طراحی مدل تلفیقی تحلیل پوششی دادهها و تحلیل مؤلفههای اصلی بهمنظور بهبود ارزیابی عملکرد گروههای آموزشی دانشگاه (مورد مطالعه: گروههای آموزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد) | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 21، 1397، صفحه 159-186 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علیرضا پویا* 1؛ فرشید اسماعیلی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ارزیابی کارآیی گروههای آموزشی دانشگاهها سهم بسزایی در ارتقای عملکرد آموزشی و پژوهشی آنان دارد. یکی از روشهایی که میتوان به کمک آن رتبهبندی واحدهای مورد ارزیابی را انجام داد، تحلیل پوششی دادهها میباشد. از جمله مشکلات پیش رو در استفاده از این روش، تمایز ناکافی واحدهای قرار گرفته روی مرز کارآیی است. این مقاله بهمنظور رفع این مشکل در رتبهبندی گروههای آموزشی دانشگاه از ترکیب تحلیل مؤلفههای اصلی و تحلیل پوششی دادهها استفاده کرده است. بدینمنظور ابتدا با انجام تحلیل مؤلفههای اصلی، روابط مکنون موجود در متغیرهای مشاهده شده ارزیابی گروهها مشخص و سپس با انجام تحلیل پوششی بر روی متغیرهای مکنون رتبهبندی گروهها انجام میگیرد. برای بررسی کارآیی این روش از تعداد واحدهایی که بر روی مرز کارآیی در این روش قرار میگیرند استفاده شده است، نتایج نشان داد تعداد این واحدها نسبت به روش معمول تحلیل پوششی دادهها کاهش یافته است. بنابراین مزایای استفاده از این رویکرد را میتوان به این شکل برشمرد: اول این که میتوان متغیرهای مکنونی که در خروجیهای گروههای آموزشی مستتر است را مشخص نموده و در تحلیلهای بعدی مورد استفاده قرار داد و دوم آن که با ارائه رتبهبندی با درجه تمیز بالاتر کارآیی استفاده محض از تحلیل پوششی برطرف میگردد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحلیل پوششی دادهها؛ تحلیل مؤلفههای اصلی؛ رتبهبندی؛ ارزیابی عملکرد؛ گروههای آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing a Combined Model of PCA and DEA for Improving the Ranking of Educational Departments: A Case study of Educational Depratments of Ferdowsi University | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Alireza Pooya1؛ Farshid Esmaeli2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad | ||
| 2PhD student in Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Performance evaluation of educational departments in universities has an important role in promoting educational and research performance. It also improves the capabilities of faculty members and students. DEA as one of the methods which is used for ranking the units must be evaluated. This is done by units that have inputs and outputs such that DEA evaluated capability of them in converting input to output. In this study, we use the combined method CCR-O and PCA to evaluate the educational groups. First, by PCA, we extracted the variables that are latent in observed variable and second, by using DEA, the evaluation of the educational departments was done. There are two advantages in terms of using this method; first, latent structures of observed variables in educational departments are discovered and second, the discrepancy of the evaluation was improved. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| DEA, PCA, Ranking, Performance evaluation, Educational departments | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azar, A., Torkashvand, A. (2006).Assessing the Teaching Researching Performance with the Help of Data Envelopment Analysis Model: Teaching Groups of Humanity Sciences Faculty. Tarbiat Modares University. IQBQ; 10 (1): 1-23. Abzari, M., Baloei Jam Khaneh, J. Pour Mostafa Khoshkroodi, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of state university educational departments with using DEA and SWOT models and structural equations and presenting strategic strategies for improving performance. Journal of Operational Research in its Applications. 10(1):19-41. Andrew, D. (1988). Management organization. 3d-ed. USA Scott Foresan Seviesin. Armstrung, M. (1991). Personal management practice.4 th-ed. Kogan. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos C. (2013). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education review; Vol. 22, No.1: 15-57. Agreel, P. & Steuer, E. (1999). ACDEA-A decision support system for faculty performance reviews. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen: Working Paper. Athanassopauolos, A. & Shale, E. (2007). Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education instituation in the UK by means of data envelopment analysis. Education Economist; 4(2): 117-134. Bazargan, A., Mirkamali, S.M., Naderi, A. (2006). Internal assessment report of management and educational planning in university of Tehran faculty of psychology and educational sciences. Beasley, J.E. (1990). Comparing University Departments, OMEGA; 18(2): 171-183. Beasley, J.E. (1995). Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies. Journal of Operation Research Society; 46(4): 441-452. Cardinaels, E., Veen, Paula, M. G. (2010). Financial Versus Non-financial Information: The Impact of Information Organization and Presentation in a Balanced Scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society; 35 (6): 565-578. Dharmapala, P. S., & Saber, H. M. (2017). Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university. Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 14, No.2: 212-211. Do, Quang Hung and Jeng-Fung Chen. (2014). Integrating managerial preferences into the assessment by the fuzzy AHP/DEA approach: A case application in the assessment of university performance. Depocen Working Papers. No. 2114/13. Ezati, M. (2012). Study of Impact Factors on Educational Performance of University Departments: Qualitative Method. IRPHE; 18 (3): 23-45. Goudarzi, G., Khosravi, S., Askari, R. (2012). Performance Appraisal of Selected Departments in Kerman University of Medical Sciences: A Quantitative Study. Iranian Journal of Medical Education; 12 (3): 193-201. Hock-Eam, Lim, Md. Taib, Fauziah, Abdullah, Nur Adiana Hiau. Hwa, Yen Siew. (2017). how efficient are malaysian public universities? a comparative analysis using data envelopment analysis, Asian Academy of Management Journal; Vol. 21, No. 2: 75–97. Hosseinzadeh Bahreini, M.H. (2008). Research project of designing performance evaluation system for educational groups in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Joumady, O., Ris, C. (2012). Performance in European Higher Education: A Non-ParametricProduction Frontier Approach. Education Economics. Vol.13, No.2: 189-205. Johnes, J., Cubbin, J. (2000). Public sector efficiency measurement: application of data envelopment analysis. Amsterdam: North Holand. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hoseinzadeh Lotfi, F. Zohrebandian, M. (2004). Estimation of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Mathematicaland Computational Applications; vol.9, No.2: 299-302. Kline, P. (2001). An easy guide to factor analysis; Translation of Sadr al-Sadat, Seyyed Jalal and Mina'i, Asghar. Tehran: Samt Publication. Lopes, A.L., Lanzer, E. A. (2012). Data Envelopment Analysis – DEA and Fuzzy Sets to Assessthe Performance of Academic Department: A case study at Federal University of Santa Catarina-UFSC. Pesquisa Operational; Vol.22, No.2: 217-230. Martin, E. (2010). An Application of the Data Envelopment Analysis Methodology in thePerformance Assessment of Zaragoza University Departments. An Application of the Data Envelopment Analysis Methodology. Paradeise, C., Emanuela, R., Bleiklie, I. (2009). Ferlie E. Editors. University Governance. Springer Inc. Robbins S.P. (2005). Essentials of organizational behavior. Eight edition New Jersey. Pearson Prentice Hall. Inc. Sreekumar, S., Mahapatra, S.S. (2011). Performance modeling of Indian business schools: a DEA-neural network approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal; Vol. 11, No. 2: 221-235. Rezvani, M.A. (2001). The analysis of the technical efficiency of large state universities using the DEA method. Master's Thesis. University of Isfahan. Shams, Gh, Ghahramani, M., Maarfavand, Z., Zanganeh, F. (2014). Evaluation of Shahid Beheshti University performance based on organizational excellence model. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational Systems; 6(12): 39-67. Sreedevi, R.P. (2017). Improving Quality Education and Rankings in Women’s Technical Institutions Using Peer Weight through DEA Approach. International Journal of Statistics and Systems ISSN 0973-2675; Volume 12, Number 1: pp. 139-143 Yazdanpanah, A. A., Soltani, O. (2014). Identification and analysis of relationship between strategic planning with flexibility ability and performance of higher education institutions: Shahid Beheshti University case. IRPHE; 20 (3): 67-93. Wei Hsin, K., Tsu Tan, F. (2011). Measuring the Student-Base Performance of College of Business Using AR/DEA Model. Taiwan Economic Review; 36(4): 483-514. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8,588 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,997 |
||