تأملی بر دستاوردهای علمی و جهت‌گیری‌های پژوهشی استادان مدیریت آموزشی ایران | ||
| مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در نظام های آموزشی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 28، 1401، صفحه 85-104 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.52547/MPES.15.1.85 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمیده لطفی1؛ رضوان حسین قلی زاده* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی و توسعه منابع انسانی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی و توسعه منابع انسانی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: هدف اصلی این نوشتار، تأملی بر دستاوردهای علمی استادان مدیریت آموزشی در دانشگاه‌های دولتی ایران با تأکید بر شناخت جهت‌گیری‌های پژوهشی آنان می‌باشد. مواد و روش‌ها: برای دستیابی به این هدف از روش پژوهش اسنادی از نوع مرور نظام‌مند به‌منظور بازخوانی پژوهش‌های انجام شده توسط استادان مدیریت آموزشی بهره گرفته شد. پس از مراجعه به صفحه شخصی حدود 170 عضو هیئت علمی وابسته به گروه‌های دارای رشته مدیریت آموزشی از جمله گروه علوم تربیتی، و پایش نمونه براساس روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند (با ملاک‌های دارا بودن مدرک دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، مدیریت آموزش عالی، آموزش و پرورش)، سرانجام 2440 مقاله علمی پژوهشی انتشار یافته توسط 76 نفر از استادان مدیریت آموزشی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. داده‌های به دست آمده برحسب توزیع سالانه فراوانی مقالات علمی-پژوهشی منتشر شده طی سال‌های 1366 تا 1397، سهم مشارکت استادان به‌عنوان «نویسنده مسئول» یا «همکار»، سهم مقالات انتشار یافته در سطح ملی و بین‌المللی، رویکرد روش‌شناختی (کمی، کیفی و آمیخته) مقالات منتشر شده و در نهایت جهت‌گیری موضوعی مقالات منتشر شده در حیطه‌های موضوعی مختلف و سطوح مدیریت آموزش عمومی، آموزش عالی و آموزش سازمانی با روش کدگذاری باز و محوری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. به‌منظور تأمین اعتبار نتایج نیز از تکنیک‌های توصیف حداکثری، خودبازبینی محقق، بازبینی توسط همکار (متخصص) و حسابرسی پژوهشی استفاده شد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها حاکی از شتاب یک باره و افزایش شمار انتشار مقالات طی ده سال اخیر به‌ویژه بین سال‌های 92 تا 96 می‌باشد که یکی از دلایل اصلی آن را می‌توان به رشد قابل توجه دوره‌های تحصیلات تکمیلی و بازنگری در آیین‌نامه ارتقای اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه‌ها با تأکید بر افزایش تولیدات علمی نسبت داد. علاوه براین، نتایج نشان داد در حدود 60 درصد مقالات پژوهشی، استادان مدیریت آموزشی نقش نویسنده مسئول را داشته و جهت‌گیری موضوعی استادان به مدیریت آموزشی بیشتر معطوف به سطح آموزش عالی با 46 درصد و پس از آن به آموزش عمومی (آموزش و پرورش) با 33 و آموزش سازمانی با 18 بوده است. مقایسه سهم استادان مدیریت آموزشی در انتشار مقالات در مجلات داخلی و خارجی حاکی از مشارکت بسیار پایین استادان مدیریت آموزشی در سطح بین‌المللی (13 درصد) به‌ویژه در مجلات معتبر در مقایسه با مجلات داخلی (87 درصد) قابل ملاحظه می‌باشد. ضمن اینکه، گرایش بیشتر به استفاده از رویکردهای کمی به‌ویژه روش‌های پژوهش همبستگی و پیمایشی (74 درصد) کیفیت مقالات منتشر شده را دور از انگاره تولید دانش فعال تحت تأثیر قرار داده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استادان دانشگاهی؛ جهت‌گیری پژوهشی؛ دستاوردهای علمی؛ مدیریت آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Reflection on the Scientific Achievements and Research Orientations of Iranian Educational Administrators Professors | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamideh Lotfi1؛ Rezvan Hosseingholizadeh2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student of Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The main purpose of this article is to reflect on the scientific achievements of educational management academic members in Iranian public universities with an emphasis on recognizing their research orientations. Materials and Methods: To achieve this goal, the documentary research method of systematic review was used for the content analysis of research-based articles conducted by academic members. After visiting the personal page of about 170 faculty members affiliated with groups in the field of educational management, including the department of educational sciences, and by purposeful sampling method (with the criteria of having a doctorate in educational management, educational planning, higher education, education), 2440 articles published by 76 educational management academic members were analyzed. In general, the data obtained in terms of the annual distribution of the frequency of articles published during the years 1987 to 2018, the share of academic members as "corresponding author" or "co-author", the rate of articles published nationally and internationally, the methodological approach (quantitative, qualitative and mixed) of the published articles and finally the thematic orientation of the published articles in different thematic areas and levels of general education, higher education and organizational education management were analyzed by open and axial coding method. To provide credibility in the research, the techniques of maximum description, researcher self-review, peer review (expert), and research audit were used. Result and Discussion: The findings indicate a sudden acceleration and increase in the number of articles published during the last ten years, especially between 1992 and 1996; one of the main reasons can be attributed to the significant growth of graduate courses and the revision of the regulations of universities faculty members’ promotion with emphasis on increasing scientific productions. In addition, the results showed about 60% of research articles, professors of educational management have the role of corresponding author, and the thematic orientation of professors to educational management is more focused on the level of higher education with 46% and general education (education) with 33% and organizational training with 18%. A comparison of the share of educational management professors in publishing articles in domestic and foreign journals indicates very low participation of educational management professors at the international level (13%), especially in reputable journals compared to domestic journals (87%) is significant. In addition, the tendency to use quantitative approaches, especially correlational and survey research methods (74%) has affected the quality of published articles far from the idea of active knowledge production. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Educational Administration, Scientific Achievements, University Academic Members, Research Orientation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2014). The systematic review: an overview. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 114(3), 53-58. Aypay, A., Çoruk, A., Yazgan, D., Kartal, O., Çağatay, M., Tunçer, B., & Emran, B. (2010). The status of research in educational administration: An analysis of educational administration journals, 1999-2007. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 59-77. Bajunid, I. A. (1996). Preliminary explorations of indigenous perspectives of educational management: The evolving Malaysian experience. Journal of educational administration, 34(5), 50-73. Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2019). A systematic review of educational leadership and management research in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration. 57 (6), 731-747 Boyan, N. J. (1988). Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association. Longman Pub Group. Bush, T. (2008). From management to leadership: semantic or meaningful change?. Educational management administration & leadership, 36(2), 271-288. Castillo, F. A., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 207-225. Dimmock, C. (2011). Formulating a research agenda in school leadership and organizational change for school improvement in Singapore. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 321-338. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. Sage. Eacott, S. (2013). Rethinking ‘leadership’in education: A research agenda. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 113-125. Eacott, S. (2016). Sociological Approaches to Educational Administration. In M.A. Peters (ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Eacott, S., & Evers, C. (2015). New Frontiers in Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Theory Farahmand, M (2013). A Comparative Study of Bourdieu's Sociology of Science and the Network Activist Approach. Philosophy of Science, Third Year, Spring and Summer 2013, No. 1 (5 in a row), 57-71. Glass, T. E., Carver, F. D., Mason, R., Eaton, W., & Parker, J. C. (2004). The history of educational administration viewed through its textbooks. R&L Education. Gunter, H. M. (2001). Knowledge production and the field of leadership studies from 1960. Teachers and Teachers' Work, 9, 3. Hallinger, P. (2011). Developing a knowledge base for educational leadership and management in East Asia. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 305-320. Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration. Hallinger, P. (2017). Surfacing a hidden literature: A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 362-384. Hallinger, P., & Bryant, D. (2013). Mapping the terrain of educational leadership and management in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration. Hallinger, P., & Chen, J. (2014). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of research topics and methods, 1995–2012. Educational management administration & leadership, 43(1), 5-27. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1998). Unseen forces: The impact of social culture on school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 126-151. Hallinger, P., Lee, T. H. T., & Szeto, E. (2013). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Hong Kong, 1995–2012: Topographical analysis of an emergent knowledge base. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(3), 256-281. Hare, D., (1996). Theory development in educational administration. UMI Microform 9624189 Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229-244. Hosseingholizadeh, R., Ahanchian, M., Kuhsari, M. & Nofaresti, A. (2017). Experience of reviewing the curriculum of educational management in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Higher Education Letter, 10 (40), 97-124. Hosseingholizadeh, R., Sharif, A., & Kerman, N. T. (2021). A systematic review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on school principals in Iran. Journal of Educational Administration. 59 (5), 564-581. Kovačević, J., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Finding Europe’s niche: science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management in Europe, 1960–2018. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 405-425. Mazloumi, A., Khalkhali, A. & Shakibaei, Z. (2020). Evolution of educational management knowledge in Iran. Modern Thoughts in Education, 15 (4), 119-137. Mohseni, H (2019). Educational Management Rethinking Studies in the Last Two Decades: Lessons for the Future. School Management Quarterly, 7 (4), 135-177. Nazarzadeh Zare, M, Jamali, A, Aryan, M, Skorchi, R & Nasiri Firooz, AS (2014). Comparison of Iranian scientific productions with rival Middle Eastern countries in the field of education. Journal Caspian Scientometrics, 1 (2), 22-31. Nemati, S., Shirbegi, N., Azizi, N. and grandson of Ibrahim, A. (2020). Representation of the identity of the field of educational management in Iran with emphasis on articles published in specialized journals. Management and planning in educational systems, 13 (1), 225-262. Oplatka, I. (2008). The field of educational management some intellectual insights from the 2007 BELMAS national conference. Management in Education, 22(3), 4-10. Oplatka, I. (2010). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Peter Lang. Oplatka, I. (2018). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Translated by Nasser Shirbegi, Tehran: Contemporary Effects. Oplatka, I. (2020, May 29). The Knowledge Base in the Field of Educational Administration and New Field Members. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 31 Mar. 2021, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-636. Orucu, D. (2006). An Analysis of the Present State of Educational Administration Scholarship in Turkey from the Perceptions of the Scholars in Ankara. (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, 2006) Özdemir, M. (2011). Educational Administration: A Science at the Intersection of Public Administration and Business Administration. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 44(2), 29-42. Pakdaman, H, Alami, F & Ghahremani, M. (2020). Investigating Educational Management Transformations: A Qualitative Study. School Management Quarterly, 8 (3), 439-458. Pounder, D.G. (2000). A discussion of the task force’s collective findings. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 465-73. Raadi Afsouran, n. & Nasr, A (2015). Study of methodological preferences of researchers in the field of educational management in Iran and the West, and the future of research method in it. Educational Sciences, 22 (2), 55-78. Raste Moghadam, A. (2018) Four Climates of Educational Management Knowledge, a Historical date Approach. Foundations of Education, 16 (8), 49-65. Raste Moghadam, A., Abbas poor, A., & Jalali Dizeji, A. (2016). Reflection on Global Scientific Legacy of Educational Management. Management and planning in educational systems, 9(16), 51-64. Riehl, C., Larson, C.L., Short, P.M. and Reitzug, U.C. (2000). Re-conceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 391-427. Samadzadeh, H. (2013). A study of the status of educational management in Iran from the perspective of faculty members of Islamic Azad University, a qualitative study. Managing Education in Organizations, (2), 71-94. Sammons, P., Hillman, J. and Mortimore, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: a Review of School Effectiveness Research. Report by the Institute of Education, University of London, for the Office for Standards in Education. Sattari, A., Khodabandelo, R., & Lashgari, M. (2021). Study of research trends in management with emphasis on the concept of leadership and its implications in leadership and educational management: A bibliographic analysis. Management and planning in educational systems, 13 (2), 121-148. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70, 747-770. Tian, M., & Huber, S. G. (2019). Mapping the international knowledge base of educational leadership, administration and management: a topographical perspective. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-20. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,490 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,040 |
||