طراحی الگوی دانشگاه کارآفرین براساس نظریه داده بنیاد (مطالعه موردی: واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی غرب ایران) | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 23، 1398، صفحه 41-74 اصل مقاله (1.06 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/mpes.12.2.41 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیدمحمدرضا مصطفائی1؛ فرامرز ملکیان* 2؛ الهام کاویانی3؛ محمد جواد کرم افروز3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 3گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: هدف از این پژوهش طراحی الگوی دانشگاه کارآفرین برای دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی غرب ایران بود. این پژوهش در چارچوب رویکرد کیفی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل داده بنیاد انجام گرفت. مواد و روش‌ها: جامعه آماری، دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی غرب کشور بود. تعداد مشارکت‌کنندگان دوازده نفر از متخصصان دانشگاه کارآفرین بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. داده‌های مورد نیاز به روش مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری شدند. روایی سؤالات با استفاده از نظرات متخصصان حوزه دانشگاه کارآفرین به دست آمد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها براساس رهیافت نظام‌مند نظریه داده بنیاد در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام شد. اعتبار یافته‌ها به کمک روش‌های تطبیق اعضاء و بررسی همکار به‌دست آمد. نتایج نشان‌دهنده بیست و یک مقوله شامل منابع انسانی، پایه‌های اقتصادی، سیاست‌های سازمانی، ساختار سازمانی، فرهنگ سازمانی، آموزش و پژوهش کارآفرینانه، استراتژی دانشگاه، نگرش سازمانی کارآفرینانه، جو سازمانی کارآفرینانه، ریسک‌پذیری، تغییر ماهیت آموزش عالی، اعتبار و جایگاه دانشگاه، تهیه سند کارآفرینی، بهبود محیط کسب و کار، ارتباط دانشگاه با جامعه، مواضع قانونی، اکوسیستم‌های کارآفرینی، سیاسی‌کاری، بین‌المللی شدن دانشگاه، رضایت ذی‌نفعان و تجاری‌سازی دانشگاه بود که در شش طبقه اصلی شامل شرایط علی، پدیده محوری، عوامل زمینه‌ای، شرایط مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها در قالب مدل پارادایمی قرار گرفت. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج کدگذاری مصاحبه‌ها و تجزیه و تحلیل یافته‌های بخش کیفی نشان داد که دو مؤلفه منابع انسانی شایسته و پایه‌های اقتصادی از شرایط علی و به وجود آورنده دانشگاه کارآفرین هستند. سیاست‌های سازمانی کارآفرینانه ازجمله اصلاح سیاست‌های بالادستی و قوانین وزارت علوم؛ ساختار سازمانی کارآفرینانه، فرهنگ سازمانی کارآفرینانه و اجرای سیاست‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی مشتری‌گرا و کارآفرینانه مهم‌ترین ویژگی‌ها و مؤلفه‌های دانشگاه کارآفرین بودند. هم‌چنین شرایط زمینه‌ای که بر مؤلفه‌های دانشگاه کارآفرین تأثیر می‌گذارد عبارت‌اند از استراتژی دانشگاه، جو سازمانی کارآفرینانه، نگرش کارآفرینانه، ریسک‌پذیری، تغییر ماهیت آموزش عالی و انتظار جامعه، دولت و صنعت از دانشگاه برای رفع نیازهای‌شان، که آموزش عالی را متحول نموده و سبب شده تا دانشگاه‌ها به سمت کارآفرین شدن و پاسخگویی به خواسته‌های مشتریان‌شان هدایت شوند. ششمین عامل زمینه‌ساز دانشگاه کارآفرین، خوش‌نامی دانشگاه است؛ که بر ذی‌نفعان و مشتریان تأثیر گذاشته و آن‌ها را به سرمایه‌گذاری در دانشگاه و مشارکت با آن ترغیب می‌کند. عوامل مداخله‌گر که می‌توانند سرعت بخش یا مانع تبدیل یک دانشگاه سنتی به دانشگاه کارآفرین شوند و تا حدودی در کنترل دانشگاه نیستند؛ عبارت بودند از مواضع قانونی و حقوقی، اکوسیستم‌های کارآفرینی اعم از اکوسیستم‌های در اختیار دانشگاه و اکوسیستم‌های خارج از اختیار دانشگاه، سیاسی گری و انواع لابی‌ها که در بیشتر امور زندگی ما دخالت داشته و دانشگاه‌ها نیز مشمول این مهم هستند. یکی از راهبردهای دستیابی به دانشگاه کارآفرین وجود و اجرای چشم‌انداز و سند کارآفرینی دانشگاه است که به‌منزله کانال عبور و چراغ راه است. بهبود محیط کسب و کار و ارتباط دانشگاه با جامعه اطراف خود ازجمله کارآفرینان و ارتباط با دانشگاه‌های کارآفرین جهان و منطقه و الگوگیری از آن‌ها یکی دیگر از راهبردهای اثرگذار در ایجاد دانشگاه کارآفرین است. در نهایت بین‌المللی شدن دانشگاه، رضایت ذی‌نفعان و تجاری‌سازی دانش در قالب شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان، پارک‌های علم و فناوری، ایجاد کسب و کارهای زایشی از پیامدهای دانشگاه کارآفرین بودند. بر این اساس پیشنهاد می‌شود: وزارت علوم افرادی را به مدیریت دانشگاه‌ها منصوب کند که کارآفرین باشند یا به سیاست‌های کارآفرینی دولت و دانشگاه‌ها پایبند باشند. کارآفرینی در ارزشیابی و ارتقای علمی و اداری اساتید نقش داشته باشد. دانشگاه‌ها از طریق مراکز رشد، پارک‌های علم و دفاتر ارتباط با صنعت ارتباط بیشتری با بخش صنعت داشته باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| دانشگاه کارآفرین؛ مدل‌سازی؛ نظریه داده بنیاد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Desingning the Entrepreneurial University Model based on Grounded theory (case study: units of Islamic Azad University of West Iran ( | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ُSayyed Mohammad Reza Mostafaei1؛ Faramarz Malekian2؛ Elham Kaviani3؛ Mohammad Javad Karamafrooz3 | ||
| 1PhD student in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The purpose of this research is to design entrepreneurial university model for Islamic Azad universities in west of Iran. This research is carried out in the framework of qualitative approach and by using grounded data analysis method. Materials and Method: Islamic Azad Universities of the west of Iran compose the statistical society of this research. The number of participants is Twelve from the entrepreneur university experts who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected by semi-structured interview method. The validity of the questions was obtained using the views of the experts of the entrepreneurial university. The data analysis is performed based on grounded theory systematic approach in three stages of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding.The results indicate Twenty-one categories included human resources, economic bases, organizational policies, organizational structure, organizational culture, entrepreneurial education, university strategy, entrepreneurial organizational attitude, entrepreneurial enterprise climate, risk taking, changing the nature of higher education, accreditation and university status, preparing the university entrepreneurship document, improving the business environment, university relations with the community and entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship ecosystems, political and lobbying, university internationalization, stakeholder satisfaction, knowledge commercialization which was classified in the six main categories including causal conditions, axial phenomenon, underlying factors, interventional conditions, strategies and outcomes in the form of a paradigmatic model. Result and Discusion: The results of the coding of the interviews and the analysis of the qualitative sector findings showed that the two components of competent human resources and economic bases are causal and creator conditions of entrepreneurial university. Entrepreneurial organizational policies, including reformation the upper policies and Leges of the Ministry of Science; Entrepreneurial organizational structure; Entrepreneurial organizational culture and the implementation of customer-oriented and entrepreneurial educational and research policies were the most important features and components of Entrepreneurial University. Also the contextual conditions that affect the components of Entrepreneurial University include university strategy, entrepreneurial enterprise climate, entrepreneurial attitude, risk taking, changing the nature of higher education and expectation of society, government and industry to resolving their needs, That has revolutionized higher education and led universities to become more entrepreneurial and responsive to their customers' demands. The sixth factor contriver of entrepreneurial university is university reputation, which affects stakeholders and clients and encourages them to invest in university and participate with it. Interfering factors that can accelerate or hinder the transformation of a traditional university into an entrepreneurial university and somewhat are not controlled by the university; legal and juridical positions, entrepreneurial ecosystems, including university-owned ecosystems and outside the university ecosystems, politicize and the kinds of lobbies that are involved in most of our lives and universities are subject to this. One of the strategies for accessing entrepreneurial university is the existence and implementation of entrepreneurship university vision and document, which is the channel of passage and the Lights of the way. Improving the business environment and communication of university with its surrounding community including entrepreneurs, communication with entrepreneurial universities Entrepreneurial Universities of the World and the Region and modeling them, is one of the most effective strategies in creating an entrepreneurial university. Ultimately, internationalization of university, stakeholders satisfaction, and Commercialization of knowledgein in the template of Knowledge Based Companies, science and technology parks, and the creation of natal businesses were the consequences of entrepreneurial university. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Ministry of Science appoint individuals to manage universities to be entrepreneurs or to adhere to government and university entrepreneurship policies. Entrepreneurship has a role to play in the evaluation and promotion of academic and administrative professors. Universities are more connected to the industry through growth centers, science parks and industry liaison offices. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| entrepreneurial university, Modeling, Grounded Theory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abby, J. (2016). The 2016 ranking of the 10 most innovative universities in the world. Retrieved 10 August, 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/most-innovative-universities-in-the-world-2016-12 Audretsch, D. B (2017), Entrepreneurship and universities, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(1), 4-11. Audretsch, D. B., Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N (2012), Universities as research partners in publicly supported entrepreneurial firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(5-6), 529-545. Banning, E. B (2002). Archaeological survey (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media. Behzadi, N., Razavi, S. M., & Hosseini S. R (2014), Designing A Conceptual Model for an Entrepreneurial University; Using Corporate Entrepreneurship Approach, Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 7(4), 697-713. Bhayani, A (2015) Building entrepreneurial universities in a specific culture—barriers and opportunities, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(4), 312-330. Bienkowska, D., Klofsten, M., & Rasmussen, E (2016), PhD Students in the Entrepreneurial University‐Perceived Support for Academic Entrepreneurship, European Journal of Education, 51(1), 56-72. Blenker, P., Trolle Elmholdt, S., Hedeboe Frederiksen, S., Korsgaard, S., & Wagner, K (2014), Methods in entrepreneurship education research: a review and integrative framework, Education+ Training, 56(8/9), 697-715. Bozoki, E., & Richter, M (2016), Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Economic Growth: A quantitative study about the moderating effects of institutional dimensions on the relationship of necessity-and opportunity motivated entrepreneurship and economic growth. Cano, M. G., & Pulido, D. U (2007), Entrepreneurial universities: the case of Autonomous University of Barcelona, Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Clark, B. R (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Issues in Higher Education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales, 665 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 (paperback: ISBN-0-08-0433545; hardcover: ISBN-0-08-0433421, $27). Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L (2000), Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. Creswell, J. W (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd edition). Dabic, M., Gonzalez-Loureiro, M., & Daim, T. U (2015), Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and Spanish universities, Technology in Society, 42, 167-178. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research policy, 29(2), 313-330. Etzkowitz, H (2004), The evolution of the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64-77. Etzkowitz, H., & Ranga, M (2015), Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society, In Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Exchange (pp. 117-158). Routledge. Etzkowitz, H (2016), The entrepreneurial university: vision and metrics, Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97. Etzkowitz, H (2017), Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122-129. Ewalt, D (2016), Reuters Top 100: The World's Most Innovative Universities- 2016. Retrieved 10 August, 2017, from http://www.reuters.com/article/amers-reuters-ranking-innovative-univers-idUSL2N1C406D Farsi, J. Y., & Toghraee, M. T (2014), Identification the main challenges of small and medium sized enterprises in exploiting of innovative opportunities (Case study: Iran SMEs), Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 4. Fathi Vajargah, K., Khorasani, A., Daneshmandi S., & Arman, Mani (2014), Studying the coaching model in training of human resource based on grounded theory, Organizational Culture Management, 12(3), 375-398. Fathi Vajargah, K., Khorasani, A., & Daneshmandi, S (2015), The study of the coaching foundations in education and Improvement of Human Resource Management, Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 8(15), 27-48. Garcia Aracil, A., Castro Martinez, E., Jimenez Saez, F., Arroyo Vazquez, M (2013), What might an entrepreneurial university constitute? Proceedings of the 2013 EU SPRI Forum Conference, Madrid 10 12 April 2013. Gibb, A (2012),Exploring the synergistic potential in entrepreneurial university development: towards the building of a strategic framework, Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 16742. Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I (2012). Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In Universities in change (pp. 9-45). Springer, New York, NY. Graham, R (2014), Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from emerging world leaders, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Guerrero, M. & Urbano, D (2012), The development of an entrepreneurial university, The journal of technology transfer, 37(1), 43-74. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S (2016), Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape, Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551-563. Jameson, J., & O'Donnell, P (2015),The entrepreneurial university: A unifying theme for TU4Dublin, Higher Education in transformation Conference, Dublin. Kelli, A., Mets, T., Jonsson, L., Pisuke, H., & Adamsoo, R (2013), The changing approach in academia-industry collaboration: from profit orientation to innovation support, Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(3), 215. Ketikidis, P. H., Ververidis, Y., & Kefalas, P (2012), An Entrepreneurial Model for Internationalisation of Higher Education: The Case of City College, an International Faculty of the University of Sheffield. Kirby, D. A (2006), Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599-603. Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D (2011), Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 28(3), 302-316. Kordnaiej, A., Ahmadi, P., Ghorbani, Z., & Niakan Lahiji, N (2013), Investigating the Features of Entrepreneurial University at Tarbiat Modarres University, Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 5(3), 64-47. Lundqvist, M. A (2014), The importance of surrogate entrepreneurship for incubated Swedish technology ventures, Technovation, 34(2), 93-100. Mansourian, F., Fatehrad M., & Ranjbar Tazanji M. A ( 2013), Presentation of the macro model of the University of Entrepreneurship and Studying its success factors, The 10th International Conference on Strategic Management, Tehran, Strategic Management Association of Iran, https://www.civilica.com/ Paper-ICSM10-ICSM10_033.html Marzban, S., Moghimi, S. M., & Arabian, A (2010), The Effect of Organizational Entrepreneurship on the Entrepreneurial Behavior of Managers, Modern Economics and Business, 21 and 22, 1-25. Mousavi, S. H., Salehi Omran, I., Farasatkhah, M., & Towfighi, J (2018), Providing a model for development of entrepreneurial university in Iran, Iranian Journal Engineering Education, 19(76), 1-28. Nikfarjam, A., Kiani Mavi, R., & Fazli, S (2013), Prioritizing entrepreneurial university factors by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(10), 876-884. Radmanesh, S. A., Tabatabaiyan, S. H., & Farahani Boraghani, S (2016), Entrepreneurial University and the need to pay attention to it in the Islamic-Iranian model of progress. The 5th Islamic Pattern of Iran Progress; Progress Model; Tehran, National Library. Ramezani, G., Mehni, O., & Azizi, N (2018), Investigate the Barriers and Factors Influencing Inefficiency of Research at Farhangian University: A Grounded Theory Approach, Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 11 (2), 27-50. Reyes, C. N (2016), Framing the entrepreneurial university: the case of the National University of Singapore, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 134-161. Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E (2011), Entrepreneurial impact: The role of MIT, Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 7(1–2), 1-149. Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Daraei, M. R (2011), Toward a Systematic Framework for an Entrepreneurial University: A Study in Iranian Context with an IPOO Model, Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 3(1), 30- 37. Samadi Miarkolaei, H., Aghajani, H. A., & Samadi Miarkolaei, H (2015), Exploration and verification of entrepreneurial capacity status in selected universities of Mazandaran Province, Journal of Public Administration, 7(1), 111-132. Sporn, B (2001), Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US universities, Tertiary Education & Management, 7(2), 121-134. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Ed., Sage. Taghipoor Zahir, A., & Hasanmoradi, N (2006), Developing entrepreneurial university model, Journal Management System, 18(2), 31-40. Todorovic, Z. W., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P (2011), ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities, Technovation, 31(2-3), 128-137. Volkmann, C., & Grünhagen, M (2014). Integrated support for university entrepreneurship from entrepreneurial intent towards behaviour: the case of the German ‘EXIST’ policy programme, in: A. FAYOLLE & D. T. REDFORD (Eds) Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar) pp. 225–247 Wang, X. and Bukhari, N. H., 2014-03-10 "Has the Burton Clark’s Entrepreneurial University Model (EUM) stemmed out from Globalization-Driven Reforms (GDRs)?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society Annual Conference, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada . 2014-12- 10 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p716823_index.html Wiesche, M., Jurisch, M. C., Yetton, P., & Krcmar, H (2017), Grounded Theory Methodology in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 685-701. Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A (2007), Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore, World Development, 35(6), 941-958. Yadollahi Farsi, J., Zali, M. R., & Bagherifard, S. M (2011), Recognizing Affective Structural Factors on Developing Academic Entrepreneurship; The Case of University of Applied Science and Technology, Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 4(1), 17-31. Zhou, C (2008), Emergence of the entrepreneurial university in evolution of the triple helix: The case of Northeastern University in China, Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 109-126.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7,743 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,680 |
||