سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

حکاک, محمد. (1402). شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان؛ کاربست رویکرد دلفی فازی. , 14(3), 155-182. doi: 10.52547/jpap.2023.229295.1225
محمد حکاک. "شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان؛ کاربست رویکرد دلفی فازی". , 14, 3, 1402, 155-182. doi: 10.52547/jpap.2023.229295.1225
حکاک, محمد. (1402). 'شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان؛ کاربست رویکرد دلفی فازی', , 14(3), pp. 155-182. doi: 10.52547/jpap.2023.229295.1225
حکاک, محمد. شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان؛ کاربست رویکرد دلفی فازی. , 1402; 14(3): 155-182. doi: 10.52547/jpap.2023.229295.1225

شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان؛ کاربست رویکرد دلفی فازی

چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55، 1402، صفحه 155-182    اصل مقاله (573.92 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/jpap.2023.229295.1225
نویسنده
محمد حکاک*
دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: تحقیق حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه از سازمان‌های دولتی شهر ایلام به رشته تحریر در آمده است.
طراحی/ روش شناسی/ رویکرد: این تحقیق از نظر رویکرد در زمره تحقیقات آمیخته، از منظر هدف کاربردی و از حیث شیوه جمع‌آوری داده‌ها توصیفی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری در بخش کیفی خبرگان شاغل در سازمان‌های دولتی شهر ایلام بودند که با بهره‌گیری از روش نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی هدفمند و گلوله برفی و با در نظر گرفتن قاعده اشباع نظری با 16 نفر از خبرگان مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته انجام شد. در فاز کمی با تنظیم پرسشنامه دلفی فازی و بعد از دو مرحله نظرسنجی از خبرگان، اولویت پیشایندها و پسایندها به‌­دست آمد.
یافته­‌های پژوهش: نتایج تحقیق نشان داد اقتضائات محیطی، عدم‌درک حمایت سازمانی و بافتار شرنگ‌آلود همکاران در اولویت اول تا سوم پیشایندها قرار می‌­گیرند. هم­چنین، غلیان کنش‌های منفی در رتبه اول، افزایش هزینه‌های سازمان و تزریق تدریجی انگاره‌های فسادمحور در رتبه دوم و پیدایش تدریجی بیزاری سازمانی در رتبه سوم پسایندها جای می‌گیرند.
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: از جمله محدودیت­‌های پژوهش می­‌توان به دسترسی دشوار به اعضای نمونه و زمان‌­بر بودن جمع­‌آوری اطلاعات از آنها، همچنین کم بودن ادبیات و مبانی نظری مرتبط با رفتارهای کناره‌­گیرانه اشاره کرد.
پیامدهای عملی: شناسایی و اولویت‌­بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتارهای کناره گیرانه.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: این پژوهش در حوزه رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه، نوآوری­‌های نظری به همراه داشته است و به مدیران و پژوهشگران در درک و شناخت بهینه از چگونگی مواجهه با رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه کمک می­‌کند.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
رفتارهای کناره‌گیرانه؛ سازمان‌های دولتی؛ پیشایند؛ پسایند
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying and Explaining the Antecedents and Consequences of Withdrawal Behaviors from the Organization; Application of Fuzzy Delphi Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Mohammad Hakkak
Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Lorestan, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Purpose: The present research has been written with the aim of identifying and explaining the antecedents and consequences of withdrawal behaviors from government organizations in Ilam city.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is descriptive in terms of the approach in the category of mixed research, in terms of the practical purpose, in terms of the method of data collection. The statistical population in the qualitative section was the experts working in the government organizations of Ilam city, which was conducted using the purposeful judgment sampling method and snowball and considering the theoretical saturation base, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 16 experts. In the quantitative phase, by setting up a fuzzy Delphi questionnaire and after two stages of surveying experts, the priority of antecedents and consequences was obtained.
Research Findings: The results of the research showed that environmental requirements, lack of understanding of organizational support, and the tight knit context of colleagues are placed in the first to third priority of the antecedents. Also, the rise of negative actions in the first place, the increase in organization costs and the gradual injection of corruption-oriented ideas in the second place, and the gradual emergence of organizational dislike are in the third place.
Limitations & Consequences: Research limitations include difficult access to sample members and the time it takes to collect information from them, as well as the lack of literature and theoretical foundations related to withdrawal behaviors.
Practical Consequences: Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents and consequences of withdrawal behaviors.
Innovation or value of the Article: This research has brought theoretical and theoretical innovations in the field of withdrawing behaviors and helps managers and researchers in understanding and understanding optimally how to deal with withdrawing behaviors.
Paper Type: Research Article
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Withdrawal Behaviors, Government Organizations, Antecedents, Consequences
مراجع
  1. Al-Shamaileh, M. O. F., Abuhjeeleh, M., Shamout, M. D., & Harazneh, I. (2022). Three-way Interaction effect of Workplace Aggression, Income, and Gender on Workplace Withdrawal in the Hotel Industry. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 23(2), 391-407.
  2. Annuar Khalid,S, Abdul Rahman,N , Ahmad,A, N, Mat Noor &Rizaimy Shaharud, M(2021). AConceptual Paper on the Role ofCohesion as a Moderatoron the Relationship etweenCitizenshipBehavior andWithdrawal Behaviour, International Journal of Academic Researchin Business and Social Sciences, 11(9),PP. 380–391.
  3. Bauer, M. W., & Trondal, J. (2015). The administrative system of the European Union. In The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system(pp. 1-28). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  4. Colquitt, J.A., Lepine J.A, Wesson, M.J. (2010). Organization Behavior:Essential for performance and commitment, Mc Graw-hill International.11(4):PP.200-247.
  5. da Silva Timossi, L., Pedroso, B., de Francisco, A. C., & Pilatti, L. A. (2008). Evaluation of quality of work life: an adaptation from the Walton’s QWL model. In XIV Intenational Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, http://pg utfpr edu br/dirppg/ppgep/ebook/2008/CONGRESSOS/Internacionais.
  6. Dineo Semeny, L (2021). The Effect of Psychological Empoerment on Withdrawal Behaviours as Mediated by Organisational Citizesship Behaviour and Work Engagement in a South African MilitaryUniversit.
  7. Erdemli,O (2015). Teachers’ Withdrawal Behaviors and their Relationship withWork Ethic, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 60. PP., 201-220.
  8. Eslami G, Rahimnia F, Mortazavi S, Khorakian A. Causes of Backstabbing Behaviors in Public Organizations (2018). JMDP, 31 (3) :49-84.
  9. Feizi,M, Soheili,S, Hasanzadeh, M pakdel,A(2012). Surveying the Relationship between Job Stressors and Withdrawal Behaviors (In Health and Social Securityoffice of Ardebil City). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(9): PP. 407-411. (In persion).
  10. Griffez, R. W, Gaertner, S., andSager, J. K. (2009). Taxonomic Model of Withdrawal Behaviors: the Adaptive Response Model. Human Resource Management Review9,PP.90-577.
  11. Hogh, A., Hoel, H., & Carneiro, I. G. (2011). Bullying and employee turnover among healthcare workers: a three‐wave prospective study. Journal of nursing management, 19(6), 742-751.
  12. Islami, Q., Rahimnia, F., Mortazavi, S., & Shoshban, A. (2017). Discovering the formation process of subjugation behavior and its consequences in public sector organizations, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, PhD thesis, Management. (in Persian)
  13. Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organisational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
  14. Jiang, X.; Du, J.; Yang, T.;Liu, Y.(2021). How Do Instant Messages Reduce Psychological Withdrawal Behaviors?—Mediation of Engagement and Moderation of Self-Control. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 2983,PP.2-13.
  15. Kanungo, R. N., & Mendonca, M. (2002). Employee withdrawal behavior. In Voluntary employee withdrawal and inattendance(pp. 71-94). Springer, Boston, MA.
  16. Karapinar, O(2015). Integrity As It Relates To Job Performance, Organizational Citizenship I Behavior and Withdrawal Behavior: Moderating Efect of Orginizational R Justice.
  17. Kasaie, T & Rahmani, R (2017). Investigating the relationship between management styles and job withdrawal behaviours in the branches of the Agricultural Bank of Kurdistan province. Scientific journal of research in humanities and social studies, 10: 121-113.
  18. Kesai, T., & Rahmani, R. (2016). Investigating the relationship between managerial styles and job withdrawal behaviors in branches of the Agricultural Bank of Kurdistan Province. Scientific Research Journal in Humanities and Social Studies, 10, 113-121. (in Persian)
  19. Lehman, W.E.; Simpson, D.D, (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Appl. Psychol., 77,PP. 309–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lishchinsky, O, S(2012). Emerald Article: Teachers' withdrawal behaviors: integrating theory and findings, Journal of Educational Administration, 50 Iss: 3. PP. 307 – 326.
  21. Liu,C, E, Yuan, X & Chenhong Hu, M, Z(2019). Work-related Identity Discrepancy and Work Withdrawal Behavior: the Mediation Effect of Negative Emotion. International Journal of Business and Social Science 10 , No. 7,PP.229-236. doi:10.30845/ijbss.v10n7p25
  22. Manale, J & Melwin Joy, M(2016). A Study on the Impact of Job Satisfaction on Employee Withdrawal Behaviours in Information Technology Industry. The International Journal Of Business & Management (ISSN 2321–8916).
  23. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
  24. Mirsepasi,N, Memarzadeh, G, Alipour, H & Feizi, M (2012). Citizenship and Withdrawal Behaviors in Contingency Cultures. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(9), PP.9398-9406. (In persion).
  25. Noroozi1, D & Abdi Masumabad. S,. (2015). The role of spiritual intelligence in employees’ withdrawal behaviors in physical education organization. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 4, PP.60-71.
  26. Oh, K. H. (1995). The impact of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on withdrawal: A cross-cultural approach (Doctoral dissertation). University ofIllinois, California
  27. Okache, G. O. Skill Variety and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Telecommunication Firms in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
  28. Park, K, H, Youns,S, J Moon, J(2020). The Effect of Workforce Restructuring on Withdrawal Behavior: The Role of Job Insecurity, Career Plateau and Procedural Justice, Journal of Asian Finance. Economics and Business Vol 7 No 7 , PP.413 – 424.
  29. Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New York: Psychology Press
  30. Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(2),P. 438.
  31. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.
  32. Rosenblatt, Z, Lishchinsky, O,(2017). S"Temporal withdrawal behaviors in an educational policy context", International Journal of Educational Managemen,PP.1-34.
  33. SehBaradar, S., Ebrahimpour, H., & Hasanzadeh, M. (2013). Investigating the relationship between organizational justice and withdrawal behaviour among the employees of ardabil technical & vocational training organization. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR), 2(3), 93-99.
  34. SERFRAZ, A., MUNIR, Z., MEHTA, A. M., & QAMRUZZAMAN, M. (2022). Nepotism effects on job satisfaction and withdrawal behavior: An empirical analysis of social, ethical and economic factors from Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 311-318.
  35. Shajar,S, Arif, M, Muhammad, L & Naqv, S,M,M, R(2021). The Impact of Tyrannical Leadership on Employee Withdrawal Behavior: Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion
    and Moderating Role of Employee Workplace Ostracism, Capitil University Of Science And Technology, Islamarad.
  36. Smith, j, RMicich, L, A & Micich, L, A(2016). Organization Citizenship and Employee Withdrawal Behavior in the Workplace. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 6, No. 3, PP.43-62.
  37. Spendolini, M. J. (1985). Employee withdrawal behavior: Expanding the concept(Turnover, Absenteeism) (Doctoral dissertation). California Üniversitesi,Irvine. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.8516557).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,413
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,819