سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

رجبی فرجاد, حاجیه, منشی, گلناز. (1399). تاثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت. , 11(1), 144-167. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2020.96704
حاجیه رجبی فرجاد; گلناز منشی. "تاثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت". , 11, 1, 1399, 144-167. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2020.96704
رجبی فرجاد, حاجیه, منشی, گلناز. (1399). 'تاثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت', , 11(1), pp. 144-167. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2020.96704
رجبی فرجاد, حاجیه, منشی, گلناز. تاثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت. , 1399; 11(1): 144-167. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2020.96704

تاثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت

چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، 1399، صفحه 144-167    اصل مقاله (830.29 K)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی ( با رویکردهای کمی)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jpap.2020.96704
نویسندگان
حاجیه رجبی فرجاد* 1؛ گلناز منشی2
1گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین، تهران
2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد، واحد علوم تحقیقات تهران، تهران
چکیده
هدف: مطالعه حاضر با هدف پاسخگویی به سؤال اصلی پژوهش مبنی بر اینکه رهبری استبدادی چه تأثیری بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت دارد، انجام شد.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: این پژوهش از نظر هدف جزو پژوهش­های کاربردی، از نظر نوع، کمّی و از نظر روش، توصیفی- همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل مدیران و کارکنان سازمان جنگل­ها، مراتع و آبخیزداری کشور به تعداد 460 نفر است که تعداد 210 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای به‌عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار اصلی جمع‌آوری داده­ها پرسشنامه بود. برای آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد.
یافته‌های پژوهش: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که مبادله رهبر- پیرو، رابطه رهبری استبدادی و خلاقیت را با ضریب مسیر 415/0 و مقدار معناداری 43/5، میانجی­گری می‌کند. فاصله قدرت با ضریب مسیر 241/0 و مقدار معناداری 041/2، رابطه رهبری استبدادی و مبادله رهبر- پیرو را تعدیل می‌کند؛ همچنین رهبری استبدادی با ضریب مسیر 595/0- و مقدار معناداری 731/5- بر خلاقیت کارکنان، با ضریب مسیر 887/0- و مقدار معناداری 238/17- بر خلاقیت مبادله رهبری کارکنان و با ضریب مسیر 919/0 و مقدار معناداری 218/6 بر خلاقیت کارکنان تأثیر دارد.
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: به دلیل تعدد متغیرهای پژوهش و پیچیدگی‌های خاص پژوهش، برای پژوهش‌های آینده باید سایر مؤلفه‌های متغیرها به­طور دقیق بررسی شوند تا دیگر روابط متغیرها هر چه شفاف­تر و جامع­تر شناخته شود. درنهایت با اتخاذ رهبری مناسب خلاقیت کارکنان را افزایش داد.
پیامدهای عملی: با اتخاذ سبک رهبری مناسب در یک سازمان با اعمال مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت، میزان خلاقیت کارکنان را افزایش داد.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: در این پژوهش تأثیر رهبری استبدادی بر خلاقیت کارکنان با توجه به نقش مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت بررسی می­شود؛ همچنین چهار متغیر (رهبری استبدادی، خلاقیت کارکنان، مبادله رهبر و فاصله قدرت) به­صورت یک­جا در مدیران و کارکنان سازمان جنگل­ها، مراتع و آبخیزداری کشور برای نخستین بار در نظر گرفته است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رهبری استبدادی؛ خلاقیت کارکنان؛ مبادله رهبر؛ فاصله قدرت؛ سازمان جنگل‌ها؛ مراتع و آبخیزداری کشور
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Impact of Tyrannical Leadership on Creativity of Staff in Light of the Role of the Leader's Exchange and the Power Distance
نویسندگان [English]
Hajieh Rajabi Farjad1؛ Golnaz Monshi2
1Department of Human Resource Management, Amin police University, Tehran
2Master's student, Azad University, Research Sciences Branch, Tehran, Tehran
چکیده [English]
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to answer the main research question on how authoritarian leadership affects employee creativity with regard to the role of leader exchange and power gap. Done.
Design / methodology / approach: This research is a quantitative and descriptive-correlational research component in terms of purpose, applied research. The statistical population of the study consisted of 460 managers and staffs of the Organization of Forests, Rangelands and Watersheds of Iran. 210 persons were used as the statistical sample and stratified random sampling method. Questionnaire was the main tool for data collection.
Findings: The findings showed that the leader-follower exchange mediated the relationship between authoritarian leadership and creativity with a path coefficient of 0.415 and a significant value of 5.43. Power gap with path coefficient of 0.224 and a significant value of 2.041 modulate the relationship between authoritarian leadership and leader-follower exchange. Also, authoritarian leadership with path coefficient of -0.595 and -5.731 significant, on employee creativity, authoritarian leadership with path coefficient of -0.87 and significant value of -17.28, on creativity of staff leadership exchange significant value of 6.28 affect the creativity of the staff.
Limitations and Consequences: Due to the multitude of research variables and the specific complexities of research, future research on other variables needs to be scrutinized to make the other variables' relationships more transparent and comprehensive. Ultimately, by adopting appropriate leadership, it enhances employee creativity.
Practical implications: By adopting the right leadership style in an organization by practicing leader exchange and power distance, employees increase creativity.
Originality or value of the article: This article examines the impact of authoritarian leadership on employee creativity with regard to the role of leader exchange and power distance. It also considers four variables (authoritarian leadership, staff creativity, leader exchange, and power gap) for the first time in managers and staff of the country's forest, rangeland and watershed organization.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
authoritarian leadership, employee creativity, leader exchange, power distance, forestry organization, pastures and watershed management
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Amabile T, A., Schatzel, E.A., Monetal, G.B., Karmer, S.J. (2004). Leader behaviors and work environment for creativity: perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 2- 32.
  2. Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader- member exchange, feelings energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly.
  3. Bialas, S. (2009). Power distance as a determinant of relations between managers and employees in the enterprises with foreign capital. journal ofintercultural management, 1(2), 105-115
  4. Cantisano, G. T., Dominguez, J. F. M., & Depolo, M. (2008). Psychological contract breach and outcomes: combining meta-analysis and structure equation models. Psicothema, 20(3), 487-496
  5. Chen, Y. Yu, E, & Son, J. (2014). Beyond leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader–member relationship differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 611–627.
  6. Chen, Y. Yu, E, & Son, J. (2014). Beyond leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader–member relationship differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly 25, 611–627.
  7. Chen, Y. Yu, E, & Son, J. (2014). Beyond leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader–member relationship differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 611–627.
  8. Darwish, H. & Farzaneh, N. (2010). The Follower-Heber Relationship in Energy Creation and Creativity in the Workplace. Public Administration, 2(5), 21-29 (in Persian).
  9. Dulebohn, J.H, Bommer, W. H, Liden, R, C, Brouer, R. L & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader- Member Exchange: Integrating the Past with an Eye toward the Future, 2(3), 85-96.
  10. Esterby, S. Malina, M., &Yuan, D. (1995). How culture sensitive HRM?, A comparative analysis of practices in Chinese and UK companies. Theinternational journal of human resource management,6(1), 10-26.
  11. Farh, J.L., Hackett, R.D. & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy ofManagement Journal, 50(3), 715-729.

12. Fishkind, Russell J. & Kautz, Robert C. (2011). Estate and Business Succession planning “, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York: PP.152.

  1. Gol Mohammadi, Emad; Koshcheh, Parviz; Sultan Panah, Hirsch (2013). Leadership styles and strategic thinking at the organizational level. Strategic Management Studies, 7(5), 93-114 (In Persian).
  2. Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C. & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
  3. Graen, G.B. and Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
  4. GU, J., Gang W., Hefu L., Derun S., Changqing H. (2018). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee creativity: The influences of leader–member exchange, team identification and power distance, Chinese Management Studies.
  5. Jafari, R. & Najafi, H. (1396). The Influence of Leadership Style on Human Resource Performance by Mediating Organizational Silence. Journal of Management Studies, 26(85), 85-58(in Persian).
  6. Kiazad, K., Restubog, S.L.D., Zagenczyk, T.J., Kiewitz, C. & Tang, R.L. (2010). In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512-519.
  7. Kiazad, K., Restubog, S.L.D., Zagenczyk, T.J., Kiewitz, C. & Tang, R.L. (2010). In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512-519.
  8. Kirkman, B., Chen, G., et al. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross level, cross cultural examnation. Journal of academy management, 52(4), 744-64.
  9. Lam, S. S. K., Schaubroeck, J. & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and emplotyee work outcomes: A cross national study. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 1-18.
  10. Le, P.B., Le, P.B., Lei, H. & Lei, H. (2017). How transformational leadership supports knowledge sharing: evidence from Chinese manufacturing and service firms. Chinese ManagementStudies, 11(3), 479-497.
  11. Le, P.B., Le, P.B., Lei, H. & Lei, H. (2017). How transformational leadership supports knowledge sharing: evidence from Chinese manufacturing and service firms. Chinese Management Studies, 11(3), 479-497.

24. Martínez, A.B,. Palacios, T.M. B., O Jiménez, J. L. T,. (2013). "Family growth versus family firm growth: professional management and succession process. Management Research. Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 11(1), 58 – 76.

  1. Mohammadzadeh, Z. & Amini, A. (1396). Investigating the Effect of Leader-Follower Exchange on Follower Implicit Theories. Journal of Management of Public Organizations, 5(2), 22-23 (In Persian).
  2. Mozaffari, Leila; Tirgar, Hedayatollah; Mortazavi, Hamid; Investigating the Relationship between Transformational Leadership Style and Employee Creativity in Governmental Organizations of Neyriz, Human Resource Management,  3(4), 75-52 (in persian).
  3. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis. B., Strange J. M. (2012). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quartly, 13, 705- 750.
  4. Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B. & Sendjaya, S. (2015). How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(5), 1-14.
  5. Peter, T., Braun, S. & Frey, D. (2015). How shared leadership affects individual creativity and support for innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 162-212.
  6. Qu, R., Janssen, O. & Shi, K. (2017). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: the mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 286-299.

31. Sally, J. Z, Bengtson, E, & Parylo, O, (2012). Examining the planning and management of principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), 136 – 158.

  1. Schaubroeck, J.M., Shen, Y. & Chong, S. (2017). A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 203-214
  2. Shalley.E. & Gilson, L.L. (2004). What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
  3. Volmer, J., Spurk, D. & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.
  4. Wang, W., Mao, J., Wu, W. & Liu, J. (2012). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(1), 43-60.

36. Weigel, N. (2006). Developing Leadership capacity by creating succession management system. Dissertation for MA degree in Leadership and Training, Royal Roads University.

  1. Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C.K. & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: the mediating role of lmx. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 531-543.
  2. Zhang, A.Y. Tsui, A.S. & Wang, D.X. (2015).  Leadership behaviours and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. TheLeadership Quarterly, 22(5), 851–862.
  3. Zhang, A.Y. Tsui, A.S. & Wang, D.X. (2015). Leadership behaviours and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. TheLeadership Quarterly, 22 (5), 851–862.
  4. Zhang, X. & Bartol, K.M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
  5. Zhang, Y. & Xie, Y.H. (2017). Authoritarian leadership and extra-role behaviors: a role-perception perspective. Management and Organization Review, 13(1), 147-166.
  6. Zhang, Y. & Xie, Y.H. (2017). Authoritarian leadership and extra-role behaviors: a role-perception perspective. Management and Organization Review, 13(1), 147-166.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,378
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,189