حمایت ازسرمایهگذاری خارجی در معاهده منشور انرژی | ||
| فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 19، شماره 73، خرداد 1395، صفحه 107-135 اصل مقاله (398.48 K) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد جغفر قنبری جهرمی؛ حمیدرضا علیخانی | ||
| دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقررات مربوط به سرمایهگذاری مندرج در فصل سوم معاهده منشور انرژی، سنگبنای معاهده است. هدف این مقررات ترویج و حمایت از سرمایهگذاری خارجی در کشورهای عضو است. برای رسیدن به این هدف، معاهده تعدادی حقوق بنیادین به سرمایهگذاران خارجی در رابطه با سرمایهگذاری آنها در کشور میزبان اعطا نموده است. منطبق با رویکرد معاهده، این مقاله در دو مرحله مجزا، مرحله قبل از ایجاد انجام سرمایهگذاری یا اصطلاحاً مرحله پذیرش سرمایهگذاری و مرحله پس از استقرار سرمایهگذاری، حمایت از سرمایهگذاری خارجی را مورد بررسی قرار میدهد. در این راستا، عدم تبعیض از طریق اعطای رفتار ملی و یا رفتار ملتهای کاملهالوداد، هریک به نفع سرمایهگذار باشد، بهعنوان مهمترین تعهد دولتها در مواجهه با سرمایهگذاری خارجی در کنار برخی مفاهیم حمایتی دیگر چون تعهد به اعطای رفتار عادلانه و منصفانه به سرمایهگذاری سرمایهگذاران دیگر دولتهای عضو و رعایت حداقل استانداردهای حقوق بینالملل در رابطه با سرمایهگذاری خارجی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته و تلاش میشود ضمن مقایسه آنها با سایر اسناد مشابه و رویههای داوری موجود، درک صحیحی از جایگاه معاهده ارائه گردد.معاهده منشور انرژی، سرمایهگذاری خارجی، حمایت از سرمایه گذاری | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| معاهده منشور انرژی؛ سرمایهگذاری خارجی؛ حمایت از سرمایهگذاری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| 1 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| class="a">Provisions on investment contained in chapter three of energy charter treaty are the cornerstone of the treaty that aim to promote and protect foreign investment in member states. To this end, the treaty confers some fundamental rights to foreign investors in host state in the relation to their investment. Compatible with treaty approach, this article addresses the protection of investment in two separated phase; pre-investment phase or so-called adoption of foreign investment by state, and after establishing investment. In this respect, Nondiscrimination through national treatment or MFN, whichever is the more favorable, as the most important commitment of states in facing with a foreign investment in company with some other concepts such as obligation to accord at all times to Investments of Investors of other Contracting Parties fair and equitable treatment and observing minimum standards of international law will be discussed and try to, by comparing them with other similar instruments and arbitral practice, render a correct comprehension from treaty’s position.Key words Energy Charter Treaty, Foreign Investment, Protection of Investment. | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
الف) فارسی .1381/12/ 1. قانون تشویق و حمایت سرمایهگذاری خارجی، مصوب 19 2. مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسلامی ، پیرامون سرمایه گذاری خارجی ، گزارش .1373/8/4 ،1400708 3. مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسلامی ، تنگناهای سرمایه گذاری در ایران ، گزارش . 1601428 ، خرداد 1375 4. پاکدامن، رضا؛ نظام حقوقی مناطق آزاد جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسه مطالعاتی . و پژوهشهای بازرگانی، تهران، 1375 5. غفاری، سید محمدرضا؛ بررسی آثار پیوستن ایرا ن ب ه پیما ن منشو ر انرژی ، . مدیریت کل اوپک و روابط با مجامع انرژی، مرداد 1393 ب) لاتین a) Books 6. Fatouros, Arghyrios A., "An international legal framework for energy (Volume 332)." Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, The Hague Academy of International Law, 2008. 7. Gaillard, Emmanuel and McNeill, Mark, “The Energy Charter Treaty”, in: YANNACA-SMALL, KATIA (Ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, A guide to the key issues, oxford university press, 2010. 8. Gaillard, Emmanuel, “How does the so-called 'fork-in-the-road' provision in Article 26(3)(b)(i) of the Energy Charter Treaty work? Why did the United States decline to sign the Energy Charter Treaty?”, in: Coop & C. Ribeiro (eds)., INVESTMENT PROTECTION AND THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY, G. Juris Publishing, 2008. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 73 حمایت از سرمای هگذاری خارجی در معاهده منشور انرژی 132 9. Joubin-Bret, Anna, “Admission and establishment in the context of investment protection”, in August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford University Press, 2008. 10.Oppenheim, International Law, edited by R. Jennings and A. Watts, and Vol. I, Harlow, 1992. 11.Schreuer, Christoph H., “Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): interactions with other standards”, in: Coop, Graham and Ribeiro, Clarisse (Ed.), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty, huntington: juris publishing, 2008. 12.Yannaca-Small, A., “Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law”, in: INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW: A CHANGING LANDSCAPE 73 (OECD Publishing 2005). b) Articles 13.Dolzer, RUDOLF, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties,’ The International Lawyer, 39 (2005). 14.Gaillard, Emmanuel, “Treaty-based jurisdiction: broad dispute resolution clauses’, NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL (N.Y. L.J.) No. 68, vol. 234, (2005). 15.Houde, Marie-France and Pagani, Fabrizio, “MOST-FAVOUREDNATION TREATMENT IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW”, in: International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape A Companion Volume to International Investment Perspectives, OECD 2005. 16.Pinsolle, Philippe, The Dispute Resolution Provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty, INT ALR 86, London: Sweet & Maxwell, (2007). 17.Schreuer, Christoph H., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Geneva, Vol. 6, No. 3 (2005). 18.Selinova, Yulia, ‘The Energy Charter and the International Energy Governance’ (2012) 3 European Yearbook of International Economic Law. 19.Waelde, Thomas W., ‘International Energy Investment’ Energy Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 191 (1996). 20.Wawryk, Alexandra, International Energy Law: An Emerging Academic Discipline (June 2, 2014). U. of Adelaide Law Research Paper No. 2014- 16, p.20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2445267. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 73 حمایت از سرمای هگذاری خارجی در معاهده منشور انرژی 133 21.Yannaca-Small, K., “Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements”, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2006/03, OECD Publishing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/415453814578 c) Instruments 22.Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, BIT (2007). Available in: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/1347 23.Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United Mexican States for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, BIT (2006). Available in: 24. http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/2009 25.Convention establishing the European FreeTrade Association (EFTA), 4 January 1960, revised at 21 June 2001. Available in: 26. http://www.efta.int/sites/default/files/documents/legal-texts/eftaconvention/ Vaduz%20Convention%20Agreement.pdf 27.Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), 2004. In: https://ustr.gov/tradeagreements/ free-trade-agreements/cafta-dr-dominican-republic-centralamerica- fta/final-text 28.Energy Charter Secretariat, THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY, A READER’S GUIDE, 2002. Available in: http://www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Legal/ECT_G uide_en.pdf 29.ENERGY CHARTER TREATY (ECT), FINAL ACT OF THE EUROPEAN ENERGY CHARTER CONFERENCE, ANNEX 1, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 069 , 09/03/1998 P. 0001 – 0116, 9.3.98 30.Final Act of the European Energy Charter Conference, Official Journal of the European Communities, Official Journal L 380, 31/12/1994 P. 0003 – 0023 31.ILC, Draft articles on most-favoured-nation clauses (ILC Draft), Yearbook of the international Law Commission, 1978, Vol. II, Part Two 32.ILC, “Comments of Member States, organs of the United Nations, specialized agencies and other intergovernmental organizations on the فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 73 حمایت از سرمای هگذاری خارجی در معاهده منشور انرژی 134 draft articles on the most-favoured-nation clause adopted by the International Law commission at its twenty-eighth session”, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1978, Vol. II, Part Two 33.ILC, First Report of the ILC’s Special Rapporteur, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1969, Vol. II 34.NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions, Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents, July 31, 2001, B(3). available in: http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp 35.North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 1992. In: 36. https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Legal-Texts/North-American-Free- Trade-Agreement 37.UNCTAD, MOST-FAVOURED-NATION TREATMENT: A SEQUEL, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, UNITED NATIONS, New York and Geneva, 2010 d) Cases 38.Ad hoc Arbitration, Eureko B.V. v. Poland, Partial Award, 19 August 2005. Available at http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/Eureko- PartialAwardandDissentingOpinion.pdf 39.ICJ, ElettronicaSiculaSpA (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), Judgment, 20 July 1989 40.ICSID, Wena Hotels Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000 41.ICSID, PSEG v. Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, Award, 19 January 2007 42.ICSID, Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID CASE No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 43.ICSID, Noble Ventures. Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 October 2005 44.ICSID, Wena Hotels v. Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000 45.ICSID, TecnicasMedioambientalesTecmed S. A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003 46.ICSID, Noble Ventures Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 October 2005 فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 73 حمایت از سرمای هگذاری خارجی در معاهده منشور انرژی 135 47.ICSID, AAPL v. Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 21 June 1990 48.ICSID, AMT v. Zaire, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, 21 February 1997 49.ICSID, ČeskoslovenskáObchodní Banka A.S. v. The Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, Award, 29 December 2004 50.ICSID, Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, CSID CASE No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 51.ICSID, Siemens v. Argentina, ICSID CASE No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007 52.ICSID, SGS SociétéGenérale de Surveillance, S.A. v. Pakistan, ICS1D Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, August 6, 2003 53.ICSID, PSEG Global, Inc., The North American Coal Corporation, and Konya InginElectrikÜretimveTicaret Limited Sirketi v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, Award, 19 Jan 2007 54.UNCITRAL, Saluka Investments BV (The Netherlands) v. The Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 55.UNCITRAL, CME v. The Czech Republic, Partial Award, 13 September 2001 56.UNCITRAL, Ronald S. Lauder v. The Czech Republic, Award, 3 September 2001 57.LCIA, Occidental Exploration and Production Co. v. Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, Award, 1 July 2004 58.SCC, Petrobart v. The Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Case No. 126/2003, Award, 29 March 2005 59.SCC, NykombSynergetics Technology Holding AB v. Republic of Latvia, Award, 16 December 2003 e) Internet sites: 60.http://www.energycharter.org 61.http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org 62.http://www.efta.int 63.https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org 64.https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements 65.http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents 66.http://www.sice.oas.org 67.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/direct-access.html | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,084 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 967 |
||
