اعتباریابی و بررسی روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه «قطعیت درباره وضعیت ذهنی» (CAMSQ) در بزرگسالان ایرانی | ||
| فصلنامه روانشناسی کاربردی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 20، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 77، فروردین 1405، صفحه 56-81 اصل مقاله (773.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/apsy.2026.241037.1879 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه منصوری* 1؛ نازنین عابد2 | ||
| 1کاندیدا دکتری، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده روانشناسی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده روانشناسی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: ذهنیسازی، توانایی درک و تفسیر حالات ذهنی خود و دیگران است که در تنظیم هیجان و روابط اجتماعی نقش اساسی دارد. نقص در این توانایی با اختلالات روانشناختی مرتبط او سنجش دقیق آن ضروری است. پرسشنامه «قطعیت درباره وضعیت ذهنی» ابزاری نوین است که نسخه فارسی آن هنوز اعتبارسنجی نشده است. هدف این پژوهش، اعتباریابی و بررسی روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه قطعیت درباره وضعیت ذهنی در جمعیت بزرگسال ایرانی بود. روش: پژوهش کاربردی و توصیفی- پیمایشی بود. نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه ترجمه و روایی محتوا و معادلسازی مفهومی آن بررسی شد. جامعه آماری شامل بزرگسالان ۲۰ تا ۵۰ سال با حداقل مدرک دیپلم و بدون اختلال روانی بود. نمونهگیری به روش در دسترس و آنلاین انجام شد (۵۰۰ نفر). برای پایایی بازآزمایی، ۶۰ نفر دو هفته بعد پرسشنامه را تکمیل کردند. پرسشنامههای همدلی، عزتنفس و عملکرد بازتابی برای بررسی اعتبار همگرا ابزار بهکار رفت. یافتهها: تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی دو عامل «خوداطمینانی» و «دیگراطمینانی» با بارهای عاملی بالای ۵۰/۰ و مجموع ۶/۴۷ درصد واریانس تبیینی را تأیید کرد. پایایی درونی مقیاس و زیرمقیاسها بالا (آلفای کل ۸۹۵/۰) و پایایی بازآزمایی ۸۲/۰ به دست آمد. همبستگی مثبت مؤلفهها با همدلی و عزتنفس و همبستگی منفی با عملکرد بازتابی، اعتبار همگرا و واگرای مناسبی را نشان داد. نتیجهگیری: نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه «قطعیت درباره وضعیت ذهنی» ابزار قابل اعتماد و کاربردی برای ارزیابی قطعیت ذهنی در جامعه ایرانی است و میتواند در مطالعات روانشناختی، بالینی و آموزشی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| خوداطمینانی؛ دیگر اطمینانی؛ قطعیت درباره وضعیت ذهنی؛ روان سنجی؛ روایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ): in Iranian Adult | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Mansouri1؛ Nazanin Abed2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: Mentalization, defined as the ability to understand one’s own and others’ mental states, plays an important role in emotional regulation and social functioning. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ) in Iranian adults. Method: This applied descriptive-survey study translated the CAMSQ into Persian using the forward–backward translation method. Content validity and conceptual equivalence were assessed. Participants included 500 Iranian adults aged 20–50 years with at least a high school education and no history of psychiatric disorders, recruited through convenience and online sampling. To evaluate test–retest reliability, 60 participants completed the questionnaire again after two weeks. Convergent and divergent validity were examined using the Empathy Questionnaire, Self-Esteem Scale, and Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure consisting of Self-Certainty and Other-Certainty, with factor loadings above 0.50 and 47.6% explained variance. The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.895) and satisfactory test–retest reliability (r = 0.82). Positive correlations with empathy and self-esteem and negative correlations with reflective functioning supported convergent and divergent validity. Conclusion: The Persian version of the CAMSQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing certainty about mental states in Iranian adults and may be useful in psychological, clinical, and educational research. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Self-Certainty, Other-Certainty, Certainty About Mental States, Psychometrics, Validity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Antonsen, B. T., Johansen, M. S., Rø, F. G., Kvarstein, E. H., & Wilberg, T. (2016). Is reflective functioning associated with clinical symptoms and long term course in patients with personality disorders? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 64, 46–58. [link] Ahmadi, M., Bagherian Sararoudi, R., & Mousavi, S. M. H. (2020). Mentalization and its multidimensional nature. Behavioral Sciences Research,18(4), 616–622. [link] Ballespí, S., Vives, J., Sharp, C., Chanes, L., & Barrantes-Vidal, N. (2021). Self and other mentalizing polarities and dimensions of mental health: association with type of symptoms, functioning and well-being. Frontiers in psychology,12, 566254. [link] Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. American Psychiatric Pub. [link] Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child. Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. [link] Bouchard, M. A., Target, M., Lecours, S., Fonagy, P., Tremblay, L. M., Schachter, A., & Stein, H. (2008). Mentalization in adult attachment narratives: Reflective functioning, mental states, and affect elaboration compared. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(1), 47–66. [link] Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatmen for borderline personality disorder. World psychiatry, 9(1), 11. [link] Bo, S., Sharp, C., Fonagy, P., & Kongerslev, M. (2017). Hypermentalizing, attachment, and epistemic trust in adolescent BPD: Clinical illustrations. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(2), 172. [link] Dorogar, E., Fathi Ashtiani, A., & Ashrafi, E. (2020). Validation and reliability of the Persian version of the Mentalization Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 1–12. [link] Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence or a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. [link] Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., & Jolić Marjanović, Z. (2018). The Mentalization Scale (MentS): A Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(3), 268–280. [link] Fonagy, P., Leigh, T., Steele, M., Steele, H., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., Target, M., & Gerber, A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(1), 22–31. [link] Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2006). The mentalization-focused approach to self pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(6), 544–576. [link] Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Jurist, E. L. (2018). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. Routledge. [link] Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y. W., Warren, F., Howard, S., & Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PloS one, 11(7), e0158678. [link] Fonagy P, Luyten P, Allison E, Campbell C. What we have changed our minds about: Part 1. Borderline personality disorder as a limitation of resilience. Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation. 2017 Dec; 4:1-1. [link] Gori, A., Arcioni, A., Topino, E., Craparo, G., & Lauro Grotto, R. (2021). Development of a new measure for assessing mentalizing: The multidimensional mentalizing questionnaire (MMQ). Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(4), 305. [link] Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. [link] Jafari, M. A., Norouzi, Z., & Fooladchang, M. (2017). Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Basic Empathy Scale: Persian version. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 14(25), 23–38. [link] Küçükkambak, S. E., & Armağan, E. (2022). Examination of the validity and reliability of data collected through online and face-to-face survey techniques. Aksaray University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14(4), 397-410. [link] Kasper, L. A., Hauschild, S., Berning, A., Holl, J., & Taubner, S. (2024). Development and validation of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire: A self-report measure for mentalizing emotions of the self and other. Plos one, 19(5), e0300984. [link] Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. [link] Köber, C., Kuhn, M. M., Peters, I., & Habermas, T. (2019). Mentalizing oneself: Detecting reflective functioning in life narratives. Attachment & Human Development, 21(4), 313-331. [link] Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2015). The neurobiology of mentalizing. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(4), 366. [link] Müller, S., Wendt, L. P., & Zimmermann, J. (2023). Development and validation of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ): A self-report measure of mentalizing oneself and others. Assessment, 30(3), 651-674. [link] Müller, S., Wendt, L. P., Spitzer, C., Masuhr, O., Back, S. N., & Zimmermann, J. (2021). A critical evaluation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ). Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. [link] Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., & Wright, A. G. (2020). The interpersonal situation. The Oxford handbook of psychological situations, 123-142. [link] Poznyak, E., Morosan, L., Perroud, N., Speranza, M., Badoud, D., & Debbané, M. (2019). Roles of age, gender and psychological difficulties in adolescent mentalizing. Journal of adolescence, 74, 120-129. [link] Richter, F., Steinmair, D., & Löffler-Stastka, H. (2021). Construct Validity of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) within a mixed psychiatric sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 608214. [link] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package, 61(52), 18. [link] Shapurian, R., Hojat, M. and Nayerahmadi, H. (1987) Psychometric characteristics and dimensionality of a Persian version of Rosenberg Self esteem Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65(1), 27-34. [link] Silverstone, P. H., & Salsali, M. (2003). Low self-esteem and psychiatric patients: Part I–The relationship between low self-esteem and psychiatric diagnosis. Annals of general hospital psychiatry, 2, 1-9. [link] Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., & Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality disorders: theory, research, and treatment, 2(1), 4. [link] Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. 6h Edition, Person Education, Boston [link] Usluoglu, F., Bülbül, E., & Çakır, R. (2024). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation the certainty about mental states questionnaire (CAMSQ). Cukurova university faculty of education journal, 53(1), 398-422. [link] Wang, J., Siegal, H. A., Falck, R. S., & Carlson, R. G. (2001) Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s self- esteem scale among crack- cocaine drug users. Structural equation modeling, 8, 275- 286. [link] Zimmermann, J., Müller, S., Bach, B., Hutsebaut, J., Hummelen, B., & Fischer, F. (2020). A common metric for self-reported severity of personality disorder. Psychopathology, 53, 161–171. [link] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 339 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 51 |
||