فهرست منابع

الف) منابع فارسی

کتاب

1. کرایر، رابرت، هاکان فریمن، داریل رابینسون، الیزابت ویلمز هورست، درآمدی بر حقوق و آییندادرسی بین‌المللی کیفری، ترجمۀ حسین فخر و داود کوهی، تهران: انتشارات مجد، 1393.

2. کیتی­شیایزری، کریانگ­ساک، حقوق بین‌المللی کیفری، ترجمۀ بهنام یوسفیان و محمد اسماعیلی، چاپ سوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت، 1392.

مقاله

3. رضوی­فرد، بهزاد،از کارکردهای سنتی کیفر درحقوق داخلی تا کارکردهای نوین آن در حقوق بین‌الملل کیفری، فصلنامه مطالعات پیشگیری از جرم، زمستان1390، شمارۀ 21.

4. غلامی,حسین، نجفی ابرند آبادی، علی حسین، نظریه مجازات های استحقاقی و تکرار جرم، مدرس علوم انسانی، زمستان 1378، شمارۀ 4.

5. غلامی، حسین، رستمی غازانی،امید، زمینه‌های عدالت ترمیمی در اساسنامه دیوان کیفری بین المللی، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق کیفری، سال دوم، پاییز1392، شمارۀ 4.

6. کوشا، جعفر، زارعی، محمد حسین،اصل تناسب جرم و مجازات در حقوق بین‌المللی کیفری، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی، تابستان1390.

ب) منابع انگلیسی

Books

7. Arent, H. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Washington: Penguin Books, 1994

8. Drumbl M. A.Atrocity, Punishment, And International Law, NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

9. Van Zyl Smit D. and Sonja Snacken. Principles of European Prison Law andPolicy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Articles

10. Akhavan P. “Justice in the Hague, Peace in the Former Yugoslavia? A Commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal”, Human Rights Quarterly 20( 1998).

11. Bar-Tal D. “From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: psychological analysis”, Political Psychology 21(2000).

12. Cassese A. “The ICTY: A Living and Vital Reality”, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2(2004).

13. Cassese A. “Reflection On international Criminal Justice”, The modern law review 61(1998).

14. Danner A.M. & Martinez J.S.”Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law”, California Law Review 93(2005).

15. Fischer M. “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice”, in Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II (2011).

16. Fletcher L. E. “From Indifference to Engagement: Bystanders and International Criminal Justice”,Michigan journal of international  law 26( 2004).

17. Galbraith J. “The Pace of International Criminal Justice”, Michigan Journal of International Law 79(2009).

18. Goffrier B.” Deterrence as Principle of Sentencing in International Criminal Justice”,Amsterdam: Centre for International Criminal Justice( 2014)

19. Hola, B. & van Wijk, J. “Life after Conviction at International Criminal Tribunals – Empirical Overview”,  Journal of  International Criminal Justice, 12(2014).

20. Keenan P. J. “The Problem Of  Purpose In International Criminal Law”,Michigan Journal of International Law 37(2016).

21. Kuster M. “Reconciliation as a sentencing goal in International Criminal Justice”, Amsterdam: Centre for International Criminal Justice (2014).

22. Muphy. C. ”Political reconciliation and international criminal trials”, International Criminal Law and Philosophy (2009).

23. Mennecke, M. “Punishing genocidaires. A deterrent effect or not?”, Human Rights Review 8(2007) .

24. Olásolo H. “The Prosecutor of The ICC Before the Initiation of Investigations: A Quasi-Judicial or a Political Body?”, International Criminal Law Review 3(2003).

25. Smith K. “Rehabilitation as a Sentencing Goal in International Criminal Justice”, Amsterdam: Centre for International Criminal Justice (2014).

26. Sufferling, C.M.J. “The Justification Of Punishment In International Criminal Law Can National Theories Of Justification Be Applied To The International Level?”,Austrian Review of International and European Law Online 4(2000).

27. Wilson, R. A. “Judging History: The Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia”, Human Rights Quarterly 27 (2005).

28. Wippman D. “Atrocities, deterrence, and the limits of international justice”, Fordham International Law Journal 23(1999).

Cases

29. Prosecutor vs.Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14/1 , Appeal chamberJudgement, 24 Mar 2000.

30. Prosecutor vs.Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T,  Trail Judgement, 2 September 1998.

31. Prosecutor v.Deronjic, Case No. IT-02-61, Sentencing judgemen,30 Mar 2004.

32. Prosecutor v. Erdemovic, Case No. IT-96-22,Sentencing judgement, 29 Nov 1996.

33. Prosecutor vs.Karadzic, Case No. IT-95-5/18, Trial Chamber Decisions , 8 Jul 2009.

34. Prosecutor vs.Kordic , Case No. IT-95-14/2 , Appeal chamber Judgement, 17 Dec 2004.

35. Prosecutor vs.Krstic, Case No. IT-98-33,Trial Judgement, 2 Aug 2001.

36. Prosecutor vs. Kunarac et al, Case No. IT-23 & IT-96-23/1, Trail Judgement, 22 February 2001.

37. Prosecutor vs. Mrda, Case No. IT-02-59, Sentencing Judgement, 31 March 2004.

38. Prosecutor vs.mucic et al, Case No. IT-96-21, appeal chamber judgement, 20 Feb 2001.

39. Prosecutor vs. Musema, Case No. ICTR-96-13 , judgement and Sentence,  27 January 2000.

40. Prosecutor vs.Nicolic, Case No. IT-94-2, judgement on sentensing appeal, 4 February 2005 .

41. Prosecutor vs.Plavsic, Case No. IT-00-39 & 40/1,Sentencing Judgement,27 Feb 2003.

42. Prosecutor vs. Rutaganda, Case No. ICTR-96-3,  judgement and Sentence, 6 December 1999.

43. Prosecutor vs.Rutaganira, Case No. ICTR-95-1C, Judgement and Sentence, 14 March 2005.

44. Prosecutor vs.Tadic, Case No. IT-96-21, judgement in sentensing appeal, 26 Jan 2000.

45. Prosecuter vs. Todorovic, Case No. IT-95-9/1,Sentencing Judgement, 31 Jul 2001.

Internet sites

46. Plea Agreement in Todorovic case available at 

http://www.icty.org/en/press/plea-agreement-announced-motion-hearing-todorovic-case( last visited on17/7/2017).