ابراهیمی، عصمت؛ ابوالمعالی الحسینی، خدیجه؛ و هاشمیان، کیانوش. (1398). ویژگی­های روانسنجی پرسشنامه ساختار انگیزشی در نوجوانان دختر و پسر مقطع متوسطه دوم. فصلنامه روانشناسی کاربردی، 13 (2 پیاپی 50): 333-317. (پیوند)

زارع گاریزی، معصومه؛ ابراهیمی مقدم، حسین؛ و ابوالمعالی الحسینی، خدیجه. (1399). پیش­بینی تعهد زناشویی بر اساس نیازهای بنیادین روانشناختی و صمیمیت با واسطه­گری تمایزیافتگی خود. فصلنامه روانشناسی کاربردی، 14 (1 پیاپی 53): 76-55. (پیوند)

دهشیری، غلامرضا؛ و موسوی، سیده فاطمه. (1394). بررسی ویژگی­های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی شاخص بهزیستی پنج سؤالی سازمان بهداشت جهانی. مجله روانشناسی بالینی. 2 (پیاپی 30): 67- 75. (پیوند)

کاظمی، شکوفه؛ کاکاوند، علیرضا؛ جلالی، محمدرضا؛ و جوادی، حمیدرضا. (1397). ارتباط نیازهای اساسی گلاسر با فشار خون بالا در میانسالان: نقش واسطه­ای شوخ طبعی. مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قزوین. 22(2): 63-73. (پیوند)

هفت لنگ، ابراهیمی؛ محمد اسماعیل، زمانی؛ و صاحبی، علی. (1398). بررسی رابطه شدت نیازهای اساسی در نظریه گلاسر با رضایت از زوجیت، سلامت روان و بهزیستی روانی دانشجویان متأهل. فصلنامه فرهنگی تربیتی زنان و خانواده. 14(47): 23-38.‎ (پیوند)

هومن، حیدرعلی (1393). مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم افزار لیزرل. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها. (پیوند)

وزیری، ‌مژده. (1394). پیش بینی رضایت زناشویی زوج‌ ها براساس نیازهای اساسی آن­ها. رویش روان شناسی. 12(4): 87-96.‎ (پیوند)

Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 189–199. [link]

Arshadi, N., & Kaabomeir, N. (2020). The Relationship between self-determined motivation and psychological well-being, life well-being, and workplace well-being: A canonical correlational study. Iranian Journal of Health Psychology, 3(1), 121–132.[link]

Aydinli-Karakulak, A., Bender, M., Chong, A. M. L., & Yue, X. (2016). Applying Western models of volunteering in Hong Kong: The role of empathy, prosocial motivation and motive-experience fit for volunteering. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 112–123. [link]

Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Cemalcilar, Z., Chong, A., & Yue, X. (2016). A Cross-Cultural Study of Explicit and Implicit Motivation for Long-Term Volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(2), 375–396. [link]

Bahmer, J. A., Kuhl, J., & Bahmer, F. A. (2007). How do personality systems interact in patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and urticaria? Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 87(4), 317–324. [link]

Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 201–216. [link]

Baum, Baumann, Ingrid Baum, & Nicola Baumann. (2019). Arousing Autonomy: A Valid Assessment of the Implicit Autonomy Motive. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(9), 1689–1699. [link]

Baum, I. R. (2020). Validating the Implicit Autonomy Motive: Studies on the Measurement and Functions of a Fourth Basic Motive.[link]

Baumann, N. (2017). Why People Do the Things They Do About the Editors. Hogrefe Publishing.[link]

Baumann, N. (2018). Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contributions to the Psychology of Motivation and Volition. [link]

Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 781. [link]

Baumann, N., Kaz, M., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Implicit motives: A look from personality systems interaction theory. In Implicit Motives. Oxford University Press. [link]

Baumann, N., Kazén, M., Quirin, M., & Koole, S. L. (2017). How do we know if you know yourself: Measures, causes, and consequences of self-access. Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contributions to the Psychology of Motivation and Volition, 259–280. [link]

Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2020). Nurturing your self : measuring and changing how people strive for what they need. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 00(00), 1–12. [link]

Baumann, N., & Scheffer, D. (2010). Seeing and mastering difficulty: The role of affective change in achievement flow. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1304–1328. [link]

Bech, P., Olsen, L. R., Kjoller, M., & Rasmussen, N. K. (2003). Measuring well‐being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF‐36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO‐Five well‐being scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 85–91.[link]

CARDINET, J. (1975). International Test Commission: Application of the Liège Recommendations for the Period 1971–4. Applied Psychology, 24(1), 14–16. [link]

Chatterjee, M. B., Baumann, N., Osborne, D., Mahmud, S. H., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Cross-Cultural Analysis of Volition: Action Orientation Is Associated With Less Anxious Motive Enactment and Greater Well-Being in Germany, New Zealand, and Bangladesh. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUN), 1043. [link]

Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. [link]

Cox, W. M., & Klinger, E. (2011). Handbook of Motivational Counseling. Handbook of Motivational Counseling. [link]

Department, T. A. K., Kyriazos, T. A., & Department, T. A. K. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. In Psychology (Vol. 09, Issue 08, pp. 2207–2230). Scientific Research Publishing, Inc,. [link]

Gröpel, P., Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (2004). Toward an integrated self : Age differences and the role of action orientation. 2001, 1–10.[link]

Halisch, F., & Geppert, U. (2001). Motives, personal goals, and life satisfaction in old age: First results from the Munich Twin Study (GOLD). In Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 389–409). [link]

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can Self-Determination Theory Explain What Underlies the Productive, Satisfying Learning Experiences of Collectivistically Oriented Korean Students? In Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 101, Issue 3, pp. 644–661). [link]

Kazén, M., & Quirin, M. (2018). The integration of motivation and volition in personality systems interactions (PSI) theory. Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contributions to the Psychology of Motivation and Volition., January, 15–30. [link]

Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating Implicit Motives , Explicit Compensatory Model of Work Motivation and Volition. Work, 29(3), 479–499. [link]

Kim, S., Kim, G., & Ki, J. (2014). Effects of group art therapy combined with breath meditation on the subjective well-being of depressed and anxious adolescents. In The Arts in Psychotherapy (Vol. 41, pp. 519–521). [link]

Kotera, Y., Green, P., & Sheffield, D. (2021). Positive Psychology for Mental Wellbeing of UK Therapeutic Students: Relationships with Engagement, Motivation, Resilience and Self-Compassion. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. [link]

Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395. [link]

Kuhl, J. (1989). Individuelle Unterschiede in der Selbststeuerung in der Selbststeuerung. In Motivation und Handeln (pp. 1–41). Heidelberg: Springer.[link]

Kuhl, J. (2001). Interaktion psychischer Systeme. Göttingen: Hogrefe.[link]

Kuhl, Julius. (1999). Der Motiv-Umsetzungs-Test (MUT) [The motive-enactment-test (MET)]. Unpoblished.

Kuhl, Julius. (2000). A Functional-Design Approach to Motivation and Self-Regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 111–169. [link]

Kuhl, Julius. (2005). A Functional Approach to Motivation. Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research, 239–268. [link]

Kuhl, Julius. (2008). The functional architecture of approach and avoidance motivation. Cognition, October.

Kuhl, Julius. (2011). Der Freiheits-Umsetzungs-Test (FUT)[The freedom-enactment-test (FET)]. Unpublished Questionnaire.

Kuhl, Julius. (2018). Individual differences in self-regulation. In Motivation and Action, Third Edition (pp. 529–577). Springer International Publishing. [link]

Kuhl, Julius, & Kazén, M. (2008). Motivation, Affect, and Hemispheric Asymmetry: Power Versus Affiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 456–469. [link]

Kuhl, Julius, & Koole, S. L. (2008). The functional architecture of approach and avoidance motivation. Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation, October, 535–553.[link]

Kuhl, Julius, Quirin, M., & Koole, S. L. (2020). The functional architecture of human motivation: Personality systems interactions theory. Advances in Motivation Science, 7(July), 1–88. [link]

Kuhl, Julius, Quirin, M., & Koole, S. L. (2021). The functional architecture of human motivation: Personality systems interactions theory. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8, pp. 1–62). Elsevier. [link]

Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Duriez, B. (2009). Basic Need Satisfaction and Identity Formation: Bridging Self-Determination Theory and Process-Oriented Identity Research. In Journal of Counseling Psychology (Vol. 56, Issue 2, pp. 276–288). [link]

Lynch, M. F., La Guardia, J. G., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). On being yourself in different cultures: Ideal and actual self-concept, autonomy support, and well-being in China, Russia, and the United States. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(4), 290–304. [link]

Melendro, M., Campos, G., Rodríguez-Bravo, A. E., & Arroyo Resino, D. (2020). Young People’s Autonomy and Psychological Well-Being in the Transition to Adulthood: A Pathway Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. [link]

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications. [link]

Nestler, S., Thielsch, M., Vasilev, E., & Back, M. D. (2015). Will they stay or will they go? Personality predictors of dropout in an online study. International Journal of Internet Science, 10(1), 37–48.[link]

Okabayashi, H. (2020). Self-Regulation, Marital Climate, and Emotional Well-Being among Japanese Older Couples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 35(4), 433–452. [link]

Poeller, S., Birk, M. V., Baumann, N., & Mandryk, R. L. (2018). Let me be implicit: Using motive disposition theory to predict and explain behaviour in digital games. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2018-April(May). [link]

Quirin, M. (2005). Self-System and Regulation of Negative Affect [ Selbstsystem und Regulation negativen Affekts ] Dissertation Doktors der Naturwissenschaften. In Naturwissenschaften. [link]

Quirin, M., & Kuhl, J. (2008). Positive affect, self-access, and health. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(3), 139–142. [link]

Kuhl, J., Mitina, O., & Koole, S. L. (2017). The extended trust hypothesis: Single-attractor self-contagion in day-to-day changes in implicit positive affect predicts action-oriented coping and psychological symptoms. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21(4), 505–518. [link]

Renger, S. (2009). Begabungsausschöpfung – Persönlichkeitsentwicklung durch Begabungsförderung. In Dissertation. Osnabrück.[link]

Schüler, J., Baumann, N., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Baum, I. (2019). Implicit motives and basic psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 37–55. [link]

Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V., Wegner, M., & Baumann, N. (2015). Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG. Motivation and Emotion, 39(6), 839–857. [link]

Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., Prentice, M., & Halusic, M. (2016). Do Some People Need Autonomy More Than Others? Implicit Dispositions Toward Autonomy Moderate the Effects of Felt Autonomy on Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 84(1), 5–20. [link]

Showers, C. J., & Kling, K. C. (1996). Organization of self-knowledge: implications for recovery from sad mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 578. [link]

Slabbinck, H., Van Witteloostuijn, A., Hermans, J., Vanderstraeten, J., Dejardin, M., Brassey, J., & Ramdani, D. (2018). The added value of implicit motives for management research development and first validation of a brief implicit association test (biat) for the measurement of implicit motives. PLoS ONE, 13(6), 1–29. [link]

Tsymbaliuk, A. (2019). Age and Gender Differences in Implicit Motives Ferdinand. 509, 1–21.[link]

Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future.[link]

van Genugten, L., Dusseldorp, E., Massey, E. K., & van Empelen, P. (2017). Effective self-regulation change techniques to promote mental wellbeing among adolescents: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 11(1), 53–71. [link]

Williams, G. C., Niemiec, C. P., Patrick, H., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(3), 315–324.[link]

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Educational and Psychological Measurement. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety Duc Psychol Meas. Educ Psychol Meas., 76(6), 913–934. [link]