ارائه الگویی برای تجاری‌سازی دانش: الگویی مفهومی و آزمون تجربی آن | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 28، 1401، صفحه 129-152 اصل مقاله (1.13 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/MPES.15.1.129 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین واحدچوکده* 1؛ محمدرضا کرمی پورشمس آبادی2؛ علی صحبتلو3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد زنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد زنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف : هدف اول پژوهش حاضر شناسایی مقوله‌ها و مفاهیم تجاری‌سازی دانش جهت ارائه یک الگوی مفهومی است. و هدف دوم آن آزمون تجربی الگوی مفهومی تجاری سازی دانش می‌باشد. مواد و روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر با راهبرد ترکیبی از نوع اکتشافی انجام شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش رؤسا، مدیران گروه و استادان دانشگاه، متخصصان مراکز رشد دانشگاهی و پارک علم و فناوری در استان گیلان بودند. برای انجام پژوهش، در مرحله کیفی30 نفر با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و در مرحله کمی، 230 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای به‌عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. در مرحله کیفی، با نمونه‌ها مصاحبه عمیق تا دستیابی به اشباع نظری موضوع انجام شد و در مرحله کمی، از مشارکت‌کنندگان درخواست شد تا به پرسشنامه پژوهش پاسخ دهند. برای تحلیل اطلاعات مرحله کیفی از روش تئوری داده بنیاد و برای تحلیل داده‌های کمی از روش مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: در مرحله کیفی، با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای استقرایی مصاحبه‌ها و رویکرد سیستمی اشتراوس و کوربین در طی سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی، 146 مفهوم اولیه، 23 مفهوم ثانویه و 9 مقوله عمده (سرمایه فکری، بهره‌وری دانشگاهی، سیاست‌ها و قابلیت‌های سازمانی، نهادینه کردن تجاری‌سازی، بسترسازی، شبکه‌سازی (شبکه‌گرایی)، خلق دانش، دستیابی به توان رقابتی، قابلیت تجاری‌سازی دانش) استخراج گردید که در مرحله کدگذاری محوری، مفاهیم به دست آمده از مرحله کدگذاری باز در قالب: شرایط علی، پدیده محوری، عوامل زمینه‌ای، عوامل مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها به صورت الگوی پارادایمی به هم مرتبط گردید. و در ادامه الگوی مفهومی پژوهش ارائه شد. در مرحله کمی، مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های شناسایی شده به روش معادلات ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتابج برازش‌های الگوی تأییدی مرتبه دوم (مقدار گزارش شدة خی دو، مقدار خی دو تقسیم بر درجة آزادی که کمتر از 3 و شاخص برازش مقایسه‌ای، بیشتر از 9/0) ، و نتایج بار عاملی (ضریب لامبدا) تمام متغیرهای آشکار که بالاتر از 4/0 است، حاکی از مطلوب بودن براش الگوی تجربی می‌باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تجاری‌سازی دانش؛ دانشگاه؛ دانش‌آموختگان؛ مدل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Providing a Model for Knowledge Commercialization: A Conceptual Model and its Empirical Test | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hosein Vahedchokdeh1؛ Mohammad Reza Karamipour Shamsabadi2؛ Ali Sohbatloo3 | ||
| 1PhD Student in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Zanjan Branch, University of Azad Islamic, Zanjan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Zanjan Branch, University of Islamic Azad, Zanjan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Farhangian, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The first objective of the present study is to identify the categories and concepts of knowledge commercialization for making a conceptual model. And the second goal is to test the model empirically. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with a mixed exploratory strategy. Participants in the study were heads, department heads and university professors, specialists from university growth centers, and science and technology parks in Guilan province. To conduct the research, in the qualitative stage, 30 people were selected using purposive sampling and in the quantitative stage, 230 people were selected as the research sample by stratified random sampling. In the qualitative stage, the samples were interviewed in depth to achieve theoretical saturation and in the quantitative stage, participants were asked to answer the research questionnaire. The grounded theory method was used to analyze the qualitative data and the structural equation model method was used to analyze the quantitative data. Discussion and Conclusion: In the qualitative stage, using inductive content analysis of interviews and the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin during the three stages of open, axial, and selective coding, 146 primary concepts, 23 secondary concepts, and 9 major categories (intellectual capital, academic productivity, policies and organizational capabilities, the institutionalization of commercialization, context building, networking (networking orientation), knowledge creation, competitiveness (knowledge commercialization) were extracted. Obtained from the open coding stage in the form of causal conditions, pivotal phenomena, contextual factors, intervening factors, strategies, and consequences were linked in a paradigmatic pattern. Then the conceptual model of the research was presented. In the quantitative stage, the identified components and indicators were analyzed by the structural equation method. The result of the second-order confirmation model’s fits (reported chi-square value, chi-square value divided by degrees of freedom less than 3, and comparative fit index more than 0.9), and factor load results (lambda coefficient) of all variables are obviously higher than 0.4 which indicates the empirical model is desirable. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Knowledge Commercialization, University, Graduates, Model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, B., Gholipour, A., Delavar, A., & Jafari, P. (2009). A Qualitative Research about the Effect of Commercialization Approach on the Traditional Academic Values. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 2(2): 62-77. Abbasi Esfanjani, H. (2017). Designing the Model for Commercialization of University Research Using Structural Equation Modeling- Partial Least Squares Method (SEM-PLS). Journal of Trade Studies, 21(82): 33-65. Ala, E., Hatami, J., Ahmadi, A., & Aghajani, H. (2019). Presentation of Entrepreneurial University Conceptual Model with Psychological Maturity and Psychological Preparedness for Commercialization and Entrepreneurship (Experimental Control: Applied Science Centers of Mazandaran Province). Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 14 (1): 157-184. Alnatsheh, A., Gbadegeshin, S.A., Rimpiläinen, A., Imamovic-Tokalic, I., & Zambrano, A. (2015). Identifying the challenges in commercializing high technology: A case study of quantum key distribution technology. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5 (1): 26-36. Banning, E.B. (2002). Archaeological survey. Springer Science & Business Media, Vol. 1. Creswell, J.W., & Miller, D.L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3): 124-130. Chih-Hung, H. (2013). Patent Value Assessment and Commercialization Strategy. Journal of Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80: 307–319. Göktepe, H. (2008). University Inventors and University Patenting Patterns at Lund University: Conceptual- Methodological & Empirical Insights" in Krishna. C. Sri Academic. Amicus Books, ICFAI, India ISBN, 81,314-349. Danaeifard, H., & Islami, A. (2010). Application of research strategies of data foundation theory in practice: making the theory of organizational indifference. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university”. Research Policy, 32: 21-109. Fathi Vajargah, K., Khorasani, A., & Daneshmandi, S. (2015). The Study of the coaching foundations in education and Improvement of Human Resource Management. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 8(15): 27-48. Fakour, B. (2005). Reasech results commercialization. Rahyaf journal, 1(4): 53-58. Fulghieri, P., & Sevilir, M. (2011). Mergers, spin-offs, and employee incentives. Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2207-2241. Gabrielsson, J., Politis, D., & Tell, J. (2009). University professors and research commercialization: An empirical test of the “knowledge corridor” thesis. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series, 4-6. Glaser, B.G. (2004). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. San Francisco: Sociology Pr. Hafezi, H., Ekrami, M., Ghorchiyan, N., & Sarmadi, M. (2016). Fitting of the mathematical-structural model of knowledge commercialization in Payame Noor University. Journal of Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 22(2):125-146(Persian). Hasangholipour, H., Gholipour, A., & Roshandel Arbatani, T. (2012). Barriers to Knowledge Commercialization in Academic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 4(14): 165-183. Hsu, D.W.L., Chishen, Y., Yuan, B., & Chou, C. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 92(1): 25–39. Hmieleski, K.M., & Powell, E.E. (2018). The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1): 43-77. Hindle, K., & Yenchen, J. (2004). Technovation. (24), 793-803. Hung, K.P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R & D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10): 368-380. Kariminejad, H., Ghourchian, N., Jafari, P., & Mohammad Davoodi, A. (2018). A Model for improving the Quality of Non-Profit and Non-Governmental Higher Education Universities and Institutes (Case Study: Guilan Province). Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 12 (1): 13-46. Kirbyd, D., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Making Universities More Entrepreneurial: Development of a Model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(1): 302–316. Korpi, M., Nazem, F., & Karimzadeh, S. (2018). Provide a native model of knowledge commercialization in the field of health University of Medical Sciences in Tehran. Journal of JundiShapur Educational Development, 9(4): 310-296. Krstic, B., & Stanisic, T. (2013). The Influence of Knowledge Economy Development on Competitiveness of Southeastern Europe Countries. Industrija, (41):151-168. Lin, Y., Wang, W., & Kung, L.A. (2015). Influences of cross-functional collaboration and knowledge creation on technology commercialization: Evidence from high-tech industries. Industrial Marketing Management. http//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. indmarman. Li, C., & Morgan, G. (2010). From knowledge to product: Institutional change and commercialization of university research in China. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(3): 254-274. Lotfabadi, H. (2010). Research Methodology in Educational Sciences and Psychology. Qom University and University Research Institute Publications. Masters Farahani, F., Niaz Azari, K., & Salehi, M. (2016). Presentation of Structural models for the commercialization of knowledge in Islamic Azad Universityin Tehran. Journal of Management Future Research, 26 (105): 85-17. Mahmoudi, T. (2008). Problems of interaction between university and industry. Analytical News Journal of Science and Technology Park, University of Tehran, No. 9: 12-3. Mehta, S.S. (2008). Commercializing Successful Biomedical Technologies: Basic Principles for the Development of Drugs, Diagnostics and Devices.New York, Cambridge University Press. Mets, T. (2009). Creating Business Model for Commercialization of University Research. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 51 (1.2): 5-6. Mir, A., Bagheri, M., & Hashemi, S. (2019). Components of knowledge commercialization based on knowledge management. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration of Islamic Azad University Garmsar Branch, 12(3): 261-278. Mostafaei, S.M., Malekian, F., Kaviani, E., & Karamafrouz, M. (2018). Desingning the Entrepreneurial University Model based on Grounded theory (case study: units of Islamic Azad University of West Iran). Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 12 (2): 41-74. Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35: 1499–1508. Pazhouhesh, A. (2017). Odeling the Factors Influencing Commercialization of Academic Research Achievements: Mixed Method (Case Study: Engineering Faculties of State Universities in Tehran). Journal of Industrial Management, 9(2): 265-286. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2): 423-442. Pourezzat, A., Gholipour, A., & Nadirkhanlou (2010). Representating Barriers to Academic Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Commercialization at University of Tehran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 2(4): 65-75. Pourezzat, A., & Heidari, H. (2012). Identification and classification of challenges and barriers to knowledge commercialization by Q. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(1): 49-62. Pourezzat, A., Gholipour, A., & Nadirkhanlou (2010). Identifying and prioritizing Factors Affecting Knowledge Commercialization at University. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 2 (7): 35-66. Pournaghi, R., & Hejazi, A. (2019). Investigation of Factors Affecting Knowledge Commercialization from the Viewpoint of Graduated Students at Shahid Rajaee Teachers’Training University. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology, 34 (3): 1023-1050. Umam, K.K., Hewanto, W.D., & Larso, D. (2008). Higher Education Institution and Technology Transfer. Proceedings of the 5th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange. Melbourne, Australia, February. University of British Colombia (2009). Commercialization Procedures. University Industrial Liaison Office, Canada. Available at: http://www. Uilo.ubc.ca/researcher_commercialization.asp. Rezaei, B., Abbaspour, A., Niknami, M., Rahimian, H., & Delaware, A. (2012). Analyzing strategies to improve academic entrepreneurship in the field of humanities and presenting a grounded theory. Samwel, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objective, teacher method, and impact indicators. Journal Education Training, 52: 20-47. Seif, M., Safa, S., & Biranvand, A. (2019). The Factors that Affect Intention to Knowledge Commercialization in Shiraz University. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(1): 64-76. Shirazi, H., Hashemzadeh Khorasgani, G., Radfer, R., & Torabi, T. (2019).The effect innovation capability on technology commercialization performance in knowledge based companies: The mediating role organizational innovation. Journal of Management facuity of Shahid Sattari AIR University, 2(5):81-106. Torkiantabar, M., Mohammad esmaeil, S., & Nooshinfard, F. (2017). Factors affecting commercialization of scientific research results in knowledgebased companies in Iran. Human Information Interaction, 3 (3): 32-42. Touhill, C., Touhill, J., Gregory, J., & O'Riordan, Th.A. (2008). Commercialization of Innovative Technologies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wiesche, M., Jurisch, M.C., Yetton, P., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Grounded Theory Methodology in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 41(3): 685-701. Wu, Y., Welch, E.W., & Huang, W.L. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36: 12-25. Yadollahi, j., & Klathayi., Z. (2011). Commercialization of innovations and introduction of management positions in major business models in the field of high-tech industry. Journal parks and incubators, 9 (33): 26-36. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7,178 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,670 |
||