ویژگیهای روانسنجی فرم فارسی مقیاس ادراک موانع تحصیلی و مسیر شغلی | ||
فصلنامه روانشناسی کاربردی | ||
دوره 18، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 70، 1403، صفحه 197-225 اصل مقاله (1.29 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/apsy.2024.234877.1620 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
ندا علیپور اصفهانی1؛ پریسا نیلفروشان* 2؛ نلی دیکوآیپر3 | ||
1گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
3روانشناسی فردی و سازمانی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه کاتولیک لون، لون، بلژیک | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: این پژوهش به منظور تدوین فرم فارسی مقیاس ادراک موانع تحصیلی و مسیر شغلی، ویژگیهای روانسنجی این ابزار شامل ساختار عاملی، روایی و اعتبار را در دانشجویان بررسی نمود. روش: نمونهای متشکل از 453 دانشجوی کارشناسی دانشگاه اصفهان (287 دختر، 166 پسر)، به صورت تصادفی به دو گروه جداگانه (n1=227،n2=226 ) تقسیم شد و ساختار عاملی از طریق تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و سپس تحلیل عاملی تأییدی بررسی گردید. برای برآورد روایی واگرای این ابزار، از پرسشنامه شایستگیهای مسیر شغلی استفاده شد. همچنین، اعتبار این مقیاس بر اساس همسانی درونی و ثبات سنجیده شد. یافتهها: نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی حاکی از استخراج سه عامل موانع مسیر شغلی، تحصیلی و محیطی بود. همچنین نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد که ساختار تک عاملی مرتبه دوم نسبت به سه عاملی مرتبط مرتبه اول در نمونه دانشجویان ایرانی از برازش بهتری برخوردار است. بر اساس تحلیل تغییرناپذیری، بین دانشجویان دختر و پسر از نظر بارهای عاملی، کوواریانسها و خطاهای باقیمانده تفاوت معناداری وجود نداشت. نتایج همبستگی این مقیاس با شایستگیهای مسیر شغلی از روایی واگرا حمایت کرد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای کل مقیاس 93/0 و برای زیرمقیاسهای موانع مسیر شغلی 90/0، تحصیلی 90/0و محیطی 88/0 برآورد شد. نتیجهگیری: مقیاس ادراک موانع تحصیلی و مسیر شغلی ابزاری مناسب و کارآمد برای اهداف تحقیقاتی در زمینه راهنمایی و مشاوره مسیر شغلی است و ویژگیهای روانسنجی قابل قبولی دارد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تغییرناپذیری؛ تحلیل عاملی تأییدی؛ مقیاس ادراک موانع تحصیلی و مسیر شغلی؛ ساختار عاملی؛ ویژگیهای روانسنجی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Perception of Educational and Career-Related Barriers Scale | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Neda Alipour Esfahani1؛ Parisa Nilforooshan2؛ Nele De Cuyper3 | ||
1Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
3Organisational and Personnel Psychology، Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Aim: This study aimed to develop a Persian version of the Perception of Educational and Career-Related Barriers Scale and examine its psychometric properties, including factor structure, validity, and reliability among students. Method: A sample of 453 undergraduate students from the University of Isfahan (287 females, 166 males) was randomly divided into two groups (n1 = 227, n2 = 226). The factor structure was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To assess divergent validity, the Career Path Competencies Questionnaire was utilized. Reliability was evaluated based on internal consistency and stability. Results: EFA identified three factors—career barriers, academic barriers, and environmental barriers. CFA indicated that a single second-order factor structure provided a better fit compared to the three first-order factors in the Iranian student sample. Invariance analysis showed no significant differences between male and female students concerning factor loadings, covariances, and residuals, supporting the model's measurement invariance across gender. The correlation with the Career Path Competencies Questionnaire supported divergent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.93 for the entire scale and 0.90, 0.90, and 0.88 for the subscales of career barriers, academic barriers, and environmental barriers, respectively. Conclusion: The Persian version of the Perception of Educational and Career-Related Barriers Scale is a valid and reliable tool for research in career guidance and counseling, demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Invariance, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Perception of Academic and Career Barriers Scale, Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties | ||
مراجع | ||
Abubakar, I. A. (2021). Perceived Barriers and Post University Career Plans among Education Students in Bayero University Kano, Nigeria. [Link] Akkermans, J., Brenninkmeijer, V., Huibers, M., & Blonk, R. W. (2013). Competencies for the contemporary career: Development and preliminary validation of the career competencies questionnaire. Journal of Career Development, 40(3), 245-267. [Link] Bateman, L. B., Heider, L., Vickers, S. M., Anderson, W. A., Hood, A. C., Jones, E., ... & Fouad, M. N. (2021). Barriers to advancement in academic medicine: The perception gap between majority men and other faculty. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36, 1937-1943. [Link] Beaumont, E., Gedye, S., & Richardson, S. (2016). ‘Am I employable?’: Understanding students' employability confidence and their perceived barriers to gaining employment. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 19, 1-9. [Link] Becerra, D. (2012). Perceptions of educational barriers affecting the academic achievement of Latino K–12 students. Children & Schools, 34(3), 167-177. [Link] Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological methods & research, 16(1), 78-117. [Link] Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Education Research an Introduction, Seventh Editions. University of Oregon. United States of America. [link] Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications. [link] Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1996). A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling. The career development quarterly, 44(4), 354-366. [Link] Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. routledge.[link] Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. [Link] Chuang, N. K. (2010). The impact of gender on hospitality undergraduates' perceived career barriers. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 22(3), 12-19. [Link] Derous, E., & Decoster, J. (2017). Implicit age cues in resumes: Subtle effects on hiring discrimination. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1321. [Link] Di Fabio, A. (2014). Career counseling and positive psychology in the 21st century: new constructs and measures for evaluating the effectiveness of intervention. Journal of Counsellogy, 1, 193-213. [Link] Diaz, S., Elwell, J., Rigolosi, R., & Proto, M. (2024). Barriers and motivating factors for licensed practical nurses to pursue a bachelor's degree in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 51, 51-57. [link] Donald, W. E., Ashleigh, M. J., & Baruch, Y. (2018). Students’ perceptions of education and employability: Facilitating career transition from higher education into the labor market. Career Development International, 23(5), 513-540. [Link] England, J. W., Duffy, R. D., Gensmer, N. P., Kim, H. J., Buyukgoze-Kavas, A., & Larson-Konar, D. M. (2020). Women attaining decent work: The important role of workplace climate in Psychology of Working Theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(2), 251. [Link] Fassinger, R. E. (2000). Gender and sexuality in human development: Implications for prevention and advocacy in counseling psychology. [Link] Fernández, A. M., & Dufey, M. (2015). Adaptation of Collins' revised adult attachment dimensional scale to the Chilean context. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 242-252. [Link] Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological assessment, 6(4), 304. [link] Goncalves, B. (2021). Barriers to Careers: How Self-Efficacy Impacts Student Career Readiness. [Link] Gonzalez, M. J. F., Semjonovs, D., Bogdanecs, A., & Ozola, S. (2014). Youngsters’ motivations and difficulties for choosing seafarer career. The case of Lativia. European Integration Studies, (8), 131-140. [Link] Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage publications. [link] Harari, M. B., McCombs, K., & Wiernik, B. M. (2021). Movement capital, RAW model, or circumstances? A meta-analysis of perceived employability predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103657. [Link] Heyman, J. (2000). The widening gap: Why America’s working families are in jeopardy and what to do about it. NY: Basic Books. [Link] Heijde, C. M. V. D., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. (2006). A competence‐based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 45(3), 449-476. [Link] Holloway-Friesen, H. (2018). Acculturation, enculturation, gender, and college environment on perceived career barriers among Latino/a college students. Journal of Career Development, 45(2), 117-131. [link] Jain, U., Angrisani, M., Langa, K. M., Sekher, T. V., & Lee, J. (2022). How much of the female disadvantage in late-life cognition in India can be explained by education and gender inequality. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5684. [Link] Karimi Ghartemani, M., Abedi, M., & Nilforoushan, P. (2021). Comparing the Impact of Training on Career Personality Approach and Career Path Construction Counseling on Children's Career Adaptability from a Life Design Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(4), 131-155. [Link] Kim, Y. H., & O'Brien, K. M. (2018). Assessing women’s career barriers across racial/ethnic groups: The Perception of Barriers Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(2), 226. [Link] Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. [Link] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122. [Link] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of counseling psychology, 47(1), 36. [Link] Li, X., Kim, Y. H., Keum, B. T., Wang, Y. W., & Bishop, K. (2022). A broken pipeline: Effects of gender and racial/ethnic barriers on college students’ educational aspiration–pursuit gap. Journal of Career development, 49(4), 753-768. [Link] Li, X., Wang, Y. W., & Kim, Y. H. (2022). The moderation of parental support on the relationship between race-related career barriers and academic achievement. Journal of Career Development, 49(2), 363-377. [Link] Linnér, L., Stambulova, N. B., Lindahl, K., & Wylleman, P. (2019). Swedish university student-athletes’ dual career scenarios and competences. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-16. [Link] Luzzo, D. A. (1993). Ethnic differences in college students' perceptions of barriers to career development. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. [Link] Luzzo, D. A. (1995). Gender differences in college students' career maturity and perceived barriers in career development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73(3), 319-322. [Link] Luzzo, D. A., & McWhirter, E. H. (2001). Sex and ethnic differences in the perception of educational and career‐related barriers and levels of coping efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 61-67. [Link] Ma, P. W. W., & Shea, M. (2021). First-generation college students’ perceived barriers and career outcome expectations: Exploring contextual and cognitive factors. Journal of Career Development, 48(2), 91-104. [link] Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press. [Link] Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications. [Link] Mejia‐Smith, B., & Gushue, G. V. (2017). Latina/o college students' perceptions of career barriers: Influence of ethnic identity, acculturation, and self‐efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95(2), 145-155. [Link] Melo, M. R. D., Martins-Silva, P. D. O., Andrade, A. L. D., & Moura, R. L. D. (2021). Barriers, adaptability, employability, and satisfaction: Career perceptions of business students. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25. [Link] Morales, N., & Jacobson, S. (2020). Student perceptions of environmental and conservation (EC) Careers: Exploring perspectives of diverse university students. Environmental Management, 66(3), 450-459. [Link] Miner, K. N., Walker, J. M., Bergman, M. E., Jean, V. A., Carter-Sowell, A., January, S. C., & Kaunas, C. (2018). From “her” problem to “our” problem: Using an individual lens versus a social-structural lens to understand gender inequity in STEM. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 267-290. [Link] Mulvey, K. L., Cerda‐Smith, J., Joy, A., Mathews, C., & Ozturk, E. (2023). Factors that predict adolescents' engagement with STEM in and out of school. Psychology in the Schools. [Link] Ojeda, L., & Flores, L. Y. (2008). The influence of gender, generation level, parents' education level, and perceived barriers on the educational aspirations of Mexican American high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 57(1), 84-95. [Link] Okay–Somerville, B., & Scholarios, D. (2015). Career Self–Management, Perceived Employability, and Employment Success during University–to–Work Transitions: A Social Cognitive Career Theory Perspective. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, (2015 6 (107) Employability (Zatrudnialność)), 33-60. [Link] Pasha, S., Hosseinian, S., & Pardalan, N. (2024). Construction and Validation of a Native Scale for Successful Transition of Students from University to Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18(1), 131-154. [Link] Reich, R. B. (2001). The Future of Success. New York: AIfred A. [Link] Rothwell, A., & Arnold, J. (2007). Self‐perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale. Personnel review, 36(1), 23-41. [Link] Sadeghi, H., Abedi, M. R., Ahmadi, A., & Nilforooshan, P. (2017). Development and validation of the career transition scale. Quarterly Journal of Career & Organizational Counseling, 9(31), 45-64. [link] Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74. [link] Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991). Development and initial validation of the Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of vocational behavior, 39(3), 344-361. [Link] Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991b). College students’ perceptions of barriers to career[Link] Toyokawa, T., & DeWald, C. (2020). Perceived career barriers and career decidedness of first‐generation college students. The Career Development Quarterly, 68(4), 332-347. [Link] Yoo, H. J. (2015). The Influences of Career Interrupted Women’s Perceived Career Barriers on Employability: The Mediating Effect of Social Network. Published biyearly by The Korean Association for Thinking Development, 11(1), 155-178. [Link] | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,346 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 809 |