معماری محیطهای یادگیری بر پایه سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 21، 1397، صفحه 209-229 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محمدتقی نظرپور* | ||
| استادیار دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از این پژوهش، شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در طراحی محیطهای یادگیری براساس سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش است. روش پژوهش کیفی استت که برای انجام آن، سعی شده است با بهرهگیری از سند تحول و آییننامههای در دسترس نسبت به شناسایی عوامل کارکردی، کالبدی، تربیتی و روانشناختی و اجتماعی در فضاهای آموزشی اقدام شود. ابزار مورداستفاده برای جمعآوری اطلاعات و استخراج مفاهیم مرتبط با موضوع، فیشهای تحقیق بودند. دادههای گردآوری شده از طریق تحلیل محتوا مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافتههای تحقیق نشان داد که در طراحی معماری فضاهای آموزشی میتوان اقدامات لازم را برای معماران و طراحان فضاهای آموزشی مدارس تبیین نمود و برنامهزیر نظام تأمین فضا، تجهیزات و فناوری را مورد تأکید قرار داد تا خروجی طرحهای معماری مدارس با اهداف سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش همخوانی لازم را داشته باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش؛ معماری؛ محیطهای یادگیری؛ تأمین فضا؛ تجهیزات و فناوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Architecture of Learning Environments on the basis of the Document of the Fundamental Transformation of Education | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Taghi Nazarpour | ||
| Assistant Professor Shahid Beheshti University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The aim of this study is to identify the effective factors in designing of learning environments on the basis of the Document of the Fundamental Transformation of Education. The research methodology is a qualitative method that has been tried by using resources, documentation and available literature to identify the functional, physical, psychological and social factors in the educational spaces. The obtained data were analyzed using content analysis method. According to the results, evolution in the providing the spaces for learning and equipment adaptation with technological infrastructure are crucial. There are some principles that can be used to provide an environment favorable to education and learning. It is clear that the mentioned criteria to the design suggestions, should be considered by designers and architects, in order to obedient of provided principles and regulations can solve the present difficulties of educational spaces. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| The document of the fundamental transformation of education, Learning environments, Subsystem of Providing Space, Equipment and Technology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alagheband, A. (2016). Theoretical foundations and the principles of educational management. Ravan Publication. Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Azarkasb, S. H., Naderi, E., & Seif Naraghi, M. (2016). Studying the status of science and technology education spaces in management of providing the space and educational equipment for schools in fundamental evolution document. Urban Management. 44, 81-90. Bagheri Majd, R., Seyed Abbaszadeh, M. M., Mehr Alizadeh, Y., & Shahi, S. (2014). Studying and Designing the Pedagogical Pattern in Virtual Higher Education. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. 4 (3), 127-144. Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2013). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. Guilford Press. Burgstahler, S. E., & Cory, R. C. (Eds.) (2010). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press. Cox, B. E., Thompson, K., Anderson, A., Mintz, A., Locks, T., Morgan, L., & Wolz, A. (2017). College experiences for students with autism spectrum disorder: Personal identity, public disclosure, and institutional support. Journal of College Student Development. 58 (1), 71-87. Daneshgarmoghaddam, G., & Eslampour, M. (2013). Study of the Affordance Theory Based on Gibson’s Point of View and Its Effects on Studies of Human-Built Environment. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 5 (9), 73-86. Hornecker, E. (2005). Space and Place–setting the stage for social interaction. In Position paper presented at ECSCW05 workshop Settings for Collaboration: The Role of Place. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage. Kamelnia, H. (2007). Design Grammar of Learning Environments (Concepts & Experiences). Tehran: Sobhan Nour Press. Kiaee Jamali, S. M., Fathi Vajargah, K., Mosapoor, N., & Khorasani, A. (2018). Study of Curriculum Orientation in the Concentration Period in Iran’s Higher Education System. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 11 (1), 159-184 Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30 (3), 411-433. Lang, J. T. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think. Routledge. Management and Planning Organization (2016). Regulations for Design of Educational Buildings (Planning for Uniform Architectural Design of Primary and Elementary Schools), No. 697. Tehran. Mardomi, K., & Delshad, M. (2010). Flexible Learning Environment. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism. 1 (1), 109-118. McAndrew, F. T. (1993). Environmental psychology. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 14 (3-4), 409-426. Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2011). The Document of the Fundamental Transformation of Education. Tehran. Organization for Development, Renovation and Equipping Schools (2016). The Subsystem of Supplying of Space, Equipment, Technology. Tehran. Mortazavi, Sh. (1997). Learning Spaces from the Perspective of Environmental Psychology. Tehran: Publications of Ministry of Education. Mortazavi, Sh. (2001). Environmental psychology and its application. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. Nair, P., Fielding, R., & Lackney, J. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools. Minneapolis, MN: Designshare. Pakzad, J., & Bozorg, H. (2012). An Introduction to Environmental Psychology for Designers. Tehran: Armanshahr Press. Plambech, T., & Van Den Bosch, C. C. K. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity–A study among Danish creative professionals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14 (2), 255-263. Porter, G. L., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2012). Exploring inclusive educational practices through professional inquiry. Springer Science & Business Media. Pourdeihimi, Sh. (2015). The Human Aspects of Housing Environment. Tehran: Armanshahr Press. Shahcheraghi, A., & Bandarabad, A. (2015). Environed in Environment. Tehran: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research. White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55 (1), 22-45. Williams, K. J., Lee, K. E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S., & Johnson, K. A. (2018). Conceptualising creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 59, 36-45. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8,364 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5,220 |
||
