دوره کارشناسی‌ارشد مدیریت آموزشی در ترازوی تحلیل و نقد | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 13، شماره 1، 1399، صفحه 139-168 اصل مقاله (1009.22 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/mpes.13.1.139 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| امین باقری* 1؛ جمیله علم الهدی2 | ||
| 1دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران، | ||
| 2دانشیار فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: اغلب بحران‌های تربیتی و مسائل آموزشی در خلأ دانشی تعلیم و تربیت ریشه دارد. دانش تعلیم و تربیت بیش از همه محصول فعالیت‌های علمی دوره‌های تحصیلات تکمیلی است. مدیریت آموزشی یکی از علوم تربیتی است که در چند دهه اخیر به‌لحاظ کمی رشد بسیار زیادی داشته و اغلب دانشکده‌های علوم تربیتی به تأسیس و اجرای دوره‌های ارشد و دکتری پرداخته‌اند. ولی پرسش این است که سهم رشته مدیریت آموزشی در پیشرفت دانش تعلیم و تربیت و حل مسائل تربیتی کشور چیست. برای پاسخ به این پرسش در تحقیق حاضر تلاش شده وضعیت موجود برنامه‌درسی رشته مدیریت آموزشی در مقطع کارشناسی‌ارشد با رویکرد کیفی و با کمک روش تحقیق موردی، مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. مواد و روش‌ها: جامعه تحقیق اعضای هیأت علمی و دانشجویان دکتری مدیریت آموزشی هستند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و در دسترس، 11 نفر جهت مصاحبه کیفی و نیمه‌ساختاریافته انتخاب شدند. داده‌های حاصل با استفاده از روش تحلیل کیفی نظام‌مند اشتراوس و کوربین مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های تحقیق بیانگر مسایل و چالش‌های متعددی است که از سطح آشکار اشتغال تصادفی و سردرگمی حرفه‌ای دانش‌آموختگان تا مسائل نظری و غیرملموس هم‌چون جایگاه و قلمرو نامشخص مدیریت آموزشی را شامل می‌شود. درخصوص بازنگری و اصلاح وضعیت موجود نیز بازنگری همه‌جانبه و راهبردی در مجموعه‌ای از عوامل متعدد برنامه‌درسی ضرورت پیدا می‌کند. از این‌رو، دوره‌های تحصیلات تکمیلی مدیریت آموزشی بایستی متوجه تربیت دانشجویانی باشند که در درک، تحلیل، نقد و طراحی و بازآفرینی نهادها و سیستم‌های آموزشی توانمند باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بازنگری و اصلاح دوره‌های آموزشی؛ برنامه درسی؛ مدیریت آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Educational Administration Critical and Analytical Review of Master program | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amin Bagheri1؛ Jamileh Alamolhoda2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. in Educational Adiministration, Department of Education, Faculty of Education and psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Philosophy of Education, Department of Education, Faculty of Education and psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: Most educational crises and issues are rooted in the knowledge weaknesses of education. The knowledge of education is the outcome of graduate courses. Educational administration is a branch of educational science that has been such quantitative development in recent years. However, what is the contribution of educational administration to the development of knowledge and solving educational problems? Materials and methods: To answer this question, the case study method had been used to investigate the current status in the graduate course of educational administration. Population is the Ph.D. students and faculty members of educational administration major, in which a sample of them was selected through purposeful sampling and participated in qualitative and semi-structured interviews. Result and discussion: Research findings reveal that issues and challenges include apparent level elements such as accidental occupation and professional confusion as well as theoretical and intangible issues such as uncertain scope and places of educational administration. A comprehensive and strategic review of multiple factors is required to refine the existing situation of the master course of educational administration. Thus, graduate courses should focus on educating students who are capable of understanding, analyzing, criticizing, designing, and recreating educational institutions and systems. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Course review and modification, Curriculum, graduate courses of education, Educational Administration | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aali, M. & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2010). Evaluation and criticizing the curriculum of education science, the branch of administration and education planning. Higher Education Letter, 2(8), 35-51 [Persian]. Afshari, T. & Hosseini, S.S. (2016). Identifying and analysing the employment barriers in educational sciences from M.A. students’ viewpoints in Tehran. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 8(15), 105-118. Amin, A.A. & Bakhtiari, A. (2007). Study the ways of increasing recrution of graduates of educational management at management jobs of education, Quarterly journal of New Thoughts on Education, 3(3-4), 21-39 [Persian]. Arefi, M. (2005). An assessment of education curriculum (educational Administration) in Iran’s higher education by view of students, experts, and employers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 43-74 [Persian]. Bigdeli, M., Keramati, M. & Bazargan, A. (2012). The relationship between education and employment status of psychology and educational sciences alumnus in Tehran University. IRPHE, 18(3), 111-131 [Persian]. Bush, T. (2007). Theories of educational leadership and management. London: SAGE. Evers, C.W. & Lakomski, G. (2001). Theory in educational administration: naturalistic directions. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(6), 499-520. Fazeli, N. (2008). Culture and university, Tehran: Sales. Ghadimi, F. (2013). Evaluation of individual, econemic, social and scientific quality of M.A. graduates of educational administration of Tehran & Kharazmi Universities. M.A. thesis, University of Kharazmi, Iran, Tehran [Persian]. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005) Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Izadi, A. & Fadaie, M. (2010). An assessment of the necessity of training and scientific development of entrepreneurship skills in students of educational administration at MA level. Education Journal, 17(1), 129-10 [Persian]. Jean-Marie, G., & Normore, A. H. (2010). Educational leadership preparation: innovation and interdisciplinary approaches to the Ed.D. and graduate education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Keedy, J. (2005). Reconciling the theory and practice schism in educational administration through practitioner-developed theories in practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(2), 134-153. McCarthy, M. (2015). Reflections on the evolution of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States and challenges ahead. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 416-438. McClellan, R. & Dominguez, R. (2006). The uneven march toward social justice; Diversity, conflict, and complexity in educational administration programs. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 225-238. Mehralizadeh, Y. & Zendvanian, A. (2006). The necessity of reviwing educational administration in light of chaos and entrepreneurship theories. Management for future, 4(13-14), 143-152 [Persian]. National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author. NoorAbadi, S., Ahmadi, P., Dabiri, O. & Farasatkhah, M. (2015). The necessity and possibility of changing higher education approved curriculum in Iranto integrated curriculum (a case study on educational management domain, undergraduate course). Quarterly Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 7(25), 101-122 [Persian]. Normore, A. H. (2010). Historical Context of Graduate Programs in Educational Leadership. In Jean-Marie, G., & Normore, A. H. (2010). Educational leadership preparation: innovation and interdisciplinary approaches to the Ed.D. and graduate education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8-35. Rahmani, M. & Behrangi, M.R. (2010). Investigating the construct and content of the curriculum of the “principles of educational administration” course based on professors and students viewpoint. Higher Education Letter, 2(7), 41-58 [Persian]. Sergiovanni, T. J., Kelleher, P., McCarthy, M. M., & Wirt, F. M. (2004). Educational governance and administration (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. SuichWood, A. (2007). Cultural analysis and systems theory: The concept of common culture: from Durkheim to parsons. Translated by rezaie. From the book of theoretical issues of culture (Proceedings, Organon 18), Translated by collection of writers, Tehran: Ministry of culture and Islamic guidance, Second edition. Swaffied, S. & Macbeath, J. (2009). Leadership for learning. In MacBeath, J. E., & Dempster, N. (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice. London: Routledge. Walther – Thomas, C. (2003) Principals and Education, The critical Role of school Leader, center on Personel studis in spical Educational. University of Florida, Florida, U.S.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,552 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,693 |
||