Narrative Ethics and Trauma-Form in The Brothers Karamazov | ||
| نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 36 - شماره پیاپی 13، فروردین 1405، صفحه 23-35 اصل مقاله (412.88 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/clls.2026.242944.1417 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علی سلامی* | ||
| دانشیار، دانشکده زبانها و ادبیات خارجی دانشگاه تهران ، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This article argues that The Brothers Karamazov does not merely represent trauma as content but constructs a trauma-form: a repeatable narrative mechanism that produces ethical pressure by positioning the reader as a juror of damaged testimony. To make this claim operational, the essay offers four analytically separable formal processes, rupture, recurrence, testimonial gap, and juridical capture, and demonstrates how they function across key scenes including Ivan’s “Rebellion” and “Grand Inquisitor” materials, Smerdyakov’s confessional sequences, and Dmitri’s trial. Drawing on trauma and testimony theory alongside narrative ethics, the paper shows how Dostoevsky’s narration converts breakdown, contradiction, and withheld verification into conditions of judgment, recruiting readers into decision under uncertainty rather than offering stable evidentiary resolution. Moral injury is used here as a critical heuristic for the ethical damage produced when adjudication is demanded without reliable grounds. By shifting trauma studies from a vocabulary of inner states to a protocol for reading narrative address and evidentiary form, the article provides a transferable method for tracing how novels engineer responsibility through testimonial contamination and the pressures of public verdict. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Dostoevsky؛ moral injury؛ testimony؛ witnessing؛ confession؛ theodicy؛ readerly responsibility | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Narrative Ethics and Trauma-Form in The Brothers Karamazov | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Salami | ||
| Associate Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This article argues that The Brothers Karamazov does not merely represent trauma as content but constructs a trauma-form: a repeatable narrative mechanism that produces ethical pressure by positioning the reader as a juror of damaged testimony. To make this claim operational, the essay offers four analytically separable formal processes, rupture, recurrence, testimonial gap, and juridical capture, and demonstrates how they function across key scenes including Ivan’s “Rebellion” and “Grand Inquisitor” materials, Smerdyakov’s confessional sequences, and Dmitri’s trial. Drawing on trauma and testimony theory alongside narrative ethics, the paper shows how Dostoevsky’s narration converts breakdown, contradiction, and withheld verification into conditions of judgment, recruiting readers into decision under uncertainty rather than offering stable evidentiary resolution. Moral injury is used here as a critical heuristic for the ethical damage produced when adjudication is demanded without reliable grounds. By shifting trauma studies from a vocabulary of inner states to a protocol for reading narrative address and evidentiary form, the article provides a transferable method for tracing how novels engineer responsibility through testimonial contamination and the pressures of public verdict. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Dostoevsky, moral injury, testimony, witnessing, confession, theodicy, readerly responsibility | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alulis, Joseph. “Dostoevsky and the Metaphysical Foundation of the Liberal Regime: ‘Legend of the Grand Inquisitor.’” Perspectives on Political Science 38, no. 4 (2009): 206–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457090903231763. Babushkina, Dina. “Secrets, Dark and Deep in Dostoevsky.” Homo Oeconomicus 28, no. 4 (2011): 533–47. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/33828/7/13.%20Tine%20Blom.pdf. Barineau, R. Maurice. “The Triumph of Ethics over Doubt: Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov.” Christianity & Literature 43, nos. 3–4 (1994): 375–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/014833319404300311. Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. Cherkasova, Evgenia V. “Virtues of the Heart.” In Virtues and Passions in Literature, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 69–82. Analecta Husserliana. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6422-7_4. Corrigan, Yuri. “Donna Tartt’s Dostoevsky: Trauma and the Displaced Self.” Comparative Literature 70, no. 4 (2018): 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-7215462. Dostoevsky, Fyodor. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. Introduction by Malcolm V. Jones. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992. Drennan, Erica. “The Other Trial in The Brothers Karamazov.” Dostoevsky Studies 27 (2024): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.13136/1013-2309/1461. Felman, Shoshana, and Dori Laub. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge, 1992. Frank, Joseph. Dostoevsky: A Writer in His Time. Edited by Mary Petrusewicz. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009. Kirillova, Nataliya P., and Elena N. Lisanyuk. “Truth and Legal Argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers.” Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filosofiya, Sotsiologiya, Politologiya, no. 48 (2019): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/48/19. LaCapra, Dominick. Writing History, Writing Trauma: With a New Preface. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014. Martinsen, Deborah A. Surprised by Shame: Dostoevsky’s Liars and Narrative Exposure. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2003. Orange, Donna M., and Maxim Livshetz. “Ethics as Optics: Fyodor Dostoevsky.” In Nourishing the Inner Life of Clinicians and Humanitarians: The Ethical Turn in Psychoanalysis, 121–45. Hove, East Sussex, and New York: Routledge, 2016. Patyk, Lynn Ellen. “The Dark Side of Dialogue: Dostoevskian Provocation and the Provocateurs Karamazov.” The Slavonic and East European Review 99, no. 1 (2021): 41–68. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.99.1.0041. Sandoz, Ellis. “Philosophical Anthropology and Dostoevsky’s ‘Legend of the Grand Inquisitor.’” The Review of Politics 26, no. 3 (1964): 353–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500005088. Solovieva, Olga. “Rebellion: A Note on Agamben’s Reception of Dostoevsky in The Open.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 43, no. 4 (2016): 520–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/crc.2016.0039. Taheri, Sadreddin. “The Brothers Karamazov: The Gospel of Fyodor.” Critical Language and Literary Studies 5(8), 2012, pp. 111–127. Vanden Auweele, Dennis. “Existential Struggles in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80, no. 3 (2016): 279–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9561-6. Williams, Rowan. Dostoevsky: Language, Faith, and Fiction. London: Continuum, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frn059. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 202 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 195 |
||