The significance of Economic History, and the Fundamental Features of the Economic History of Iran | ||
| International Journal of New Political Economy | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 1، شماره 2، 2020، صفحه 27-54 اصل مقاله (495.64 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/jep.1.2.27 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Homa Katouzian* | ||
| St Antony’s College, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Social history is the mother of the social sciences. Economic history and the history of political economy are useful and respectable academic pursuits in their own right, just as history itself is one of the most important fields of learning and scholarship in every civilized country. Not every economist, sociologist or political scientist has to be a historian, but their work is meaningful, realistic and relevant to the extent that it is conducted against the appropriate social background and reality, which history, its logic and its sociology can provide, on the condition that these too are constructed on a realistic and relevant plain. This does not mean that every economist must be an economic historian or a sociologist. It means that economic studies, whether theoretical or empirical, whether as an academic pursuit or as a policy prescription, must have in the background the history and social framework to which they refer. So, the rules of social and economic behavior, public and private economic decision making can be, and often are, very different from the assumptions of models which are based on theories of European society and economy, irrespective of the ideology or paradigm to which they refer. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Economic History؛ History of Political Economy؛ Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Clark, C. (1957). The conditions of economic progress: London and New York.
- Dickens, A.G. (1977). The Age of Humanism and Reformation: London.
- Eric Roll, A. (1974). History of Economic Thought: London.
- Gerschenkron, A. (1962). The Approach to European Industrialization, in Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspectives: Cambridge Mass.
- Green, V. H. H. (1954). Luther and the Reformation: London and New York.
- Hurstfield, J. (1965). The Reformation Crisis: London.
- Isaiah Berlin, I. (1969). Historical Inevitability” in his Four Essays on Liberty: London.
- Joseph, A. S., (1996). Historian of Economics: Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, ed, Laurence S. Moss: London.
- Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Growth of the British Economy, Economic Journal.
- Katouzian, H. (1989). Oil and Economic Development in the Middle East, in The Modern Economic History of the Middle East in its World Context, Essays Presented to Charles Issawi, ed., George Sabagh: Cambridge.
- Katouzian, H. (1961). Adam Smith and Adam Smith, A Study in the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed., Edwin Cannan: London
- Katouzian, H. (1970). The Development of the Service Sector: A New Approach, Oxford Economic Papers.
- Katouzian, H. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Katouzian, H. (1977). Adam Smith va Servat-e Melal, second edition, (Tehran, 2003). See further, The Life of Adam Smith, ed., Jacob Viner.
- Katouzian, H. (1979). Services in International Trade: A Theoretical Interpretation" in Herbert Giersch, ed., International Economic Development and Resource Transfer, Tübingen, Institute of World Economics.
- Katouzian, H. (1979). The Political Economy of Oil Exporting Countries, Peuples Mediterraneans.
- Katouzian, H. (1980). Ideology and Method in Economics: London and New York.
- Katouzian, H. (1981). The Political Economy of Modern Iran, London and New York.
- Katouzian, H. (1982). The Hallmarks of Science and Scholasticism: A Historical Analysis, The Yearbook of the Sociology of the Sciences.
- Katouzian, H. (1997). Arbitrary Rule, A Comparative Theory of State, Politics and Society in Iran”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies: 1, 24.
- Katouzian, H. (1997). The Pahlavi Regime in Iran” in H. E. Chehabi and Juan Linz (eds.), Sultanistic Regimes, Baltimore.
- Katouzian, H. (1998). Problems of Democracy and the Public Sphere in Modern Iran”, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 18, 2.
- Katouzian, H. (1998). Iranian History and Politics, “Farrah-ye Izadi va Haqq-e Elahi-ye Padshahan” in Ettela‘at Siyasi-Eqtesadi, 129-130.
- Katouzian, H. (1999). Towards a General Theory of Iranian Revolutions”, Journal of Iranian Research and Analysis: 15, 2.
- Katouzian, H. (2000). State and Society in Iran, The Eclipse of the Qajars and the Emergence of the Pahlavis: London and New York.
- Katouzian, H. (2003). Iranian History and Politics: London and New York.
- Katouzian, H. (2003). Legitimacy and Succession In Iranian History”, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23, 1&2.
- Katouzian, M.A. (1978). Oil versus Agriculture, A Case of Dual Resource Depletion in Iran, Journal of Peasant Studies. 3: 347-369.
- Kuznets, S. (). Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure and Spread: London.
- Mill, J. (1977). The History of India: London.
- Phillips, M. (1949). Erasmus and the Northern Renaissance: London.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). Economic Doctrine and Method: London.
- Smyth, R. L. (1962). Essays in Economic Method: London.
-Marx, K. (1968). Theories of Surplus Value: Moscow.
-Max Weber, (1930). Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism: London, 1930.
-Tawney, R. H. (1937). Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: London, 1937. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 270 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,516 |
||