سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

طاهرپور, فاطمه. (1396). رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و هم‌آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های برتر ایران. , 9(1), 109-128.
فاطمه طاهرپور. "رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و هم‌آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های برتر ایران". , 9, 1, 1396, 109-128.
طاهرپور, فاطمه. (1396). 'رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و هم‌آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های برتر ایران', , 9(1), pp. 109-128.
طاهرپور, فاطمه. رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و هم‌آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های برتر ایران. , 1396; 9(1): 109-128.

رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و هم‌آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های برتر ایران

چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 1، 1396، صفحه 109-128    اصل مقاله (1.05 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی ( با رویکردهای کمی)
نویسنده
فاطمه طاهرپور*
عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه بیرجند
چکیده
چکیدهپژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین رابطه بین سایش اجتماعی و مؤلفه های هم آفرینی با نقش میانجی عزت نفس سازمانی در اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه­های برتر ایران انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش توصیفی- همبستگی و جامعه آماری شامل اعضای هیأت علمی 20 دانشگاه برتر ایران در سال تحصیلی 92-91 به تعداد 10482 نفر بود که با استفاده از نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای متناسب با حجم تعداد 384 نفر انتخاب شدند. برای سنجش متغیر هم آفرینی از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ، برای سنجش سایش اجتماعی از پرسشنامه دافی (2002) و برای سنجش عزت نفس سازمانی از پرسشنامه پیرس و همکاران (1989) استفاده شد. ضریب پایایی پرسشنامه­ها با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ بررسی و با میزان 92/0 و 94/0 تایید شد. در خصوص الگوی معادلات ساختاری هنگامی که متغیر هم آفرینی، متغیر پیش­بین و سایش اجتماعی متغیر ملاک بودند، از برازش بهتری برخوردار بود و روابط بین مولفه­های هم آفرینی و سایش اجتماعی در سطح 05/0 معنادار بود. یافته­ها در مورد متغیر میانجی نشان داد که عزت نفس سازمانی نقش میانجی ایفا نمی­کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سایش اجتماعی؛ هم آفرینی؛ عزت نفس سازمانی؛ دانشگاه‌های ایران- اعضای هیأت علمی
عنوان مقاله [English]
The relationship between social undermining and co-creating with mediating role of organizational self- esteem among faculty members of selected Iranian universities.
نویسندگان [English]
fatame taherpour
Assistant Prof ., Faculty of Education & Psychology, University of Birjand
چکیده [English]
Deviance behaviors and social undermining are related with other organizational variables. The purpose of this research was to study relationship between social undermining and co-creation with mediation role of organization based self- esteem among faculty members of higher ranking universities in Iran. The study adopted a descriptive – correlational method. The statistical population of the study consisted university faculty members in Iran, from which 384 members were selected as the participants using stratified random sampling consistent with the sample size.
Co-creation were examined using a researcher-made questionnaire based on co-creation DART model and social undermining was examined using Duffy et al. questionnaire (2002) and OBSE was examined using Pierce et al. questionnaire (1989).The construct validity of the scales was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, reliability coefficients were obtained equal to 0.95, 0.95 & 0.93. The results of research indicated that when co-creation variable was independent and social undermining was dependent variable, suggested model has goodness of fit with the obtained data and there is significant relationship between social undermining and co-creation. But mediator role of organization based self- esteem was not meaningful at 0.05 level of significance and there isn’t significant relationship between co-creation and organization based self- esteem.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
social undermining, co-creation, organization based self -esteem, Iranian university, faculty members
مراجع
  1. Ballantyne, D. (2004). “Dialogue and its role in the development of relationship specific knowledge”, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, (19)2, 114-123
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.
  3. Borys, B. & Jemison, D.B., (1989). Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp 234-249.
  4. Bowonder, B., Dambal, A., Kumar, S., Shirodkar, A. (2010), Innovation strategies for creating competitive advantage, Research-Technology Management, 53(3), 19-32.
  5. Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., & Smith, A. (2004). What Determines Corporate Transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 2: 207-252.
  6. Chiva & Alegra and Lapiedra (2007). Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforce. International journal of manpower. Vol, 28. No3/4. Pp 224-242
  7. Crossley, C., 2009. Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motives, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 108, no.1, pp. 14-24.
  8. Crossley, C.,(2009). Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motives, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 108, no.1, pp. 14-24.
  9. Diaz-Mendez and Gummesson, (2012) " value co-creation and university teaching quality: consequences for the European higher education area (EHEA)", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 23 Iss: 4
  10. Duffy .K. and Ganster .G. & Pagon (2002). Social undermining in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No.2,331-351.
  11. Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted, interdependent groups: When and how does self-esteem make a difference? Academy of management Journal, 43, 772–784.
  12. Duffy, M.K., Ganster, D.C., Shaw, J.D., Johnson, J.L., & Pagon, M. (2006a). The social context of undermining behavior at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 105-126.
  13. Duffy, M.K., Scott, K.L., Shaw, J.D., Tepper, B.J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643–666.
  14. Fang, R. (2010). Peer Influence on Undermining Behaviors in the Workplace: A Social Network Perspective. PhD thesis, submitted to the faculty of the graduate school of the university of Minnesota.
  15. Ferris, D.L, Brown, D.J., & Heller, D. (2009) Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 279-286.
  16. Forsström, B. (2005). Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer- Seller Partnerships – Creating and Exploiting Interdependencies. An Empirical Case Study. http://www.impgroup.org/uploads/ dissertations/dissertion_19.
  17. Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., & Relyea, C. (2003). A social identity perspective on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (6), 789-791.
  18. Granados, N., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. (2006). The impact of IT on market information and transparency: a unified theoretical framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(3): 148-178.
  19. Guillermo Enz, M.A (2009). Co -creation of value: managing cross-functional interactions in buyer-supplier relationships. PhD, Thesis on Business Administration, The Ohio State University: 232 Pages.
  20. Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2000). Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on the relationship between perception of organizational uncertainty and employee response. Journal of Management, 26(2): 215–232.
  21. Khorshidi A, Mahdavi M, Salmani Ghahbazi A.(2006) The effective factors and indicators on the efficiency of universities and higher education centers. Quarterly Journal in Medical Education System. Autumn and Winter;2,5:75–99. In Persion.
  22. Kirkpatrick, L., Waugh, C., Valencia, A., & Webster, G. (2002). The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 756–767.
  23. Kristensson, P., Matthing, J. & Johansson, N. (2008) Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International journal of service industry management, 19(4), pp 474-491.
  24. Lin Dar,. O. (2010)Trust In Co-Workers and Employee Behaviors At Work. International Review of Business Research Papers. Vol.6, No.1, Pp.194-204.
  25. Maplesa, J., D.Miller, J., F.Wilsoberta, I., R.Fewa, I. and Zeichnera, a. (2010). Narcissistic personality disorder and selfesteem: An examination of Differential relation with self report and laboratory-based aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4),559-563.
  26. Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P., (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36 (1), 83–96.
  27. Pierce, J. & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization based self-esteem literature, Journal of management, 30, 591-622.
  28. Pierce, J. L, Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622–648.
  29. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, Venkat (2004), The future of Competition: co-creating unique value with customers, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
  30. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, Venkat (2004),”co-creating unique value with customers”, Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 4-9.
  31. Qureshi,J,A. & Shahjehan, A. & Zeb, F. and Saifullah, K. (2011)The effect of self-esteem and organizational identification on organizational citizenship behavior: A case of Pakistani public sector university. African Journal of Business Management Vol.5 (9), pp. 3448-3456.
  32. Romero, D., Molina, A. (2009), Value co-creation and co-innovation: linking networked organizations and customer communities, leveraging knowledge for innovation, in Collaborative Networks, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 307, 401-412
  33. Sarawati Hj. Johar, Siti; Mad Shah, Ishak; Abu Bakar, Zainudin. (2013)." Neuroticism Personality and Emotional Intelligence of Leader, and Impact towards Self-esteem of Employee in Organization", 3rd World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Malaysia, 84: 431– 436.
  34. Savin, R., & Jaquish, G. (1981). The assessment of adolescent self-esteem: A comparison of methods. Journal of Personality, 49, 324–336.
  35. Strongman, L.(2013)The Psychology of Social Undermining in Organizational Behaviors. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organizational Psychology, Volume 6, e3, 1–7.
  36. Stubberup, P. (2010). Co-Creation in Danish Retail Banking.Master‟s Thesis Copenhagen Business School, Department of Marketing Cand. Merc. Strategic Market Creation.
  37. Tanev, S. & Bailetti, T. & Allen, S. & Milyakov, H. & Durchev, P. and Ruskov, P. (2011). How do value co-creation activities relate to the perception of firms' innovativeness? Journal of Innovation Economics, No 7, p. 131-159. DOI : 10.3917/jie.007.0131.
  38. Tanev, S., Durchev, P., Milyakov, H., Ruskov, P. (2010b), Value co-creation in open source firms and beyond, Open Source Innovation (Beyond Software) Workshop, Strasbourg, France, Feb. 24-25, 2010: http://cournot.u-strasbg.fr/users/osi/program/.
  39. Vinokur, A. D., Price, R.. & Gaplan. R. (1996). Hard times and hurtful partners: How financial strain affects depression and relationship satisfaction of unemployed persons and their spouses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 166-179.
  40. Whelpley and McDaniel (2011). Self-esteem and Counterproductive Behaviors: A Meta-analytic Review. Virginia Commonwealth University. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago.
  41. Zhang,. X. & Ye,. C. & Chen,. R. Wang,. Z. (2011). Multi-focused strategy in value co-creation with customers: Examining cumulative development pattern with new capabilities. Production Economics No,132 .pp122–130.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,875
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,346