سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

اکبری, محسن, رضائی پیته نوئی, یاسر, شمس قاسمی, معصومه. (1398). نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی در اثرگذاری ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت. , 9(27), 109-132. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.9.27.109
محسن اکبری; یاسر رضائی پیته نوئی; معصومه شمس قاسمی. "نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی در اثرگذاری ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت". , 9, 27, 1398, 109-132. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.9.27.109
اکبری, محسن, رضائی پیته نوئی, یاسر, شمس قاسمی, معصومه. (1398). 'نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی در اثرگذاری ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت', , 9(27), pp. 109-132. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.9.27.109
اکبری, محسن, رضائی پیته نوئی, یاسر, شمس قاسمی, معصومه. نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی در اثرگذاری ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت. , 1398; 9(27): 109-132. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.9.27.109

نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی در اثرگذاری ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت

چشم انداز مدیریت مالی
مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 27، آذر 1398، صفحه 109-132    اصل مقاله (955.29 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/jfmp.9.27.109
نویسندگان
محسن اکبری1؛ یاسر رضائی پیته نوئی* 2؛ معصومه شمس قاسمی3
1دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
2استادیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
3دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
پذیرش دیدگاه شهروندی برای شرکت به عنوان عضوی از جامعه، مسئولیت پاسخگویی را از جهت افزایش شفافیت و گزارشدهی به همراه دارد. گزارش‌گری مسئولیت اجتماعی از مهمترین این ابزارهاست، که تبعات و تاثیرات متفاوتی را به همراه خواهد داشت. هدف از این پژوهش، شناسایی اثر تعدیلی نظارت خارجی بر رابطه بین ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران است. در این مطالعه داده‌های مربوط به 105 شرکت و برای دوره زمانی 1392 تا 1396 و با بهره‌گیری از مدل‌های رگرسیون چندمتغیره مبتنی بر تکنیک داده‌های ترکیبی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که ابعاد مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت به‌صورت مستقیم رابطه معنی‌داری دارند. علاوه بر این تأثیر ابعاد فنی و نهادی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی بر سودآوری شرکت با نقش تعدیلی نظارت خارجی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش مطابق با پیش بینی نظریه مکمل بیانگر آن بود که نظارت خارجی رابطه مثبت بین بعد فنی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی و سودآوری شرکت را تعدیل (تشدید) می‌کند؛ اما در رابطه بین بعد نهادی مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی و سودآوری شرکت، نظارت خارجی نقش تعدیلی ایفا نمی‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی؛ سودآوری؛ نظارت خارجی؛ بعد فنی؛ بعد نهادی
عنوان مقاله [English]
The moderating role of external monitoring in influencing the technical and institutional dimensions of corporate social responsibility on profitability
نویسندگان [English]
Mohsen Akbari1؛ Yasser Rezaei Pitenoei2؛ masoomeh Ghasemi shams3
1Associate prof, Department of Management, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
2Assistant Prof, Department of Accounting, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
3Ph.D. Student in Management , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Adopting a citizen's perspective for participating as a member of the community brings responsibility for accountability for increased transparency and accountability. Social responsibility reporting is one of the most important tools that will have different consequences and impacts. The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of moderating role of external monitoring on the relationship between the technical and institutional dimensions of social responsibility on profitability in companies of Tehran Stock Exchange. In this study, data from 105 companies for the period 2013 to 2017 were investigated using multivariate regression models based on combined data technique. The results of the research showed that social responsibility dimensions have a direct relationship with the firm's profitability. In addition, the impact of the technical and institutional dimensions of social responsibility on the company's profitability with the moderating role of external monitoring was examined. The results of the study, according to the prediction of the complementary theory, indicate that external monitoring exacerbates the positive relationship between the technical dimension of social responsibility and profitability of the company, but in the relationship between the institutional dimension of social responsibility and profitability of the company, external monitoring does not play a moderating role.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Social Responsibility, Profitability, External Monitoring, Technical Dimension, Institutional Dimension
مراجع
  1. Anthony, J., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices: A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 15, 203-227.
  2. Arab Salehi, M., Sadeghi. GH. & Moin al-Din. M. (2013). The relationship of social responsibility with the financial performance of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. Empirical Accounting Research, 3(9), 1-20 (In Persian).
  3. Arefi, A. (2009). The Study of Financial Performance in Iranian Acquisition Firms. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 13(50), 225-245 (In Persian).
  4. Arshad, R. & Razak, S. N. A. A. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Interaction Effects of Ownership Structure On Firm Performance, Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 111, 25-28.
  5. Attig, N., Cleary, S., Ghoul, S. (2014). Corporate Legitimacy and Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics.121, 297-314.
  6. Bahari Moghaddam, M., Zeinal Abedini, S., and Safarzadeh, S. (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Mechanisms of Corporate Governance on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Accounting, 5(20), 90-107 (In Persian).
  7. Benlemlih, M. & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency, J Bus Ethics, 148(3), 647-671.
  8. Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. (2013). Institutional Investor stability and Crash Risk: Monitoring or Expropriation? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3047–3063.
  9. Darabi, R., Vaghfi, S. H., & Salmanian, M. (2017). Relationship between social responsibility reporting with company value and risk for companies registered in Tehran Stock Exchange, Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accountings Achievements, 1(2), 193-213 (In Persian).
  10. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73, 131-146.
  11. Fakhari, H., Fallahpour, F. (2018). The Mediating Effect Of financial Performance on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Market Value-Added (Study: At Listed Companies in The Tehran Stock Exchange), Financial Management Perspective Journal, 20, 97-114 (In Persian).
  12. Fakhari, H., Rezaei Pitenoei, Y., & Noroozi, M. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Investment Efficiency, Journal of Financial Management Strategy, 4(4), 85 -106 (In Persian).
  13. Feizollahi, S., Fatemi, A., Shirmohammadi, A. (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Market orientation and Social Responsibility and their Effect on Firm Performance. Productivity Management, 7(27), 81-98 (In Persian).
  14. Fisman, R., Heal, G. & Nair, V. B. (2008). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working paper. Columbia University, New York.
  15. Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393-416.
  16. Hajiha, Z. & Chenari Bouket, H. (2016). Skewness of Stock Returns and corporate social responsibility, Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accountings Achievements, 1(1), 77-98 (In Persian).
  17. Han-MinWang, D., Chen, P., Hui-Kuang Yu, T. & Hsiao, C. (2015). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand equity and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, In Press.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.003.
  18. Harjoto, M. A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Fraud. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 762-779.
  19. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011).Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45–67.
  20. Heydari, M., Alikhani, R., Maranjory, M. (2018). The Effect of the board's independence on the quality of social information disclosure in Annual Reports. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 7(27), 51-62 (In Persian).
  21. Iatridis, G. E. (2013). Environmental Disclosure Quality: Evidence on Environmental Performance, Corporate Governance and Value Relevance, Emerging Markets Review, 14, 55-75.
  22. Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions, Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864.
  23. Jalili, S., Gheiysari, F. (2014). Investigating the relationship between earnings quality and social responsibility of listed company on Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Auditing Knowledge, 57, 147-172 (In Persian).
  24. Kim, Y. S., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and Internal Control Effectiveness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46, 341–372.
  25. Legnick-Hall, C. A. (1996). Customer contributions to quality: A different view of the customer-oriented firm. Academy of Management Review, 21, 791–824.
  26. Maranjory, M., & Alikhani, R. (2014). Social Responsibility Disclosure and Corporate Governance, Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 21(3), 329 -348 (In Persian).
  27. McCarthy, S., Oliver, B. & Song, S. (2014). CEO overconfidence and corporate social responsibility. Working paper. UQ Business School.
  28. Mehrabanpour, M., Kazempour, M., Esmaeil Beigi, F. (2017). Explaining the Mutual Relationship between Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance by Using Simultaneous Equations System. Journal of Health Accounting, 5(2), 112-129 (In Persian).
  29. Mehrani, S., Moradi, M., Eskandar, H. (2010). The Relationship between Type of Institutional Ownership and Conservative Accounting. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 2(1), 47-62 (In Persian).
  30. Mokarami, Y. (2006). Principles of Corporate Governance, Hesabras, 32, 40.
  31. Moradi, J., Bagheri mooselu, F. (2015). Life Cycle Impact on the Relationship between Firm Growth and Profitability: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 7(2), 108-93 (In Persian).
  32. Moshabbaki, A., Khalili Shojaie, V. (2010). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Social Responsibility of Organizations, Journal of Applied Sociology, 21(4), 37-56 (In Persian).
  33. Oeyono, J. and Samy, M .and Bampton, R. (2011). An examination of corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the top 50 Indonesian listed corporations, Journal of Global Responsibility, 2(1), 100-112.
  34. Omidvar, A. (2005).Corporate social responsibility and its limits, Tadbir Journal, 146, 23-34 (In Persian).
  35. Park, J., H. Lee, & C. Kim. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 295-302.
  36. Poddi, L., & Vergalli, S. (2009). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms? FEEM Working Paper NO, 52.
  37. Pourali, M. R., & Hajjami, A. (2014). Relationship between social responsibility disclosure and institutional ownership in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 3(10), 135 -150 (In Persian).
  38. Rahimi, S., Lashgari, Z., Hajiha, Z. (2015). Social Trust and Earning Management. Financial Management Perspective Journal, 12, 9-26 (In Persian).
  39. Rezaei Pitenoei, Y., Abdollahi, A. (2017). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, Accepted Manuscript (In Persian).
  40. Rezaei Pitenoei, Y., Safari Gerayli, M., Norouzi, M. (2017). Social Trust, External Monitoring and Stock Price Crash Risk: Testing Complementary and Substitution Theory. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 24(3), 349-370 (In Persian).
  41. Saboohi, N., Mohamadzadeh, A. (2018). Investigating the relationship between social performance, ownership structure and corporate governance. Accounting Empirical Research of Financial, 5(1), 127-151 (In Persian).
  42. Safari Gerayeli, M. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Market Value of Corporate Cash Holdings. Financial Management Strategy, 6(1), 163-183 (In Persian).
  43. Servaes, H. & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
  44. Setiawan, M., & Darmawan, B. (2011). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from the Firms Listed in LQ45 of the Indonesian Stock Exchange Market. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 288-293.
  45. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (2000).Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.
  46. Van de Velde, E., Vermeir, W. & Corten, F. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Finance and Accounting, 3, 129-138.
  47. Velury, U. & Jenkins, D. S. (2006) Institutional ownership and the quality of earnings. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 1043-1051.
  48. Waddock, S. A., Graves, S. B., (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,500
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,841