Creative Destruction and the Golden Triangle: Evidence from the PSTR model | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 6، شماره 1، 2025، صفحه 267-297 اصل مقاله (1.05 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jep.2025.236784.1187 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hassan daliri* | ||
| Associate Professor of Economics, Golestan University,Golestan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This research aimed to investigate the establishment of the golden triangle hypothesis, which emphasizes the importance of a balanced interaction between the state, civil society, and the market in fostering creative destruction and innovation. Data were collected from 107 countries and analyzed using Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) models. Two primary indexes were developed: the Golden Area Index, representing the area of the golden triangle for each country and year, and the Golden Difference Index, representing the standard deviation of the three indicators (state, civil society, and market) for each country and year. These were combined to create the Golden Threshold Index to comprehensively represent the golden triangle hypothesis. The estimation results, obtained for two groups of countries (all sample of 107 countries and a subset of 78 upper-middle and high-income economies), revealed that an increase in the Golden Area Index is associated with improved innovation growth and enhanced creative destruction. Conversely, an increase in disparity among the three pillars of the golden triangle leads to a decrease in innovation growth and a halt in creative destruction. Additionally, an increase in the Golden Threshold Index correlates with increased innovation growth and the facilitation of creative destruction. The study confirms the significance of the golden triangle hypothesis in promoting innovation and creative destruction. It highlights the necessity of maintaining a balanced interplay among the state, civil society, and market forces to foster an environment conducive to sustainable economic growth. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Innovation؛ Golden Triangle؛ State؛ Market؛ Civil Society | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401.
Acs, Z. J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(1), 97-107.
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
Aghion, P., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2021). The Power of Creative Destruction: Economic Upheaval and the Wealth of Nations. Harvard University Press.
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615-1660.
Ahmed M, Khan MA, Attique A, Khan MA, Haddad H, Al-Ramahi NM. Democracy's limited impact on innovation: Panel data evidence from developing countries. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 15;19(3):e0297915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297915.
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process. American Economic Review, 86(2), 401-407.
Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2004). Microeconomic evidence of creative destruction in industrial and developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3464.
Bénabou, R. (2002). Tax and Education Policy in a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy: What Levels of Redistribution Maximize Growth and Efficiency? Econometrica, 70(2), 481-517.
Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurial Activity: Some Cross-Country Evidence. Public Choice, 134(3-4), 307-328.
Block, F., & Keller, M. R. (2009). Where Do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System, 1970-2006. Sociological Review, 24(1), 1-19.
Coccia, M. (2014). Democratization is the driving force for technological and economic change. Technology in Society, 36, 22-34.
De Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (2003). Does more democracy lead to greater economic freedom? New evidence for developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 547-563.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37.
Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Ramalho, R. (2006). Regulation and Growth. Economics Letters, 92(3), 395-401.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. Basic Books.
Gao, Y., Zang, L., & Sun, Y. (2017). Political institutions and innovation: The case of China. Technovation, 64, 50-62.
Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W. T., & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics, 57(3), 323-364.
González, A., Teräsvirta, T., & Dijk, D. V., et al. (2005). Technical report, SSE/EFI working paper Series in Economics and Finance, Quantitative Finance Research Center, University of Technology, Sydney.
Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171-197.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23-44.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Hall, J. (2012). Economic Freedom of the World: 2012 Annual Report.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-368.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Sirowy, L., & Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 126-157.
Sturm, J.-E., & de Haan, J. (2001). How robust is the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth? Applied Economics, 33(7), 839-844.
Sweet, C. M., & Eterovic Maggio, A. (2014). Do strong intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Development, 66, 665-677.
Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Q. (2015). Fixed-Effect Panel Threshold Model Using Stata. Stata Journal, 15(1), 121-134.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 169 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71 |
||