تحلیل نسبت میانِ «دَرْمَه» در مقام آموزه و «بدنِ حقیقت» بودا | ||
| آینه معرفت | ||
| دوره 25، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 83، تیر 1404، صفحه 77-96 اصل مقاله (800.03 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jipt.2025.238883.1612 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محسن ساربان نژاد1؛ حسن بلخاری قهی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکدهی هنرهای تجسمی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه مطالعات عالی هنر، دانشکدهی هنرهای تجسمی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این مقاله، آموزهی «دَرْمَهکایَه» ـ شریفترین بدنْ و بدنِ حقیقت بودا ـ تحلیل و معناشناسی شده است. نظریهی تریکایَه (سه کالبد)، که در آموزهی بوداشناختی ریشه داشت و راهبان مَهایانَه مطرح کردند، کوششی بود برای تبیین نسبت میان بودای ازلی و بودای تاریخی در بستر نظام اندیشگی بودیسم. پرسش مقاله در خصوص معنای دقیق واژهی «بدن» و تأثیر نگرش فلسفی مهایانیستها در مقایسه با تأثیر طبیعت بودا در تئوریزه شدن دَرْمَهکایَه و نسبت آن با مفهوم «دَرْمَه» در مقام تعلیم بودا است. دادههای پژوهش با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و با رجوع به منابع کتابخانهای گردآوری، تحلیل و تفسیر شدهاند. نتایج نشان میدهند دَرْمَهکایَه معادل حقیقت غایی و ازلی ـ ابدی بودا است و بازتاب آموزهای است که، بر اساس آن، دیدن دَرْمَه دیدن بودا تلقی میشود. تنها در ادبیات متقدم مهایانیستی بود که تَتَتا مطلع شناخت تَتاگَتَه دانسته و دَرْمَهکایَه واجد دلالتهای فلسفی، معنایی و هستیشناختی شد. بدینترتیب، تَتَتا با دَرْمَهکایَه یکی دانسته و، بهدلیل حضور در همهچیز، به «بدن کیهانی» بودا بدل شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بودیسم؛ بدن؛ دَرْمَهکایَه؛ مَهایانَه؛ آموزهی بوداشناخت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of the Relationship between “Dharma” as Doctrine and the Buddha's “Truth Body” (“Reality Body”) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohsen Sarebannejad1؛ Hasan Bolkhari Ghehi2 | ||
| 1PhD Student in College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Advanced Art Studies, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This article presents a semantic and philosophical analysis of Dharmakāya—the most exalted and truth-body of the Buddha. The Trikāya doctrine (Three Bodies), rooted in Buddhist ontology and developed by Mahāyāna monks, aimed to articulate the relationship between the eternal Buddha and the historical Buddha within Buddhist thought. The study’s central question concerns the meaning of the term “body” and how Mahāyānists philosophical views on Buddha’s nature shaped the theorization of Dharmakāya, particularly in relation to Dharma as the Buddha’s teaching. Research data were collected from library sources and interpreted through a descriptive-analytical method. Findings suggest that Dharmakāya is equated with the ultimate, eternal truth of the Buddha and reflects the doctrine that seeing the Dharma is seeing the Buddha. Only in early Mahāyāna literature was Tathatā regarded as a point of access to the Tathāgata, and Dharmakāya endowed with philosophical, semantic, and ontological meanings. Thus, Tathatā was identified with Dharmakāya and, due to its all-encompassing presence, became the Buddha’s “cosmic body”. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Buddhism, Body (Kāya), Dharmakāya, Mahāyāna, Buddhology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bhikkhu, B. (1989). Me and Mine: Selected Essays of Bhikkhu Buddhadasā. New York: State University of New York Press. Buddhaghosa (2003). The Path of Purification: Visuddhimagga, translated by Bhikkhu Ñanamoli. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society. Burnouf, E. (2010). Introduction to the History of Indian Buddhism, translated by Katia Buffetrille & Donald S. Lopez. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dayal, H. (1999). Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhist Sanskrit Literature. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Endo, T. (2002). Buddha in Theravada Buddhism; A Study of the Concept of Buddha in the Pali Commentaries. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Cultural Center. Griffiths, P. J. (1994). On Being Buddha. New York: State University of New York Press. Harrison, P. (1992). “Is the Dharma-kaya the Real ‘Phantom Body’ of the Buddha?” In The Journal of The International Association of Buddhist Studies, 15(1), 44–94. Hookham, S. K. (1991). The Buddha Within: Tathagatagarbha Doctrine According to the Shentong Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga. New York: State University of New York Press. Irons, E. A. (2008). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. NY: Checkmark Books. Kalupahana, D. J. (1984). Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Karkkainen, V. M. (2016). Spirit and Salvation: A Constructive Christian Theology for the Pluralistic World. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Kloetzli, W. R. (1989). Buddhist Cosmology: Science and Theology in the Images of Motion and Light. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publication. Lancaster, L. R. (1975). “The Oldest Mahāyāna Sūtra: Its Significance for the Study of Buddhist Development”. In Eastern Buddhist Society, 8(1), 30-41. Makransky, J. J. (1997). Buddhahood Embodied: Sources of Controversy in India and Tibet. New York: State University of New York Press. Mizuno, K. (1989). Buddhist Sutras: Origin, Development, Transmission, translated by Morio Takanashi. Tokyo: Kosei Publishing Co. Pandita, S. (2015). Stages of the Buddha’s Teachings, translated by David P. Jackson. Massachusetts: Wisdom Publications. Powers, J. (2009). A Bull of a Man: Images of Masculinity, Sex, and the Body in Indian Buddhism. Massachusetts: Harvard University. Soothill, W. E., & Hodous, L. (2003). A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms: With Sanskrit and English Equivalents and a Sanskrit-Pāli Index. London: Routledge. Stevens, R. (2022). Red Tara: The Female Buddha of Power and Magnetism. Massachusetts: Wisdom Publications. Sutton, F. G. (1990). Existence and Enlightenment in the Laṅkāvatāra Sutra: A Study in the Ontology and Epistemology of the Yogācāra School of Mahayana Buddhism. New York: State University of New York Press. Suzuki, D. T. (2016). Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism. California: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya (2005). Translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi. MA: Wisdom Publications. The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Dīgha Nikāya (1995). Translated by Maurice Walshe. Massachusetts: Wisdom Publications. The Mahā-Vairocana-Abhisambodhi Tantra (2003). Translated by Stephen Hodge. London: Routledge. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya (2009). Translated by Bhikkhu Nanamoli & Bhikkhu Bodhi. Massachusetts: Wisdom Publications. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Complete Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya (2012). Translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi. MA: Wisdom Publications. The Questions of King Milinda (Milindapañha) (2009). In The Sacred Books of the East, translated by T. W. Rhys Davids. Ed. F. Max Muller. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vimalakīrti (1994). The Teaching of Vimalakīrti, Translated from Sanskrit to French by Étienne Lamotte and translated from French to English by Sara Boin. Oxford: The Pāli Text Society. Williams, P. (2012). Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. London: Routledge. Wright, D. S. (2011). The Six Perfections: Buddhism and the Cultivation of Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xing, G. (2010). The Concept of the Buddha: Its Evolution from Early Buddhism to the Trikaya Theory. London: Routledge. Yinshun (1994). The Origin and Development of Early Mahayana Buddhism. Taipei: Zhengwen Publication. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,025 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 944 |
||