سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

سامانی, بابک, ساکی, عادل, تقی زاده, سحر. (1399). تحلیل استرین نهایی در شیست‌های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان. , 11(2), 193-208. doi: 10.52547/esrj.11.2.193
بابک سامانی; عادل ساکی; سحر تقی زاده. "تحلیل استرین نهایی در شیست‌های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان". , 11, 2, 1399, 193-208. doi: 10.52547/esrj.11.2.193
سامانی, بابک, ساکی, عادل, تقی زاده, سحر. (1399). 'تحلیل استرین نهایی در شیست‌های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان', , 11(2), pp. 193-208. doi: 10.52547/esrj.11.2.193
سامانی, بابک, ساکی, عادل, تقی زاده, سحر. تحلیل استرین نهایی در شیست‌های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان. , 1399; 11(2): 193-208. doi: 10.52547/esrj.11.2.193

تحلیل استرین نهایی در شیست‌های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان

پژوهشهای دانش زمین
مقاله 12، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 42، 1399، صفحه 193-208    اصل مقاله (1.76 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/esrj.11.2.193
نویسندگان
بابک سامانی* ؛ عادل ساکی؛ سحر تقی زاده
گروه زمین‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
در این پژوهش با استفاده از عناصر ساختاری به مطالعه فازهای دگرشکلی و پارامترهای استرین در شیست­های آندالوزیت دار جنوب شرق همدان پرداخته شده است. در این تحقیق با استفاده از تحلیل استریوگرافی عناصر برگوارگی و خطوارگی، الگوی صفحات فاقد طویل شدگی نهایی به عنوان معیاری جهت تحلیل استرین نهایی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نتایج نشان دهنده وقوع دو فاز دگرشکلی در منطقه می­باشد. مقادیر نسبت استرین در اولین فاز دگرشکلی به صورت Rxz=4.3، Rxy=2.2 و Ryz=1.9  و مقادیر نسبت استرین برای دومین فاز دگرشکلی به صورت Rxz=3.6، Rxy=2.0‌ و Ryz=1.8 محاسبه گردید. فاکتور شکل بیضوی استرین (k) در هر دو فاز دگرشکلی نشان دهنده بیضوی کشیده شده سه محوری می­باشد. تاثیر دومین فاز دگرشکلی به صورت تغییر موقعیت محورهای متوسط و کوچک بیضوی استرین در نتیجه چرخش حول محور بزرگ استرین می­باشد. به احتمال زیاد این تغییر جهت یابی محورهای استرین در نتیجه نفوذ و جایگیری توده باتولیت الوند می­باشد. محاسبه مقادیر عدد جنبش شناختی تاوایی حاکی از غالب بودن مولفه استرین برشی ساده در هر دو فاز دگرشکلی می­باشد. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
بیضوی استرین؛ استرین نهایی؛ عدد جنبش شناختی تاوایی؛ سطوح فاقد طویل شدگی نهایی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Finite strain analysis in the andalusite schists, south eastern Hameden
نویسندگان [English]
Babak Samani؛ Adel Saki؛ Sahar Taghizadeh
Department of Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Strain analysis in the deformed area has been one of the interesting subjects for structural geologist in the last decades. Strain studies based on field data help geologists to understand the parameters such as quantities of amounts of strain in the principal plane of strain ellipsoid, orientation of principal axes of strain ellipsoid, strain ellipsoid shape and the strain type. In this research the strain analysis of andalusite schist has been conducted in the south eastern part of Hamedan.
Materials and Methods
In this research because of evolution of penetrative planar and linear structures in the andalusite schist rocks of south eastern part of Hamedan, these rocks have been studied as strain markers for strain analysis goals. The orientations of principal axes of strain ellipsoid and geometry of surface of non-finite longitudinal strains have been studied with application of stereography analysis and using structural elements. The geometry of surface of non-finite longitudinal strains was used as criterion for determination of amounts of finite strain in the principal plane of strain ellipsoid. Also with application of some graphical functions and the strain ratio in the principal plane of strain ellipsoid the amounts of kinematic vorticity number and the percentage of each pure shear and simple shear component were determined.
Results and Discussion
Micro-tectonics and petrofabric studies show the development of three planar and two linear structural elements in the study area. S-C shear bands, delta and sigma types porphyroclasts, strain shadow and hat shadow are the most important structures that developed in the study area. These studies reveal the occurrence of two main deformation phases in the area. Using structural elements and application of stereography analysis of the planar and linear structures in the SpheriStat 2.2 software, the average pole of foliations and the lineation directions were determined as spatial locations of Z and X axis of strain ellipsoid. Therefore the direction of principal axes of strain ellipsoid in the first deformation phase were determined as X= 184/16, Y= 88/3, Z= 350/76 and the direction of principal axes of strain ellipsoid in the second deformation phase were determined as X=195/20, Y=345/59, Z= 95/12 respectively. Using of angular amounts of surface of non-finite longitudinal strain respecting the orientation of principal axes of strain ellipsoid and application of nomogram (Imber et al, 2012) of the amounts of finite strain in the XY and XZ principal planes of strain ellipsoid for both deformation phases were determined.
The amounts of kinematic vorticity number for the first and second phase of deformation were calculated as 0.91 and 0.93 respectively. These results show the simple shear dominant deformation in both deformation phases.
Conclusion
Results of strain analysis show the different strain ellipsoid shapes and orientation of principal axes of strain ellipsoid for each of deformation phases. Different amounts of strain parameters reveal the different effect of strain components in D1 and D2 deformation phases. Results of this research show the existence of inclined transpression in the Sanandaj-Sirjan zone as offered by previous geologist researchers. Probably the intrusion of Alvand batholiths causes local changes in the stress and strain properties and the high amounts of kinematic vorticity numbers causes simple shear dominant deformation.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Strain ellipsoid, Finite strain, Kinematic vorticity number, Surface of no finite longitudinal strain
مراجع
  1. ایزدی کیان، ل.، علوی، ا.، محجل، م.، سپاهی‌گرو، ع.ا. و رهگشای، م.، 1388. بررسی دگرریختی چند مرحله‌ای و رشد پورفیروبلاست ها در منطقه کمری-ده نواسداله خان، جنوب خاور همدان، فصلنامه زمین‌شناسی ایران، شماره 11، ص 17-26.
  2.  
  3.  
  4. -Alavi, M., 1994. Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations, Tectonophysics 229, p. 211-238.
  5. -Alavi, M., 2004. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran, and its proforeland evolution. American Journal of Science, v. 304, p. 1-20.
  6. -Aliani, F., Maanijou, M., Sabouri, Z. and Sepahi, A.A., 2012. Petrology, geochemistry and geotectonic environment of the Alvand Intrusive Complex, Hamedan, Iran, Chemie der Erde, v. 72, p. 363-383.
  7. -Bailey, C.M., Gilmer, A.K. and Marquis, M.N., 1999. A tale of two shear zones: the vorticity and strain path of two greenschist facies shear zones, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 31(7), p. 1-59.
  8. -Bailey, C.M. and Eyster, E.L., 2003. General shear diformation in the Pinaleno Mountains metamorphic core complex, Arizona, Journal of Structural Geology 25, p. 1883-1893.
  9. -Berberian, M. and King, G.C.P., 1981. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 18, p. 210-265.
  10. -Bickle, M.J. and Hawkesworth, C.J., 1978. Deformation phases and the tectonic history of the eastern Alps, Geoscienceworld Bulletin, v. 89(2), p. 293-306.
  11. -Fergosson, C., Nutman, A., Mohajjel, M. and Bennett, V.C., 2016. The Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone in the Neo-Tethyan suture, western Iran: Zircon U–Pb evidence of late Palaeozoic rifting of northern Gondwana and mid-Jurassic orogenesis, Gondwana Research, v. 58, p. 216-238.
  12. -Flinn, D., 1962. On folding during three-dimensional progressive deformation, Geol Soc Lond Q J 118, p. 385-433.
  13. -Fort, A.M. and Bailey, C.M., 2007. Testing the utility of the porphyroclast hyperbolic distribution method of kinematic vorticity analysis, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 29, p. 983–1001.
  14. -Fossen, H., 2010. Structural geology, Cambridge University Press, 481 p.
  15. -Fossen, H., 2016. Structural geology second edition, Cambridge University Press, 520 p.
  16. -Imber, J., Perry, T., Jones, R. and Wightman, R.H., 2012. Do cataclastic deformation bands form parallel to lines of no finite elongation (LNFE) or zero extension direction? J Struct Geol, v. 45, p. 158-172.
  17. -Law, R.D., Searle, M.P. and Simpson, R.L., 2004. Strain, deformation temperatures and vorticity of flow at the top of the Greater Himalayan Slab, Everest Massif. Tibet. J Geol Soc Lond, v. 161, p. 305-320.
  18. -McQuarrie, N., 2004. Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 26, p. 519-535.
  19. -Means, W.D., Hobbs, B.E., Lister, G.S. and Williams, P.F., 1980. Vorticity and noncoaxiality in progressive deformations, J Struct Geol, v. 2, p. 371-378.
  20. -Mohajjel, M. and Fergusson, C.L., 2000. Dextral transpression in Late Cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 22, p. 1125-1139.
  21. -Ramsay, J.G., 1967. Folding and fracturing of rocks, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  22. -Ramsay, J.G. and Huber, M.I., 1983. The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Strain Analysis, Academic Press, London, 307 p.
  23. -Sarkarinejad, K. and Azizi, A., 2008. Slip partitioning and inclined dextral transpression along the Zagros Thrust System, Iran, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 30, p. 116-136.
  24. -Sarkarinejad, K., Samani, B., Faghih, A., Grasemann, B. and Moradipoor, M., 2010. Implications of strain and vorticity of flow analyses to interpret the kinematics of an oblique convergence event (Zagros Mountains, Iran), J Asian Earth Sci, v. 38, p. 34-43
  25. -Sepahi, A.A., Whitney, D.L. and Baharifar, A.A., 2004. Petrogenesis of andalusite–kyanite–sillimanite veins and host rocks, Sanandaj‐Sirjan metamorphic belt, Hamadan, Iran, Journal of Metamorphic Geology, v. 22, v. 119-134.
  26. -Shahbazi, H., Siebel, W., Pourmoafee, M., Ghorbani, M., Sepahi, A., Shang, C. and Abedini, M.V., 2010. Geochemistry and U–Pb zircon geochronology of the alvand plutonic complex in Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone Iran: New evidence for Jurassic magmatism, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 39, p. 668-683.
  27. -Simpson, C. and De Poar, D.G., 1997. Strain and kinematic analysis in general shear zones. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 15, p. 1-20.
  28. -Talbot, C.J., 1970. The minimum strain ellipsoid using deformed quartz veins, Tectonophysics, v. 9, p. 47-76.
  29. -Tunini, L., Munt, I., Fernandez, M., Verges, J. and Villasenor, A., 2015. Lithospheric mantle heterogeneities beneath the Zagros Mountains and the Iranian Plateau: a petrological-geophysical study, Geophys Journal International, v. 200, p. 596-614.
  30. -Twiss, R.J. and Moores, E.M., 2004. Structural Geology second edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 552 p.
  31. -Wallis, S.R., 1995. Vorticity analysis and recognition of ductile extension in the Sanbagawa belt, SW Japan, J Struct Geol, v. 17, p. 1077-1093.
  32. -Xypolias, P., 2010. Vorticity analysis in shear zones: A review of methods and applications, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 42, p. 1-21.
  33. -Yang, T.N., Chen, J.L., Liang, M.J., Xin, D., Aghazadeh, M., Hou, Z.Q. and Zhang, H.R., 2018. Two plutonic complexes of the Sanandaj-Sirjan magmatic-metamorphic belt record Jurassic to Early Cretaceous subduction of an old Neotethys beneath the Iran microplate, Gondwana Research, v. 62, p. 246-268.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10,042
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5,837