سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

مهدیه, امید. (1402). ارزیابی راهبردهای ارتباطات ون رولر. , 14(3), 133-153. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2021.101954
امید مهدیه. "ارزیابی راهبردهای ارتباطات ون رولر". , 14, 3, 1402, 133-153. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2021.101954
مهدیه, امید. (1402). 'ارزیابی راهبردهای ارتباطات ون رولر', , 14(3), pp. 133-153. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2021.101954
مهدیه, امید. ارزیابی راهبردهای ارتباطات ون رولر. , 1402; 14(3): 133-153. doi: 10.48308/jpap.2021.101954

ارزیابی راهبردهای ارتباطات ون رولر

چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
مقاله 5، دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55، 1402، صفحه 133-153    اصل مقاله (455.79 K)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی ( با رویکردهای کمی)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jpap.2021.101954
نویسنده
امید مهدیه*
عضو هیئت علمی گروه مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه زنجان
چکیده
هدف: اهمیت ارتباطات برای سازمان‌ها منجر به طیف وسیعی از دیدگاه‌ها شده است. در این مقاله پس از مروری بر این دیدگاه‌ها، اعتبار و تعمیم‌پذیری مدل یا شبکه ارتباطات ون‌رولر در زمینة ارتباطات بررسی شده است.
طرح/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: تحقیق حاضر به‌صورت توصیفی (پیمایشی) و با رویکرد کمّی انجام شده است. پرسشنامه‌ای بر اساس مدل ون‌رولر طراحی شد و در بین کارکنان دو سازمان ایرانی توزیع و جمع‌آوری گردید.
یافته‌های پژوهش: تجزیه و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نتوانست از راهبردهای ارتباطی پیشنهاد شده توسط ون‌رولر پشتیبانی کند و در تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی اولیه نیز مدل پیشنهادی به دلیل وجود تنها دو عامل در داده‌ها برای هر دو نمونه مورد تأیید قرار نگرفت. تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی بعدی نیز مدل را بیشتر به چالش کشید زیرا داده‌های هر دو نمونه، حاکی از وجود یک عامل بودند.
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: از آنجایی که پرسشنامه اولیه بر اساس تحلیل محتوا طراحی شده است، سایر محققان ممکن است ابعاد متفاوتی را برای ارتباطات سازمانی طبق مدل ون رولر استخراج کنند. به علاوه، مطالعه حاضر بر روی دو سازمان ایرانی انجام شده و باید در تعمیم یافته‌ها احتیاط کرد.
پیامدهای کاربردی: می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که برداشت‌های متفاوت و مجزا از ارتباطات سازمانی ممکن است در بعضی از زمینه‌ها مفید باشند اما لزوماً توسط گیرندگان به صورت بخش‌بندی‌شده و مجزا تلقی نمی‌شود و همچنین لزوماً در کل زمینه‌ها و فرهنگ‌ها قابل تعمیم نیستند.
نوآوری یا ارزش مقاله: در تحقیق حاضر، برای اولین بار پرسشنامه‌ای برای سنجش ارتباطات سازمانی بر اساس مدل ون رولر طراحی و مورد آزمون قرار گرفته است. در تدوین الگوهای ارتباطات، ارزش‌ها و تفاوت‌های فرهنگی باید مورد توجه قرار گیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها: ارتباطات سازمانی، ون‌رولر، شبکة ارتباطات، راهبرد ارتباطات.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
کلیدواژه‌ها
ارتباطات سازمانی؛ ون‌رولر؛ شبکه ارتباطات؛ راهبرد ارتباطات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Assessing the van Ruler Communication Strategy
نویسندگان [English]
omid mahdieh
Department of Management and Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan
چکیده [English]
Purpose: The importance of communication for organizations has resulted in a wide variety of perspectives being proposed and investigated. This study was conducted to assess the validity and generalizability of van Ruler’s model, or grid, of communication.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The present research has been done descriptively (survey) and in the form of quantitative approach. After creating a scale based on van Ruler’s model, we administered it to two samples of employees in Iranian workplace settings.
Research Findings: Results of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFAs and EFAs, respectively) failed to support the communication strategies proposed by van Ruler in that there was lack of model fit in CFAs, and in initial EFAs further disconfirmation of the model occurred because there were only two factors in the data for both samples. Refined follow-up EFAs challenged the model still further because both sample’s data comprised a single factor.
Limitations & Consequences: 
Because the initial questionnaire was designed based on content analysis, other researchers may extract different dimensions for organizational communication based on van Ruler’s model. The present study was conducted on two Iranian organizations and caution should be exercised in generalizing the findings.
Practical Consequences: After canvassing explanations for the results, we conclude that compartmentalized conceptions concerning organizational communication might be useful in some contexts but are not necessarily perceived as being compartmentalized by recipients of the communication, nor are they necessarily generalizable across contexts.
Innovation or value of the Article: The present study, for the first time, designed and tested a scale for measuring organizational communication based on the van Ruler’s model. In designing communication models, cultural values and differences must be taken into account
Paper Type: Research Paper
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Organizational Communication, Van Ruler, Communication Grid, Communication Strategy
مراجع
  1. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2006). "The Internet and Change in Corporate Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Strategies on Social and Environmental Performance." Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 2(3), 281–303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/18325910610690090
  2. Aitken, J. (2013). Encyclopedia of the Documentary Film. New York: Routledge.
  3. Austin, E. W., & Pinkleton, B. E. (2006). Strategic Public Relations Management: Planning and Managing Effective Communication Programs (2nd). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Badea, M. (2014). "Social Media and Organizational Communication."Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.192
  5. Balaji, M. S., Kumar Roy, S., & Kok Wei, K. (2016). "Does Relationship Communication Matter in B2C Service Relationships?" Journal of Services Marketing, 30(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-08-2014-0290
  6. Berezan, O., Yoo, M., & Christodoulidou, N. (2016). "The Impact of Communication Channels on Communication Style and Information Quality for Hotel Loyalty Programs." Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 7(1), 100–116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2015-0031
  7. Besley, J. C., Dudo, A. D., Yuan, S., & Abi Ghannam, N. (2016). "Qualitative Interviews with Science Communication Trainers about Communication Objectives and Goals." Science Communication, 38(3), 356–381.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016645640
  8. Borca, C., & Baesu, V. (2014). "A Possible Managerial Approach for Internal Organizational Communication Characterization." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.512
  9. Chen, J., Silverthorne, C., & Hung, J. (2006). "Organization Communication, Job Stress, Organizational Commitment, and Job Performance of Accounting Professionals in Taiwan and America." Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(4), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610666000
  10. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2016). Managing and Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Craig, R. T. (1999). "Communication Theory as a Field." Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
  12. Daft, R. L. (2009). Organization Theory and Design (10th ed.). CA: South-Western College Publishing.
  13. Dasgupta, S. A., Suar, D., & Singh, S. (2013). "Impact of Managerial Communication Styles on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviours." Employee Relations, 35(2), 173–199. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01425451311287862
  14. Dominick, J. R. (2005). The Dynamics of Mass Communication: Media in the Digital Age (8th). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Doyen, B., Vlerick, P., Maertens, H., Vermassen, F., & Van Herzeele, I. (2019). "Nontechnical Attributes and Surgical Experience: A Cross-sectional Study Comparing Communication Styles and Attitudes in Surgical Staff, Trainees and Applicants." International Journal of Surgery, 6, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.002
  16. Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2014). "On Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Review of Recent Evidence, an Assessment of Current Practice, and Recommendations for future use." International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(3), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005
  17. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2008). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (5th). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  18. Green, M. (2018). "How an Organization’s CSR Communication Style Makes or Breaks Consumer Trust: Strategic Reputation Building on Twitter."Annals in Social Responsibility, 4(1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/ASR-03-2018-0003
  19. Gürel, E., & Kavak, B. (2010). "A Conceptual Model for Public Relations in Museums." European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011008600
  20. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). "Exploratory Factor Analysis." In J. F. Hair, Jr., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, & R. E. Anderson (Eds.), Multivariate data analysis (7th, pp. 89–149). UK: Pearson Education.
  21. Harris, T. E. (2002). Applied Organizational Communication: Principles and Pragmatics for Future Practice (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  22. Harris, T. E., & Nelson, M. D. (2008). Applied Organizational Communication: Theory and Practice in a Global Environment (3rd). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  23. Hatfield, J., & Huseman, R. (1982). "Perceptual Congruence about Communication as Related to Satisfaction: Moderating Effects of Individual Characteristics." Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.5465/255996
  24. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives." Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  25. Ihlen, Ø., & van Ruler, B. (2007). "How Public Relations Works: Theoretical Roots and Public Relations Perspectives." Public Relations Review, 33(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.001
  26. Jones, P. (2008). Communicating Strategy. UK: Gower.
  27. Juodvalkis, J. L., Grefe, B. A., Hogue, M., Svyantek, D. J., & DeLamarter, W. (2003). "The Effects of Job Stereotype, Applicant Gender, and Communication Style on Ratings in Screening Interviews." The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028963
  28. Kim, S., & Rader, S. (2010). "What They Can Do Versus How Much They Care: Assessing Corporate Communication Strategies on Fortune 500 Web Sites." Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541011017816
  29. Kollat, J., & Farache, F. (2017). "Achieving Consumer Trust on Twitter via CSR Communication." Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(6), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2127
  30. Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management: The Millennium Edition (10th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
  31. Langer, E. (2014). "What’s Trending? Social Media and its Effects on Organizational Communication."Journal of Undergraduate Research, XVII, 1–10.
  32. Le Roux, T. (2014). "The Description of South African Corporate Communication Practitioners that Contribute to Organisational Performance." Public Relations Review, 40(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.008
  33. Luoma-aho, V., & Vos, M. (2010). "Towards a More Dynamic Stakeholder Model: Acknowledging Multiple Issue Arenas." Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(3), 31–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011068159
  34. Mahdieh, O. (2015). "Interaction between Communication and Organizational Conflict and its Relationship with Performance." International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 1(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.10002-2
  35. Ng, C. W. (1998). "Do Women and Men Communicate Differently at Work? An Empirical Study in Hong Kong." Women in Management Review, 13(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429810369587
  36. Patil, V. H, Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. T. (2017). "Parallel Analysis Engine to Aid in Determining Number of Factors to Retain Using R." https://analytics.gonzaga.edu/parallelengine/
  37. Penley, L. E., & Hawkins, B. (1985). "Studying Interpersonal Communication in Organizations: A Leadership Application." Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/256203
  38. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th). UK: Pearson Education.
  39. Rogers, D. P. (1987). "The Development of a Measure of Perceived Communication Openness." Journal of Business Communication, 24(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194368702400404
  40. Saphiere, D. H., Mikk, B. K., & DevVries, B. I. (2005). Communication Highwire: Leveraging the Power of Diverse Communication Styles. UK: Intercultural Press.
  41. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). "Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-fit Measures." Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  42. Siljanovska, S. (2015). "The Influence of Social Media on Organizational Communication: Case Study in Republic of Macedonia."European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v3i1.p83-92
  43. Treurniet, W., Messemaker, M., Wolbers, J., & Boersma, F. K. (2015). "Shaping the Societal Impact of Emergencies: Striking a Balance between Control and Cooperation." International Journal of Emergency Services, 4(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-06-2014-0007
  44. Tyagi, C. L., & Kumar, R. (2004). Advertising Management. UK: Atlantic.
  45. van Ruler, B. (2004). "The Communication Grid: An Introduction of a Model of Four Communication Strategies." Public Relations Review, 30(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.01.002
  46. van Ruler, B. (n. d.). "The Communication Grid of Tactics by Betteke van Ruler". https://bettekevanruler.nl/the-communication-grid-2/
  47. van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (2004). "Overview of Public Relations and Communication Management in Europe." In B. van Ruler & D. Verčič (Eds.), Public relations and communication management in Europe: A nation-by-nation introduction to public relations theory and practice (pp. 1–11). Mouton de Gruyter.
  48. van Woerkum, C., & Aarts, N. (2008). "Staying Connected: The Communication between Organizations and Their Environment." Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280810869613
  49. Vaught, B. C. (1979). "An Index of Interpersonal Communicative Competence and its Relationship to Selected Supervisory Demographics, Self-actualization and Leader Behavior in Organizations" [Doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, Denton, TX]. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc331311/m2/1
    /high_res_d/1002783399-Vaught.pdf
  50. Vaught, B. C., Pettit, J. D., & Taylor, R. E. (1989). "Interpersonal Communication Behaviour of Male and Female Administrators." International Journal of Educational Management, 3(2), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001947
  51. Verčič, D., van Ruler, B., Bütschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2001). "On the Definition of Public Relations: A European view." Public Relations Review, 27(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00095-9
  52. Visser, B. (2000). "Organizational Communication Structure and Performance." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00087-1
  53. Wang, G. (2014). "Culture, Paradigm, and Communication Theory: A Matter of Boundary or Commensurability?"Communication Theory, 24(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12045
  54. Wijn, R., & van den Bos, K. (2010). "On the Social-communicative Function of Justice: The Influence of Communication Goals and Personal Involvement on the Use of Justice Assertions." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209347382
  55. Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2015). "Looking Over, Looking Out, and Moving Forward: Positioning public relations in theorizing organizational network ecologies." Communication Theory, 25(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12049
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7,395
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,493