بازنمایی هویت رشتۀ مدیریت آموزشی در ایران با تأکید بر مقالات منتشرشده در مجلات تخصصی | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 13، شماره 1، 1399، صفحه 225-262 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/mpes.13.1.225 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سمیه نعمتی* 1؛ ناصر شیربگی2؛ نعمت اله عزیزی3؛ عبدالرحیم نوه ابراهیم4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران. | ||
| 4استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: به‌منظور بررسی ماهیت حوزۀ مدیریت آموزشی در ایران، شناخت مرزهای رشته‌ای، شناخت حیطه‌های مورد مطالعه توسط محققان، رویکردهای معرفت‌شناختی مورد استفاده در پژوهش‌های این‌حوزه، ویژگی‌های جمعیت‌شناختی نویسندگان و نهایتاً ارائه یک الگو برای گسترش کیفی شاخص‌های علمی حوزه، پژوهش حاضر انجام گرفت. مواد و وروش‌ها: پژوهش با رویکرد تفسیری- برساختی و با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی انجام گرفت. میدان تحقیق، رشتۀ مدیریت آموزشی و مقالات منتشر شده در مجلات تخصصی مرتبط با مدیریت آموزشی در ایران بود. شیوۀ نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و ملاک‌محور بود. بدین منظور، همۀ مجلات مرتبط با مدیریت آموزشی از دوگروه عمدۀ علوم تربیتی و مجموعۀ مدیریت که تا آذرماه سال 1397 در فهرست نشریات علمی- پژوهشی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری نمایه شده بودند مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. از این مجموعه، نهایتاً در فاز اول نمونه‌گیری چهار مجلۀ (مدیریت مدرسه، مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان‌ها، رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی و مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی) که بیشترین درصد مقالات تخصصی را نسبت به‌کل مقالات چاپ شده در حوزۀ مدیریت آموزشی داشتند، انتخاب شدند. در فاز دوم نمونه‌گیری، تمامی مقالات تخصصی چاپ شده در مجلات مزبور که تعدادشان به 94 مقاله رسید انتخاب شدند. جهت گردآوری داده‌های مطلوب و بررسی محتوی مجلات، از یک چک لیست محقق‌ساخته استفاده گردید که اطلاعات مربوط به مقالات از جمله: عنوان اصلی پژوهش، میدان یا جامعه آماری تحقیق، نوع رویکرد معرفت‌شناسی، روش تحقیق بکار رفته و اطلاعات جمعیت‌شناختی نویسندگان به‌وسیله آن احصا می‌شد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که در کل چهار حیطۀ اصلی پژوهشی تحت عناوین ویژگی‌ها و مهارت‌های مدیریتی، سبک‌های رهبری، ابعاد شناسایی رهبران توانمند و اثربخشی قابل تشخیص است. هم‌چنین، سه حیطۀ فرعی پژوهشی تحت عناوین، ارزشیابی، نگرش‌سنجی اعضای جامعۀ مدرسه و علم‌سنجی در مدیریت آموزشی مورد توجه پژوهشگران و اساتید دانشگاهی حوزۀ مدیریت و رهبری آموزشی بوده است. در مجموع، 77 درصد از مقالات تخصصی با رویکرد اثبات گرایانه و کمّی، و فقط 13 درصد از پژوهش‌ها با رویکرد طبیعت‌گرایانه و کیفی یا آمیخته انجام‌شده بودند. حدود 90 درصد از مقالات از پایان‌نامه‌های دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی استخراج شده بودند و حدود 10 درصد بقیه مقالات مستخرج از پژوهش‌های مستقل یا طرح‌های پژوهشی سفارشی وزارت‌خانه‌ها یا مؤسسات پژوهشی بودند. تمامی نویسندگان مقالات یا از اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه و یا دانشجوی تحت راهنمایی آن‌ها بودند. در وابستگی سازمانی هیچکدام از نویسندگان کارورز شاغل در مدرسه و یا محقق مستقل علاقه‌مند به حوزۀ مدیریت آموزشی ذکر نشده بود. گسترش کمّی تعداد مجلات تخصصی در دو دهه اخیر نشان از تلاش استادان متخصص این رشته برای ارتقای استقلال و بازنمایی ماهیت ویژۀ رشتۀ مدیریت آموزشی از مجموعۀ علوم تربیتی و تلاش برای افزایش پیوند بین نظریه و عمل دارد. یافته‌های پژوهش از اشارات کاربردی مفیدی برخوردار است: نخست اینکه، به‌نظر می‌رسد همگام با تحولات جهانی حوزۀ مدیریت و رهبری آموزشی، در یک دهه گذشته در داخل ایران نیز مجلات تخصصی و محققان مدیریت آموزشی درصدد نشان دادن توانایی‌های خود جهت تولید پژوهش‌های عمل‌محور به‌ویژه در حوزۀ مدیریت مدرسه بودند. دوم اینکه، حوزۀ مدیریت و رهبری آموزشی شاهد پیشرفت‌‌های در انجام پژوهش‌های تجربی در خصوص رهبری آموزشی به جای مدیریت آموزشی، بازتعریف و گسترش فهم بیشتر از حوزۀ مدیریت و رهبری آموزشی، استفاده از ابزارهای روش‌شناختی و چارچوب‌های مفهومی متنوع در پژوهش‌های انجام شده بوده است. نهایتاً اینکه، بهره‌گیری از فنون فرا تحلیل جهت یکپارچگی یافته‌ها و مطالعۀ مبانی دانش رشتۀ مدیریت آموزشی مدنظر نسل جدید محققان بوده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رهبری آموزشی؛ علوم تربیتی؛ ماهیت رشته‌ای؛ مدیران مدارس؛ مدیریت مدرسه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Representing the Identity of the Educational Administration in Iran with Emphasis on the Articles Published in the Specialized Journals | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Somayyeh Nemati1؛ Naser Shirbegi2؛ Nematollah Azizi3؛ Abdolrahim Naveh Ebrahim4 | ||
| 1PhD. candidate in Educational Administration, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Iran. | ||
| 4Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: To study the nature of the field of education administration and in Iran, recognizing the disciplinery boundaries of, dentifing areas of study by researchers, the epistemological approaches, the demographic characteristics of authors and finally providing a model for qualitative expansion of scientific indicators the present study was conducted. Materials and Methods: The research was performed with an interpretive-constructive approach and content quality analysis method of. The research field was the field of educational administration and articles published in specialized journals in Iran. The sampling method was purposeful and criterion-oriented. For this purpose, all journals related to educational management from the two main groups of educational sciences and the collection of management that were indexed in the list of scientific-research journals by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology until December 2016 were examined. In the first phase of sampleing, four journals (School Aministartion, Organizational Education Administration on organizations, New Approach to Educational Administration and Management and Planning in Educational Systems) were selected, which had the highest percentage of specialized articles compared to all published articles in the field of educational management. In the second phase of sampling, all specialized articles published in these journals (94 articles) were selected. In order to collect the data a researcher-made checklist was used, which includes information related to articles such as: research title, field of research, type of epistemological approach, research method and authors' demographic information. Result and Discussion: The research findings showed that four main areas of research under the heading of managerial characteristics and skills, leadership styles, identifying effective leaders can be identified. Also, three sub-areas of research under the titles of evaluation, attitude assessment of school community have been considered by researchers in the field of educational administration. In total, 77% of the studies were done with a positivist and quantitative approach, and only 13% of the research was done with a qualitative or mixed approach. About 90% of the articles were extracted from graduate student dissertations, and about 10% of the rest of the articles were from independent researchs or projects in diffrent institutes. All the authors of the articles were either university faculty members or students under their guidance. In the organizational affiliation, none of the school practitioner or independent researchers of educational administration was mentioned. The quantitative expansion of the number of specialized journals in the last two decades shows the efforts of the professors in this field to promote independence and special nature of educational administaration from the educational sciences and efforts to increase the link between theory and practice. The research findings have useful implications: First, it seems that in line with global developments in the field of administaration and leadership, in the past decade in Iran, specialized journals and educational administaration researchers seek to demonstrate their ability to produce practical research. The focus was specifically on school administaration. Second, the field of educational administaration and leadership is witnessing progress in conducting experimental research on educational leadership instead of educational administaration, redefining and expanding further understanding of the field of educational administaration and leadership, using methodological tools and diverse conceptual frameworks in researchs. Finally, the use of meta-analysis techniques to integrate the knowledge base of educational administaration has been considered by the new generation of researchers. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Educational Leadership, Educational Sciences, Field Nature, School Principals, School Management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bagherpour, M., & Abdollahpour, H. (2012). The Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Leadership Principals in Gorgan's High School. A New Approach to Educational Management, 3 (2): 87-97. Bazargan, Z. (2003). New Approaches to Educational Management. Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, 33 (2). Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Behrangi, M, R; Navehebraham, A, R., &Yousefzadeh, R. (2014). Investigating the relationship between Philosophical mindset of managers of high school in Amol and Teachers' Mentality and Adoption of Science Education Management Model. Approaches to Educational Management, 5 (1): 1-21. Behrangi, M, R., & Tabatabai, S. (2009). Investigating the relationship between entrepreneurship and the effectiveness of principals at high school in Kerman. A New Approach in Educational Management, 2 (3): 66-78. Bridges, D. (2006). The disciplines and discipline of educational research. Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 259-272. Blumberg, A. (1989). School administration as a craft. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Campbell, R. F. (1979). A critique of the "Educational Administration Quarterly". Educational Administration Quarterly, 15 (3). 1-19. Caldy, A. & Fallah, F. (2009). Investigating the basic functions of each university from the point of view of students, Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1): 92-73. Capper, C.A. (ed.) (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society. New York: State University of N.Y. Press. Derafsh, H; Farhadi., Rad, H. & Abharakpour, A. (2017). The Role of Talent Management in Organizational Health in Secondary Schools in Ahvaz. School Administration, 5 (2): 1-20. English, F. (1997a). The cupboard is bare: The postmodern critique of educational administration. School Leadership, 7 1, pp. 4-25. English, F. (1998a). The postmodern turn in educational administration: Apostrophic or catastrophic development? School Leadership, 8 5, pp. 426- 447. English, F. (2002d, May). On the intractability of the achievement gap in urban schools and the discursive practice of continuing racial discrimination. Education and Urban Society, 34, 3, pp. 298-311. Foskett, N. Lumby, J. & Fidler, B. (2005). Evolution or extinction? Reflections on the future of research in educational leadership and management. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 245-253. Foster, W. (1999). Administrative science, the postmodern, and community. In P.T. Begley (ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 97-113). New York: State University of New York Press. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language. A.S. Smith (trans). New York: Pantheon Books. Gholami, F., M., Fathi-Wahjarah, K. & Abolghasemi, M. (2017). Challenges of English Language Teaching in the Iranian Education System from the Perspectives of Educational Managers and English Language Teachers. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 8 (2): 162-194. Glass, T. (2000). The History of Educational administration through its Textbooks (Translated by Naser Shirbagi, 2018) Greenfield, T. and Ribbons, P. (1993). Greenfield on educational administration. London: Routledge. Hallinger, P; & Chen, H. (2014). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of research topics and methods, 1995–2012. Educational Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 1-23. Khalijian, S., Shams; G., Pardakhtchi; M, H., and Mirkamali; Seyyed Mohammad. (2017). The relationship between security leadership and the happiness of school staff: the role of the mediator of psychological security, School Administration, 5 (2): 1-20. Khalkhali, Khalatbari, J and Admitted, Maryam. (2011). The Relationship between Educational Philosophy and the Leadership Style of School Directors. A New Approach in Educational Management, 2 (2): 23-40. Kidouzi, A.H.; Mohammadi Hosseini, S. A. & Hosseinpour, A. (2017). The Role of Transformational Leadership in School Organizational Health: An Intermediate Role of Organizational Justice. School Administration Journal, 5 (2): 1-20. Klein, J.T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D.R Shumway & DJ. Sylvan (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185-205). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Kohgard, M. & Shamshiri, B. (2016). Instructions with the exception of management purposes. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 7 (2): 17-37. Lewontin, R. (1997). Billions and billions of demons. The New York Review of Books, 44, 1, pp. 28-32. Mard, S. M.; Zainabadi, H. & Arasteh, H.R. (2017). Indices of a successful educational leader; findings of a phenomenological study, School Administration Journal, 5 (2): 1-20. Mirmakali, S.M.; Romyani, Y. & Abdul Wahabi, M. (2016). Explaining the Role of Knowledge and Attitude in Managing the Change of Khorramabad School Principals in Their Creativity. School Administration Journal, 4 (2): 23-44. Mohammedi, A. & Purgaz, A. (2013). The Relationship between Thinking Styles and School Principals' Power Sources. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 4 (3), 117-138. Mohammadi, M., Jahani, J., Shafi'i, M., Latifi, M. & Verdi Ala'i, T. (2016). The Islamic-Iranian Model of Aswah School Principals in the Education System: A Qualitative Research, School Administration Journal, 4 (2): 1-21. Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Counter-Method: The Philosophical Underpinigs and Practical Procedures in Qualitative Methodology (Second Edition). Logos. Mohammadpour, B.; Rahimian, H.; Abbaspour, A. & Delaware, A. (2012). Marketplaces of career management training sessions with contextual theory. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 3 (3): 1-26. Mokhtarian, F.; & Jahed, H. A. (2013). Explaining educational management as a discipline. Second National Conference on Modern Management Sciences, 8-1. Murphy, J. (1995). The knowledge base in school administration: Historical footings and emerging trends. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imber and J. Scheurich (eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration. SUNY Press, New York, pp. 62-73. Murphy, J. Vriesenga, M. & Storey, V. (2007). Educational administration quarterly, 1979-2003: An analysis of types of work, methods of investigation, and influences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 612-628. Mysticism, M. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing the components of school principals' competencies with emphasis on Islamic management. School Administration Journal, 5 (1): 151-172. Nasiri, F.; Ghanbari, S. & Serchani, Z. (2016). Exploring the Growth of School Principals, Foundation Data Theories. A New Approach to Educational Management, 7 (4): 1-26. Nave Ibrahim, A.R. (2011). Research in a decade of publication of articles in the Journal of Education Planning and Management (2008-2009). Education, 26 (3): 1-24. Nicknami, M.; Taqipour Zahir, A., Delawar, A. & Ghaffari, M. (2009). Design and Evaluation of Causal Model of Innovation and Creativity of Educational Managers in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2 (5): 1-28. NoardSadei, M.; NaveIbrahim, A. R., Arasteh, H. and Zeinabadi, H. (2017). Analysis, ranking and presentation of the pattern of identifying principals of non-governmental talented school principals in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration,8 (3): 1-28. Nowruzi, N. & Marzouki, R. (2012). A Comparative Study of the Cultural Values System of Principals and Teachers Based on Schwarz's Theory of Fundamental Values. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 3 (2): 99-118. Oplatka, I. (2009b). The field of educational administration: An historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from 1960s onwards. Educational Administration, 47(1), 8-35. Oplatka, I. Foskett, N.H. & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2002). Educational marketisation and the headteacher's psychological well-being: A speculative conceptualization. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50 (4), 419-441. Oplatka, I. (2010). The Legalacy of Educational Administration: the history Analysis of an Academic Field. (Translation by Sherbagi, Naser, 2018): Contemporary works. Poorzahir, A, T., & Tavakoli, R. (2011). Investigating the Relationship between Philosophical Mindset High of the High Managers and the Performance of Teachers in District 4, Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 4 (6), 80-63. Rasteh Moghaddam, A; Abbaspour, A, & Jalali, A. (2016). Reflection on the World Heritage of Educational Management. Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 9 (16): 84-51. Rezaei, B., & Tarin, H. (2017). A meta-analysis of research on factors affecting the performance of school principals. School Administration, 5 (2): 1-20. Ribbins, P. (2006). History and the study of administration and leadership in education: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Administration and History, 38(2),113-124. Rowan, B. (2006). Truth or consequences? Reflections on the theory movement and its aftermath in education. In D.E. Mitchell (ed.), New foundations for knowledge in educational administration, policy and politics (pp.53-69). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Salehi, M.; Kaltash, A. & Ebrahimi, S. (2008). Investigating the relationship between managers' readiness to execute management more closely with organizational and tactical managers. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration 1 (2): 91-110. Sahami, S; Ghaisari, M., & Abbasi, Z. (2012). Investigating the attitude of teachers and staff towards the performance of managers with a degree in management and educational planning and other disciplines. New Approach to Educational Management, 3 (4): 85-97. Sarjahani, Z., & Jahani, J. (2011). The study of the effect of individual factors on the creativity of school principals in Shiraz. A New Approach to Educational Management, (5): 51-70. Sarjahani, Z., Zare, R., Ghanbari, S., and Gholtash, A. (2018). Pathology of the Performance Evaluation System of School Directors: Qualitative Research. School Administration, 6 (2): 1-20. Shirbagi, N., Zebardast, M. A., & Amani, S. (2017). The Study of Self-Development of Principals, Leadership and Its Relationship with Motivational Factors and Self-Regulatory Skills, Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 9 (17).111-130 Shirbagi, N., Fatehi, R. & Bolandhematn, K. (2017). The relationship of Principals’ Dogmatism with their Rule Orientation and Teachers’ Understanding of the School Organization Bureaucracy. Journal of Managing Education in Organization. 5 (2): 129-166. Shirbagi, N., Azizi, N., Zebardast, M, A., & Nosrati, R. (2012). The Relationship Between Self-Efficiency and Leadership Effectiveness Among High School Managers in Guilan, A New Approach to Educational Management, 3 (4): 37-50. Sarmadi, M, R; Pakseresht, M, J., Safaei Moghaddam, M., & Mehrali Zadeh, Y. (2009). A Critique of Taylor's Anthropology and its Consequences in Educational Management. Ferdosi University Educational and Psychological Studies: 10 (1), 97. Sharifi, S., Salimi, G., and Ahmadi, A. (2010 Investigating the Relationship between Personality Traits and Organizational Commitment in principals of elementary, middle and high school in Khansar. A New Approach to Educational Management, 1 (4): 80-105. Tahmasebi, A.; Taheri, A. M. & Ahmadi, A. (2014). The Relationship between Managers' Use of Power and the Effectiveness and Organizational Commitment of Teachers. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 5 (3): 145-162. Yassini, A., Mohammadi, F, & Yassini, T. (2012). The Impact of Distributed Leadership on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Karaj Elementary School Teachers (Investigating the Mediating Role of Teachers' Academic Optimism). Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 6 (12), 146-174. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,443 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,644 |
||