.ir/sites/Apps/yearbook/Lists/year_book_req/Item/newifs.aspx UNDP., 2003. The Urban Governance Initiative (UNDP–TUGI), Environment & Urbanization 151, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500121 Uzun, C.N., 2007. Globalization and urban governance in Istanbul, ORIGINAL PAPER, 127-138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41107372 Valencia, S.C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., Buck, N.T. and Versace, I., 2019. Adapting the sustainable development goals and the new urban agenda to the city level: initial reflections from a comparative research project. Int J Urban Sustain Dev, 11, 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172 Yang, H., 2021. Holistic Governance: An Explanatory Framework, In: Urban Governance in Transition. Understanding China. Springer, Singapore. 215 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7082-7_4 Ziari, K., Yadollahnia, H. and Yadollahnia, H., 2019. Urban Management Performance Analysis with Emphasis on Good Governance Indicators from the Citizen's Perspective (Case Study: Sari City), Journal of Urban Planning and Research, 11(40), 1-16 (In Persian) http://jupm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_4004.html
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 668 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 252

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

واکاوی موانع و چالش های حکمروایی یکپارچه شهری (مورد مطالعه: شهر ارومیه)