سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

کشاورزصفی ئی, اسماعیل. (1404). مبنای مسئولیت مدنی عوامل مرتبط با عملکرد سیستم های هوش مصنوعی در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا و حقوق ایران. , 28(4), 267-288. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2025.235893.2736
اسماعیل کشاورزصفی ئی. "مبنای مسئولیت مدنی عوامل مرتبط با عملکرد سیستم های هوش مصنوعی در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا و حقوق ایران". , 28, 4, 1404, 267-288. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2025.235893.2736
کشاورزصفی ئی, اسماعیل. (1404). 'مبنای مسئولیت مدنی عوامل مرتبط با عملکرد سیستم های هوش مصنوعی در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا و حقوق ایران', , 28(4), pp. 267-288. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2025.235893.2736
کشاورزصفی ئی, اسماعیل. مبنای مسئولیت مدنی عوامل مرتبط با عملکرد سیستم های هوش مصنوعی در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا و حقوق ایران. , 1404; 28(4): 267-288. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2025.235893.2736

مبنای مسئولیت مدنی عوامل مرتبط با عملکرد سیستم های هوش مصنوعی در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا و حقوق ایران

فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی
مقاله 15، دوره 28، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 112، آذر 1404، صفحه 267-288    اصل مقاله (721.73 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jlr.2025.235893.2736
نویسنده
اسماعیل کشاورزصفی ئی*
. استادیار، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی: واحد قزوین، قزوین، ایران keshavarzsmaeil@gmail.com
چکیده
در اسناد اتحادیه اروپا باتوجه‌به تعیین مسئولیت مدنی (بدون تقصیر) متمایز برای تولیدکننده فرآورده معیوب از زمان تصویب دستورالعمل (PLD) از 1985، مسئولیت تولیدکنندگان هوش‌مصنوعی نیز در سال 2022 با بازنگری پیشنهادی همان دستورالعمل بر پایه مسئولیت بدون تقصیر تنظیم گردید. نسبت به ارائه‌دهندگان و به‌کارگیرندگان سیستم‌های هوش‌مصنوعی به‌دلیل فقدان سابقه پیشین قانون‌گذاری، دستورالعمل پیشنهادی جدید و جداگانه‌ای موسوم به AILD در سال 2022 و قانون هوش‌مصنوعی 2024 بر مبنای درجه خطر تنظیم شد که برخلاف تولیدکننده، بر پایه مسئولیت مبتنی‌بر تقصیر مفروض برای سیستم‌های پرخطر و مسئولیت مبتنی‌بر تقصیر برای سسیستم‌های کم‌خطر استوار استباوجود این، نوعی ابهام و هم‌پوشانی در دامنه شمول برخی عناوین نظیر تولیدکننده، اپراتور، ارائه‌دهنده در این اسناد به چشم می‌خورد. در نظام حقوقی کنونی ایران، قانون حمایت از مصرف‌کننده می‌تواند با حذف شرط آگاهی از تبصره ماده 2 این قانون، متضمن مسئولیت بدون تقصیر تولیدکننده (شامل عرضه‌کننده) سیستم‌های هوش‌مصنوعی معیوب تلقی شود. درباره به‌کارگیرندگان سیستم‌های هوش‌مصنوعی ماده 78 قانون تجارت الکترونیکی و تبصره 2 ماده 526 ق. م. ا در وضع کنونی نمی‌تواند پاسخ‌گوی درجات ریسک سیستم‌های هوش‌مصنوعی باشد. پیشنهاد نگارنده به‌مانند طبقه‌بندی حاکم بر اسناد اتحادیه اروپا، وضع قوانین جدید یا اصلاح قوانین با تکیه‌بر نظام مسئولیت بدون تقصیر برای تولیدکنندگان، مسئولیت مبتنی‌بر تقصیر مفروض برای ارائه‌دهندگان و به‌کارگیرندگان سیستم‌های پرخطر و مسئولیت مبتنی‌بر تقصیر برای سیستم‌های کم‌خطر است.

تازه های تحقیق
  • مسئولیت تولیدکننده هوش مصنوعی در دستورالعمل PLD، مسئولیت بدون تقصیر است.
  • طبق مواد 3 و 4 لایحه AILD مورخ 28 سپتامبر 2022، مسئولیت ارائه‌دهنده و بکارگیرنده هوش مصنوعی، مسئولیت مبتنی بر تقصیر مفروض (فرض رابطه سببیت قابل رد) برای سیستم‌های پرخطر و مسئولیت مبتنی بر تقصیر برای سیستم کم خطر است.
  • حقوق ایران، نیازمند وضع قانون اختصاصی برای عملکرد زیان‌بار هوش مصنوعی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
هوش مصنوعی؛ سیستم های پرخطر؛ مسئولیت محض؛ ارائه دهنده؛ بکارگیرنده. تقصیر
عنوان مقاله [English]
The basis of civil liability of factors related to the performance of artificial intelligence systems in European Union documents and Iranian law
نویسندگان [English]
Same’il Keshavarz Safi’e
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University: Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran. keshavarzsmaeil@gmail.com
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The development of computer science since the mid-twentieth century has led to the formation of the phenomenon of artificial intelligence. Today, artificial intelligence, by using precise calculations, access to very large volumes of information, and a lower error rate, has demonstrated its superiority over human performance in thinking and decision-making in many fields. However, this development has also brought risks with it. One of these risks is the issue of compensation for damages resulting from the behavior of artificial intelligence systems, as well as the basis for civil liability resulting from their harmful actions. The emergence of damages caused by artificial intelligence systems has led to the tendency of lawyers and legislators in various countries to establish special regulations regarding human factors related to artificial intelligence activities, from the production and manufacturing process to its use in relationships between humans. The European Union is one of the leading regions in regulating civil liability arising from the operation of AI. This article seeks to comprehensively examine various EU documents separately in the field of civil liability, factors related to the performance of artificial intelligence systems, and compare the current Iranian legal system with EU documents. In the final step, a proposed solution to address the shortcomings and criticisms of EU documents as well as the Iranian legal system will be examined.
Methods
The main research method in this study is a descriptive-analytical method. The sources required in this study have been collected through library methods and by referring to reliable databases and websites. The main goal of this study is to determine the basis for civil liability of various factors related to the performance of artificial intelligence systems. In this context, two legal systems of the European Union and Iran were selected. Regarding the European Union, various documents were studied, such as the 2020 European Parliament Resolution, the 2022 PLD Proposed Directive on Defective Products, as well as the 2022 AILD Proposed Directive. Also, despite the lack of a specific law in Iranian law regarding civil liability arising from the performance of artificial intelligence, the capacities of related laws such as the Consumer Protection Law and the E-Commerce Law to respond to the harmful performance of artificial intelligence were examined. 
Results and Discussions
European Union documents are one of the leading legal documents in the field of regulation regarding the obligations, requirements and responsibilities of various factors related to the performance of artificial intelligence systems. In short, Resolution 2020, PLD's proposal and instructions for artificial intelligence producers, contains a no-fault liability system. But regarding providers and users of artificial intelligence AILD Directive And the artificial intelligence Act 2024 is proportional to the degree of risk of artificial intelligence systems, including liability based on fault (presumed fault for high-risk systems). However, due to the differences between documents regarding the basis of civil liability of various factors, as well as the interference and mixing in the definition of some titles such as producer, operator and provider, the preparation of a single recipe for the precise definition of each of the titles and determining the basis of civil liability of each one of factors are suggested separately to resolve the ambiguity and complexity of these documents. Regarding the laws of Iran, the current laws do not have the ability to respond to the challenges and harms of the emerging phenomenon of artificial intelligence and the progress of this technology and the degrees of danger and harm they cause, and the need to enact a comprehensive law to determine the legal framework and civil responsibility of each of the factors related to the performance of artificial intelligence appears to be an urgent matter. Until then, the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act And the Law of Electronic Commerce and Note 2 of Article 526 of the Islamic Punishment Act of Iran will rule regarding the harmful behavior of artificial intelligence systems, that due to some conflicts and deficiencies, the amendment of the conflicting articles and the addition of amendments to the mentioned laws in order to properly cover the types and Various degrees of high-risk and low-risk artificial intelligence systems will be essential. In summary, in the field of Iranian law, the author suggests two suggestions: 1- The most appropriate solution is to regulate the rules governing the civil liability of artificial intelligence systems in a specific manner. The 2024 Artificial Intelligence Law and its instructions can be a useful and appropriate guide for establishing regulations in this field. 2- The second suggestion (in case the first proposal cannot be implemented), regarding the civil liability of manufacturers (including suppliers) of artificial intelligence systems, is to eliminate the conflict between the note to Article 2 and Articles 18 and 19 of the Consumer Protection Law by amending the note to Article 2 and removing the condition that the supplier be aware of the defect in production, in order to establish a system of liability without fault for manufacturers and suppliers of artificial intelligence systems.  
Conclusion
The 2020 Resolution, the PLD Proposal 2022 for AI Producers contain a system of no-fault (strict) liability. However, for AI Providers and Deployers, the AILD Directive and the AI ​​Act 2024 contain, in proportion to the degree of risk of AI systems, presumed fault-based liability for high-risk systems and fault-based liability for low-risk systems. In the current Iranian legal system, the Consumer Protection Law can be considered to include no-fault liability of the manufacturer (including the supplier) of defective artificial intelligence systems by removing the note in Article 2 of this law. With respect to users of artificial intelligence systems, Article 78 of the Electronic Commerce Law and Note 2 of Article 526 of the Islamic Penal Code cannot, in the current situation, respond to the risk levels of artificial intelligence systems
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Artificial intelligence, high-risk systems, Strict liability, provider, deploye. fault
مراجع
منابع

کتاب

  1. کشاورز، اسماعیل، حقوق مسئولیت مدنی، تهران: امجد، 1403.
مقاله

  1. حامدزاده، حامد و علی خوشدل واجاری، «بررسی مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از ارتباطات الکترونیکی»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق، شماره 16، 1396، صص 165-144.
  2. حکمت‌نیا، محمود، مرتضی محمدی و محسن واثقی، «مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از تولید ربات‌های حاوی هوش‌مصنوعی خودمختار»، فصلنامه حقوقی اسلامی، دوره 16، شماره 60، 1398، صص 255- 231.
  3. ذاکری­نیا، حانیه، «ماهیت و مبنای مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از هوش‌مصنوعی در حقوق ایران و کشورهای اتحادیه اروپا»، مجله حقوق خصوصی، دوره 20، شماره 1، 1402، صص ۱52 – ۱35، https://doi.org/10.22059/jolt.2023.356703.1007186
  4. رجبی، عبدالله، «ضمان در هوش‌مصنوعی»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 10، شماره 2، 1398، صص 466- 449، https://doi.org/10.22059/jcl.2019.274782.633787
  5. صادقی، حسین، «مسئولیت مدنی واسطه‌ها و تأمین‌کنندگان خدمات ارتباطی الکترونیک»، فصلنامه حقوق خصوصی، دوره 40، شماره 2، 1389، صص 218- 199، https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25885618.1389.40.2.12
  6. محمدی کرد خیلی، حمید، مجید صفوی، محمد غلامعلی‌زاده و حمیدرضا اسمعیلی، «تبیین ارکان مسئولیت مدنی و شیوه‌های جبران خسارت ناشی از ارتباطات اینترنتی در حقوق ایران و اتحادیه اروپا»، ماهنامه جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی ایران، دوره 4، شماره 4، 1400، صص 647-630، https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.269424.1466
  7. نظرپور، حمزه، علی‌اکبر ایزدی فرد و محمد محسنی دهکلانی، «بررسی فقهی حقوقی مسئولیت مدنی ربات»، فصلنامه فقه و اصول، دوره 53، شماره 4، 1400، صص 190-171، https://doi.org/10.22067/jfu.v54i1.87620
  8. ولی­پور، علی و محسن اسماعیلی، «امکان‌سنجی مسئولیت مدنی هوش‌مصنوعی عمومی ناشی از ایجاد ضرر در حقوق مدنی»، فصلنامه اندیشه حقوقی معاصر، دوره 2، شماره 3، 1400، صص 8-1. https://doi.org/10.22034/lth.2021.248596

References

Books

  1. Bartneck, Christoph; Christoph Lütge; Alan Wagner; and Sean Welsh. An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI. Springer Briefs in Ethics, 2021.
  2. Keshavarz, Same’il, Law of Civil responsibility, Tehran: Amjad, 2024. (In Persian)
  3. Limongelli, R and A. Bertolini. “AI & Civil Liability”, In: Regulating Advanced Technologies, Campano Edizioni, 2022.
  4. Russell, Stuart and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Hoboken: Pearson, Fourth Edition, 2022.
  5. Searle, J. Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power. Columbia University Press, 2007.

Articles

  1. Arcila, Beatriz Botero. “AI liability in Europe: How Does It Complement Risk Regulation and Deal with the Problem of Human Oversight?”, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 54, 2024, PP 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106012/
  2. Beatriz, Garcia. “The Regulation of AI Liability in Europe: a Critical Overview of Two Recent Directive Proposals– the (New) AILD and the (Revised) PLD”, E-Publica, Volume 11, Issue 3, 2024.
  3. Bory, Paolo; Simone Natale; and Christian Katzenbach. “Strong and Weak AI Narratives: An Analytical Framework”, AI & SOCIETY, Volume 40, Issue 4, 2024, PP 2107-2117. https://doi.org/10.1007 / s00146-024-02087-8 /
  4. Cerka, Paulius; Jurgita Grigiene and Gintare Sirbikyte. “Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence”, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 31, 2015, PP 376-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008 /   
  5. Eric Tjong Tjin Tai. “Liability for AI Decision Making”, In: L.A. DiMatteo, C. Poncibò and M. Cannarsa. The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence; Global Perspectives on Law and Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2022, PP 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072168.014/
  6. European Commission's Proposal for a Revised Product Liability Directive, Feedback of the European Law Institute.
  7. Gallage-Alwis, Sylvie; and Trainee Gaëtan Defer. “Proposal for a New EU Product Liability Directive What’s likely to come?” Signature Litigation, No Date.
  8. Hacker, Philipp. “The European AI Liability Directives Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future”, Computer Law, 2023, PP 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105871 /
  9. Hamed-Zadeh, Hamed and Ali Khoshdel Vajari, “A Study of Civil Liability Arising from Electronic Communications”, Quarterly Journal of Legal Studies, Issue 16, 2017, PP 144-165. (In Persian)
  10. Heiss, Stefan. “Artificial Intelligence & Civil Liability light of the EU’s AI Act and President Biden’s Executive Order”, Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, TTLF Working Papers No 112, 2024.
  11. Hekmat-Nia, Mahmoud, Morteza Mohammadi and Mohsen Vaseghi. “Civil Liability for Damages Caused by Robots Based on Autonomous Artificial Intelligence”, Islamic Law Quarterly, Volume 16, Issue 60, 2019, PP 231-258. (In Persian)
  12. Koch, B. A. et al. “Response of the European Law Institute: Public Consultation on Civil Liability Adapting Liability Rules to the Digital Age and Artificial Intelligence” Journal of European Tort Law, Volume 13, Issue 1, 2022, PP 25-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0002 /
  13. Li, Shu; Michael Faure; and Katri Havu. “Liability Rules for AI، Related Harm: Law and Economics Lessons for a European Approach”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Volume 13, Issue 4, 2022, PP 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2022.26,2022/
  14. ligarska, iWona gredka. “In Search of Adequate Principles for AI Civil Liability”, Prawo i więź, Volume 3, Issue 50, 2024. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.829/
  15. Liorca, David Fern´andez; Vicky Charisi; Ronan Hamon; Ignacio Sánchez; and Emilia Gómez. “Liability Regimes in the Age of AI: A Use, Case Driven Analysis of the Burden of Proof”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 76, 2023, PP 613-644. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14565/
  16. McCarthy, John. “What is AI?”, Available at: https://www،stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf,2007.
  17. Mohammadi Kord Kheili, Hamid, Majid Safavi, Mohammad Gholam-Ali-Zadeh and Hamidreza Esmae’ili, “Explain the Pillars of Civil Liability and Methods of Compensation for Damages Caused by Internet Communications in Iranian and EU Law”, Monthly Magazine of Political Sociology of Iran, Volume 4, Issue 4, 2020, PP 630-647. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.269424.1466/
  18. Müller, Melinda Florina. “Robots as Grab Bags”, A Civil Law, 2017. (In German)
  19. Nazar-Pour, Hamzeh, Ali Akbar Izadi-Fard and Mohammad Mohseni Dehklani, “Jurisprudential Study of the Civil Liability of Robots”, Quarterly Journal of Jurisprudence and Principles, Volume 53, Issue 4, 2021, PP 171-190. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/jfu.v54i1.87620/
  20. Rajabi, Abdollah, “Liability of Artificial Intelligence; the Reflection of Developments in the Liability Rules”, Comparative Law Review Quarterly, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2019, PP 449-466. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jcl.2019.274782.633787.
  21. Rimkutė, Deimantė. “Shaping Civil Liability in the Digital Age: AILD and the Revisited PLD Civilinės Atsakomybės Formavimas”, Teisė, Volume 130, 2024, PP 129-143. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2024.130.11/
  22. Sadeghi, Hossein, “Civil Liability of Electronic Communications Service Providers and Intermediaries”, Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 2, 2010, PP 199-218. (In Persian) https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25885618.1389.40.2.12.5.
  23. Sousa Antunes, Henrique. “Civil Liability Applicable to Artificial Intelligence: A Preliminary Critique of the European Parliament Resolution of 2020”, 2023, PP 122-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3743242
  24. Tambiama, Madiega. “EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service”,
  25. Uuk, Risto; et al. “A Taxonomy of Systemic Risks from General-Purpose AI”, Computers and Society, RAND Working Paper Series Forthcoming, 2024, PP 1-34. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07780/
  26. Vali-Pour, Ali and Mohsen Esmae’ili, “Feasibility Study of Civil Liability of Artificial General Intelligence Due to Damage in Civil Law”, Contemporary Legal Thought, Volume 2, Issue 3, 2021, PP 1-8. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/lth.2021.248596
  27. Vladeck, David C. “Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence”, Wash L Rev, Volume 89, 2014, PP 117-150. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol89/iss1/6
  28. Zakeri-Nia, Hanieh, “The Nature and Basis of Civil Liability Arising from Artificial Intelligence in Iranian and EU Members’ Laws”, Private Law Journal, Volume 20, Issue 1, 2023, PP135-152. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jolt.2023.356703.1007186/
  29. Zein, Sarah. “The Civil Liability for Artificial Intelligence”, BAU Journal-Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, PP 1- 8. https://doi.org/10.54729/2958-4884.1110/
  30. Ziosi, M. et al. “The EU AI Liability Directive (AILD): Bridging Information Gaps”, European Journal of Law and Technology, Volume 14, Issue 3, 2023, PP 1-10. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4470725.

Electronic Resources

  1. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
  2. https://maples.com/knowledge/ai-act--set-to-come-into-force-on-1-august-2024/
  3. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0276_EN.html /
  4. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/739342/EPRS_BRI(2023)739342_EN.pdf/
  5. https://www.europeanlawblog.eu/pub/refusing-to-award-legal-personality-to-ai-why-the-european-parliament-got-it-wrong/release/1/
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,727
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 428