تأملی بر تعامل بوروکراسی و دموکراسی: مطالعهای در میان اعضای هیئتعلمی دانشگاهها | ||
| چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، 1399، صفحه 39-74 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی (با رویکردهای کیفی) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jpap.2020.96674 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرهاد مهرگان* 1؛ ابوالحسن فقیهی2؛ ناصر میرسپاسی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای، مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: در این مطالعه هدف اصلی بررسی ویژگیهای ساختاری بوروکراسی و شناسایی کارکردهای آن بهمنظور استقرار یک نظام دموکراتیک است. طراحی/روششناسی/رویکرد: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، بنیادی، از لحاظ ماهیت و روش، توصیفی و از نظر نوع دادهها جزو پژوهشهای کیفی به شمار میرود. جامعه موردمطالعه در این پژوهش اعضای هیئتعلمی دو دانشگاه صلاحالدین و جهان در منطقه کردستان عراق است که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 23 نفر بهعنوان نمونه و به روش نمونهگیری خوشهای انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری دادهها، مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته بود که از طریق تحلیل تم، تمهای فرعی و مفاهیم مربوطه به آن شناسایی و کدگذاری شدند. یافتههای پژوهش: نتایج نشان داد که ویژگیهای ساختاری بوروکراسی جامعه موردمطالعه، متفاوت از مدل بوروکراسی وبر است؛ اما به دلیل وجود تنوع نیروی کار در نظام اداری و همکاری آن با بخشهای مختلف حاکمیتی، نقش مؤثری در استقرار نظام دموکراتیک داشته است. محدودیتها و پیامدها: شرایط موجود در منطقه موردمطالعه بر نظرها و دیدگاههای مصاحبهشوندگان تأثیر گذاشته است. ازآنجاکه گردآوری دادهها در میان گروهی خاصی انجام شده است، برای تعمیمپذیری نتایج پژوهش باید مطالعات بیشتری در میان گروههای مختلف جامعه و در زمانهای مختلف انجام شود. پیامدهای عملی: با توجه به دیدگاه مختلف درباره رابطه بین بوروکراسی و دموکراسی، دموکراتیککردن فرایندهای بوروکراتیک در سازمانها برای ایجاد دموکراسی در جامعه، امری ضروری به نظر میرسد. ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: این مقاله در حوزه مدیریت دولتی است و با رویکردی عملی، درک بهتری از رابطه بین بوروکراسی و دموکراسی را تبیین میکند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بوروکراسی؛ دموکراسی؛ تحلیل تم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Contemplation on the Interaction of Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Study among Faculty Members of Universities | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farhad Mehrgan1؛ Abolhassan Faghihi2؛ Naser Mirsepassi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D student of public administration, department of management and economics, science and research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor of public administration, department of management and economics, science and research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to examine the structural features of the bureaucracy and identify its functions for establishing a democratic system. Design/Methodology/Approach: The present study is descriptive in terms of purpose, fundamental, in terms of nature and method, and qualitative in terms of data type. The study population was faculty members of two Salah al-Din universities and Jahan in Iraqi Kurdistan who 23 individuals were selected using Cochran formula and cluster sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews that were identified and coded through theme analysis, sub-themes and related concepts. Research Findings: The results showed that the structural characteristics of the bureaucracy in the studied community are different from the Weber bureaucracy model. But because of the diversity of the workforce in the administrative system and its cooperation with different parts of the government, it has played an effective role in establishing the democratic system. Limitations and Consequences: There were many changes (referendum) in the studied area at during the survey. Therefore, these changes are likely to affect the views and opinions of the interviewees. Data were also collected among a specific group who are socially and economically in the desirable level. Accordingly, it is necessary to generalize the results of the study, further studies should be conducted between different groups of society at different times. Practical Consequences: Considering different views on the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy, it seems necessary democratizing bureaucratic processes in organizations to create democracy in society. Innovation or Value of the Article: This article is in the area of public administration, which uses a practical approach, explains the better understanding of the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Bureaucracy, Democracy, Theme Analysis | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
10. Brodkin, E. (2008). Accountability in Street-Level Organizations. International Journal of Public Administration,31(3), 317–336.
11. Bryce, J. (2000). Modern Democracies, New York: The Macmillan Co, Vol 1.
12. Cohen, B. (2011). The foundations of sociology. (Translated by Gholam Abbas Tavassoli and Reza Fazel). Tehran: Saamt Publishing. (In Persian)
13. D"Netto, B. & Sohal, A. (2013). Human Resource Practices and Workforce Diversity: An Empirical Assessment. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 530-547.
14. Deleon, L. (2005). Public Management, Democracy, and Politics. In Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Edited by Ferlie, L and Polllitt. Oxford University Press.
15. Demir, F. (2011).Relation between Bureaucracy and Democracy and the Problem of Bureaucratic Control by the Elected. Yonetimve Ekinomidergisi, 18(2), 122-135.
16. Denhardt, R. & L. Deleon. (2000). Great Thinkers in Personnel Management. In Jack Rabin, et al. (eds.) Handbook of Public Personal Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker: 21–43.
17. Diamond, L. (2015). Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4-17.
18. Dulan, J. & Rosenbloom, D. (2003). Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
19. Esman, J. (2009). Public Administration and Conflict Management in Plural Societies: The Case for Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration and Development, 19(4), 353-366.
20. Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(33), 245-258.
21. Frederickson, G. & Hart, D. (1985). The Public Service and Patriotism of Benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547-553.
22. Frederickson, G. (2000). Compares The Reinventing Government Movement with The New Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263-269.
23. Ghillyer, A. (2009). Business Ethics: A Real World Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Groeneveld, S. & S. V. Walle. (2010). a Contingency Approach to Representative Bureaucracy: Power, Equal Opportunities and Diversity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 239-258.
25. Hale, M. & Kelly, R.M. (2013). Gender Bureaucracy and Democracy: Careers and Equal Opportunity in the Public Sector. New York: Greenwood.
26. Heywood, A. (2014). Introduction Political Theory (Translated by Abdurrahman Alam), Tehran: Gomes Publishing. (In Persian)
27. Hicks, H., & Golletti, S. (2000). Theories of Organization and Management: Generalities and Concepts (Translated by Guelle Cohen). Tehran: Etelaat Publishing. (In Persian)
28. Hupe, P. & Hill, M. (2007).Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
29. Hyenman, C. (2012). Bureaucracy in a Democracy. New York: Harper & Brother.
30. Jasbi, A. (2000). Fundamentals and Principles of Management. Tehran: Islamic Azad University Publishing. (In Persian)
31. Jones, W. T. (2007). Gods of Political Thought (Translated by Ali Ramin). Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing. Volume II. (In Persian)
32. Jun, J. (2013). Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
33. Kiwisto, P. (2013). Fundamental Thoughts in Sociology (Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri). Tehran: Nay Publishing. (In Persian)
34. Laski, H. (2015). Encyclopedia of the Social Science. Edwin Seligman and Alvin Johnson. New York: The Macmillan Company. Vol. 3.
35. Lim, H. (2006). Representative Bureaucracy: Rethinking Substantive Effects and Active Representation. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 193-204.
36. Lipset, M. (2002). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.
37. Lipsky, M. (2009). Street – Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Louisiana State University Press.
38. Long, N. (2013). Bureaucracy and Constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 46(3), 808-818.
39. McQauil, D. (2007). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. California: Sage Publishing.
40. Meier, K. J. & Hawes, D. P. (2009). Ethnic Conflict in France: A Case for Representative Bureaucracy? American Review of Public Administration. 39(3), 269-285.
41. Meier, K. J. (1993). Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition, in James Perry (Ed.), Research in Public Administration. New Greenwich: JAI Press, Vol 2.
42. Merriam, C. (2008).The New Democracy and New Desperation. Chicago University Press.
43. Michels, R. (2012). The Bureaucracy Tendency of Political Parties. In Robert Merton and et al, reader in Bureaucracy. The Free Press.
44. Michels, R. (2017). The Sociology of Parties, (Translated by Ahmad Nighibzadeh). Tehran: Qomes Publishing. (In Persian)
45. Milbrath, L., & Goel. L. (2007). Political Participation (Translated by Rahim Abolhassani). Tehran: Meizan Publication. (In Persian)
46. Moselis, N. (2006), Organization and Bureaucracy: an Analysis of New Theories, (Translated by Hossein Mirzaei Ahrangani and Ahmad Tedini). Tehran: Tehran University Publishing. [In Persian]
47. Mosher, C. (2015). Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Naff, K. C. (2007). Passive Representation in The South African Bureaucracy: A Lot has happened, but its A Lot More Complicated. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL: 1-49.
49. Naqibzadeh, A. (2014). An Introduction to Political Sociology. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian)
50. Newman, W. L. (2011). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research (Translated by Abolhassan Faghihi and Asal Aghaz). Tehran: Termeh Press, Volume I. (In Persian)
51. Nicholson, C.J., Grissom, J.A. & Nicholson, .C.S. (2011). Bureaucratic Representation, Distributional Equity and Democratic Values in the Administration of Public Programs. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 582–596.
52. Popper, C. (2014). Conjectures and Falsifications (Translated by Ahmad Aram). Tehran: Enteshar Sahami sherkat. [In Persian]
53. Pourazat, A. A. (2008). Fundamentals of Knowledge of State Administration and Government. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian)
54. Pye, L. (2006). Political Growth: the Concept of Political Growth (Steps and Factors and Obstacles to Political Growth) (Translated by Ezzatollah Fouladvand). Tehran: Fish Publishing. (In Persian)
55. Qavam, A. (2010). Bureaucracy in Democracy. Foreign Policy Magazine, 1(4), 704-695. (In Persian)
56. Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Revitalizing Human Resources Management. In Robert F. Durant (ed.), TheOxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Riggs, F. (1997). Modernity and Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 57(4), 347-354.
58. Robbins, S. (2012). Organization Theory (structure, design, and applications), (Translated by Mehdi Alwani and Hassan Danaeefard). Tehran: Saffar Publishing. (In Persian)
59. Roch, C. H. & Pitts, D. W. (2012). Differing Effects of Representative Bureaucracy in Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools. American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 282-302.
60. Roozbeh K., & Maanavi, M. (2012). Political Words. Tehran: Research Publications. (In Persian)
61. Rosenbloom, D. & Featherstonhaugh, J. (2006). Passive and Active Representation in the Federal Service: A Comparison of Blacks and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 57(4), 873-878.
62. Rush, M. (2014). Society and Politics: Introduction to Political Sociology (Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri). Tehran: Samt Publishing. (In Persian)
63. Sadeghi, S. (2012). The Course of Political Thought in the West. Tehran: Payam Noor University Press. (In Persian)
64. Sadeghpour, A. (1998). Theories on the Bureaucracy of Organizational Structures. Tehran: Governmental Education Management Center Publishing. (In Persian)
65. Schumpeter, J. (2011). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Translated by Hassan Mansour). Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian)
66. Selden, S. C. (2009). The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
67. Selden, S. C., Brudney, J. L., & Kellough, J. E. (2015). Bureaucracy as A Representative Institution: Toward A Reconciliation of Bureaucratic Government and Democratic Theory. American Journal of Political Science,42(3), 717-744.
68. Sowa, E., & Selden, C. (2003). Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700-710.
69. Tahmasebi, R. (2014). An Introduction to Public Management Theories. Tehran: Samt Publishing. [In Persian]
70. Weber, M. (2016). Religion Power Society (Translated by Ahmad Tadayn). Tehran: Hermes Publishing. (In Persian)
71. Weiner, F. (2006). The Culture of Political Thought (Translated by Kheshayar Dehimi). Tehran: Ney Publishing. )In Persian(
72. Werlin, H. (2001). Bureaucracy and Democracy: An Essay in Memory if Dwight Waldo. Public Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 290-315.
73. Wilkins, V. M. & Keiser, L. R. (2004). Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87-102.
74. Woodhouse, D. (2009). In Pursuit of Good Administration: Ministers, Civil Servants and Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. Heady, Ferrel. (2017). Comparative Management (Translated by Mehdi Alvani & Gholamreza Memarzadeh) Tehran: Morvarid Publishing. )In Persian(
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7,323 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,945 |
||
